工作與家庭的意義對因應職家衝突的影響─華人雙文化自我觀之展現

The Meaning of Work and Family and its Role in Coping with Work and Family Conflict: Practicing the Chinese Bicultural Self

10.6254/2012.37.141

陸洛(Luo Lu)；張婷婷(Ting-Ting Chang)；張妤玥(Yu-Yueh Chang)

工作與家庭衝突 ； 工作與家庭意義 ； 折衷自我 ； 社會取向自我觀 ； 個人取向自我觀 ； composite self ； individual- and social-oriented self ； meaning of work and family ； work and family conflict

本土心理學研究

37期（2012 / 06 / 30）

141 - 189

繁體中文

工作與家庭研究已累積了相當豐富的研究成果，但研究成果大多發表自西方國家，從生態系統理論的觀點，不同文化背景會形塑不同的價值觀、教育體制、家庭結構，最終影響到個體的發展，故不同國家的文化背景差異可能會影響工作與家庭研究結果。工作與家庭衝突是一種壓力感受，而個人賦予角色或壓力源的「意義」是造成壓力感受的關鍵因素，即個人賦予工作與家庭意義會影響個人對工作與家庭衝突的感受與因應。「自我觀」則是心理系統運作、日常生活中與他人、團體及社會互動的基礎，會影響個體對工作與家庭意義之界定。故本研究將從華人文化之「自我觀」－個人取向、社會取向與折衷自我的自我觀角度切入，探討個人如何界定工作與家庭的意義，以及如何影響工作與家庭介面的互動。本研究採用個別訪談之質性研究方法，藉深入訪談讓受訪者用豐富的生活體驗來詮釋個人的職家衝突歷程，並從中窺見個人「自我觀」對工作與家庭意義之界定，以及對職家衝突感受與因應策略選擇的影響。研究發現不同的「自我觀」，確實有截然不同的職家互動情形，工作與家庭意義是一種「主觀的意義」，基於個人建構之工作與家庭的意義，個人會投注不同的心力，而當職家衝突產生時，個人的抉擇也會有所不同。

Most research on work and family has been conducted in a Western context. From the perspective of ecological systems theory, each culture shapes the development of its people through the shared value system, family structure, and educational institutions. Culture plays an important role in the study of work and family. As work and family conflict can be stressful, the ”meaning” that an individual gives to certain roles or stressors is a key factor affecting perceived strain and influencing the choice of coping strategies. One's view of oneself is the foundation of individual psychological functioning as well as one's interactions with others, groups, and the larger society. It also shapes the meaning of work and family for an individual. The present study take the vantage point of the self, namely the individual-oriented self, social-oriented self, and composite self, to explore how individuals construct the meaning of work and family, and how it in turn affects the interface between work and family.We used in-depth qualitative interviews to draw on the rich life experiences of participants to understand how they make sense of work and family conflict. We used these narrative accounts to identify the influence of self view in the construction of the meaning of work and family, in the experience of work and family conflict, and in the effort to resolve conflict. Results indicated that people with different views of self did experience work and family interactions differently. The meanings of work and family are subjective, and based upon these personal convictions, people devote different levels of effort and adopt different strategies to cope with work and family conflict.

