以二十五年的科技管理學刊描繪台灣科技管理學術社群

Analyzing Twenty-Five Years' Journal of Technology Management for Understanding Technology Management Research Community in Taiwan

李沛錞(Pei-Chun Lee)；蘇信寧(Hsin-Ning Su)

科技管理 ； 跨領域 ； 學術社群 ； 社會網路分析 ； Technology Management ； Interdisciplinarity ； Scholarly Community ； Social Network Analysis

科技管理學刊

27卷1期（2022 / 06 / 01）

1 - 22

繁體中文

台灣科技管理學術社群屬於跨領域研究範疇，其具有跨領域性、異質性、整合性、與科技產業共同演化的特性。國內探討科技管理研究社群之相關文獻甚少，且其跨領域知識發展的歷程與參與知識生產之科技管理學術社群有著密切關係，故本研究旨於分析科技管理學術社群之知識網路，期望透過揭示科技管理學刊之知識網路結構，以完整呈現科技管理學術社群之多元知識發展，其中包含學者社群、大專院校系、核心概念等網路。本研究針對科技管理學刊之所有發表文章，使用書目計量學與社會網路分析法進行資料蒐集與分析，根據學者過去在科技管理學刊所發表之期刊論文，分別使用關鍵字共現與作者合著網路分析進行資料處理，進一步使用社會網路進行大學校系網路分析、學者網路分析、關鍵字分析，以獲致科技管理學術社群二十五年來在我國發展出之知識網路。將網路節點分類為大學、系所、作者與關鍵字，可將之分作四個網路群體進行觀察，本研究發現科技管理學術社群除領域內交流之外，系所與大學間聯繫亦相當頻繁，此現象說明科技管理學術社群之知識互動乃是建立在研究主題與議題之上，不僅侷限於相同學科背景內部。本研究結果顯示，科技管理學術社群之網路連結密度偏低，並且存在核心人物發揮凝聚網路之社群影響力，此為跨領域學術社群內異質性成員交流溝通之重要凝聚基礎。

Taiwan's research community of Technology Management is featured by its interdisciplinarity, heterogeneity, integrity, co-evolution high-tech industry. The research community of Technology Management in Taiwan has been barely investigated, the role played by this community helps develop technology management knowledge critically influencing the trajectory of interdisciplinary knowledge development. Therefore, this study aims to understand the knowledge network developed in Taiwan's technology management research community by analyzing the network structure of knowledge developed in the Journal of Technology Management. The network structures with university, department, scholar, keyword as network actors provide a channel to understand knowledge developed in Taiwan's Technology Management community from multiple perspectives. This study analyzed papers published in the Journal of Technology Management through collaborative relations of university, department, scholar, as well as keyword co-occurrence. The results show that extensive research interaction occurred between different universities or departments. Such cross-universities or cross-department research collaboration facilitate topic-based researches underpinned by interdisciplinary research capabilities. It can also be observed that density of Technology Management knowledge network is relatively low and several core scholars considerably influence the formation of knowledge network. All of these characteristics are served as the bases for interactions among Technology Management community members with heterogeneous knowledge backgrounds.

