题名

全球碳定價發展趨勢－企業與國家間競合

并列篇名

The Global Trend of Carbon Pricing-Competition between Corporations and Nations

作者

劉易鑫(Yi-Xin Liu)；黃千容(Chien-Rung Huang)

关键词

碳定價 ； 新興金融產業 ； 國際政治經濟 ； Carbon Pricing ； Emerging Financial Industry ； International Relations ； International Political Economy

期刊名称

科技管理學刊

卷期/出版年月

28卷2期（2023 / 09 / 01）

页次

133 - 164

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

本文由國際政治經濟的範疇進行討論，探討碳定價發展趨勢及國家與企業間的互動模式。本文發現碳定價所連動的國際金融資產，不僅將成為次世代新興金融商品，同時先進經濟體企業透過抗衡與扈從策略，能對具有較高碳權之開發中經濟體實施偏好影響。若以美國政府與特斯拉為競合案例，碳定價與碳交易明顯存在著國家與企業間合作又對抗的多重賽局，特別在共同利益上國家與企業存在合作之中又保有對抗資本的局面，致使每個碳定價連動的碳交易市場，都存在著國家優先與企業利益最大化的平衡過程；不同的是，碳交易賽局提供巨型企業相對較多的協商空間與話語權。
英文摘要

This study discusses the development trends of carbon pricing and the interaction between countries and enterprises from the perspective of international political economy. The study reveals that the international financial assets associated with carbon pricing will not only become the next generation of emerging financial commodities but also enable advanced economy enterprises to exert influence on developing economies with higher carbon rights through strategies of resistance and compliance. Taking the case of the competition between the US government and Tesla as an example, it is evident that carbon pricing and carbon trading involve multiple game dynamics of cooperation and confrontation between countries and enterprises, particularly in terms of shared interests where cooperation exists alongside confrontations for capital. As a result, each carbon trading market linked to carbon pricing experiences a balancing process between national priorities and maximizing corporate interests. The difference lies in the fact that the carbon trading game provides large-scale enterprises with more negotiation space and discursive power.
主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Bull, H. (2012), The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics, Bloomsbury Publishing.
  2. Gilpin, R. G. (2016), The political economy of international relations, Princeton University Press, 231.
  3. Groosman, B. (1999), Pollution tax, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 2500, 539-568.
  4. Spero, J. E. (1981), The Politics of International Economics Relations, 2nd. ed., St., 298-328
  5. Keohane, R. O. (1986), Neorealism and its critics, Columbia University Press.
  6. Keohane, R. O. (2005), After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy, Princeton university press.
  7. Mearsheimer, J. J., Alterman, G., et al. (2001), The tragedy of great power politics, WW Norton & Company.
  8. Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2008), This time is different: A panoramic view of eight centuries of financial crises (Tech. Rep.), National Bureau of Economic Research.
  9. Schweller, R. L. (1994), “Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in. International security”, Vol.19(1), 72–107.
  10. Santikarn, M., Churie Kallhauge, A. N., Bozcaga, M. O., Sattler, L., Mccormick, M. S., Ferran Torres, A., ... & Korthuis, A. (2021), "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2021", World Bank Group, United States of America, From: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1806796/state-and-trends-of-carbon-pricing-2021-english/2540378/.
  11. The World Bank. (2022),“State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022", World Bank, Washington, DC., From: https://Doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1895-0.
  12. UNEP(2012), Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, 9th ed, Ozone Secretariat.
  13. European Commission(2021), "Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Questions and Answers", From: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_21_3661.
  14. IAS Plus. (2005), "Emission Rights”, IAS Plus, From : https://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/ifric/ifric3.
  15. U.S. Department of Interior(2022), “Interior Department Releases Blueprints for Implementing Bipartisan Infrastructure Law”, Press Releases, From : https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/interior-department-releases-blueprints-implementing-bipartisan-infrastructure-law.
  16. Lance T. ,Brasher Joshua B. Nickerson (2022), “Part II/ Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act: A guide to key energy and Infrastructure programs and funding”,From : https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2022/09/infrastructure-investment-and-jobs-act/part-ii-electric-vehicles-and-battery-materials-processing.
  17. 廖舜右(2020)，現實主義，國際關係總論，第六版，頁 43–74。
  18. 聯合國(1998)，聯合國氣候變化框架公約，京都議定書。
  19. 李堅明&楊喻閔(2021)，「企業內部碳價訂定與氣候效益」，會計研究月刊，第 427 期，頁 54-59．
  20. 李宜樺、蔡亦臺、廖容翎、鄭嵐尹 (2022)，「全球淨零轉型–碳定價機制在財務報表上的化身」，會計研究月刊，第 434 期，頁 50-57。
  21. 紀舜傑(2012)，「政治學者眼中的國際政治經濟」，臺灣國際研究季刊，第 8 卷 3 期，頁 23–43．
  22. 蔡元閎(2015)，「試論碳交易制度下之價格穩定機制─以歐盟「市場穩定儲備」為中心」，經貿法訊，第 179 期，頁 12–22。
  23. 陳衍任(2019)，「碳排放權交易的稅捐課徵」，臺北大學法學論叢，第 112 期，頁 127–190。
  24. 譚偉恩等(2014)，「氣候變遷專題(三)：全球碳交易市場擴張制度逐步健全」，科技大觀園，取自: https://reurl.cc/jRnd72。
print cancel