北部新移民與非新移民學童國語科學習路徑之探究：智力固定觀的影響

The Path of Chinese Learning between Immigrant and Non-Immigrant Fourth Grade Students in Northern Taiwan-The Impact of Entity Belief

許嘉家(Jia-Jia Syu)；余民寧(Min-Ning Yu)；鍾珮純(Pei-Chun Chung)

新移民學童 ； 智力固定觀 ； 自律學習 ； 閱讀 ； new immigrant students ； entity theory ； self-regulated learning ； reading

嘉大教育研究學刊

33期（2014 / 09 / 30）

35 - 53

繁體中文

在國小階段，新移民與非新移民學童在國語文的學習成就上有明顯不同，但至國中階段，此差異即縮小甚至消失。過去研究顯示，影響國語科學習的因素存在群體間的差異，但並未有以新移民學童族群為對象在此議題上進行討論。本研究以此為緣起，探討此二群體在國語文學習上的情形。以北部四年級新移民學童及非新移民學童各108名進行分析，路徑分析的結果指出，對非新移民學童族群而言，國語科的成就僅與閱讀行為有關；但對新移民學童族群而言，智力固定觀則是對國語科成績產生直接影響，也由自律學習以及對學科喜愛產生間接影響，但不透過閱讀行為。文末對不同族群學童在國語科成績上的努力方式及對學科的喜愛程度進行討論。

The significant difference of achievement in Chinese between immigrant and non-immigrant students in the stage of primary school was proposed by longitudinal study. However, the discrepancy was vanished when they were in high school. The path of Chinese learning for these two groups was investigated in this study to reveal the changes, especially in immigrant students. The model supposed that beliefs (entity theory) triggers certain behaviors (reading and self-regulation learning), and then affect Chinese achievement. In this model, the level of favorite in Chinese was also considered. Data were collected from 216 immigrant and non-immigrant fourth grades students. Path analysis indicated that the learning paths are different between the two groups. Non-immigrant students improved the Chinese learning by reading, whereas immigrant students adopted self-regulated learning to enhance the achievement. The favorite of Chinese mediated the relation of beliefs and behaviors effectively. Lastly, the corresponding learning strategy was suggested.

1. 王雅玄(2008)。進入情境與歷史：臺灣原住民教師的多元文化素養及其實踐。臺東大學教育學報，19(1)，33-68。
   連結：
2. 許嘉家、詹志禹(2010)。高中職生個人知識論信念量表之編製與驗證。測驗學刊，57(3)，433-458。
   連結：
3. 臺灣學生學習成就評量資料庫（2009）。2007 年TASA學科主觀喜愛程度及自信心變化與學習成就相關之探究。臺灣學生學習成就評量資料庫電子報，１。線上檢索日期：2014 年5 月1 日。網址：http://tasa.naer.edu.tw/10epaper-2-detail.asp?id=7。
4. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.
5. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. London: Macmillan.
6. 教育部（2014）。102 學年新移民子女就讀國中小學人數分布概況統計。線上檢索日期：2014 年08 月20 日。網址：https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/analysis/son_of_foreign_102.pdf
7. Boekaerts, M.(Ed.),Pintrich, P. R.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of self-regulation.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
8. Bråten, I.,Strømsø, H.I.(2005).The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among norwegian post-secondary students.British Journal of Educational Psychology,75,539-565.
9. Chen, J. A,Pajares, F.(2010).Implicit theories of ability of Grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science.Contemporary Educational Psychology,35(1),75-87.
10. Dweck, C. S.,Leggett, E. L.(1988).A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.Psychological Review,95,256-273.
11. Hidi, S.(1990).Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning.Review of educational research,60(4),549-571.
12. Horn, J. L.(1982).The theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence in relation to concepts of cognitive psychology and aging in adulthood.Aging and cognitive processes,New York:
13. Hu, L.,Bentler, P.M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,61,1-55.
14. Koksal, M. S.,Yaman, S.(2012).An investigation of the epistemological predictors of self-regulated learning of advanced science students.Sicence Educator,21(2),45-54.
15. Metallidou, P.(2012).Epistemological beliefs as predictors of self-regulated learning strategies in middle school students.School Psychology International,34(3),283-298.
16. Pintrich, P. R.,DeGroot, E. V.(1990).Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1),33-40.
17. Schommer, M.(1990).Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology,82,498-504.
18. Schommer-Aikins, M.,Duell, O. K.,Hutter, R.(2005).Epistemological beliefs, mathematical problem-solving beliefs, and academic performance of middle school students.The Elementary School Journal,105(3),289-304.
19. Spence, J. T.(Ed.)(1983).Achievement and achievement motives.San Francisco:Freeman.
20. 王永裕(2011)。新移民學童基礎教育的問題與因應策略。網路社會學通訊期刊，93
21. 古秀梅(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄，國立中山大學教育研究所。
22. 朱建民(2003)。知識論。新北:空大。
23. 余民寧、陳柏霖、鍾珮純、趙珮晴、許嘉家(2010)。科技部委託之整合型專題研究案科技部委託之整合型專題研究案,臺北:中華民國科技部。
24. 林建平(2010)。低成就學童的家庭環境與自律學習之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報，27(1)，93-126。
25. 林益群(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義，私立南華大學教育社會學研究所。
26. 許嘉家、詹志禹(2010)。高中職生個人知識論信念與創造力之關係。教育與心理研究，33(2)，89-110。
27. 陳仕宗(1995)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，國立政治大學教育研究所。
28. 陳怡華(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
29. 湯滿(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄，樹德科技大學兒童與家庭服務系。
30. 賴哲民、林秀芬(2008)。不同國籍新移民學童的社會適應及學習。健康與管理學術研討會，新竹: