從職家角色扮演看自我的展現

Unfolding the Self through the Work and Family Roles Playing

10.6254/2014.41.65

許伊均(Yi-Chun Hsu)；張妤玥(Yu-Yueh Chang)；陸洛(Luo Lu)；張婷婷(Ting-Ting Chang)

工作與家庭 ； 夫妻 ； 自我 ； 角色 ； couple consensus ； role ； self ； work and family research

本土心理學研究

41期（2014 / 06 / 01）

195 - 259

繁體中文

文化對自我的影響自不待言，但自我並非單向地接受文化的塑造，而是在個己的欲望與文化期待下來來回回。本研究從自我的角度出發，並鎖定「夫妻關係」此情境脈絡，透過夫妻職家角色的扮演來看其各自的堅持與退讓。兩個自我的過招，迫使個體思考「我是誰？」、「這是我要的生活嗎？」、「什麼是我要堅持的？」等問題，進而可在職家角色扮演過程中，看到自我困頓與明朗的轉變過程。本研究遵循質性研究典範中的敘說分析，採用深度訪談法，邀請夫妻同時受訪以了解他們的互動樣貌。研究結果指出：（1）自我同受「文化規範」與「關係互依」的雙重夾擊。自我雖不斷將各種角色予以內化，挫折衝突則有助於個體對「我是誰？」有所反思。在關係之中，兩人共組家庭，磨合的過程便是夫妻雙方自我的角力。（2）在文化規範與關係互依的雙重夾擊下，自我是否有多重的可能？結果顯示個人需有自覺醒悟，才能讓各種角色兼容並蓄。在關係中超越我執，感通他人的需求，拓展自我的彈性，方能開創職家角色扮演的新路徑，以及自我的新樣貌。前述歷程中，我們可看到自我的不易改變、與文化的相互創造，以及由主轉客的彈性。

Culture has unique importance in shaping the self. However, the self is not a passive receiver. The self is evident in determining the extent of individual desire vs. cultural expectation. The present study employed role playing in a situated context (marital relationships) to examine the persistence and yielding of each partner's self. The interaction of two selves forces individual to think ＂Who am I? Is this what I want?＂ We hope to observe the transform of self in the answers to these questions. We used in-depth qualitative interviews to draw on the rich life experiences of participants to understand how they negotiate with their spouses. Our participants were three married couples and one wife whose husband declined interview request. The average age was 35.57 years old. Using narrative analysis, our results indicated that: (1) When acting one's role in accordance with social expectations, frustration and conflict give individuals an opportunity for introspection. Furthermore, married individuals have to negotiate with the ＂selves＂ of their spouses. (2) Individuals need to perceive themselves as acting beyond social expectation, answering the question of whether it is possible to keep multiple selves when facing pressure from both cultural norms and interdependent relationship requirements. Individuals need to be self-reflexive and strike a balance between gratifying others' expectations and transcending the view other people have of them. Couples can create new work and family roles and also new selves. From these processes, it is possible to unravel the nature of the self, including impermeability, and situated-embeddness.

