複雜理論觀點下之創新產業政策：以韓國推動智慧家庭產業為例

The Complexity Theory Perspective of Innovative Industrial Policy：A Case of Promoting Smart Home Industry in South Korea

10.6378/JTM.201112.0078

陳意文(Yi-Wen Chen)；吳忠華(Se-Hwa Wu)；王美雅(Mei-Ya Wang)

產業政策 ； 新興產業 ； 複雜理論 ； 創新生態系統 ； 韓國智慧家庭產業 ； lndustrial Policy ； Emerging lndustry ； Complexity Theory ； lnnovation Ecosystem ； Smart Home lndustry in South Korea

科技管理學刊

16卷4期（2011 / 12 / 01）

77 - 104

繁體中文

目前政府擬定產業政策的決策程序，多半遵循企業策略規劃的方式，透過對未來環境的預測，配合國內的相對競爭優劣勢分析，進而決定策略性產業的發展方向。事實上，隨著產業結構的快速變化，形成技術相依 (technological interdependence) 的創新生態系統 (innovation ecosystems)，才是推動新興產業的最大挑戰。不過，過去對產業政策的研究，多半從經濟學的角度，評估政策之競爭力與有效性，卻較少探討產業政策與廠商行為之間的關係，此外，透過產業政策引導廠商建構創新生態系統的動態過程，在過去研究中亦付之闕如。因此，本研究納入複雜理論觀點 (complexity theory)，以韓國政府致力推動的智慧家庭產業為例，分析不同成員的互動關係，探討產業政策的另一種創新規劃模式。研究發現，產業政策應透過編寫未來想像藍圖或劇本，使潛在成員能理解價值承諾、快速尋找利基並形成標準，進而共創未來；其次，國家資源應由集中投入轉而以「分散式與階段性」的實驗性策略評估模式，挹注新興產業，以維持系統能量， 逐步建構創新生態系統。

A national industrial policy usually follows the concept and process of traditional strategic planning, by external environmental scanning, forecasting and the competitive advantage analysis. After deciding promising industries, the government then invests sufficient resources to support related actors. However, when faced with the rapidly changing and unpredictable future, one wrong decision may result in resource rigidity. Actually, building an innovation ecosystem to create value by technological interdependence is the biggest challenge. However, most studies emphasize to evaluate the competitiveness and effectiveness of policies, and neglect the relationship between policies and firms behavior, overlooking how innovative entities interact and grow.This study adopts the complexity theory, using the Korean smart home industry as an example to analyze how entities interact, proposing a new paradigm for promoting emerging industries. This study believes industrial policies should be collective mobilized, not unitary focused; secondly, resources should be invested by stage to keep the momentum, instead of focusing all resources in one direction. The government should therefore be able to create an innovation ecosystem.

