翻轉教室學習模式下自我效能、內在價值及測試焦慮與學習成就之交互影響：以微積分課程為例

The Correlation between Self-efficacy, Intrinsic Value, Test Anxiety and Learning Achievement in Flipped Calculus

陳姵蓉(Pei-Jung Chen)；康以諾(Yi-Nuo Kang)；英家銘(Jia-Ming Ying)；唐功培(Kung-Pei Tang)

微積分 ； 自我效能 ； 學習動機 ； 動機信念 ； 翻轉教室 ； Calculus ； Self- efficacy ； Learning Motivation ； Motivational Belief ； Flipped Classroom

嘉大教育研究學刊

38期（2017 / 06 / 30）

71 - 103

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討大學微積分課程採用翻轉教室教學模式對學習者的學習經驗之影響。以改編自Pintrich 與 De Groot (1990)學習動機與策略問卷（MSLQ：Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire）之動機信念自陳量表作為研究工具，以臺北市某大學藥學系1 年級學生共179 名學生為研究對象，分為實驗組（88 人）與控制組（90 人）兩組。以性別及原先學習表現為共變項，學生之自我效能、內在價值及測試焦慮為依變項，經分析後研究結果顯示：（1）不論是在實驗組或控制組，性別差異對微積分學習成就的影響力未達顯著水準；（2）實驗組與控制組的後測學習成就表現有顯著差異；（3）實驗組的前測及後測學習成績表現有顯著差異；（4）實驗組學生的自我效能後測分數愈高，在微積分課程的學習成就分數進步愈多。

This study investigate the effect of the Flipped-Classroom Format on Calculus Learning Experience. Measure Instrument was the revised version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire which developed by Pintrich and De Groot. Sample of this study were 179 pharmacy students who were enrolled in calculus class in the fall semester 2015. The independent variables of this comparative study was the flipped classroom as instructional intervention (90 in control group; 88 in experimental group 88).The dependent variables were students' perception of self-efficacy, intrinsic value, their test anxiety and learning achievement in the calculus class. The control variables were the gender and students' initiated learning performance in calculus. Results indicate that students in experimental group did have significantly better learning achievements than students in control group. The learning achievement of the students in experimental group is significantly positive correlated with their perception of the calculus learning self-efficacy.

1. 李浩然、柳賢(2012)。國三學生數學觀念之研究。科學教育學刊，20(3)，267-294。
   連結：
2. 黃國清(2008)。數學學習成就之性別差異研究─以九年一貫課程七年級數學綱要為例。中等教育，59(4)，40-56。
   連結：
3. Abeysekera, L.,Dawson, P.(2015).Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and call for a research.Higher Education Research & Development,34(1),1-14.
4. Baker, J. W. B.(2000).The"classroom flip": using web course management tools to become the guide on the side.11th international conference on College Teaching and Learning,Jacksonville, Florida, US.:
5. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.Psychological review,84(2),191-215.
6. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York:W. H. Freeman.
7. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
8. Bandura, A.(1982).Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency.American psychologist,37(2),122-147.
9. Bandura, A.(2000).Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy.Current Directions in Psychological Science,9(3),75-78.
10. Bandura, A.,Blanchard, E. B.,Ritter, B.(1969).Relative efficacy of desensitization and modeling approaches for inducing behavioral, affective, and attitudinal changes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,13(3),173-199.
11. Berrett, D.(2012).How 'Flipping' the Classroom Can Improve the Traditional Lecture.Chronicle of Higher Education,February 19
12. Cassady, J. C.,Johnson, R. E.(2001).Cognitive Test Anxiety and Academic Performance.Contemporary Educational Psychology,27,270-295.
13. Devine, A.,Fawcett, K.,Szűcs, D.,Dowker, A.(2012).Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and the relation to mathematics performance while controlling for test anxiety.Behavioral and Brain Functions,8,33-41.
14. Hembree, R.(1988).Correlates, causes, and treatment of test anxiety.Review of educational research,58,47-77.
15. Kim, M. K.,Kim, S. M.,Khera, O.,Getman, J.(2014).The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles.The Internet and Higher Education,22,37-50.
16. Lage, M.,Platt, G.,Treglia, M.(2000).Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning enviroment.Journal of Economic Education,31(1),30-43.
17. Leicester, M.(Ed.),Modgil, S.(Ed.)(2005).Classroom Issues: Practice, Pedagogy and Curriculum.London:RoutledgeFalmer.
18. Maslow, A.(1954).Motivation and personality.New York:Harper.
19. Meijer, J.,Oostdam, R.(2007).Test anxiety and intelligence testing: a closer examination of the stage-fright hypothesis and the influence of stressful instruction.Anxiety Stress Coping,20(1),77-91.
20. Milman, N.(2012).What is it and how can it best be used.Distance Learning,9(3),85-87.
21. Neuhauser, C.(2011).Calculus for biology and medicine.Pearson.
22. O'Flaherty, J.,Phillips, C.(2015).The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review.Internet and Higher Education,25,85-95.
23. Pintrich, P. R.,De Groot, E. V.(1990).Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance.Journal of educational psychology,82(1),33-40.
24. Rogers, C. R.(1969).Freedom to Learn.Columbus, OH:Merrill.
25. Sarason, I. G.(1961).Test anxiety and the intellectual performance of college students.Journal of educational psychology,52,201-206.
26. Sarason, I. G.(Ed.)(1980).Test anxiety: Theory, research, and applications.Hilladale, NJ:Erbaum.
27. Spence, J. T.(Ed.)(1983).Achievement and achievement motivation.San Francisco, CA:W. H. Freeman.
28. Strayer, J.(2007).Columbus,The Ohio State University.
29. Tamim, R. M.,Bernard, R. M.,Borokhovski, E.,Abrami, P. C.,Schmid, R. F.(2011).What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning.Review of educational research,81(1),4-28.
30. Wigfield, A.,Eccles, J. S.(1994).Children's Competence Beliefs, Achievement Values, and General Self-Esteem: Change across Elementary and Middle School.Journal of Early Adolescence,14(2),107-138.
31. Wigfield, A.,Eccles, J. S.(2000).Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,68-81.
32. Zimmerman, B. J.(2000).Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,82-91.
33. Zimmerman, B. J.,Pons, M. M.(1986).Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies.American educational research journal,23(4),614-628.
34. 陳維昭(2007)。臺灣高等教育的困境與因應。臺北市:國立臺灣大學出版中心。
35. 韓珮華(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立政治大學。

1. 曾意儒,石家安(2021)。應用翻轉教室於大學資料科學課程之學習行為與滿意度分析。科學教育學刊，29(4)，375-396。
2. 陳慧珊(2019)。表演藝術之翻轉學習：從跨領域趨向談起。藝術學報，105，1-25。
3. 陳麒,高台茜(2019)。翻轉教學應用於偏鄉網路課輔國小高年級數學之成效。當代教育研究季刊，27(2)，1-37。
4. 魏玉萍,陳建方,夏秉楓(2023)。問題導向學習（PBL）教學對提升觀光系大學生領隊危機處理能力之成效。觀光旅遊研究學刊，18(2)，47-71。
5. 莊雅淇(2019)。提升四技護理實習生之學習信心教學方案。中科大學報，6(1)，87-103。
6. (2022).Aula invertida para un curso de español en Taiwán: estudio y análisis.靜宜語文論叢,14,85-117.