1. 楊國樞(2004)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究：社會取向與個人取向的觀點。本土心理學研究，22，11-80。
   連結：
2. Barnett, R. C.,Hyde, J. S.(2001).Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory.American Psychologist,56,781-796.
3. Boss, P.(1988).Family stress management.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
4. Brief, A. P.(ed.),Nord, W. R.(ed.)(1990).Meanings of occupational work: A collection of essays.Lexington, MA:Lexington Books.
5. Brief, A.(Ed.),Nord, W.(Ed.)(1990).The case of work values Meanings of occupational work: A collection of essays.Lexington, MA:Lexington Books.
6. Bronfenbrenner, U.(1986).Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives.Developmental Psychology,22(6),723-742.
7. Byron, K.(2005).A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents.Journal of Vocational Behavior,67,169-198.
8. Cameron, K. S.(ed.),Dutton, J. E.(ed.),Quinn, R. E.(ed.)(2003).Positive organizational scholarship.San Francisco, CA:Berrett-Koehler.
9. Crabtree, B. F.,Miller, W. L.(1999).Doing qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
10. Edwards, J. R.,Rothbard, N. P.(2000).Mechanisms linking work andm family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs.Academy of Management Review,25(1),178-199.
11. Grahame, K. M.(2003).For the family: Asian immigrant women's triple day.Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare,30,65-90.
12. Guest, D. E.(2002).Perspectives on the study of work-life balance.Social Science Information,41(2),255.
13. Hackman, J. R.,Oldham, G. R.(1980).Work redesign.Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
14. Hofstede, G.(1980).Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
15. Kahn, R. L.,Wolfe, D.,Quinn, R.,Snocek, J. D.,Rosenthal, R. A.(1985).Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity.New York:Wiley.
16. Kim, U.(1994).Individualism and collectivism: Conceptual clarification and elaboration.Individualism and collectivism: Theory,London, UK:
17. Kvale, S.(1996).Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
18. Lin, T. Y.(Ed.),Tseng, W. S.(Ed.),Yeh, E. K.(Ed.)(1995).Chinese societies and mental health.Hong Kong:Oxford University Press.
19. Lu、 L.(2008).The individual- and social-oriented Chinese bicultural self: Testing the theory.Journal of Social Psychology,148,347-374.
20. Lu、 L.(1994).University transition: Major and minor life stressors, personality characteristics and mental health.Psychological Medicine,24,81-87.
21. Lu、 L.,Gilmour, R.(2004).Culture and conceptions of happiness: Individual oriented and social oriented SWB.Journal of Happiness Studies,5,269-291.
22. Lu、 L.,Gilmour, R.(2004).Culture, self and ways to achieve SWB: A cross-cultural analysis.Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies,5,51-79.
23. Lu、 L.,Kao, S. F.,Chang, T. T.,Wu, H. P.,Zhang, J.(2008).The individual- and social-oriented Chinese bicultural self: A sub-cultural analysis contrasting mainland Chinese and Taiwanese.Social Behavior & Personality,36,337-346.
24. Lu、 L.,Lin, Y. Y.(1998).Family roles and happiness in adulthood.Personality and Individual Differences,25,195-207.
25. Markus, H. R.,Kitayama, S.(1991).Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review,98(2),224-253.
26. Markus, H. R.,Kitayama, S.(1998).The cultural psychology of personality.Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology,29(1),63-87.
27. Marsella, A. J.(ed.),DeVos, G.(ed.),Hsu, F. L. K.(ed.)(1985).Culture and self: Asian and western perspectives.New York:Tavistock.
28. Morse, J. M.,Richards, L.(2002).Read me first for a user's guide to qualitative methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
29. Morse, N. C.,Weiss, R. S.(1955).The function and meaning of work and the job.American Sociological Review,20(2),191-198.
30. Oldham, G. R.(1976).Job characteristics and internal motivation: The moderating effect of interpersonal and individual variables.Human Relations,29(6),559-569.
31. Poelmans, S. A. Y.(Ed.)(2005).Work and family: An international research perspective.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Roe, R. A.,Ester, P.(1999).Values and work: Empirical findings and theoretical perspective.Applied Psychology,48(1),1-21.
33. Rosso, B. D.,Dekas, K. H.,Wrzesniewski, A.(2010).On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review.Research in Organizational Behavior,30,91-127.
34. Rothausen, T. J.(1999).Family' in organizational research: A review and comparison of definitions and measures.Journal of Organizational Behavior,20(6),817-836.
35. Sampson, E. E.(1989).The challenge of social change for psychology: Globalization and psychology's theory of the person.American Psychologist,44,914-921.
36. Schabracq, M. J.(ed.),Winnubst, J. A. M.(ed.),Cooper, C. L.(ed.)(2003).The handbook of work and health psychology.Chichester, UK:John Wiley & Sons.
37. Shweder, R. A.(1991).Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
38. Triandis, H. C.(1995).Individualism and collectivism.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
39. Wrzesniewski, A.,Dutton, J. E.,Debebe, G.(2003).Interpersonal sensemaking and the meaning of work.Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews,25,93-135.
40. Wrzesniewski, A.,McCauley, C.,Rozin, P.,Schwartz, B.(1997).Jobs, careers, and callings: People's relations to their work.Journal of Research in Personality,31,21-33.
41. Yang、 K. S.(2003).Beyond Maslow's culture-bound, linear theory: A preliminary statement of the Double-Y model of basic human needs.Nebraska symposium on motivation, cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self,Lincoln, NE:
42. 畢恆達(2000)。家的意義。應用心理研究，8，55-56。
43. 陸洛(2003)。人我關係之界定─「折衷自我」的現身。本土心理學研究，20，139-207。
44. 陸洛(2007)。個人取向與社會取向的自我觀：概念分析與實徵測量。美中教育評論，4(2)，1-23。
45. 楊國樞(1982)。緣及其在現代化生活中的作用。中華文化復興月刊，15，51-67。
46. 劉惠琴(2000)。母女關係的社會建構。應用心理研究，6，87-130。
47. 歐用生(1989)。質的研究。台北:師大書苑。

