题名

完成台灣科技廊帶最後一哩路：以多準則分析探討屏東科學園區發展之政策工具

并列篇名

Accomplishing the last mile of the Taiwan Science and Technology Corridor: Applying DEMATEL-based ANP (DANP) approach to explore the policy tools of developing the Pingtung Science Park

作者

王仁聖(Jen-Sheng Wang)；潘怡君(Yi-Chun Pan)；鄧鈺霖(Yu-lin Teng)；魏大雅(Dah-Yee Wei)

关键词

屏東科學園區 ； Rothwell and Zegveld政策工具 ； 決策實驗室分析法（DEMATEL） ； 網絡分析法（ANP） ； 比較分析 ； PingTung Science Park ； Rothwell and Zegveld Policy Instruments ； Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory(DEMATEL) ； Analytic Network Process (ANP) ； Comparasion Analysis

期刊名称

科技管理學刊

卷期/出版年月

28卷3期（2023 / 12 / 01）

页次

37 - 69

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

屏東科學園區位於台灣科技廊帶的最南端，且與高雄、屏東周邊產業園區之在地產業相輔相成，預期形塑產業群聚效應。然而科學園區的成功發展取決於其向利益相關者提供政策工具所創造的價值主張，因此科學園區發展必須考慮哪些政策工具會導致產業環境發生變化，以及這些政策工具如何影響科學園區發展。據此，本文以Rothwell and Zegveld政策工具理論為研究架構，運用決策實驗室分析法（decision making trial and evaluation laboratory，DEMATEL）結合網絡分析法（analytic network process，ANP）成為DANP多準則分析，並藉由屏東科學園區四大主軸產業比較分析，探討屏東科學園區發展。DEMATEL分析結果首先顯示供給面政策工具與需求面政策工具的影響性相對重要。其次，DANP分析結果指出前六個最重要的政策工具分別為「公共服務」、「公營事業」、「教育與訓練」、「貿易管制」、「政府採購」及「海外機構」，最後本研究依據分析結果說明其意涵與相關建議。
英文摘要

