题名

The R&D Strategies of Fabless Semiconductor Companies in Taiwan, China, and the United States: Risk-based perspectives

并列篇名

台灣、大陸及美國IC設計業的R&D 策略研究-風險觀點

作者

姜榮新(Rung-Shin Jiang);洪志洋(Chih-Young Hung)

关键词

IC 設計公司 ; R&D 支出費用 ; 專利 ; 風險管理行為 ; Fabless semiconductor companies ; R&D expenditure ; patents ; risk management behavior

期刊名称

科技管理學刊

卷期/出版年月

20卷2期(2015 / 06 / 01)

页次

1 - 24

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

無晶圓廠或IC 設計公司是半導體業中的子產業,其主要專注於產品設計和開發,並通常將生產工作外包給晶圓代工公司。為了在激烈的技術競爭的環境中生存,IC 設計公司必須持續投資於研究與發展(R&D)。本研究旨在探討不同國的IC 設計公司在三大客源市場,台灣、中國和美國中的研究與發展策略。首先,本研究找出研究與發展經費的支出與其在每個市場中成功的專利申請量之間的時間滯後關係。其次,我們分析內部因素,如公司規模,盈利能力和管理行為;和外部因素,如經濟上國際景氣的好壞對研究與發展經費支出的影響。這項研究有兩個主要的貢獻,首先是本研究利用研究與發展的強度和效率等新穎指標來分析在全球化的背景下IC設計公司如何決定研究與發展經費的支出;第二,它是第一個跨國性研究,並以風險的角度來分析IC 設計公司在不同國家中的研究與發展經費支出行為。本研究結果顯示研究與發展的費用投入到專利的被成功接受具有長達2年的時間滯後。另外本研究也顯示出,在經濟衰退和復甦期間台灣和中國的IC 設計公司比美國IC 設計公司更願意多花一些研究與發展費用。台灣和中國的IC 設計公司與美國相比,有比較少的生產投入要素、比較小的需求市場及比較少的相關行業支持,這也許能解釋他們為什麼必須採取比美國更積極的研究與發展經費支出策略,以期讓他們能在競爭激烈的全球市場中生存。

