意元集組教學策略對學生記憶廣度影響之研究

A Study of the Influence between Chunking Strategy and the Memory Spans of Middle School Students

10.6474/NCUJER.201203.0059

林士堯(Shih-Yao Lin)；楊雅婷(Carolyn Ya-Ting Yang)

意元集組 ； 記憶廣度 ； 數字串 ； Chunk ； memory span ； digit strings

嘉大教育研究學刊

28期（2012 / 03 / 01）

59 - 72

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討意元集組教學策略對國中學生記憶廣度之影響。採用實驗研究法，輔以質性訪談，以期能深入地了解實驗教學的效果和學生對於實驗教學的心理歷程。參與者為高雄某國中三年級學生，採隨機及平衡取樣，實驗組20人，接受意元集組教學策略來記憶長串數字；控制組20人，接受不斷複誦長串數字來記憶數字串。量化資料蒐集以WISC-III的記憶廣度測驗，針對實驗前、實驗結束及實驗後兩週等三個時間點來觀察實驗效果，以SAS統計套裝軟體9.2版來分析實驗處理的量化資料，再依量化結果，針對研究者較感興趣的問題輔以質性訪談，所得結論如下：一、接受意元集組教學法的學生在記憶廣度有顯著的進步。二、接受意元集組教學法能激發學生的學習動機。三、不斷地以複誦的方式讓學生複誦無意義的數字，會造成學生的負向情緒。

The purpose of the study is to explore the influence between chunking strategy and the memory spans of middle school students. The study uses the experimental research and qualitative research to analyze the results of the teaching strategy and the students' mental process. The participants are middle school students in Kaohsiung. The research method is a random and balanced sampling. In the experimental group, there are 20 students who accepted the chunking strategy to memorize the digital strings. The other 20 students are in the control group, repeating the long digital strings to memorize numbers. The quantitative data use the WISC-III memory span subtest to collect students' performance before experiment, in the end of experiment, and after experiment. The research results use the SAS statistical package version 9.2 to analyze the quantitative data. According to the result, the researcher interview students on the interesting questions. Finally, the conclusions are below: 1. Students in the chunking strategy group progress significantly in the memory span.2. The chunking strategy inspires student's motivation.3. The way of repeating meaningless number will cause students the negative emotions.

1. Atkinson, R. C.,Shiffrin, R. M.(1971).,Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University.
2. Chase, W. G.,Simon, H. A.(1973).Perception in chess.Cognitive Psychology,4(1),55-81.
3. Cowan, N.(2005).Working memory capacity.Hove, East Sussex, UK:Psychology.
4. Fendrich, D. W.,Arengo, R.(2004).The influence of string length and repetition on chunking of digit strings.Psychological Research,68(4),216-223.
5. Gobet, F.(2005).Chunking models of expertise: Implications for education.Applied Cognitive Psychology,19(2),183-204.
6. Gobet, F.(1998).Expert memory: A comparison of four theories.Cognition,66(2),115-152.
7. Gobet, F.,Clarkson, G.(2004).Chunks in expert memory: Evidence for the magical number four… or is it two?.Memory,12(6),732-747.
8. Gobet, F.,Simon, H. A.(1996).Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards.Cognitive Psychology,31,1-40.
9. Klemmer, E. T.,Stocker, L. P.(1974).Effects of grouping of printed digits on forced-paced manual entry performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,59,675-678.
10. Miller, G. A.(1956).The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review,63(2),81-97.
11. Severin, F. T.,Rigby, M. K.(1963).Influence of digit grouping on memory for telephone numbers.Journal of Applied Psychology,47,117-119.
12. West, C. K.,Farmer, J.,Wolff, P. M.(1991).Instructional design implications from cognitive science.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
13. 王夢鷗(1984)。禮記今註今譯。台北:臺灣商務。
14. 何正斌、陳祖澤(2007)。長字串之串組方式對於活性記憶的影響─以身分證號碼與統一編號為例。人因工程學刊，9(2)，35-44。
15. 張春興(1995)。現代心理學。台北:東華。