PingTung Science Park is located at the southernmost tip of Taiwan's Science and Technology Corridor, and complements the local industries in Kaohsiung and Pingtung's surrounding industrial parks. It is expected to shape the industrial cluster effect. However, the successful development of a science park depends on the value proposition created by providing policy instruments to stakeholders, so the development of a science park must consider which policy instruments would lead to changes in the industrial environment, and how these policy instruments affect the development of a science park. Accordingly, this paper takes Rothwell and Zegveld policy instrument theory as the research framework and uses the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) combined with the network analysis method (analytic network process, ANP) to become DANP multivariate analysis to explore the development of Pingtung Science Park per the comparasion analysis of the four main industries of the Pingtung Science Park. The DEMATEL analysis results first show that the influence of supply-side policy and demand-side policy instruments are relatively important. Secondly, the DANP analysis results indicate that the top six most important policy instruments are 'public services', 'public enterprises', 'education', 'commmercial', 'government procurement' and 'overseas agent'. Finally, according to the analysis results, this study explains management implications and related suggestions.
主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 國家科學及技術委員會南部科學園區管理局(2022)，「屏東園區簡介」，取自 ：https://www.stsp.gov.tw/web/WEB/Jsp/Page/cindex.jsp?frontTarget=DEFAULT&thisRootID=732 。
  2. 胡欣怡、吳豐祥(2020)，「台灣學術創業之發展與挑戰：科技基本法之省思與期許」，科技管理學刊，第 25 卷 2 期，頁 61-89。
  3. Aiginger, K. & Rodrik, D. (2020), “Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century”, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Vol.20, pp.189-207, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-019-00322-3.
  4. Albahari, A., Klofsten, M., & Rubio-Romero, J. C. (2019), “Science and technology parks: A study of value creation for park tenants”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol.44, pp.1256-1272, https ://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9661-9.
  5. Blanchard, K. (2020), “Innovation and strategy: Does it make a difference! A linear study of micro & SMEs”, International Journal of Innovation Studies, Vol.4(4), pp.105-115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2020.07.001
  6. Boin, A. (2009), “The new world of crises and crisis management: Implications for policymaking and research”, Review of Policy research, Vol.26(4), pp.367-377.
  7. Cairney, P. (2016), “The politics of evidence based policymaking”, London: Palgrave.
  8. Cairney, P. & Weible, C. M. (2017), “The new policy sciences: Combining the cognitive science of choice, multiple theories of context, and basic and applied analysis”, Policy Sciences, Vol.50(4), pp.619-627.
  9. Carroll, T. (2015), “Access to Finance and the Death of Development in the Asia-Pacific”, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol.45(1), pp.139-166.
  10. Capano, G. & Engeli, I. (2022), “Using Instrument Typologies in Comparative Research: Conceptual and Methodological Trade-Offs”, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Vol.24(2), 99116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1871297.
  11. Chang, C. C. & Chen, P. Y. (2018), “Analysis of critical factors for social games based on extended technology acceptance model: a DEMATEL approach”, Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol.37(8), pp.774-785.
  12. Chen, F. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Hsu, T. H. (2011), “A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol.30(4), pp.908-932.
  13. Chowdhury, M. S. A., Azam, M. K. G., & Islam, S. (2015), “Problems and Prospects of SME Financing in Bangladesh”, Asian Business Review, Vol.2(2), pp.51-58.
  14. Chung, D., Jung, H., & Lee, Y. (2022), “Investigating the relationship of high-tech entrepreneurship and innovation efficacy: The moderating role of absorptive capacity”, Technovation, Vol.111, No.102393, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102393.
  15. Crow, D. & Jones, M. (2018), “Narratives as tools for influencing policy change”, Policy & Politics, Vol.46(2), pp.217-234.
  16. Demirkan, I., Yang, Q., & Jiang, C. X. (2019), “Corporate entrepreneurship of emerging market firms: current research and future directions”, New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, Vol.22(1), pp.5-30, https://doi.org/10.1108/NEJE-04-2019-0024.
  17. Didonet, S. R., Fearne, A., & Simmons, G. (2020), “Determining the presence of a long-term/short-term dilemma for SMEs when adopting strategic orientation to improve performance”, International Small Business Journal, Vol.38(2), pp.90-110, https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619879369.
  18. Díez-Vial, I. & Fernández-Olmos, M. (2015), “Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: How can firms benefit most? ”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol.40, pp.70-84, https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1096 1-013-9329-4
  19. Doh, S. & Kim, B. (2014), “Government Support for SME Innovations in the Regional Industries: The Case of Government Financial Support Program in South Korea”, Research Policy, Vol.43(9), pp.1557-1569.
  20. Etzkowitz, H. & Zhou, C. (2017), “Innovation incommensurability and the science park”, R&D Management, Vol.48(1), pp.73-87, https ://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12266
