國小學生社會學科思維發展之教學行動研究

Teaching Action Research of Social Study Thinking Development for Elementary School Students

陳聖謨(Sheng-Mo Chen)

小學 ； 社會領域 ； 學科思維 ； elementary school ； social studies ； disciplinary thinking

嘉大教育研究學刊

45期（2020 / 12 / 31）

1 - 27

繁體中文

在社會學習領域教學中注重學科思維能力，有利於學生核心素養之進展。社會領域教師，如何活化運用既有教材內容，提供學生學科思維能力練習的機會，以促成學生核心素養的發展，是本研究的關注焦點。本研究採取協同行動研究方法，以UbD模式進行學科思維導向的教學活動設計，並由研究者以國小五年級一班24名學生為研究對象，透過觀察、問卷測驗、晤談與同儕觀議課等資料蒐集方法，以了解學生的社會學科思維表現情形。本研究獲得發現如下：1.教師應以學生角度設想學習目標的意義性與關聯性。2.教材的系統化、組織化是引導學生發展社會思維能力的利器。3.以提問、理答做為形成性評量的機制，能發揮以評促學的效果。

The disciplinary thinking ability in social study teaching is conducive to the realization of the learning goals of students' core competences. Therefore, how to activate the content of existing textbooks and provide students with opportunities to practice their disciplinary thinking ability in the teaching of social fields, so as to promote the development of students' core competences, is the focus of this research. This research adopts a collaborative action research method and uses UbD mode to design disciplinary thinking-oriented teaching activities. The researcher uses the fifth grade students of elementary school as the research object, and collects data through observation, questionnaires, interviews and peer observation classes. The method is to understand the student's behavior of social disciplinary thinking. This research has several findings 1. It is important to imagine the significance and relevance of learning goals from the perspectives of students. 2. Systematization and organization of teaching materials is a powerful tool to guide students to develop social thinking ability. 3. Using questioning and answering as a formative evaluation mechanism does produce the effect of promoting learning by evaluation.

1. Bainbridge, D.(2008).Beyond the zonules of zinn: A fantastic journey through your brain.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
2. Beyer, K. B.(1988).Developing a thinking skills program.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
3. Brookhart, S. M.(2010).How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom.Alexandria, VA:ASCD.
4. Clark, A.(2008).History’s children: History wars in the classroom.Sydney, Australia:University of New South Wales Press.
5. Counsell, C.(2011).History teachers as curriculum makers: Professional problem-solving in secondary school history education in England.Patterns of research in civics, history, geography and religious education,Karlstad, Sweden:
6. Doidge, M.(2008).The brain that changes itself stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science.New York:Penguin Books.
7. Evans, R.W.(2004).The social studies wars: What should we teach the children?.New York, NY:Columbia University.
8. Harris, R.,Haydn, T.(2006).Pupils’enjoyment of history—What lessons can teachers learn from their pupils?.Curriculum Journal,17,315-333.
9. Husbands, C.(2011).What do history teachers (need to) know? A framework for understanding and developing practice.Debates in history teaching,London, UK:
10. Lee, P.(2011).History education and historical literacy.Debates in history teaching,London, UK:
11. Linenthal, E.T.,Engelhardt, T.(1996).History wars: The enola gay and other battles for the American past.New York, NY:Metropolitan Books.
12. Mansilla, V. B,Gardner, H.(2008).Disciplining the mind.Educational Leadership,65(5),14-19.
13. McTighe, J.,Wiggins, G.,賴麗珍（譯）(2008).重理解的課程設計－專業發展實用手冊.心理出版社.
14. Mills, G. E.(2011).Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher.Boston:Pearson.
15. National Council for the Social Studies=NCSS(2013).National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Silver Spring, MD: NCSS..
16. Ontario, Ministry of Education(2013).The Ontario curriculum: Social studies, grades 1 to 6, history and geography, grades 7 and 8.Toronto:Ontario, Ministry of Education.
17. Pollock, J. E.,Hensley, S.(2017).The i5 approach: Lesson planning that teaches thinking and fosters innovation.Alexandria, VA.:ASCD.
18. Rantala, J.(2012).How Finnish adolescents understand history: Disciplinary thinking in history and its assessment among 16-year-old.Finns Education Science,2,193-207.
19. Rogers, R.(2011).“Isn’t the trigger the thing that set the rest of it on fire?＂ Causation maps: Emphasizing chronology in causation exercises.Teach History,142,50-55.
20. Slater, J.(1995).Teaching history in the new Europe.London, UK:Cassell and Council of Europe.
21. Stringer, E. T.(2008).Action research in education.New Jersey, NJ:Pearson.
22. VanSledright, B.A.(2011).The challenge of rethinking history education: On practices, theories, and policy.New York, NY:Routledge.
23. Wineburg, S.(2001).Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past.Philadelphia, PA:Temple University Press.
24. Wineburg, S.,Martin, D.,Monte-Sano, C.(2011).Reading like a historian: Teaching literacy in middle and high school history classrooms.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
25. 張芬芬(2010)。質性資料分析的五步驟：在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊，35，87-120。
26. 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北：作者。
27. 教育部(2013)。教育部（2013）。教育部提升國民素養專案計畫報告書。臺北：作者。
28. 陳聖謨(2017)。社會學科思維導向與探究導向的能力國小社會領域之實踐。教材教法理論與實務，臺北:
29. 黃春木(2015).原來歷史可以這樣學.臺北:商周出版.
30. 劉怡甫(2011)。21 世紀教師不知不可的 UbD。輔仁大學：深耕教與學電子報，25
31. 蔡清田(2000).教育行動研究.臺北:五南.