题名

Thinking Marine Education from the Foucauldian Perspective

并列篇名

從傅柯的觀點思考海洋教育的意涵

作者

王嘉陵(Chia-Lin Wang)

关键词

海洋教育 ; 傅柯 ; 剛居朗 ; 差錯哲學 ; 老人與海 ; Canguilhem ; Foucault ; Marine Education ; Philosophy of Error ; The Old Man and the Sea

期刊名称

嘉大教育研究學刊

卷期/出版年月

30期(2013 / 03 / 30)

页次

79 - 95

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

這篇文章的寫作動機是來自於作者對於當前台灣海洋教育政策的疑惑與反思,文中作者首先描述台灣的海洋教育政策內涵,並發現在海洋教育政策文本的政治與經濟修辭中,隱含著某些特定的真理。本文的思想基底是藉由法國哲學家傅柯對於他的老師剛居朗的「差錯哲學」的詮釋,以探討海洋教育的意涵,作者於文中引用海明威的作品《老人與海》為例,說明人與海洋之間的動態關係是經由「差錯」才能顯示出其意義,所以學生與海洋互動後所產生的多元經驗是在不可預見的「差錯」中展現,不應受到預先設定的真理所治理,也不適合受限於海洋教育的特定概念之中,作者於是提出,若以船的航行來比喻,海洋教育或許可以有更多樣的動線,而非只限於固定的航行軌道可以行走。

英文摘要

This paper is motivated by unease at a current tendency towards marine education. I find that there is truth revealed by political and economic rhetoric in the policy of marine education. Drawing on Michel Foucault's interpretation of Georges Canguilhem's idea of the philosophy of error, first, I take Ernest Hemingway's work-The Old Man and the Sea as an example. I argue that the significance of the dynamic interrelationships between human living and the sea is disclosed in errors. Second, students' multiple experience of the sea, based on errors, should not be governed in the sovereignty of truth, nor in a restricted concept of marine education. I then suggest that marine education could be freely run and not merely be confined to a fixed course of navigation.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Ministry of Education (2008). Marine education implementation plan. Taipei: Ministry of Education. Retrieved September 17, 2011 from the World Wide Web: http://140.111.34.34/docdb/files/dma7fffffff084.pdf
  2. Ministry of Education (2008). The pivotal theme of Grade 1-9 Curriculum Guideline: Marine education. Taipei: Ministry of Education. Retrieved October 12, 2011 from the World Wide Web: http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/context/97-07-4.html
  3. Ministry of Education (2008). Grade 1-9 Curriculum Guideline. Taipei: Ministry of Education. Retrieved September 17, 2011 from the World Wide Web: http://teach.eje.edu.tw/data/files/class_rules/all.pdf
  4. Executive Yuan(2006).The white paper on marine policy.Taipei:Executive Yuan.
  5. Executive Yuan(2001).The white paper on ocean management.Taipei:Executive Yuan.
  6. Faubion, J.(ed.)(1998).Michel Foucault: Aesthetics, method, and Epistemology.New York:The New Press.
  7. Foucault, M.,Hurley, R.(trans.)(1990).The history of sexuality: An introduction.New York:Vintage.
  8. Foucault, M.,Sheridan, A.(trans.)(1991).Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison.London:Penguin.
  9. Hemingway, E.(1995).The old man and the sea.New York:Scribner.
  10. Ministry of Education(2007).White paper on marine education policy.Taipei:Ministry of Education.
  11. Ministry of Education(2004).National marine policy guideline.Taipei:Ministry of Education.
  12. Olssen, M.(2009).Discourse, complexity, life: Elaborating the possibilities of Foucault's materialist concept of discourse.IoE philosophy of education seminar,London:
  13. Tasi, C. L.(2007).Marine Education in Taiwan: Building a Closer Link between Marine Science/Technology Education and Industries.International Symposium on Promotion of Marine Education,Kaohsiung, Taiwan:
  14. Wu, J. G.(2009).Marine education: Textbooks, teachers and teaching.Taipei:Wunan.
被引用次数
  1. 彭佳偉、李明燕(2013)。海峽兩岸高中地理課程海洋教育意涵之比較:以龍騰版與人教版為例。地理研究,58,75-96。