朝向碳中和與氫經濟：國家氫能源發展模式之比較研究

Moving toward the Carbon Neutrality and hydrogen economy: An comparative study of national energy policy for hydrogen resources

林士清(Mark Lin)

碳邊境調整機制 ； 碳中和 ； 氫經濟 ； 國家氫能源發展模式 ； 比較個案研究法 ； Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism(CBAM) ； Carbon Neutrality ； Hydrogen Economy ； National energy policy for hydrogen resources ； Comparative case study methodology

科技管理學刊

28卷2期（2023 / 09 / 01）

243 - 271

繁體中文;英文

歐盟於2023年正式啟動「碳邊境調整機制」（Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, CBAM）等淨零碳排措施，全球主要經濟體希冀藉由在本世紀中葉達到碳中和的目標，並思索提升氫能源應用及碳中和目標之因果關係，氫能源發展與國家能源政策主導脈絡密不可分。本研究首先環顧氫能源發展之相關文獻，並透過比較個案研究法探討歐盟、美國、德國、英國、日本、韓國、中國大陸、澳洲、智利、沙烏地阿拉伯和埃及等國家氫能源發展模式；再者，分析碳中和與氫經濟之因果關係之外，更進一步區分出「減碳與氫能併用模式」、「氫能與減碳擴大模式」及「強化氫能源出口模式」等三種發展模式之差異；最後，本研究認為各國的國家氫能發展模式勢必涉及全球地緣政治之變遷因而產生國家戰略互動層次（合作夥伴、競合關係、競爭對手）。

The EU was introducing net-zero carbon emission measures such as the "Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism" (CBAM) in 2022. Major global economies are also achieving the policy goal of carbon neutrality by the mid-21st century. In fact, the replenishment of hydrogen has become extremely simple due to the proliferation of hydrogen energy applications. Since the development of hydrogen energy is inseparable from the leading context of national energy policies： First, this study focuses on the construction of hydrogen energy development models in countries such as the EU, USA, Germany, UK, Japan, Korea, Mainland China, Australia, Chile, Saudi Arabia and Egypt through a case study approach. Second, not only clarifying the causal inference between carbon neutrality and hydrogen economy, but also examines the differences between the three models of hydrogen energy policy planning, namely the "Carbon Reduction and Hydrogen Combination Model", the "Hydrogen Expansion and Carbon Reduction Expansion Model", and the "Enhanced Hydrogen Export Model". Finally, let the national hydrogen energy development model be upgraded to the level of national strategic interaction (partners, co-opetition, competitors) under global geopolitics.

