“關係取向”理論模式初探：組織與利益關係人關係之探討

Revisiting Relationship-orientation Theory: An Organization-public Relationship Perspective

10.6254/2002.18.95

黃懿慧(Yi-Hui Huang)

公共關係 ； 組織與利益關係人關係 ； 關係取向 ； 關係取向二因子模式 ； Two-factor Relations-Oriented Model ； methodological triangulation ； organization-public public relations ； relationship ； relationship-orientation ； relations-oriented theory

本土心理學研究

18期（2002 / 12 / 01）

95 - 172

繁體中文

本文旨於導入「關係取向」理論，探討當代華人社會中公共關係作業之「組織與利益關係人」關係。研究目的希望補充目前西方公共關係理論欠缺社會心理學及文化心理學觀點的問題。其次，也希望探討「關係取向」理論的跨學科應用，尤其著重其與公共關係理論及組織網絡理論等領域之對話。 本研究採取質性深度訪談法。在研究設計上採取「三角驗證原則」，透過資料校正、分析者校正、理論校正，以及方法校正等原則，提高質性研究最可能產生的效度及信度問題。本研究共涵蓋兩類受訪者的訪談資料：(1)一九九九年四月至五月間，針對十三位行政院國會聯絡人訪談所得資料，以及(2)二○○一年十二月至二○○二年一月間，針對二十二位企業內及公關公司公關從業人員訪談所得資料。 研究發現顯示，楊國樞與佐斌的「關係取向」理論對於當代華人社會之「組識與利益關係人關係」確具相當程度之解釋力。其次，以關係取向理論為基礎，本研究提出關係取向二因子模式，包含關係中心取向及關係理性取向二因子。另外，考量專業化及現代化的多重挑戰，本研究探討關係中心行為與關係理性行為，與人口變項以及組織結構變項間的關聯性，研究結果初步顯示，此二類行為與西化及專業化間呈現類型上的關聯性。

This paper explores Relationship-orientation theory with an emphasis on its application to organization-public relationships in the Chinese context of public relations operations. It addresses general problem areas in the Western public relations literature, factoring in the implications of social psychology and cultural psychology for organization-public relationships. It also identifies opportunities for interdisciplinary application of the Relationship-orientation theory and provides a discourse between public relations theories and organization network theories. In-depth interviews were used for this qualitative study, which adopts the principles of methodological triangulation for data triangulation, researcher triangulation, theory triangulation, and method triangulation in order to enhance research validity and reliability. The study covers the findings on two types of interviewees: 1) 13 Executive Yuan liaison officers with the Legislative Yuan from April through May 1999, and 2) twenty-two PR practitioners from PR agencies as well as in-house PR practitioners from December 2001 through January 2002. Based upon Yang (1992) and Zao's (2000) theories, this paper further develops the Two-factor Relations-Oriented Model, which includes relation-centered orientation and relational-rationality orientation. This model factors in multifold challenges from professionalism and modernization. Thus, the correlations between and among relation-centered-oriented behaviors, relational-rationality-oriented behaviors, demographics, and organization structure variables, are investigated. The preliminary findings of the results demonstrate significant correlations among these variables.

