義與面子在華人家庭暴力裡的運作及其對治療之啓示

Understanding of Family Violence through the Chinese Concepts of Face and Yi

10.6254/2001.15.63

陳高凌(Ko-Ling Chan)

義 ； 面子 ； 華人家庭暴力 ； face ； gender role ； Chinese family violence

本土心理學研究

15期（2001 / 06 / 01）

63 - 111

繁體中文

近年，家庭暴力在華人社會中引起廣泛關注，有關研究亦逐漸增加，而一般研究的角度大多借用了西方研究家庭暴力的理論，主要以女性主義中對父權、男性主導及權力控制的分析為重點；隨之而發展的治療方法，例如男性治療小組、女性充權小組等，均以改變兩性權力關係、挑戰男性施虐者的暴力行為、及促進兩性平等為目標。不論各種理論及治療模式有何不同，其重點主要是從女性的角度出發去理解男性暴力行為，由此而發展的治療小組，其成效參差，就算是西方盛行的強制性治療小組，亦不斷指出參加者中途退出小組的情況。而當西方研究家庭暴力的理論被應用在華人社會時，更發現與文化不相符的情況，未能對華人男性施虐者作更適切的了解。本文作者根據男性施虐者的論述，從文化角度及男性角度去理解婚姻暴力。 本文分析「義」與「面子」在男性角色定型、夫婦關係中的意義，並以此發展一套用以理解婚姻暴力的模型。作者訪問了二十六位華人男性施虐者，他們都以「義」作為個人道德、男性形象及人際交往的指標，包括「道義」、「孝義」、「兄弟之義」、「父子之義」及「夫婦情義」。當他們面對社會變遷與婚姻衝突的挑戰，難以實現「義」的道德訴求時，仍堅持地強迫自己達到要求，並強求配偶作出犧牲、配合及體諒，由此而產生巨大的壓力和衝突。當他們對自己及配偶的期望愈大，壓力及不理性的想法則更強，以致減弱個人對處理衝突和壓力的能力，加上情緒控制的能力不足，對配偶使用暴力的可能性隨之而增加。本文作者發展一套以「義」為基礎，從而理解男性施虐者的心理及行為，並以此作為治療小組的介入模式，成效顯著。

Despite the rising rate of spousal abuse in Chinese societies like Hong Kong, there is a dearth of local studies on the topic. Previous studies have not adequately addressed the cultural specificity of risk factors, tending to generalize factors across cultures. The few culturally specific studies focused on only a few factors such as patriarchal social structure, male domination, and power and control. Resulting treatment programs for male batterers have been mainly educational, emphasizing gender equality. However, male batterers do not respond well to an educational or confrontational approach. The drop-out rate is high, and the effectiveness of these types of treatment programs has not been confirmed. The purpose of this study is to identify Chinese cultural factors that are embedded in Chinese men's violence against their intimate partners, and understand how men construct their violence experiences. Twenty-six Chinese male batterers participated in this study. Based on the findings, an indigenous model of masculinity and men's violence against their female partners was developed. The Chinese cultural concepts of yi and face are associated with men's violence against their female partners. More rigid definitions of masculinity in yi and face, and greater challenges to a man's masculinity, result in greater impairment of self differentiation, lower capacity for conflict resolution, and higher likelihood of spousal violence. Implications for the development of indigenous treatment programs and policy making are discussed.