1. 陳文良、邱雅萍、王怡涵(2013)。台灣工作家庭衝突研究之回顧與展望。人力資源管理學報，13(4)，79-106。
2. 簡晉龍(2021)。本土心理學中的創造性「繼承」與「轉化」：以權威取向的理論發展為例。本土心理學研究，55，35-97。
3. 盧建中,陳玉雲,李際偉(2021)。鮭魚返鄉：玉山下中生農微型農企業創業的責任與動力。輔仁管理評論，28(1)，1-29。
4. 陸洛(2012)。忠於自我？或，從善如流？。本土心理學研究，37，241-250。
5. 陸洛,周君倚(2018)。「根留台灣」還是「西進大陸」？台灣人民自我觀及對外派大陸效益的世代差異。應用心理研究，68，187-231。
6. 陸洛、張妤玥(2013)。自我效能於家庭對工作衝突及其前因後果的調節作用。應用心理研究，57，117-154。
7. 陸洛、張妤玥(2015)。主管支持、工作對家庭增益，及情緒耗竭之關聯：夫妻之行動者─伴侶互依模式。本土心理學研究，44，73-116。
8. 潘君鳳、陸洛、張婷婷(2012)。工作與家庭的雙向增益：前因、後果及互依我的調節作用。中華心理學刊，54(4)，471-493。
9. 潘淑滿、林億玫(2016)。跨越「雇」事：新移民女性微型創業經驗。社會政策與社會工作學刊，20(1)，1-48。
10. 蕭高明、吳珮瑀、吳佳慧(2013)。博士媽媽向前走─女性多重角色與進修博士的困境與進路。應用心理研究，57，31-75。
11. 熊師瑤,張皓(2023)。雪中送炭還是雪上加霜？恆毅力對軍人工作家庭衝突之影響。應用心理研究，78，111-161。
12. 葉光輝(2012)。文化差異抑或是個別差異：一個自我理論驗證的雙重陷落。本土心理學研究，37，211-224。
13. 葉光輝,張仁和,孫蒨如(2019)。華人本土自我研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究，51，3-31。
14. (2015).The Impact of Intrinsic Motivation on The Effectiveness of Leadership Style towards on Work Engagement.Contemporary Management Research,11(4),327-350.
15. (2023)。「反擊型」男性親密暴力者的心理機制：華人關係主義的觀點。教育研究學報，57(1)，49-74。
16. (2023)。台灣高齡者由自我認同邁向統整之歷程：雙文化自我的觀點。本土心理學研究，59，123-189。
17. (2023)。中文版「主觀職涯成功量表」之發展與信效度檢驗。測驗學刊，70(4)，249-284。
18. (2024)。職場“心”能力？探討資訊服務從業人員心理資本對工作負荷與職家衝突的影響。修平學報，47，1-29。