1. (1996).Advances in strategic management: The embeddedness of strategy, Vol. 13.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
2. Ahuja,G.(2000).The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages.Strategic Management Journal,21(3)
3. Anderson, P. A.(1993).Individuals in relationships.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
4. Auster, E. R.(1994).Marco and strategic perspectives on interorganizational linkages: A comparative analysis and review with suggestion for reorientation.Advances in Strategic Management,10
5. Ballinger, J. D.(1991).San Diego, CA,San Diego State University.
6. Blau, P.(1964).Exchange and power in social life.New York:Free Press.
7. Broom, G. M., Casey, S., Ritchey, J.(1997).Toward a concept and theory of organization-public relationships.Journal of Public Relations Research,9(2)
8. Burt, R. S.(1982).Toward a structural theory of action: Network models of social structure, perception, and action.New York:Academic Press.
9. Campbell, D. T.(1975).Degrees of freedom and the case study.Comparative Political Studies,8(2)
10. Canfield, B. R., Moore, H. F.(1973).Public relations: Principles, cases, and problems.Homewood, IL:R. D. Irwin.
11. Cappella, J. N.(1991).Studying interpersonal interaction.New York:Guilford.
12. Collier, D.(1995).Translating quantitative methods for qualitative researchers: The case of selection bias.American Political Science Review,89(2)
13. Collier, D., Mahon, J. E.(1993).Conceptual 'stretching' revised: Adapting categories in comparative analysis.American Political Science Review,87
14. Cook, K. S.(1982).Social structure and network analysis.Beverly Hill, CA:Sage.
15. Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H., Broom, G. M.(1994).Effective public relations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
16. Dacin, M. T., Ventresca, M. J., Beal, B. D.(1999).The embeddedness of organizations: Dialogue and directions.Journal of Management,25(3)
17. Das, T. K., Teng, Bing-Sheng(2000).A Resource-based Theory of Strategic Alliances.Journal of Management,26(1)
18. Deutsch, M.(1975).Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?.Journal of Social Issues,31(3)
19. Duck, S. W.(1973).Personal relationships and personal constructs.London:Wiley.
20. Duck, S. W.(1986).Human relationships: An introduction of social psychology.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
21. Eisenberg, E. M., Farace, R. V., Monge, P. R., Bettinghaus, E. P., Kurchner-Hawkins, R., Miller, K. I., Rothman, L. W.(1985).Progress in communication sciences, VI.Norwood, NJ:ABLEX.
22. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989).Building Theories From Case Study Research.Academy of Management Review,14(4)
23. Emerson, R.(1981).Social psychology: Sociological perspectives.New York:Basic Books.
24. Folger, J. P., Poole, M. S., Stutman, R. K.(1993).Working Through Conflict: Strategies for Relationships, Groups and Organization.New York:Harper Collins.
25. Gelso, C. J., Carter, J. A.(1994).Components of the psychotherapy relationship: Their interaction and unfolding during treatment.Journal of Counseling Psychology,41(3)
26. Gelso, C. J., Carter, J. A.(1985).The relationship in counseling and psychotherapy: Components, consequences, and theoretical antecedents.The Counseling Psychologist,13(2)
27. Glaser, Barney G., Strauss, Anselm L.(1967).The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.Chicago:Aldine De Gruyer.
28. Goffman, E.(1961).Encounters.Indianapolis, IN:Bobbs Merrill.
29. Granovetter, M. S.(1985).Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology,91(3)
30. Grunig, J. E., Grunig, L. A.(1992).Excellence in public relations and communication management.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Grunig, J. E., Hunt, T.(1984).Managing Public Relations.New York:CBS College Publishing.
32. Grunig, J. E., Repper, F. C.(1992).Excellence in public relations and communication management.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Gulati, R.(1998).Alliances and Networks.Strategic Management Journal,19
34. Harris, S. G., Sutton, R. I.(1986).Functions of parting ceremonies in dying organizations.Academy of Management Journal,29
35. Heath, R.(2001).Handbook of public relations.Thousand, Oaks, CA:Sage.
36. Hinde, R. A.(1988).Relationships within families: Mutual influence.Oxford, UK:Clarendon.
37. Hofstede, G.(1980).Culture's consequences.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
38. Holmes, J. G.(2000).Social relationships: The nature and function of relational schemas.European Journal of Social Psychology,30(4)
39. Horney, K.(1945).Our inner conflicts.New York:Norton.
40. Huston, T. L., Robin, S. E.(1982).Conceptual and methodological issues in studying close relationships.Journal of Marriage and the Family,44
41. Jacobs, J. B.(1979).A preliminary model of particularistic ties in Chinese political alliances: Kan-ch'ing and Kuan-hsi in a rural Taiwanese township.China Quarterly,78
42. Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., Borgatti, S. P.(1997).A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms.Academy of Management Review,22(4)
43. Kapferer, B.(1969).Social networks in urban situation.Manchester, UK.:Manchester University Press.
44. Katz, D., Kahn, R. L.(1967).The social psychology of organization.New York:Wiley.
45. Kerns, K. A.(1994).Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Klir, G. J.(1991).Facets of systems science.New York:Plenum.
47. Kogut, B.(1988).Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.Strategic Management Journal,9
48. Laumann, E. O., Galaskiewicz, J., Marsden, P. V.(1978).Community structure as interorganizational linkages.Annual Review of Sociology,4
49. Ledingham, J. A., Brunning, S. D.(2000).Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
50. Leifer, R., Delbecq, A.(1978).Organizational/ environmental interchange: A model of boundary spanning activity.Academy of Management Review,20
51. Lerner, M.(1981).The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change.New York:Plenum Press.
52. Lindesmith, A. R.(1947).Opiate addiction.Bloomington, IN:Principia Press.
53. Millar, F. E., Rogers,L. E.(1987).Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
54. Miller, J. G.(1978).Living systems.New York:McGraw-Hill.
55. Mills, J., Clark, M. S.(1982).Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications.
56. Mitchell, J. C.(1969).Social Networks in Urban Situations: Analyses of Personal Relationships in Central African Towns.Manchester, UK:Manchester University Press.