1. 蔡敦浩、利尚仁、林韶怡(2008)。創業研究的新趨向—敘說探究之應用。中山管理評論，16(2)，321-350。
   連結：
2. 蔡敦浩、林韶怡、利尚仁(2010)。行動導向的創業歷程—以複雜調適系統觀點再現創業歷程。管理學報，27(1)，57- 73。
   連結：
3. Corporate Vision: A Story(http://www.nttdocomo.com/features/corporate_vision_story/index.html) (最後檢索日期: 2011 年7 月12 日) 。
4. 0zman, M.(2003).MERIT-Infonomics Research Memorandum seriesMERIT-Infonomics Research Memorandum series,MERIT:Maastricht University.
5. Adner, R.,Kapoor, R.(2010).Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations.Strategic Management Journal,31(3),306-333.
6. Alchian, A. A.(1950).Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory.The Journal of Political Economy,58(3),211-221.
7. Anderson, P.(1999).Complexity Theory and Organization Science.Organization Science,10(3),216-232.
8. Bovaird, T.(2008).Emergent Strategic Management and Planning Mechanisms in Complex Adaptive Systems.Public Management Review,10(3),319-340.
9. Brown, S. L.,Eisenhardt, K. M.(1998).Compering on the Edge: Strategv as Structured Chaos.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
10. Christensen, C. M.,Rosenbloom, R.(1995).Explaining the Attacker' s Advantage: Technological Paradigms, Organizational Dynamics and the Value Network.Research Policy,24(2),233-257.
11. Crutchfield, J. P.,Packard, N. H.,Farmer, J. D.,Shaw, R. S.(1986).Chaos.Scientific American,255(6),46-57.
12. DiMaggio, P. J.,Powell, W. W.(1983).The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.American Sociological Review,48(2),147-160.
13. Drazin, R. D.,Sandelands, L. E.(1992).Autogenesis: A Perspective on the Process of Organization.Organization Science,3(2),230-249.
14. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989).Building Theories from Case Study Research.Academy of Management Review,14(4),532-550.
15. Etzkowitx, H.,Leydesdorff, L.(1997).Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.London:Cassell.
16. Etzkowitz, H.,Leydesdorff, L.(2000).The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.Research Policy,29(22),109-123.
17. Evans, P.,Wolf, B.(2005).Collaboration Rules.Harvard Business Review,83(7),96-104.
18. Funk, J.(2010).Complexity, Critical Mass and Industry Formation: A Comparison of Selected Industries.Industry & Innovation,17(5),511-530.
19. Garud, R.,Kumaraswamy, A.(1993).Changing Competitive Dynamics in Network Industries: An Exploration of Sun Microsystems' Open Systems Strategy.Strategic Management Journal,14(5),351-369.
20. Herriott, R. E.,Firestone, W. A.(1983).Multi-site qualitative policy research: optimising description and generalisability.Educational Researcher,12(2),14-19.
21. Hill, C. W.,Jones, G. R.(2001).Strategic Management Theory.Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
22. Hodler, R.(2009).Industrial Policy in An Imperfect World.Journal of Development Economics,90(1),85-93.
23. Kaiser, R.,Kripp, M.(2010).Demand-orientation in National Systems of Innovation: A Critical Review of Current European Innovation Policy Concepts.Proceedings of 2010 DRUID Summer Conference,London:
24. Klijn, E.(2008).Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What' s New?.Public Management Review,10(3),299-317.
25. Leydesdorff, L.,Zawadi, G.(2010).The Triple Helix Perspective of Innovation Systems,.Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,22(7),789-804.
26. Lundvall, B. A. I.(ed.)(1992).National Systems of Innovations: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning.London:Pinter.
27. McKelvey, B.(2004).Toward a Complexity Science of Entrepreneurship.Journal of Business Venturing,19(3),313-341.
28. Mintzberg, H.(1994).The Fall and Rise of Strategic Planning.Harvard Business Review,72(1),107-114.
29. Mintzberg, H.,Ahlstrand, B.,Lampel, J.(1998).Strategy Safari.New York:The Free Press.
30. Morel, B.,Ramanujam, R.(1999).Through the Looking-glass of Complexity- The Dynamics of Organizations as Adaptive and Evolving Systems.Organization Science,10(3),278-293.
31. Nelson, R.(ed.)(1993).National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
32. Normann, R.,Ramirez, R.(1993).From Value Chain to Value Constellation. Designing Interactive Strategy.Harvard Business Review,July-Aug,65-77.
33. Ormerod, P.、李華夏譯(2000)。蝴蝶效應經濟學。台北:聯經出版社。
34. Poter, M. E.(1990).Competitive Advantage of Nations.London:Macmillan.
35. Raynor, M. E.(2007).The Strategy Paradox: Why committing to success leads to failure, and What to Do About It.New York:Currency Doubleday.
36. Rodríguez-Clare, A.(2007).Clusters and Comparative Advantage: Implications for Industrial Policy.Journal of Development Economics,82(1),43-57.
37. Rohrbeck, R.,Hölzle, K.,Gemünden, H. G.(2009).Opening Up for Competitive Advantage– How Deutsche Telekom Creates an Open Innovation Ecosystem.R&D Management,39(4),420-430.
38. Schindehufte, M.,Morris, M. H.(2009).Advancing Strategic Entrepreneurship Research: the Role of Complexity Science in shifting the Paradigm.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,33(1),241-275.
39. Simon, A.(1962).The Architecture of Complexity.Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society
40. Stacey, R.(1996).Complexity and Creativity in Organizations.San Francisco:Berrett-Koehler.
41. Thompson, J. D.(1967).Organizations in Action.New York:McGraw-Hill.
42. Yin, R.(1994).Case Study research: Design and Methods.CA:Sage Publishing.
43. 方念萱、鄭宇君、楊淑芬、林文琪(2006)。產業創新能耐平台建置與推廣三年計畫—韓國產業創新現況研究計畫產業創新能耐平台建置與推廣三年計畫—韓國產業創新現況研究計畫,經濟部技術處。
44. 方念萱、鐘蔚文(2006)。如何研究生活脈絡？。2006 產業創新研討會論文集
45. 王美雅(2005)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立政治大學科技管理研究所。
46. 王健全(2010)。台灣六大新興產業的發展策略探討。經濟前瞻，一月號，35-38。
47. 吳思華(1994)。產業政策與科技政策論文集，台北:
48. 李修瑩(2004)。韓國用家庭網路力拚IT 產業前五強。數位時代，88
49. 花佳正(2010)。中、日、韓、印度之新興產業推動對台灣的啟示。台灣經濟研究月刊，33(8)，69-75。
50. 侯如珊、蔡燿駿(2003)。手機才是家的中心。e 天下，六月號
51. 洪世章、林于婷(2003)。國家創新系統：概念、成因與效果。研考雙月刊，27(4)，24-33。
52. 陳意文(2009)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立政治大學科技管理研究所。
53. 溫肇東、吳忠華、顏如妙(2002)。從產業政策、科技政策到創新政策─從歷屆全國科技會議及歐盟創新政策的觀察。政大公共政策論壇「全球化與台灣」研討會
54. 溫肇東、劉文綺(2006)。產業創新能耐平台建置與推廣三年計畫—韓國產業創新現況研究計畫產業創新能耐平台建置與推廣三年計畫—韓國產業創新現況研究計畫,經濟部技術處。
55. 蔡文鈞(2006)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立政治大學科技管理研究所。
56. 蔡文鈞、吳思華(2003)。新創事業發展與利基創造—以集群屬性事業創新為例。產業創新與知識經營論文集
57. 盧智芳(2001)。韓國要追趕兩百年的科技落後。天下雜誌，243，62-63。