發展基於CDIO與雙菱形設計模型的建築設計教學法

The Development of CDIO and Double Diamond-based Architecture Design Pedagogy

沈揚庭(Yang-Ting Shen)；盧沛文(Pei-Wen Lu)；李芝瑜(Jeanne Lee)

CDIO ； 專案導向學習 ； 創客育成 ； 雙菱形設計模型 ； 跨領域 ； CDIO ； project-based learning (PBL) ； maker incubation ； double diamond design model ； cross discipline

科技管理學刊

27卷3期（2022 / 12 / 01）

45 - 74

繁體中文;英文

本研究以專案導向式學習（PBL）為基礎，透過CDIO工程教育教學規劃出操作流程，同時帶入雙菱形設計模型協助跨域連結與整合，發展出一套培育解決複雜問題人才的「建築創客育成模式」教學法。教學法將專案導向學習的操作分成構思（Conceive）、設計（Design）、實踐（Implement）、運轉（Operate）四階段的流程，並導入雙菱形收發迴圈（Double Diamond）使不同階段有其對應的發散與收斂特性，進而促成專案導向學習在跨域上的多元整合。創客育成法在歷經數次的測試後，最終歸結出C構思階段（第一迴圈）、DI從設計到實踐階段（第二迴圈）、O運轉階段的改良型第二代建築創客育成模式教學法。改良後的教學法實際投入終端課程「建築設計（七）」的現場教學，並執行出完整的跨領域團隊全尺度構築專案，並透過問卷評估學生「跨域整合能力、CDIO流程操作能力、PBL執行能力、創客實踐能力」四項核心能力表現，驗證本教學法的具體成效。

This paper develops the maker incubation method based on the integration of CDIO and double diamond design model. The maker incubation is adopted for cross-discipline linkage and integration, which is used to cultivate talents who can solve complex problems. The maker incubation method divides the project-based learning procedure into four stages of Conceive, Design, Implement, and Operate (C-D-I-O), and introduces the double diamond model used by Stanford D School that allows the different stages to have their corresponding divergence and convergence. After several tests of the proposed method, this paper concludes with an improved model that includes the C conceive stage (first cycle), DI from design to implement stage (second cycle), and O operate stage (C-DI-O). The improved maker incubation method was adopted to the "Architecture Design (7)" course. The outcomes including full-scale tectonics project and the performance evaluation in 4 ability indicators, cross disciplinary integration, CDIO operation, PBL execution, and maker practice, demonstrated the effectiveness of our maker incubation method.

1. 林士平,陳冠宇(2021)。大學創業教育生態系統影響大學生創業警覺性養成之因素重要性研究。科技管理學刊，26(2)，55-76。
   連結：
2. 楊佳翰,黃舜農(2020)。空間創生的社會創新模型建構: 以創新擴散理論為視角。科技管理學刊，25(4)，109-135。
   連結：
3. Augustine, N. R.,Vagelos, P. R.,Wulf, W. A.(2005).Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future.
4. Barrows, H. S.(1986).A taxonomy of problem‐based learning methods.Medical education,20(6),481-486.
5. Becker, S. A.,Cummins, M.,Davis, A.,Freeman, A.,Hall, C. G.,Ananthanarayanan, V.(2017).NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition.The New Media Consortium.
6. Bequette, J. W.,Bequette, M. B.(2012).A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation.Art education,65(2),40-47.
7. Blumenfeld, P. C.,Soloway, E.,Marx, R. W.,Krajcik, J. S.,Guzdial, M.,Palincsar, A.(1991).Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning.Educational psychologist,26(3-4),369-398.
8. Brown, T.(2008).Design thinking.Harvard business review,86(6),84.
9. Council, D.(2005).Council, D. (2005), “The ‘double diamond’ design process model”, Design Council..
10. Crawley, E. F.(2001).Crawley, E. F. (2001), “The CDIO Syllabus: A statement of goals for undergraduate engineering education”, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology..
11. Crawley, E. F.,Malmqvist, J.,Lucas, W. A.,Brodeur, D. R.(2011).The CDIO syllabus v2. 0. An updated statement of goals for engineering education.Proceedings of 7th International CDIO Conference,Copenhagen, Denmark:
12. Crawley, E.,Malmqvist, J.,Ostlund, S.,Brodeur, D.(2007).Rethinking engineering education.The CDIO Approach,302,60-62.
13. Dewey, J.(1986).Experience and education.The educational forum,50(3),241-252.
14. Dewey, J.(1984).The Later Works of John Dewey 1929: The Quest for Certainty.SIU Press.
15. DuFour, R.,DuFour, R.(2013).Learning by doing: A handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work TM.Solution Tree Press.
16. Halverson, E. R.,Sheridan, K.(2014).The maker movement in education.Harvard Educational Review,84(4),495-504.
17. Hmelo-Silver, C. E.(2004).Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?.Educational psychology review,16(3),235-266.
18. Kirkpatrick, D. L.(1977).Determining training needs: Four simple and effective approaches.Training and Development Journal,31(2),22-25.
19. Kolarevic, B.,Malkawi, A.(2005).Peformative Architecture: Beyond Instrumentality.Routledge.
20. Likert, R. (1932), “A technique for the measurement of attitudes”, Archives of psychology.
21. Malmqvist, J.,Rådberg, K. K.,Lundqvist, U.(2015).Comparative analysis of challenge-based learning experiences.Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference,Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China:
22. Moesby, E.(2005).Curriculum development for project-oriented and problem-based learning (POPBL) with emphasis on personal skills and abilities.Global J. of Engng. Educ,9(2),121-128.
23. Morgan, A.(1983).Theoretical aspects of project-based learning in higher education.British Journal of Educational Technology,14(1),66-78.
24. Savery, J. R.(2015).Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions.Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows
25. Savery, J. R.,Duffy, T. M.(1995).Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework.Educational technology,35(5),31-38.
26. Shen, Y. T.,Dai, P. Y.,Lu, P. W.,Shiu, Y. S.(2017).The strategy and practice of CDIO-based training process applied to the design course in the higher education.Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Planning and Design (ICPD),Tainan, Taiwan:
27. 沈揚庭,蔡明峰,戴沛吟(2016)。發展 CDIO 創客育成法應用於專案導向工作坊。E 時代的教育創新國際學術研討會－從翻轉教室到育從翻轉教室到育
28. 沈揚庭,戴沛吟(2016)。以 CDIO 精神發展創客育成模式之課程設計與評估。高等教育研究紀要，5，81-100。
29. 林鳳,李正(2007)。美國高等工程教育的歷史沿革與發展趨勢。設計藝術研究，5，37-39。
30. 戴沛吟(2017)。逢甲大學創意設計碩士學位學程。

1. (2024)。基於機械手臂木構築的建築設計教育方法與實踐。建築學報，127_S期：建築教學實踐及教育專刊，47-65。