強姦犯罪的心理歷程：（二）實徵驗證

The Sociocultural and Psychodynamic Processes Involved in Rape Behavior: Ⅱ. Empirical Testing

10.6254/2000.13.53

黃軍義(Jiun-Yih Huang)

自我防禦傾向 ； 問卷調查法 ； 投射式問卷調查法 ； 強姦行爲 ； empirical testing ； questionnaire-survey ； projective questionnaire-survey method ； self-defense tendency

本土心理學研究

13期（2000 / 06 / 01）

53 - 124

繁體中文

黃軍義（本期前文）曾從社會文化、個人心理、情境及個人行爲層次等四個面向，分析強姦行爲形成的心理歷程。本文將以問卷調查法及投射式問卷調查法兩種研究方法，驗證前文所提出之強姦行爲心理歷程的理論。結果顯示，在問卷調查法（研究一）中，不論在強姦行爲的動機方面；認知、情緒及動機三者的關係方面；動機、經驗、學習三者與強姦意圖的關係方面；強姦意圖、人格特性、當時情境三者與強姦行爲的關係方面；行爲效果、行爲合理化二者與再犯行爲的關係方面，均直接或接間的支持研究理論。不過，受試者在作答時，有強烈的自我防禦傾向，經由高、低自我防禦組的劃分，並對這兩組再進行統計分析，顯示理論中各變項間的關連性，並不是由於受試者的自我防禦傾向所造成。在投射式問卷調查法（研究二）中，亦顯示無論在強姦行爲的動機；認知、情緒及動機三者的關係；動機、經驗、學習三者與強姦意圖的關係；強姦意圖、人格特性、當時情境三者與強姦行爲的關係；行爲效果、行爲合理化二者與再犯行爲的關係方面，均直接或間接的支持研究理論。並且無論是強姦者、非強姦者或整體受試者，均得到類似的結果。值得一提的是，在投射式問卷調查法中，受試者作答時的自我防禦傾向大幅減低，分析其主要的原因可能是：採用投射式問卷使受試者的防禦心降低，以及施測時將強姦罪與非強姦罪受試者混合，使強姦罪受試者不再感到抽離的情境壓力。本文最後提出未來的研究方向，包括：家庭內問題的探討、強姦者與異性相處的經驗、社會對男性之期許的探究、認知、情感與性興奮三者交互作用的探究、以及實驗法的採行。

Two empirical studies were conducted to test the four-perspective theoretical framework of the formative factors and processes of Chinese rape behavior, as developed in the preceding paper. The first study used the questionnaire-survey method, and the second adopted the projective questionnaire-survey method, and the second adopted the projective questionnaire-survey method. Results of the first study generally supported the the theoretical framework both directly and indirectly. Many subjects showed a strong self-defense tendency in their responses. Subjects were therefore first divided into low and high self-defense tendency groups, and then reanalyzed the data for the two groups. Results indicated that the found relationships between factors stated in the theory were not due to subjects' self-defense tendency. As in the first study, results of the second study also generally supported the theoretical framework both directly and indirectly. In this case, however, the subjects' self-defense tendency was much decreased. The probable reasons for this decrease were that the use of the projective questionnaires lowered the subjects' self-defense, and that the mixture of rapists and non-rapists in the testing condition lowered the situational pressure for the rapists. Directions for future study are finally suggested, including investigation of relevant problems in the family, rapists' experiences with women, social expectations for men, interaction of cognition, affect and sexual arousal, and adoption of experimental methods.

1. Abel, G., Barlow, D., Blanchard, E., Guild, D.(1977).The components of rapists' sexual arousal.Archives of General Psychiatry,34
2. Barbaree, H. E., Marshall, W. L.(1991).The role of male sexual arousal in rape: Six Models.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,59
3. Bowlby, J.(1988).A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development.New York:Basic Books.
4. Burt, M. R.(1980).Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,38
5. Donnerstein, E.(1980).Aggressive erotica and violence against women.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39
6. Drieschner, K., Lange, A.(1999).A review of cognitive factors in the etiology of rape: Theories, empirical studies, and implications.Clinical Psychology Review,19
7. Fleener, F.(1999).Family as a factor in delinquency.Psychological Reports,85
8. Gold, S. N., Heffner, C. L.(1998).Sexual addiction: Many conceptions, minimal data.Clinical Psychology Review,18
9. Goodrow, K. K., Lim, M.(1998).Attachment theory applied to juvenile sex offending.Journal of Offender Rehabilitation,27
10. Groth, A. N.(1979).Men who rape: The psychology of the offender.New York:Plenum.
11. Hall, G. C., Hirschman, R.(1991).Toward a theory of sexual aggression: A quadripartite model.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,59
12. Hall, G. C., Hirschman, R.(1994).The relationship between men's sexual aggression inside and outside the laboratory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,62
13. Jackson, S.(1995).Rape and society: Readings on the problems of sexual assault.Colorado:Westview Press, Inc..
14. Koss, M. P., Oros, C. J.(1982).Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,50
15. Malamuth, N. M.(1986).Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,50
16. Malamuth, N. M.(1981).Rape proclivity among males.Journal of Social Issues,37
17. Malamuth, N. M.(1988).Human sexual aggression: Current perspectives.New York:New York Academy of Sciences.
18. Malamuth, N. M., Check, J. V. P.(1981).The Effects of Mass Media Exposure on Acceptance of Violence Against Women: A Field Experiment.Journal of Research in Personality,15
19. Pithers, W. D., Martin, G. R., Cumming, G. F.(1989).Relapse prevention with sex offenders.New York:New York Academy of Sciences.
20. Porter, J. F., Critelli, J. W.(1994).Self-talk and sexual arousal in sexual aggression.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,13
21. Quinsey, V., Chaplin, T.(1984).Stimulus control of rapists' and non-sex offenders' sexual arousal.Behavior Assessment,6
22. 柯永河 Ko, Yung-Ho(1999)。性侵害加害人心理狀態評估工具編製研究。台北:內政部性侵害犯罪防治委員會。
23. 莊耀嘉 Chuang, Yao-Chia(1993)。犯罪理論與再犯預測。台北:法務部。
24. 黃軍義 Huang, Jiun-Yih(2000)。國立台灣大學心理學系。
25. 黃軍義 Huang, Jiun-Yih、 陳若璋 Chen, Roda(1997)。強姦犯罪成因及相關問題之研究。台北:法務部。

1. 陳建安(2010)。社會認知評價與犯罪經驗之關係：一項針對不同犯罪類型之比較研究。中華心理學刊，52(3)，287-308。
2. 楊美婷(2004)。兒童及青少年性侵害者的團體治療。諮商與輔導，218，28-31。
3. 葉致芬,郭麗安(2023)。性平事件行為人諮商輔導中的性別權力議題。輔導季刊，59(2)，45-60。