1. 張元杰,邱文宏,蔡林彤飛(2010)。台灣科技管理研究的回顧與展望：書目計量的觀點。科技管理學刊，15(4)，1-27。
   連結：
2. 楊燕枝(2010)。以文獻計量法分析台灣在國際科管期刊的發表現況。科技管理學刊，15(4)，61-86。
   連結：
3. Ahuja, G.,Lampert, C. M.,Tandon, V.(2008)."moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation.Academy of Management Annals,2(1),1-98.
4. Bonacich, P.(2007).Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality.Social Networks,29(4),555-564.
5. Bruce, A.,Lyall, C.,Tait, J.,Williams, R.(2004).Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: The case of the Fifth Framework programme.Futures,36(4),457-470.
6. Bryant, C. G.(1975).Kuhn, paradigms and sociology.British Journal of Sociology,354-359.
7. Crane, D.(1972).Invisible colleges; diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities.University Of Chicago Press.
8. Crawford, S.(1971).Informal communication among scientists in sleep research.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,22(5),301-310.
9. Croitoru, A.(2012)."Schumpeter, J.A., 1934 (2008), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle", translated from the German by Redvers Opie, New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London (U.K.): Transaction Publishers, A review to a book that is 100 years old.Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology,3(2),137-148.
10. Cummings, J. N.,Kiesler, S.(2005).Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries.Social Studies of Science,35(5),703-722.
11. Fagerberg, J.,Mowery, D. C.,Nelson, R. R.(2006).The Oxford handbook of innovation.USA:Oxford University Press.
12. Freeman, L. C.(1977).A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness.Sociometry,35-41.
13. Freeman, L. C.(1978).Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification.Social Networks,1(3),215-239.
14. Freilich, M.(1963).Toward an operational definition of community.Rural Sociology,28(2),117-127.
15. Gibbons, M.(1994).The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.SAGE.
16. Gloor, P. A.(2017).Introduction Sociometrics and Human Relationships.Emerald Publishing Limited.
17. Hart, D. M.(2009).Accounting for change in national systems of innovation: A friendly critique based on the U.S. case.Research Policy,38(4),647-654.
18. Klein, J. T.(1996).Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities.University of Virginia Press.
19. Kuhn, T. S.(1987).What are scientific revolutions?.Cambridge:MIT.
20. Lattuca, L. R.(2003).Creating interdisciplinarity: Grounded definitions from college and university faculty.History of Intellectual Culture,3(1),1-20.
21. Martin, B.(2008).Working Papers on Innovation StudiesWorking Papers on Innovation Studies,未出版
22. Mullins, N. C.,Hargens, L. L.,Hecht, P. K.,Kick, E. L.(1977).The group structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study.American Sociological Review,552-562.
23. Porter, A. L.,Roessner, J. D.,Cohen, A. S.,Perreault, M.(2006).Interdisciplinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurture.Research Evaluation,15(3),187-195.
24. Price, D. J. de S.(1971).Some remarks on elitism in information and the invisible college phenomenon in science.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,22(2),74.
25. Price, D. J. de S.(1986).Little science, big science... And beyond.New York:Columbia University Press.
26. Price, D. J. de S,Beaver, D.(1966).Collaboration in an invisible college.American Psychologist,21(11),1011.
27. Rigby, J.,Edler, J.(2005).Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality.Research Policy,34(6),784-794.
28. Tijssen, R. J. W.(1992).A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: Co-classification analysis of energy research.Research Policy,21(1),27-44.
29. Tuire, P.,Erno, L.(2001).Exploring invisible scientific communities: Studying networking relations within an educational research community. A Finnish case.Higher Education,42(4),493-513.
30. Verspagen, B.,Duysters, G.(2003).The small worlds of strategic technology alliances.Technovation,24,563-571.
31. Verspagen, B.,Werker, C.(2003).The invisible college of the economics of innovation and technological change.Estudios de Economía Aplicada,21(3),393-419.
32. Wasserman, S.,Faust, K.(1994).Social network analysis: Methods and applications.Cambridge university press.
33. White, H. D.,Wellman, B.,Nazer, N.(2004).Does citation reflect social structure?: Longitudinal evidence from the “Globenet” interdisciplinary research group.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,55(2),111-126.
34. Zaltman, G.(1974).A note on an international invisible college for information exchange.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,25(2),113-117.
35. Ziman, J.(1999).Rules of the game of doing science.Nature,400(6746),721.
36. 傅雅秀(1999).從圖書資訊學的觀點探討科學傳播.台北:漢美圖書有限公司.

1. 周立婕,李沛錞(2023)。從技術融合與跨領域探討國家數位競爭力。科技管理學刊，28(1)，1-31。
2. (2024)。運用混合情境分析法預測2035年台灣半導體產業發展。科技管理學刊，29(1)，1-31。