英文摘要

Fabless or IC design companies are a group of enterprises within the semiconductor fabrication industry, focusing on product design and development, and usually outsourcing production to manufacturers. To survive in an environment of fierce technological competition, fabless firms must invest in research and development (R&D). The present study investigates how this is achieved in the three major source markets for this type of product; Taiwan, China and the United States. First, the investigation identifies the time lags between R&D expenditure and the quantity of successful patent applications in each market. Second, we analyze the impact of internal factors like company size, profitability and management behavior, and external factors such as the health of the economy on R&D expenditure. The study makes two important contributions to the literature; first is the use of novel indices of R&D intensity and efficiency to analyze expenditure decisions in the context of globalization, second, it is the first cross-country study to analyze R&D in this industry from a risk-based perspective. The results demonstrate a time lag of up to 2 years between R&D expenditure and patent acceptance. They also show that firms in Taiwan and China spend more on R&D than US firms during periods of both economic recession and recovery. However, fabless firms in Taiwan and China have worse factor input and demand conditions, and less support from related industries than firms in the United States, explaining why they must adopt more aggressive strategies towards R&D investment to survive and excel in global markets.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Baysinger, B.,Hoskisson, R. E.(1989).Diversification Strategy and R&D Intensity in Multiproduct Firms.The Academy of Management Journal,32,310-332.
  2. Branch, B.(1974).Research and Development Activity and Profitability: A Distributed Lag Analysis.Journal of Political Economy,82,999-1011.
  3. Cincera, M.(1997).PATENTS, R&D, AND TECHNOLOGICAL SPILLOVERS AT THE FIRM LEVEL: SOME EVIDENCE FROM ECONOMETRIC COUNT MODELS FOR PANEL DATA.Journal of Applied Econometrics,12,265-280.
  4. Dickinson, G.(2001).Enterprise Risk Management: Its Origins and Conceptual Foundation.The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice,26,7.
  5. Francis, J.,Smith, A.(1995).Agency costs and innovation some empirical evidence.Journal of Accounting and Economics,19,383-409.
  6. Grabowski, H. G.(1968).The Determinants of Industrial Research and Development: A Study of the Chemical, Drug, and Petroleum Industries.Journal of Political Economy,76,292-306.
  7. Graham, J. R.,Harvey, C. R.(2005).The economic implications of corporate financial reporting.Journal of Accounting and Economics,40,3-73.
  8. Graves, S. B.(1988).Institutional Ownership and Corporate R&D in the Computer Industry.The Academy of Management Journal,31,417-428.
  9. Hausman, J.,Hall, B. H.(1984).Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship.Econometrica,52,909-938.
  10. Kazmierski, C.(2012).,Semiconductor Industry Association.
  11. Kwanghui, L.(2004).The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981-1997).Research Policy,33,287-321.
  12. Mansfield, E.(1981).Composition of R and D Expenditures: Relationship to Size of Firm, Concentration, and Innovative Output.The Review of Economics and Statistics,63,610-615.
  13. McClean, B.(2013).Fabless Suppliers Play Increasing Role in IC Market.IC Insights
  14. McClean, B.(2012).U.S.-based Companies Held 12 of the Top 25 Fabless Spots in 2011.IC Insights
  15. McClean, B.(2014).Taiwanese and Chinese Companies Represented Five of the Eight Fastest Growing Top-25 Fabless IC Suppliers in 2013.IC Insights
  16. Ohlson, J. A.(1995).Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation.Contemporary Accounting Research,11,661-687.
  17. Pakes, A.,Griliches, Z.(1980).Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first report.Economics Letters,5,377-381.
  18. Porter, M. E.,Chandler, A. D. f. o.(1990).The competitive advantage of nations.New York:Free Press.
  19. Schilling, M. A.,Hill, C. W. L.(1998).Managing the New Product Development Process:Strategic Imperatives.The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005),12,67-81.
  20. Sher, P. J.,Yang, P. Y.(2005).The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: the evidence of Taiwan's semiconductor industry.Technovation,25,33-43.
  21. Sonneborn, M.,Wilemon, D.(1991).R&D's contributions to strategic decision-making: Rationale, content, and process.Technovation,11,267-281.
  22. Tsai, B.-H.,Li, Y.(2009).Cluster evolution of IC industry from Taiwan to China.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,76,1092-1104.
  23. Wang, J.,Lin, W.(2010).A performance-oriented risk management framework for innovative R&D projects.Technovation,30,601-611.
  24. Watanabe, C.,Asgari, B.(2003).Dynamic interactions between assimilation capacity,technology spillovers, sales and R&D intensity - the case of electrical machinery industry in Japan.Technovation,23,15-34.
  25. Watanabe, C.,Nagamatsu, A.(2003).Sources of structural stagnation in R&D intensity in Japan's electrical machinery industry-an analysis of mismatching with IT functionality development.Technovation,23,571-591.
  26. Watanabe, C.,Takayama, M.(2002).Technology spillover as a complement for high-level R&D intensity in the pharmaceutical industry.Technovation,22,245-258.
  27. Wu, D. D.,Kefan, X.(2010).Modeling technological innovation risks of an entrepreneurial team using system dynamics: An agent-based perspective.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,77,857-869.
  28. Wu, D. D.,Olson, D.(2009).Enterprise risk management: a DEA VaR approach in vendor selection.International Journal of Production Research,48,4919-4932.
  29. Wu, D. D.,Olson, D. L.(2009).Enterprise risk management: small business scorecard analysis.Production Planning & Control,20,362-369.
  30. Wu, D.,Olson, D. L.(2008).Supply chain risk, simulation, and vendor selection.International Journal of Production Economics,114,646-655.
  31. Wu, D.,Olson, D. L.(2010).Enterprise risk management: coping with model risk in a large bank.Journal of the Operational Research Society,61,179-190.
  32. Young, R. L.(2012).2012 Semiconductor Industry Yearbook.Industrial Technology Research Institute.
  33. Yu, Z.(2008).Synchronizing Export Orientation with Import Substitution: Creating Competitive Indigenous High-Tech Companies in China.World Development,36,2353-2370.