1. (1995).Understanding partner violence: Prevalence, causes, consequence and solutions.Minneapolis:National Council on Family Relations.
2. Anderson, A. F.(1999).Case study of rape in contemporary China.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,14(11)
3. Archer, J.(1994).Male violence.London:Routledge.
4. Bond, M. H.(1986).The Psychology of the Chinese People.Hong Kong:Oxford University Press.
5. Burr, V.(1995).An introduction to social constructionism.London:Routledge.
6. Chan, S. T. C.(1996).Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong.
7. Chang, Hui-Ching, Holt, G. R.(1994).The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues.Albany:State University of New York Press.
8. Chang, P. L. E.(1988).Department of Social Work and Social Administration, University of Hong Kong.
9. Chen, H. T., Bersani, C., Myers, S. C., Denton, R.(1989).Evaluating the effectiveness of a court sponsored abuser treatment program.Journal of Family Violence,4(4)
10. Cheung, F. M.(1996).Growing up the Chinese way: Chinese child and adolescent development.Hong Kong:The Chinese University Press.
11. Chung, Y. S.(1994).Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong.
12. Dangor, Z., Hoff, L. A., Scott, R.(1998).Women abuse in South Africa: An exploratory study.Violence against Women,4(2)
13. Dasgupta, S. D., Warrier, S.(1996).In the footsteps of 'Arundhati': Asian Indian women's experience of domestic violence in the United States.Violence Against Women,2(3)
14. Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. P.(1998).Rethinking violence against women.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
15. Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. P.(1979).Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy.New York:Free Press.
16. DuRant, R. H., Cadenhead, C., Pendergrast, R. A., Slavens, G., Linder, C. W.(1994).Factors associated with the use of violence among urban Black adolescents.American Journal of Public Health,84(4)
17. Dutton, D. G.(1996).Domestic partner abuse.New York:Springer.
18. Edelmann, R. J.(1994).The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues.Albany:State University of New York Press.
19. Edleson, J. L.(1996).Future interventions with battered women and their families.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
20. Fung, M. S. F.(1994).Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong.
21. Geffner, R., Mantooth, C., Franks, D., Rao, L.(1989).Treating men who batter: Theory, practice, and programs.New York:Springer.
22. Gelles, R. J.(1997).Intimate violence in families.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
23. Goffman, E.(1955).On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction.Psychiatry,18
24. Gondolf, E. W.(1997).Batterer programs: What we know and need to know.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,12
25. Hu, H. C.(1944).The Chinese concept of 'face'.American Anthropologist,46
26. Kantor, G. K., Jasinski, J. L.(1998).Partner violence: A comprehensive review of 20 years of research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
27. Levant, R. F.(1995).Masculinity reconstructed: Changing the rules of manhood at work, in relationships, and in family life.New York:Dutton.
28. Li, C. L. S. D.(1999).Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong.
29. Marrujo, B., Kreger, M.(1996).Violence in gay and lesbian domestic partnerships.New York:Haworth Press.
30. Monson, C. M., Byrd, G. R., Rohling, J. L.(1996).To have and to hold: Perceptions of marital rape.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,11(3)
31. Mulvey, T. J.(1986).Mental Health in Hong Kong.Hong Kong:Mental Health Association of Hong Kong.
32. Munroe, A. H., Stuart, G. L.(1994).Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them.Psychological Bulletin,116(3)
33. Ng, V.(1994).Sexual abuse of daughters-in-law in Qing China: Cases from the Xing'an Huilan.Feminist Studies,20(2)
34. Patton, M. Q.(1990).Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
35. Ptacek, J.(1988).Feminist perspectives on wife abuse.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
36. Scott, M. B., Lyman, S. M.(1968).Accounts.American Sociological Review,33
37. Shimanoff, S. B.(1994).The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues.Albany:State University of New York Press.
38. Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S. Y.(1996).Handbook of Chinese psychology.Hong Kong:Oxford University Press.
39. Stordeur, R. A., Stille, R.(1989).Ending men's violence against their partners: One road to peace.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
40. Straus, M. A.(1973).A general systems theory approach to a theory of violence between family members.Social Science Information,12
41. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J.(1990).Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families.New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction.
42. Sung, K. Y.(1998).Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong.
43. Tang, C. S. K.(1999).Wife abuse in Hong Kong Chinese families: A community survey.Journal of Family Violence,14(2)
44. Tang, C. S. K.(1999).Marital power and aggression in a community sample of Hong Kong Chinese families.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,14(6)
45. Tang, C. S. K.(1994).Prevalence of spousal aggression in Hong Kong.Journal of Family Violence,9(4)
46. Tay, S. W. M.(1985).Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong.
47. Thompson, E. H., Pleck, J. H.(1986).The structure of male role norms.American Behavioral Scientist,29
48. Tin, F.(1999).Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong.
49. To, L. C.(1993).Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong.
50. Tutty, L. M., Rothery, M. A., Grinnell, R. M.(1996).Qualitative research for social workers: Phases, steps, and tasks.Boston:Allyn ＆ Bacon.
51. Wong, T. W., Chung, M., Lau, C. C., Peter, Ng, Wong, W. Y., Ngan, J.(1997).Victims of domestic violence presenting to an accident and emergency departmentVictims of domestic violence presenting to an accident and emergency department,Hong Kong:Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital.
52. Wu, L. M.(1998).Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong.
53. Xu, X.(1997).The prevalence and determination of wife abuse in urban China.Journal of Comparative Family Studies,28
54. Yahia, M. M. H.(1997).Predicting beliefs about wife beating among engaged Arab men in Israel.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,12(4)
55. Yahia, M. M. H., Edleson, J. L.(1994).Predicting the use of conflict resolution tactics among engaged Arab-Palestinian men in Israel.Journal of Family Violence,9(1)
56. Yllo, K., Bograd, M.(1988).Feminist perspectives on wife abuse.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
57. Yllo, K., Straus, M. A.(1990).Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families.New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Publishers.
58. Yu, A. B.(1996).Handbook of Chinese psychology.Hong Kong:Oxford University Press.
59. 朱瑞玲 Chu, Ruey-Ling(1991)。中國人的心理與行為。台北:桂冠。
60. 何友暉 Ho, D. Y. F.(1980).Face and stereotyped notions about Chinese face behavior.Philippine Journal of Psychology,13(1/ 2)
61. 何友暉 Ho, D. Y. F.(1976).On the concept of face.American Journal of Sociology,81(4)
62. 周美伶(1996).Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong.
63. 金耀基 King, Ambrose Y. C.(1988)。中國人的心理。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
64. 陳之昭(1988)。中國人的心理。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
65. 陳高凌 Chan, Ko-Ling(1998)。屯門區家庭暴力問題研究報告書。香港:和諧之家新家庭社區教育計劃及仁愛堂社區中心。
66. 陳高凌 Chan, Ko-Ling(2000)。家庭暴力對被虐婦女及其子女的影響研究。香港:基督教家庭服務中心與香港大學社會工作及社會行政學系。
67. 曾嘉儀 、 源而德(1998)。小組工作實踐：個案匯篇。香港:香港社會工作人員協會有限公司。
68. 費孝通 Fei, Hsiao-Tung(1948)。鄉土中國。上海:觀察社。
69. 黃光國 Hwang, Kwang-Kuo(1991)。中國人的心理與行為（一九八九）。臺北:桂冠。
70. 劉夢(1999).Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong.