  21. Fernández-Sastre, J. & Montalvo-Quizhpi, F. (2019), “The effect of developing countries@@$$ innovation policies on firms’ decisions to invest in R&D”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.143, pp.214-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.02.006.
  22. Ferrara, M., Lamperti, F., & Mavilia, R. (2015), “Looking for best performers: A pilot study towards the evaluation of science parks”, Scientometrics, Vol.106(2), pp.717-750, https ://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1804-2
  23. Gao, P., Kaas, H. W., Mohr, D., & Wee, D. (2016), “Automotive revolution–perspective towards 2030 How the convergence of disruptive technology-driven trends could transform the auto industry”, Advanced Industries, McKinsey & Company, From: http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/412253.
  24. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Vafadarnikjoo, A. (2016). “A grey DEMATEL approach to develop third-party logistics provider selection criteria”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol.116(4), pp.690-722.
  25. Hansen, H., Rand, J., & Tarp, F. (2009), “Enterprise Growth and Survival in Vietnam: Does Government Support Matter? ”, Journal of Development Studies, Vol.45(7), pp.1048-1069.
  26. Halvey, M. R., Santo, R. E., Lupolt, S. N., Dilka, T. J., Kim, B. F., Bachman, G. H., Clark, J. K., & Nachman, K. E. (2021), “Beyond backyard chickens: A framework for understanding municipal urban agriculture policies in the United States”, Food Policy, Vol.103, 102013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.102013.
  27. Hobbs, K. G., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2017), “Science and technology parks: An annotated and analytical literature review”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol.42(4), pp.957-976, https ://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9522-3.
  28. Huang, C. Y., Shyu, J. Z., & Tzeng, G. H. (2007), “Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan@@$$s SIP mall industry”, Technovation, Vol.27(12), pp.744-765.
  29. Hussen, M. S. & Çokgezen, M. (2021), “The impact of regional institutional quality on firm innovation: evidence from Africa”, Innovation and Development, Vol.11(1), pp.69-90, https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2020.1750143.
  30. Hussen, M. S. & Çokgezen, M. (2019), “Analysis of Factors Affecting Firm Innovation: An Empirical Investigation for Ethiopian Firms”, Journal of African Business, https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2019.1625020.
  31. Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Ingold, K. (2018), “The advocacy coalition framework: An overview of the research program”, in Weible, C. M. & Sabatier, P. A. (ed.), Theories of the policy process, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 135-171.
  32. Kunasekaran, K. K. H. (2021), “Analysis of Information Technology Literacy Education Based on the Two-dimensional Frame Theory of Life Cycle”, International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology for Education, Vol.6(11), pp.39-45.
  33. Lin, C. L., Shih, Y. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Yu, H. C. (2016), “A service selection model for digital music service platforms using a hybrid MCDM approach”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol.48, pp.385-403.
  34. Lin, K., Shyu, J., & Ding, K. (2017), “A Cross-Strait Comparison of Innovation Policy under Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Development Transition”, Sustainability, Vol.9(5), No.786, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9050786.
  35. Link, A. N. & Scott, J. T. (2015), “Research, science, and technology parks: Vehicles for technology transfer”, in Link, A. N., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (eds), The Chicago handbook of university technology transfer, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.168-187.
  36. Liu, C. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Lee, M. H. (2012), “Improving tourism policy implementation-The use of hybrid MCDM models”, Tourism Management, Vol.33(2), pp.413-426.
  37. Löfsten, H. (2016), “New technology-based firms and their survival: The importance of business networks, and entrepreneurial business behaviour and competition”, Local Economy, Vol.31(3), pp.393-409, https://doi.org/10.1177/02690-94216-63733-4.
  38. Lumpkin, G. T. & Dess, G. G. (2001), “Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.16(5), pp.429-451.
  39. Ma, X., Ding, K., & Shyu, J. Z. (2020), “A Comparative Policy Analysis in the E-Health Industry Between China and the USA”, International Journal of E-Health and Medical Communications, Vol.11(4), https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEHMC.2020100103.
  40. Masovic, A. (2018), “Socio-Cultural Factors and Their Impact on the Performance of Multinational Companies”, Ecoforum Journal, Vol.7(14), pp.68-73.
  41. Mora-Valentín, E. M., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., & Nájera-Sánchez, J. J. (2018), “Mapping the conceptual structure of science and technology parks”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol.43(5), pp.1410-1435, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9654-8.
  42. Newkirk, H. E. & Lederer, A. L. (2006), “The effectiveness of strategic information systems planning under environmental uncertainty”, Information & Management, Vol.43(4), pp.481-501.
  43. Ng, W. K. B., Appel-Meulenbroek, H. A. J. A., Cloodt, M. M. A. H., & Arentze, T. A. (2019), “Towards a segmentation of science parks: A typology study on science parks in Europe”, Research Policy, Vol.48(3), pp.719-732, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respo l.2018.11.004
