题名

探索跨領域專案團隊共享知識之個案研究

并列篇名

Shared Knowledge in a Cross-Disciplinary Project Team: A Case Study

作者

凌漢璋(Han-Chang Ling);樊學良(Hsueh-Liang Fan)

关键词

共享知識 ; 共創 ; 跨領域專案團隊 ; 專案管理 ; 知識管理 ; team shared knowledge ; co-creation ; cross-disciplinary team ; project management ; knowledge management

期刊名称

科技管理學刊

卷期/出版年月

25卷3期(2020 / 09 / 01)

页次

1 - 27

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

共享知識是影響異質團隊績效的重要因素;但是,當前研究並未深究團隊共享知識本身,以及該知識如何為團隊所有成員所共享。為回應此一議題文獻的不足,本研究採取單一個案之質性研究,探討跨領域專案團隊發展共享知識的歷程。藉由訪談由藝術家、工程師和展演設計師組成之跨領域團隊成員在二十二個月專案期間的互動,本研究發現該團隊共享知識從提出新構想開始,而該構想是透過出現為「議題」到隱含為「前提」而成為共享知識的元素,且以「術語」形式呈現。再者,共享知識具備核心/中介/周邊結構,且在不同階段有不同的樣貌與分佈。此結構讓我們更清楚跨領域團隊培養共享知識的階段性特質及挑戰,也理解任務知識的演化有助於形成合作知識。最後,根據本研究發現提出管理團隊知識分享的實務工具,並建議後續研究方向。

