臺北市中小學教師認知教練態度與五大心智能力之相關研究

The Relationship of Cognitive Coaching Attitude and the Five States of Mind for Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in Taipei, Taiwan

10.6474/NCUJER.201103.0147

張德銳(Der-Ray Chang)；李俊達(Chun-Dar Lee)；王淑珍(Shu-Chen Wang)

中小學教師 ； 認知教練 ； 五大心智能力 ； elementary and secondary school teacher ； cognitive coaching ； five states of mind

嘉大教育研究學刊

26期（2011 / 03 / 30）

147 - 171

繁體中文

本研究旨在分析中小學教師認知教練態度與五大心智能力現況，其次探討兩者間關係。本研究採問卷調查法，以臺北市98學年度承辦教學導師制度兩年（含）以上的79所中小學為主，依1/2比例抽取40所做為研究樣本學校，並針對各校教學導師及夥伴教師施測，總計有效樣本521位。本研究以「認知教練態度」及「五大心智能力」二量表為研究工具，資料分析主要採取積差相關及逐步迴歸分析。本研究主要發現包括：（一）教師認知教練態度與五大心智能力現況良好；（二）教師認知教練態度與五大心智能力成正相關；（三）省思會談為五大心智能力的主要預測變項。根據研究結論，本研究提出相關建議，俾供教育主管機關及中小學教師在教育實務改進以及後續相關研究進行之參考。

The purposes of this study are as below: first, to review the current situation of cognitive coaching attitude and five states of mind for the mentor teachers and their proteges in Taipei, and second, to examine the relationship between these two variables.The research was conducted in the context of a questionnaire survey with 521 participants in 40 schools participating in a mentor teacher program. Results were measured by the teachers' Cognitive Coaching Scale and Five States of Mind Scale respectively. Results were analyzed by using the statistic of mean, standard deviation, product-moment correlation, and multiple regression.The main findings of this study were as follows: (1)The perception of cognitive coaching attitude and five states of mind for teachers were moderately high. (2)There was significant relationship between cognitive teaching attitude and the states of efficacy, flexibility, craftsmanship, interdependence, and holonomy. (3)Reflection conversation of cognitive coaching was the main prediction variable of five states of mind.According to the research findings, this authors proposes several suggestions for educational administration agencies, elementary and secondary schools, and for further studies respectively.

1. Alseike, B. U.(1997).University of Denver.
2. Armstrong, T.(2000).Multiple intelligences in the classroom.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3. Awakuni, G. H.(1995).The impact of cognitive coaching as perceived by the Kalani High School core team.The Union Institute,165
4. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York, NY:W. H. Freeman and Company.
5. Cochran, B.,Dechesere, J.(1995).Teacher empowerment through cognitive coaching.Thrust for Educational Leadership,24,24-27.
6. Costa, A. L.(ed.)(2001).Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
7. Costa, A. L.,Garmston, R. J.(1985).Supervision for intelligent teaching.Educational Leadership,42(5),70-80.
8. Costa, A. L.,Garmston, R. J.(1994).Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools.Norwood, MA:Christopher-Gordon.
9. Costa, A. L.,Garmston, R. J.(1986).Cognitive coaching-supervision for intelligent teaching.Better teaching through instructional supervision: Policy and practice,Sacramento, CA:
10. Edwards, J. L.,Newton, R. R.(1995).The effects of cognitive coaching on teacher efficacy and empowerment.Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,San Francisco:
11. Ellison, J.,Hayes, C.(2006).Effective school leadership: Developing principals through cognitive coaching.Norwood, MA:Christopher-Gordon.
12. Gardner, H.(1983).Frames of mind.New York:BasicBooks.
13. Garmston, R.(1990).Is peer coaching changing supervisory relationship? Some personal impressions.California ASCD Journal,winter,21-28.
14. Garmston, R.,Linder, C.,Whitaker, J.(1993).Reflections on cognitive coaching.Educational Leadership,51(2),57-6.
15. Liebmann, R. M.(1993).A dissertation for the degree of Ph. D., Seton Hall University.Seton Hall University.
16. Slinger, J. L.(2004).Colorado,University of Denver.
17. Ushijima, T. M.(1996).University of southern california.
18. 丁一顧(2009)。國民小學校長認知教練對五大心智能力狀況影響之研究。臺北市:高等教育。
19. 丁一顧、張德銳(2006)。認知教練相關概念、研究及啟示。教育行政與評鑑學刊，1，23-50。
20. 王齡嫻(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所。
21. 吳明清(2002)。促進教師專業發展的策略。理論與策略，16(1)，99-113。
22. 吳清基、張明輝、吳清山、林天祐、王巧媛、余學敏、謝勝隆、徐作蓉(2005)。優質學校。臺北市:臺北市教師研習中心。
23. 張德銳、王淑珍(2009)。美國認知教練模式及其我國中小學教師專業成長之應用。教育資料集刊，41，97-122。
24. 楊宜領(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所。
25. 廖雅惠(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所。

1. 張德銳、李俊達、王淑珍(2014)。認知教練對中小學教師教學省思及教學效能影響之研究：以參與教師專業發展評鑑方案之教師為例。臺北市立大學學報，45(1)，61-80。