  44. Ng, W. K. B., Junker, R., Appel‑Meulenbroek, R., Cloodt, M., & Arentze, T. (2020), “Perceived benefits of science park attributes among park tenants in the Netherlands”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol.45, pp.1196-1227, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09744-x.
  45. Nitani, M. & Riding, A. (2014), “Risk Factors and the Canada Small Business Financing Program”, Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, Vol.27(3), pp.251-274.
  46. Parry, M. (2018), “The Future of Science Parks and Areas of Innovation: Science and Technology Parks Shaping the Future”, World Technopolis Review, Vol.7(1), pp.44-58.
  47. Phan, P., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005), “Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.20(2), pp.165-182.
  48. Pronińska, K. & Księżopolski, K. (2021), “Baltic Offshore Wind Energy Development-Poland’s Public Policy Tools Analysis and the Geostrategic Implications”, Energies, Vol.14(16), 4883. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164883.
  49. Rahman, S. A., Amran, A., Ahmad, N. H., & Taghizadeh, S. K. (2019), “The contrasting role of government and NGO support towards the entrepreneurs at base of pyramid and effect on subjective wellbeing”, Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, Vol.31(4), pp.269-295, https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1498261.
  50. Rothwell, R. (1984), “Technology-Based Small Firms and Regional Innovation Potential: The Role of Public Procurement”, Journal of Public Policy, Vol.4(4), pp.307-332, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00002774.
  51. Saaty, T. L. (1996), “Decision making with dependence and feedback: The Analytic Network Process”, Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
  52. Sarvari, H., Chan, D. W. M., Alaeos, A. K. F., Olawumi, T. O., & Aldaud, A. A. A. (2021), “Critical success factors for managing construction small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries of Middle East: Evidence from Iranian construction enterprises”, Journal of Building Engineering, Vol.43, No.103152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103152.
  53. Su, Y. S. & Wu, F. Shang. (2015), “Regional systems of biotechnology innovation-The case of Taiwan”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol.100, pp.96-106.
  54. Torgerson, D. (2017), “Policy sciences and democracy: A reexamination”, Policy Sciences, Vol.50(3), pp.339-350
  55. Tzeng, G. H., Teng, M. H., Chen, J. J., & Opricovic, S. (2002), “Multicriteria selection for a restaurant location in Taipei”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol.21(2), pp.171-187.
  56. Tzeng, G. H. & Huang, J. J. (2011), “Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications”, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  57. Ubeda, F., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., & Mora-Valentin, E. M. (2019), “Do firms located in science and technology parks enhance innovation performance? The effect of absorptive capacity”, the Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol.44(1), pp.21-48, https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1096 1-018-9686-0
  58. Van Der Borgh, M., Cloodt, M., & Romme, G. L. (2012), “Value creation by knowledge-based ecosystems: Evidence from a field study”, R&D Management, Vol.42(2), pp.150-169, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00673.x.
  59. Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2015), “A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey”, Public Management Review, Vol.17(9), pp.1333-1357.
  60. Wang, J., Ma, X., Zhao, Y., Zhao, J., & Heydari, M. (2022), “Impact of Scientific and Technological Innovation Policies on Innovation Efficiency of High-Technology Industrial Parks”, A Dual Analysis with Linear Regression and QCA, Vol.6(3), 169-182, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2022.06.001.
  61. Weible, C. M. & Sabatier, P. A. (ed.). (2017), “Theories of the policy process”, New York: Hachette.
  62. Wirtz, B. W., Schilke, O., & Ullrich, S. (2010), “Strategic Development of Business Models: Implications of the Web 2.0 for Creating Value on the Internet”, Long Range Planning, Vol.43(2-3), pp.272-290.
  63. Woodrow, W. C. Jr. (2003), “Science parks: theory and background”, International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, Vol.2(2), pp.150-178.
  64. Wu, L., Chen, Y., & Chen, X. (2022), “Evolution of policy instruments for food safety risk management: Comparing China and Western countries”, Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, Vol.8, 100311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100311.
  65. Yang, C. H., Chen, J. C., Shyu, J. Z., & Tzeng, G. H. (2008), “Causal relationship analysis based on DEMATEL technique for innovative policies in SMEs”, PICMET’08-2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, pp.373-379.
  66. Yang, J. S. (2017), “The Governance Environment and Innovative SMEs”, Small Business Economics, Vol.48(3), pp.525-541, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9802-1.
  67. Yu, C. Y., Liang, T. H., & Isoherranen, V. (2021), “The impact of government R&D subsidy on Taiwan Science Park companies”, International Journal of Agriculture Innovation, Technology and Globalisation, Vol.2(3), pp.262-275.
  68. Zhou, M., Wang, Y., Li, G., Liu, Y., & Liang, Y. (2021), “Performance evaluation index system of provincial government information resources integration and sharing based on big data”, 2021 International Conference on Management Science and Software Engineering (ICMSSE), pp.334-337
print cancel