1. 林茂文 (2022)，「2050 淨零碳排下的氫能發展方向與挑戰」，石油季刊，第 58 卷 1 期，頁1-42 。
2. 王婷虹 (2023)，「日本經產省於 2023/4/5 公布《氫能基本戰略》修訂草案，以 2040 年氫氣供應每年達 1200 萬噸為目標」，取自：https://km.twenergy.org.tw/Data/db_more?id=7141。
3. 石蕙菱(2021)，「2021全球氫氣應用現況與趨勢」，IEK產業情報網，取自：https://ieknet.iek.org.tw/iekrpt/rpt_more.aspx?actiontype=rpt&indu_idno=5&domain=28&rpt_idno=632024394。
4. 孫玉玲、胡智慧、秦阿寧、滕飛、林漢辰 (2020)，「全球氫能產業發展戰略與技術佈局分析」，世界科技研究與發展，第 4 期，頁 455- 465 頁。
5. 許雅喬 (2022)，「2050 淨零碳排之能源新星－氫燃料電池產業」，台灣經濟研究月刊，第 45卷 8 期，頁 104-12。
6. 陳亮瑋 (2022)，「國內外氫能發電政策簡述」，台灣經濟研究月刊，第 45 卷 12 期，頁 104-112．
7. 陳立衡、楊怡真、方育恆、林綉娟(2022)，「韓國氫能經濟實施第一次基本計畫」，111年度「國家總體能源政策發展規劃及決策支援能量建構」(2/2)，工研院，取自：https://km.twenergy.org.tw/Document/reference_more?id=2246。
8. 黃佳寗 (2022)，「從歐洲氫能開發看我國的氫能部署」，經濟前瞻，第 202 期，頁 104-109。
9. 蔡宛樺 (2021)，「液化天然氣及氫能於能源轉型中之角色」，台灣經濟研究月刊，第 44 卷11 期，頁 109-119。
10. 劉瑋、萬燕鳴、熊亞林、劉堅 (2022)，「雙碳目標下我國低碳清潔氫能進展與展望」，儲能科學與技術，第 11 期，頁 635-642。
11. 徐韶徽、洪崧富 (2023)，「氫經濟產業趨勢與氫能源產出方式」，化工，第 70 卷 2 期，頁46-55．
12. 顧典晉 (2022)，「英國商業、能源及產業策略部(BEIS)公布氫能行動計畫，促進氫能產業經濟發展」，科技法律透析，第 34 卷 11 期，頁 9-11。
13. 蕭思恩、石蕙菱(2022)，「淨零碳排下的國際氫產業趨勢與倡議」，IEK 產業情報網：工研院，取自：https://ieknet.iek.org.tw/iekrpt/rpt_more.aspx?actiontype=rpt&indu_idno=5&domain_id=28&rpt_idno=609438916.
14. Arab News. (2023), “Saudi Arabia’s first sustainable guarantee issued to green hydrogen project at NEOM”, From: https://www.arabnews.com/node/2316236/business-economy.
15. Bossel, U. (2006), “ Does a Hydrogen Economy Make Sense? ”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Vol.94(10), pp.1826-1837.
16. Falcone, P.M., Hiete, M., & Sapio, A. (2021), “ Hydrogen economy and sustainable development goals: Review and policy insights”, Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry,Vol.31,Article 100506.
17. Graaf, T., Overland, V., Scholten, D., & Westphal, K. (2020). “The new oil? The geopolitics and international governance of hydrogen”, Energy Research & Social Science, Vol.70, Article 101677.
18. Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., & Iskandarova, M. (2023), “The socio-technical dynamics of net-zero industrial megaprojects: Outside-in and inside-out analyses of the Humber industrial cluster”, Energy Research & Social Science, Vol.98, Article 103003.
19. Hancock, L., & Wollersheim, L. (2021), “EU Carbon Diplomacy: Assessing Hydrogen Security and Policy Impact in Australia and Germany”, Energies, Vol.14(23), pp.1-27.
20. Howarth, R. W., & Jacobson. M. (2021), “How green is blue hydrogen? ,” Energy Science and Engineering, Vol.9(10), pp.1676-1687.
21. J.O@@$$M.Bockris. (2013),“The hydrogen economy: Its history”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol.38(6), pp.2579-2588.
22. Krieth, F., & West, R. (2004), “Fallacies of a hydrogen economy: a critical analysis of hydrogen production and utilization”, J Energy Resour Technol, Vol.126(4), pp. 249-257.
23. Lee, A. (2021), “Our largest energy source: South Korea plans 40 foreign hydrogen bases to meet vast future demand, Recharge”, From: https://www.rechargenews.com/energy-transition/our-largest-energy-source-south-korea-plans-40-foreign-hydrogen-bases-to-meet-vast-future-demand/2-1-1110526.
24. Magacho, G., Espagne, E., & Godin. A. (2023), “Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: consequences for developing countries”, Climate Policy, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2200758.
25. Niermann, M., Timmerberg. S., Drünert,S., & Kaltschmitt, M. (2021),“Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers and alternatives for international transport of renewable hydrogen”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,Vol.135, Article 110171.
26. Oliveira, A. M., Beswick, R. R., & Yan, Y. (2021). “A green hydrogen economy for a renewable energy society”, Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, Vol.33, Article 100701.
27. Rübbelke, D., Vögele. S., Grajewski, M., & Zobel, L. (2022), “Hydrogen-based steel production and global climate protection: An empirical analysis of the potential role of a European cross border adjustment mechanism”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.380(2), Article 135040.
28. Tarkowski, R. (2019), “Underground hydrogen storage: characteristics and prospects”, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, Vol.105, pp. 86-94.