內容基模與日語能力對日語閱讀理解的影響

Content Schema and Language Proficiency on the Japanese Reading Comprehension

10.29692/MCRBYJY.200810.0005

封靜宜(Ching-Yi Feng)

內容基模 ； 日語能力 ； 日語閱讀理解 ； content schema ； language proficiency ； Japanese reading comprehension

銘傳日本語教育

11期（2008 / 10 / 01）

88 - 106

日文

外語學習者的閱讀者以成人居多，他們雖然比小孩擁有豐富的基模，但是語言能力的好壞差別卻很大。基於此，本研究在探討外語學習者的閱讀能力時，將日語能力及內容基模一起列入討論的對象。具體的研究方法爲，以通過日語能力檢定1級、2級、3級的合格者爲受試者，分別請他們閱讀和讀者背景知識較接近的有關台灣的文章，以及和台灣生活經驗較疏遠的有關泰國的文章。之後，分別進行常識題及閱讀測驗。結果發現，2級、3級的受試者能有效率地使用內容基模來補足日語能力不足的現象。但是，當欠缺適當的內容基模時，則有仰賴日語能力幫助閱讀的現象。另外，本研究基於研究結果爲日語閱讀教育給予建議。

The L2 adult readers are to be in the majority. They have much more content schema than children have, but their language proficiency is quite different. For this reason, this experimental study investigating the L2 comprehension will conclude the language proficiency and content schema to be discussed. For the research of the reading comprehension, there were samples coming out of the Japanese language learners in Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 .They were separately asked to read the articles about topic familiarity (Taiwan) and non-topic familiarity (Thailand), and then to take the tests of comprehension and general knowledge .The result is that Level 2 and Level 3 use their content schema to compensate language deficiency effectively. But due to the lack of adequate content schema, they will rely on language ability to assist reading comprehension. Meanwhile, the instructional advices based on research findings will be mentioned.

1. Anderson, R.C.,Pearson, P.D.,R. Barr (Eds.),M.L. Kamil(Eds.),P. Mosenthal (Eds.)(1984).Handbook of reading research.New York:Longman.
2. Barnett, M.A.(1989).More than meets the eye: Foreign language reading: Theory and practice.New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
3. Carrell, P.L.(1982).Content and formal schemata in ESL reading.TESOL QUARTERLY,21(3),461-481.
4. Carrell, P.L.(1984).Schema theory and ESL reading: classroom implications and applications.Modern Language Journal,68,332-343.
5. Carrell, P.L.,Eisterhold, J.C.(1983).Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy.TESOL Quarterly,17(4),553-573.
6. Clarke. M.A.(1980).The short circuit hypothesis of ESL reading-or when language competence interferes with reading performance.The Modern language Journal,64,203-209.
7. Coady, J.,R. Mackay (Eds.),B. Barkman (Eds.),R.R. Jordan (Eds.)(1979).Reading in a second language: Hypotheses Organization, and practice.Rowley, MA:Newbury House.
8. Floyad, P.,Carrell, P.L.(1987).Effects on ESL reading of teaching cultural content schemata.Language Learning,37,89-108.
9. Gagne, E.D.,Yekovich, C.W.,Yekovich. F.R,岳修平（譯）(1993).The cognitive psychology of School learning.遠流.
10. Horiba, Y.(1996).Comprehension processes in L2 reading-Language competence, textual coherence, and inferences.SSLA,18,433-473.
11. Horiba, Y.(1990).Narrative comprehension processes: a study of native and non-native readers of Japanese.The modern language Journal,74,188-202.
12. Johnson, P.(1981).Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of a text.TESOL Quarterly,15,169-181.
13. Johnson, P.(1982).Effects on reading comprehension of building background knowledge.TESOL Quarterly,16,503-516.
14. LaBerce, D.,Samules, J.(1974).Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.Cognitive Psychology,6,293-323.
15. Lee, J.F.(1986).Background knowledge and L2 reading.The Modern Journal,70,350-354.
16. Rumelhart, D.E.,Ortony, A.,S. Dornic (Ed.)(1977).Attention and performance VI.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlaum.
17. Rumelhart, D.E.,RC. Spiro (Eds.),B.C. Bruce (Eds.),W.F. Brewer (Eds.)(1980).Theoretical issues in reading comprehension.Hillsdale, NJ:LEA.
18. Smith, F.(1982).Understanding Reading.New York:Holt, Rineharand Winston.
19. Stanovich, K.E.(1980).Toward an interactive-compensatory model of in dividual differences in the development of reading fluency.Reading Research Quarterly,16,32-71.
20. Steffensen, M.S.,Joag-Dev, C.,Anderson, R.C.(1979).Across-cultural perspective on reading comprehension.Reading Research Quarterly,1,10-29.
21. 山田みな子(1995)。読解過程に見られる既有知識の影響と文法能力の関係について。日本語教育，86，26-38。

1. 小林由紀(2013)。台灣高等教育機構中日本語文學系「閱讀」教育現況研究（1）－以綜合大學日文教師為對象。台灣日語教育學報，20，238-267。