1. 成蒂(2006)。婚姻暴力加害人處遇與司法體系之連結。應用心理研究，32，101-133。
2. 許華孚(2008)。走入歧途者的男性氣概：分析我國少年暴力犯的男性氣概。犯罪學期刊，11(1)，75-118。
3. 賴秦瑩,郭俊巖,王蘭心(2020)。家庭暴力低意願案主服務經驗之研究：保護性社工的角度。臺灣社會福利學刊，16(2)，55-101。
4. 廖美蓮、馬宗潔、洪惠芬(2012)。比較親密伴侶殺人案之性別差異。臺大社會工作學刊，26，1-40。
5. 廖珮如、唐文慧(2015)。超越「加害人」的觀點：婚暴處遇男性的建制民族誌分析。台灣社會學，29，133-178。
6. 潘淑滿(2021)。顧家難顧己：多重關係脈絡下的親密伴侶暴力。東吳社會工作學報，40，1-33。
7. 潘淑滿、胡育瑄、李姿佳、宋名萍(2016)。家庭暴力家事調解服務之經驗與策略─以台北、士林地方法院為例。臺灣社會工作學刊，16，119-166。
8. 彭韻治(2006)。攻擊背後的真相－與男性暴力行爲相關之內在特質因素。諮商與輔導，251，43-47。
9. 邱獻輝(2016)。從關係主義文化變遷觀點建構男性親密暴力者的分類架構。中華輔導與諮商學報，46，93-126。
10. 吳麗娟、吳昭儀(2005)。大學生的共依附與愛情態度之相關研究。教育心理學報，36(3)，241-263。
11. 蕭文、鄭青玫、黃瑛琪(2014)。男性婚暴者參與開放式處遇團體之反療效因素變化歷程初探。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，27，81-135。
12. 葉光輝,陳謙仁(2019)。護親護面型毆妻男性個案多元自我衝突調整理論與介入方案研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，55，59-95。
13. 葉光輝,許詩淇(2019)。華人人際及群際關係主題研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究，51，33-88。
14. 葉光輝、邱獻輝(2014)。臉面在教唆殺妻歷程的心理意涵：華人臉面理論的應用。人文及社會科學集刊，26(3)，483-523。
15. 翟宗悌、鄔佩麗、王佩辰(2017)。善了！心理諮詢師在離婚調解中的服務敘事。輔導與諮商學報，38(2)，1-24。
16. 鄭青玫(2021)。一位近高齡男性海洛因成癮／販賣者之停藥循環歷程、家人互動關係敘說探究。輔導與諮商學報，43(3)，71-104。
17. (2017)。報復或修復？建構暴力／財產犯罪加、被害人對話機制之研究（上）。軍法專刊，63(2)，1-29。
18. (2022)。家庭暴力被害人後追服務困境與因應之研究：以彰化縣為例。靜宜人文社會學報，16(1)，71-96。