57. Mizruchi, M. S.(1994).Social network analysis: Recent achievements and current controversies.Acta Sociologica,37
58. Mizruchi, M. S.(1992).The structure of corporate political action: Interfirm relations and their consequences.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
59. Oliver, A. L., Ebers, M.(1998).Networking network studies: An analysis of conceptual configurations in the study of inter-organizational relationships.Organization Studies,19(4)
60. Oliver, C.(1990).Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions.Academy of Management Review,15(2)
61. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., Kemmelmeier, M.(2002).Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis.Psychology Bulletin,128(1)
62. Parsons, T.(1951).The social system.New York:Free Press.
63. Patton, M. Q.(1990).Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
64. Pfeffer, J. M., Salancik, G. R.(1978).The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective.New York:Harper and Row, Publishers.
65. Rawls, J. A.(1971).A Theory of justice.Cambridge, MA:The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
66. Robinson, W. S.(1951).The logical structure of analysis induction.American Sociological Review,16
67. Sexton, T. L., Whiston, S. C.(1994).The status of the counseling relationships: Current review, theoretical implications.The Counseling Psychology,22
68. Surra, C. A., Ridley, C. A.(1991).Studying interpersonal interaction.New York:Guilford.
69. Van de Ven, A. H.(1976).On the Nature, Formation, and Maintenance of Relations among Organizations.Academy of Management Review,1(4)
70. Van de Ven, A. H., Walker, G.(1984).The dynamics of interorganizational coordination.Administrative Science Quarterly,29
71. Van Zange, P. A. M.(1997).Movement in social orientations: A commentary on Kelley.European Journal of Social Psychology,27
72. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., Berscheid, E.(1978).Equity: Theory and Research.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
73. Wilcox, D. L., Ault, P. H., Agee, W. K.(1992).Public relations: Strategies and tactics.New York:HarperCollins.
74. Williamson, O. E.(1993).Interdisciplinary perspective on organization studies.Oxford, UK:Pergamon.
75. Williamson, O. E.(1975).Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization.New York:The Free Press.
76. Yan, Aimin, Gray, B.(1994).Bargaining Power, Management Control, and Performance in United States-China Joint Ventures: A Comparative Case Study.Academy of Management Journal,37(6)
77. Yin, R. K.(1994).Discovering the future of the case study method in evaluation research.Evaluation Practice,15(3)
78. Znaniecki, F.(1934).The method of sociology.New York:Farrar ＆ Rinehart.
79. 文崇一 Wen, Chung-I(1988)。中國人的性格。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
80. 朱瑞玲 Chu, Ruey-Ling(1991)。「面子」壓力與其因應行為 'Face' stress and coping behavior。行政院國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學 Proceedings of ROC National Science Council, Part C: Humanities and Social Sciences，1(1)
81. 朱瑞玲 Chu, Ruey-Ling(1987)。中國人的社會互動：試論面子的運作 Social interactionsof the Chinese people: On the functioning of face。中國社會學刊 Chinese Journal of Sociology，11
82. 何友暉 Ho, D. Y. F.(1998).Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationalism.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,1
83. 何友暉 Ho, D. Y. F.、 陳淑娟 Chen, Shu-Chuan、 趙志裕 Chiu, Chi-Yue(1991)。中國人的心理與行為（一九八九） The mind and behavior of the Chinese。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
84. 佐斌(2000)。中國人的關係取向：概念及其測量。家人關係及其心理歷程：第五屆華人心理與行為科際學術研討會，台北:
85. 吳思華 Wu, Se-Hwa(1996)。策略九說：策略思考的本質。台北:麥田出版社。
86. 李美枝 Li, Mei-Chih(2002)。中國人社會取向的本土契合度。從本土到現代學研討會，台北:
87. 周美伶 、 何友暉 Ho, D. Y. F.(1992)。中國人的心理與行為－理念及方法篇（一九九二）。台北市:桂冠圖書公司。
88. 金耀基 King, Ambrose Y. C.(1985).Individualism and holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist values.Ann Arbor, MI:Center of Chinese Studies, University of Michigan.
89. 張惠蓉 Chang, Hui-Jung(2000)。組織傳播與公共關係的共同參考架構－從組織跨界人觀點看公關人員的影響力、角色衝突及溝通模型 A Research Framework for Organizational Communication and Public Relations: Public Relations Personnel's Influence, Role Conflict and Communication Patterns。廣告學研究 The Journal of Advertising & Public Relation，15
90. 梁漱溟(1987)。中國文化的要義。台北:學林出版社。
91. 許文宗(2001)。網絡生命週期演變分析。經營策略論壇－第一次論文發表會，台北:
92. 陳介玄 Chen, Chieh-Hsuan、 高承恕 Kao, Cheng-Shu(1991)。台灣企業運作的社會秩序－人情關係與法律。東海社會科學學報 Tunghai Journal of Social Sciences，10
93. 喬健 Chiao, Chien(1982)。社會及行為科學研究的中國化。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
94. 彭懷真 Peng, Huai-Chen(1989)。東海大學社會學研究所。
95. 費孝通 Fei, Hsiao-Tung(1948)。鄉土中國。香港:鳳凰出版社。
96. 黃光國 Hwang, Kwang-Kuo(1995)。知識與行動：中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋 Knowledge and action: A social psychological interpretation of Chinese cultural traditions。台北:心理出版社。
97. 黃光國 Hwang, Kwang-Kuo(1987).Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game.American Journal of Sociology,92(4)
98. 黃光國 Hwang, Kwang-Kuo(2000).Chinese relationalism: Theoretical construction and methodological considerations.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,30(2)
99. 黃光國 Hwang, Kwang-Kuo(1985)。中國人的權力遊戲。台北:巨流圖書公司。
100. 黃光國 Hwang, Kwang-Kuo(1997).Guanxi and mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society.Intercultural Communication Studies,7(1)
101. 黃光國 Hwang, Kwang-Kuo(1999)。儒家倫理與專業倫理：矛盾與出路 Confucian Ethics and Professional Ethics: Contradiction and Its Resolution。思與言：人文與社會科學雜誌 Thought and Words: Journal of the Humanities and Social Science，37(4)
102. 黃懿慧 Huang, Yi-Hui(2001).Should a public relations code of ethics be enforced?.Journal of Business Ethics,31(3)
103. 黃懿慧 Huang, Yi-Hui(2001)。公共關係之「關係」研究－研究方向的省思與展望 'Relationships', or 'Guanxi Factors', in Public Relations Research - Outlooks and Reflections on Research Directions。廣告學研究 The Journal of Advertising & Public Relation，17
104. 楊國樞 Yang, Kuo-Shu(1992)。中國人的心理與行為－方法與理念篇（一九九二）。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
105. 楊國樞 Yang, Kuo-Shu(1981).Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan.Journal of Social Psychology,113
106. 楊國樞 Yang, Kuo-Shu(1994)。中國人的價值觀－社會科學觀點。台北:桂冠出版社。
107. 楊國樞 Yang, Kuo-Shu(1995).Chinese societies and mental health.Hong Kong:Oxford University Press.
108. 楊國樞 Yang, Kuo-Shu(1998)。中國人的觀念與行為。高雄:麗文文化公司。
109. 熊欣華(1996)。台北，國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
110. 鄭伯壎 Cheng, Bor-Shiuan(1996)。組織網絡的形成及其相關因素的探討。行政院國家科學委員會。
111. 應國瑞 Yin, Robert K.(1989).Case Study Research: Design and Methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications, Inc..