英文摘要

This case study investigated the process through which a cross-disciplinary team developed their shared knowledge. Although team shared knowledge has been considered critical to a team's success, few studies have investigated the process through which knowledge is shared by team members. Therefore, in this study, members of a project team comprising engineers and artists were interviewed to understand how such experts from dissimilar domains developed shared knowledge during the 22-month project. Through qualitative data analysis, this study revealed two findings. First, an idea becomes part of shared knowledge through a process where it is first a theme of discussion and subsequently the premise of discussion; it is represented in team-specific jargon. Moreover, shared knowledge in teams has a layered structure comprising a core, intermediate layer, and periphery. Those layers are developed sequentially among members with different stability levels along with team tenure. This sequentially formed structure also sheds some light on how taskwork knowledge helps developing teamwork knowledge. At the end of this paper, theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 方世杰(2008)。知識管理研究之本質:組織知識的統治。組織與管理,1(2),1-35。
    連結:
  2. 方世杰,蔡馥陞,邱志芳(2004)。新產品開發團隊知識分享之研究:交易成本理論與社會交換理論之整合性觀點。科技管理學刊,9(4),67-100。
    連結:
  3. 黃彥智,李振宇(2017)。激勵專案團隊創新:獎酬與團隊學習導向在新產品開發的角色。科技管理學刊,22(4),57-85。
    連結:
  4. 蔡敦浩,李慶芳(2006)。疆界管理:探索情境知識的本質與知識轉移。科技管理學刊,11(3),89-117。
    連結:
  5. 蔡馥陞,方世杰,楊舒閔,許文齡,邱志芳(2011)。新產品開發團隊網絡結構、關係系絡與績效:共享知識之中介效果。組織與管理,4(1),33-80。
    連結:
  6. Allen, T. J.,Cohen, S. I.(1969).Information Flow in Research and Development Laboratories.Administrative Science Quarterly,14(1),12-19.
  7. Ballard, D. I.,Tschan, F.,Waller, M. J.(2008).All in the Timing: Considering Time at Multiple Stages of Group Research.Small Group Research,39(3),328-351.
  8. Blaser, M. A.,Seiler, R.(2019).Shared Knowledge and Verbal Communication in Football: Changes in Team Cognition Through Collective Taining.Frontiers in psychology,10,77.
  9. Cannon-Bowers, J. A.,Salas, E.(2001).Reflections on Shared Cognition.Journal of Organizational Behavior,22,195-202.
  10. Castellan, N. J. Jr.(Ed.)(1993).Individual and group decision making: Current issues.NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale.
  11. Coultas, C. W.,Driskell, T.,Burke, C. S.,Salas, E.(2014).A Conceptual Review of Emergent State Measurement: Current Problems, Future Solutions.Small Group Research,45(6),671-703.
  12. Davidson, R. J.(Ed.),Schwartz, G. E.(Ed.),Shapiro, D.(Ed.)(1986).Advances in Research and Theory.New York:Plenum.
  13. Decuyper, S.,Dochy, F.,Van den Bossche, P.(2010).Grasping the Dynamic Complexity of Team Learning: An Integrative Model for Effective Team Learning in Organisations.Educational Research Review,5(2),111-133.
  14. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989).Building Theories from Case-study Research.Academy of Management Review,14(4),532-550.
  15. Ensici, A.,Badke-Schaub, P.,Bayazıt, N.,Lauche, K.(2013).Used and Rejected Decisions in Design Teamwork.CoDesign,9(2),113-131.
  16. Ericsson, K. A.(Ed.)(2006).The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance.The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance.
  17. Hansen, M. T.(2002).Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies.Organization Science,13(3),232-248.
  18. Hoopes, D. G.,Postrel, S.(1999).Shared Knowledge,“Glitches,” and Product Development Performance.Strategic management journal,20(9),837-865.
  19. Humphrey, S. E.,Aime, F.(2014).Team Microdynamics.Academy of Management Annals,8(1),443-503.
  20. Kozlowski, S. W. J.(2015).Advancing Research on Team Process Dynamics: Theoretical, Methodological, and Measurement Considerations.Organizational Psychology Review,5(4),270-299.
  21. Levesque, L. L.,Wilson, J. M.,Wholey, D. R.(2001).Cognitive Divergence and Shared Mental Models in Software Development Project Teams.Journal of Organizational Behavior,22,135-144.
  22. Lewis, K.,Herndon, B.(2011).Transactive Memory Systems: Current Issues and Future Research Directions.Organization Science,22(5),1254-1265.
  23. Lim, B. C.,Klein, K. J.(2006).Team Mental Models and Team Performance: A Field Study of the Effects of Team Mental Model Similarity and Accuracy.Journal of Organizational Behavior,27(4),403-418.
  24. Lyles, M. A.,Schwenk, C. R.(1992).Top Management, Strategy and Organizational Knowledge Structures.Journal of Management Studies,29(2),155-174.
  25. Marks, M. A.,Mathieu, J. E.,Zaccaro, S. J.(2001).A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes.Academy of Management Review,26(3),356-376.
  26. Marks, M. A.,Zaccaro, S. J.,Mathieu, J. E.(2000).Performance Implications of Leader Briefings and Team-interaction Training for Team Adaptation to Novel Environments.Journal of Applied Psychology,85(6),971-986.
  27. Miller, G. A.(1956).The Magical Number 7, Plus or Minus 2 – Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information.Psychological Review,63(2),81-97.
  28. Mishler, E. G.(1986).Research Interviewing : Context and Narrative.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
  29. Mohammed, S.,Ferzandi, L.,Hamilton, K.(2010).Metaphor No More: A 15-Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct.Journal of Management,36(4),876-910.
  30. Mohammed, S.,klimoski, R.,Rentsch, J. R.(2000).The Measurement of Team Mental Models: We Have no Shared Schema.Organizational Research Method,3(2),123-165.
  31. Salas, E.,Sims, D. E.,Burke, C. S.(2005).Is There a “Big Five” in Teamwork?.Small Group Research,36(5),555-599.
  32. Salazar, M. R.,Lant, T. K.,Fiore, S. M.,Salas, E.(2012).Facilitating Innovation in Diverse Science Teams Through Integrative Capacity.Small Group Research,43(5),527-558.
  33. Smith-Jentsch, K. A.,Cannon-Bowers, J. A.,Tannenbaum, S. I.,Salas, E.(2008).Guided Team Self-Correction - Impacts on Team Mental Models, Processes, and Effectiveness.Small Group Research,39(3),303-327.
  34. Wang, S.,Noe, R. A.(2010).Knowledge Sharing: A Review and Directions for Future Research.Human Resource Management Review,20(2),115-131.
  35. Yin, R.(1994).Case Study Research: Design and Methods.Newburry Park.:Sage Publications.
  36. 工業技術研究院(2010)。科技與花的對話:花博夢想館記實─挑戰不可能。工業技術與資訊,229,28-41。
  37. 李慶芳(2013).質化研究之經驗敘說:質化研究的六個修練.新北市:高立.
  38. 陳帝鴻(2011)。就是要你「哇!」:游文富以機械花綻放夢想。工業技術與資訊,231,6-13。
被引用次数
  1. 楊朝陽,傅翊棋(2022)。概念混成策略兼顧創新原創性與實踐性之逐步式跨領域團隊思考整合工具。科技管理學刊,27(3),113-131。