台灣人日語學習者的母語對日語口語語詞辨識的影響－從中日語音類似程度的觀點探討－

Influence of the Mother Tongue on the Recognition of Spoken Japanese Words by Taiwanese Japanese Learners: Effect of Phonological Similarities between Chinese and Japanese

10.29692/MCRBYJY.201210.0003

邱學瑾(Hsueh-Chin Chiu)

台灣日語學習者 ； 日語口語語詞辨識 ； 語音類似程度 ； 語音促發 ； 詞彙判斷作業 ； Taiwanese Japanese learners ； spoken word recognition ； phonological similarity ； phonological priming ； lexical decision task

銘傳日本語教育

15期（2012 / 10 / 01）

21 - 45

日文

本研究的目的在探討中日兩語言間的語音類似程度是否會影響日語口語語詞之辨識速度。研究對象為台灣日語學習者，共實施兩個實驗。實驗一為語音促發之日語口語詞彙判斷作業，實驗中先後呈現中文語音及日語語音，並要求受試者判斷其中的日語語音是否為日語單字。實驗二為日語口語詞彙判斷作業，實驗中只呈現日語語音，要求受試者判斷該語音是否為日語單字。兩實驗的課題雖不同，但結果一致，簡述如下：（一）實驗組（日語漢字雙字詞）的反應時間比對照組（日語片假名語詞）的反應時間長，顯示了實驗組的日語單字辨識受到中文語音的干擾。（二）實驗組中，中日語音類似程度較高的單字受到中文語音干擾的程度較低。（三）比較早學的單字較不易受到中日語音類似性的干擾。由上述結果得知：在辨識日語漢字雙字詞的過程中，其漢字的中文語音表徵亦會被激化，影響日語漢字雙字詞的辨識速度。而其影響的程度則因日語單字的習得年齡及中日語音的類似程度而異。

The present study examined the influence of individuals' mother tongue on the spoken word recognition of the second language from the point of view of phonological similarities between Chinese and Japanese. Two experiments were conducted. One was a cross-linguistic auditory lexical decision task with priming paradigm and the other was a Japanese auditory lexical decision task. These two experiments indicated similar results, namely: (1) There action time for Kanji compound words was significantly longer than that for control words, which were in katakana. The recognition of Kanji compound words was hindered by Chinese language. (2) Intervention of Chinese became lower when the cross-linguistic phonological similarity was greater. (3) The reaction time for words acquired earlier was significantly shorter than that for words acquired later. These results indicated that the phonological similarities between Chinese and Japanese could inhibit the processing of Japanese Kanji compound words. The degree of this effect depends on the age of acquisition of the word and the degree of phonological similarity.

1. Tseng, C.,Chen, J.,Lin, Y.(2006).Lexical competition in the recognition of Chinese spoken words.Chinese Journal of Psychology,48(4),347-368.
   連結：
2. Broersma, M.,Cutler, A.(2008).Phantom word activation in L2.System,36,22-34.
3. Broersma, M.,Cutler, A.(2011).Competition dynamics of second-language listening.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,64(1),74-95.
4. Brysbaert, M.(2001).Prelexical phonological coding of visual words in Dutch: Automatic after all.Memory & Cognition,29(5),765-773.
5. Brysbaert, M.,Duyck, W.(2010).Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing after 15 years of service?.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,12(1),3-11.
6. Field, J.(2009).Listening in the classroom.Cambridge University Press.
7. Jusczyk, P. W.,Luce, P.(2002).Speech perception and Spoken word recognition: Past and present.Ear and Hearing,23(1),2-40.
8. Kroll, J. F.,Van Hell, J. G.,Tokowicz, N.,Green, D. W.(2010).The revised hierarchical model: A critical review and assessment.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,13(3),373-381.
9. Marian, V.,Blumenfeld, H. K.,Boukrina, O. V.(2008).Sensitivity to phonological similarity within and across languages.Journal Psycholinguist Research,37,141-170.
10. McDonough, K.(Ed.),Trofimovich, P.(Ed.)(2009).Using priming methods in second language research.:Routledge.
11. Pavlenko, A.(Ed.)(2009).The Bilingual Mental Lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches.Multilingual matters.
12. Schuplen, B.,Dijkstra, T.,Schriefers, H. J.,Hasper, M.(2003).Recognition of interlingual homophones in bilingual auditory word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,29(1),1155-1178.
13. Stahr, L. S.(2009).Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,31,577-607.
14. Stamer, M. K.,Vitevitch, M. S.(2012).Phonological similarity influences word learning in adults learning Spanish as a foreign language.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
15. Trofimovich, P.(2008).What do second language listeners know about spoken words? Effects of experience and attention in spoken word processing.Journal Psycholinguist Research,37,309-329.
16. Vandergrift, L.(2007).Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research.Language Teaching,40,191-210.
17. 山本富美子(1994)。上級聴解力を支える下位知識の分析。日本語教育，82，34-46。
18. 天野成明、近藤公久(2002)。NTTデータベースシリーズ日本語の語彙特性 頻度。三省堂。
19. 日本放送協会(1985)。NHK（編）日本語発音アクセント辞書。日本放送出版協?。
20. 邱學瑾(2010)。日本語学習者の日本語漢字語彙処理のメカニズム─ 異言語間の形態‧音韻‧意味の類似性をめぐって─。日本語教育，146，48-59。
21. 邱學瑾(2003)。台湾人日本語学習者の日本語漢字熟語の音韻処理について─ 単語タイプ‧単語の習得年齢‧習熟度の観点からの検討─。日本語教育，116，412-420。
22. 邱學瑾(2012)。漢字圏日本語学習者における日本語単語の意味処理に及ぼす母語の影響─聴覚呈示の翻訳判断課題による検討─。教育心理学研究，60(1)，82-91。
23. 阿部純一、桃内佳雄、金子康朗、李光五(1994)。人間の言語情報処理─言語理解の認知科学─。?????社。
24. 茅本百合子(2002)。語彙判断課題と命名課題における中国語母語話者の日本語漢字アクセス。教育心理学研究，50，436-445。
25. 呉瑞屯、劉英茂(1987)。國科會研究報告國科會研究報告,國科會。
26. 国際交流基金(2002)。日本語能力試験出題基準 改訂版。凡人社。
27. 斉藤純男(2010)。言語学入門。三省堂。