1. 陳益祥(2012)。華人教練選手關係之質性研究。臺灣運動心理學報，12(2)，19-36。
2. 陳益祥(2017)。華人教練─選手關係量表之編製。臺灣運動心理學報，17(1)，39-57。
3. 郭士賢、張思嘉(2011)。台灣華人婚姻中的控制觀。中華心理衛生學刊，24(4)，583-610。
4. 黃光國(2004)。儒家社會中的生活目標與角色義務。本土心理學研究，22，121-193。
5. 簡晉龍(2021)。本土心理學中的創造性「繼承」與「轉化」：以權威取向的理論發展為例。本土心理學研究，55，35-97。
6. 蔣琳琳、黃小芬、邱春蘭、林繼偉(2007)。生命實踐與自我認同：以服務工作及售貨從業青年生涯適應行為為焦點的探究。中華輔導學報，21，33-69。
7. 鄭伯壎、陳靜慧、許金田、周麗芳、任金剛(2005)。華人高階管理者網絡中的特殊連帶與人際情感：深層心理契合與正式工作關係的效果。本土心理學研究，23，201-257。
8. 鄭志富、陳美燕、郭哲君(2012)。社會資本的流動：以社會網絡分析觀點論我國體育運動組織之資源發展。中華體育季刊，26(4)，455-464。
9. (2004)。公共關係之關係策略模式初探：在地與文化的觀點。新聞學研究，79，135-195。
10. (2015)。台灣當代議聘過程之文化與性別意涵分析：一個苗栗客家地區文化展演的觀察。傳播與社會學刊，32，167-208。
11. (2021)。公共關係／策略傳播範式轉變和語境本土化－機遇、挑戰與思考：對話黃懿慧教授。傳播與社會學刊，56，1-24。
12. (2024)。華人組織中的人際關係：回顧與展望。中華心理學刊，66(1)，153-193。