1. 王舒芸、余漢儀(1997)。奶爸難為─雙薪家庭之父職角色初探。婦女與兩性學刊，8，115-149。
   連結：
2. 張思嘉(2001)。婚姻早期的適應過程：新婚夫妻之質性研究。本土心理學研究，16，91-133。
   連結：
3. 陳秉華、李素芬、林美珣(2008)。諮商中伴侶關係的自我協調歷程。本土心理學研究，29，117-182。
   連結：
4. 陸洛(2003)。人我關係之界定─「折衷自我」的現身。本土心理學研究，20，139-207。
   連結：
5. 陸洛、楊國樞(2005)。社會取向與個人取向的自我實現觀：概念分析與實徵初探。本土心理學研究，23，3-69。
   連結：
6. 黃光國(2011)。論「含攝文化的心理學」。本土心理學研究，36，79-110。
   連結：
7. 黃光國(2004)。儒家社會中的生活目標與角色義務。本土心理學研究，22，121-193。
   連結：
8. 劉惠琴(2003)。夫妻衝突調適歷程的測量。中華心理衛生學刊，16(1)，23-50。
   連結：
9. Mowrer, O. H., & Ullman, A. D. (1945). Time as a determinant in integrative learning. Psychological Review, 52(2), 61-90
10. Cassirer, E. (1944). An essay on man. New Haven: Yale University Press
11. Aron, A.,Aron, E. N.(1986).Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction.New York:Hemisphere.
12. Brindley, T. A.(1989).Socio-psychological values in the Republic of China (I).Asian Thought and Society,XIV(41-42),98-115.
13. Brindley, T. A.(1990).Socio-psychological values in the Republic of China (II).Asian Thought and Society,XIV(43),1-16.
14. Burgoon, M.(Ed.)(1982).Communication yearbook.Beverly Hill, CA:Sage.
15. Crabtree, B. F.,Miller, W. L.(1999).Doing qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
16. Crocker, J.,Karpinski, A.,Quinn, D. M.,Chase, S. K.(2003).When grades determine self-worth: Consequences of contingent self-worth for male and female engineering and psychology majors.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85(3),507-516.
17. Deutsh, M.(1990).Sixty years of conflict.International Journal of Conflict Management,1,237-263.
18. Frie, R.(Ed.)(2008).Psychological agency: Theory, practice, and culture.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
19. Frie, R.(Ed.),Coburn, W. J.(Ed.)(2011).Persons in context: The challenge of individuality in theory and practice.New York:Taylor and Francis Group.
20. Gergen, K. J.(1967).Multiple identity: The healthy, happy human being wears many masks.Psychology Today,5,15-39.
21. Gergen, K. J.(1965).Interactions goals and personalistic feedback as factors affecting the presentations of self.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1,4l3-424.
22. Gergen, K. J.(1973).Social psychology as history.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,26(2),309-320.
23. Giddens, A.(1991).Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
24. Gilgun, J. F.(Ed.),Daly, K.(Ed.),Handel, G.(Ed.)(1992).Qualitative methods in family research.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
25. Gudykunst, W. B.,Matsumoto, Y.,Ting-Toomey, S.,Nishida, T.,Kim, K.,Heyman, S.(1996).The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures.Human Communication Research,22,510-543.
26. Harris, G. G.(1989).Concepts of individual, self, and person in description and analysis.American Anthropologist,91,599-612.
27. Hendrick, C.(Ed.),Hendrick, S. S.(Ed.)(2000).Close relationships: A sourcebook.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
28. Hojjat, M.(2000).Sex differences and perceptions of conflict in romantic relationships.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,17(4-5),598-617.
29. Holland, D.,Lachicotte, W.,Skinner, D.,Cain, C.(1998).Identity and agency in cultural worlds.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
30. Hsu、 F. L. K.(Ed.)(1971).Kinship and culture.Chicago, IL:Aldine.
31. Kvale, S.(1996).Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
32. Lieblich, A.,Tuval-Mashiach, R.,Zilber, T.(1998).Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
33. Markus, H. R.,Kitayama, S.(1991).Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review,98(2),224-253.
34. Markus, H. R.,Kitayama, S.(1994).A collective fear of the collective: Implication, emotion, and theories of selves.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,20(5),568-579.
35. Markus, H.,Nurius, P.(1986).Possible selves.American Psychologist,41(9),954-969.
36. Marsella, A. J.(Ed.),DeVos, G.(Ed.),Hsu, F. L. K.(Ed.)(1985).Culture and self: Asian and western perspectives.New York:Tavistock Publications.
37. Marsella, D. A.、DeVos, G.、Hsu, F. L. K.、任鷹譯(1985)。文化與自我。杭州:浙江人民出版社。
38. May, R.(1950).The meaning of anxiety.New York:Ronald Press.
39. McCormack, C.(2000).From interview transcript to interpretive story, Part 1: Viewing the transcript through multiple lenses.Fields Methods,12,282-298.
40. Morse, J. M.,Richards, L.(2002).Read me first for a user's guide to qualitative methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
41. Oyserman, D.,Sorensen, N.,Reber, R.,Chen, S.(2009).Connecting and separating mind-sets: Culture as situated cognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,97(2),217-235.
42. Rahim, M. A.,Bonoma, T. V.(1979).Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention.Psychological Reports,44,1323-1344.
43. Riessman, C. K.(1993).Narrative analysis.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
44. Rusbult, C. E.,Zembrodt, I. M.(1983).Responses to dissatisfaction romantic involvement: A multidimensional scaling analysis.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,19,274-293.
45. Suls, J.(Ed.)(1982).Social psychological perspectives on the self.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
46. Super, D. E.(1980).A life span, life-space approach to career development.Journal of Vocational Behavior,16,282-298.
47. Witherell, C.,Noddings, N.(1991).Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education.New York:Teachers College Press.
48. 王邦雄(1988)。中西文化的傳統性格及其會通之道。鵝湖月刊，152，2-13。
49. 余德慧(2010)。生命宛若幽靜長河。台北:張老師文化。
50. 利翠珊(1995)。夫妻互動歷程之探討─以台北地區年輕夫婦為例的一項初探性研究。本土心理學研究，4，260-321。
51. 李良哲(1997)。婚姻衝突因應行為歷程模式之驗證研究。國立政治大學學報，74，53-94。
52. 陸洛(2007)。個人取向與社會取向的自我觀：概念分析與實徵測量。美中教育評論，4(2)，1-24。
53. 彭泗清(1993)。中國人「做人」的概念分析。本土心理學研究，2，277-314。
54. 楊中芳(1991)。試論中國人的「自己」：理論與研究方向。中國人、中國心─人格與社會篇，台北:
55. 齊力編、林本炫編(2005)。質性研究方法與資料分析。嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究所。
56. 蔡敏玲譯、余曉雯譯、Clandinin, D. J.、Connelly, F. M.(2000)。敘事探究：質性研究中的經驗與故事。台北:心理出版社。

1. 陸洛,張婷婷,高旭繁(2021)。生理性別、性別角色取向在職家互動的作用：三階調節效果的檢驗。臺大管理論叢，31(3)，1-46。
2. 溫錦真、林美珠(2018)。臺灣心理與諮商敘事研究之回顧與展望。中華輔導與諮商學報，53，81-116。
3. (2023)。台灣高齡者由自我認同邁向統整之歷程：雙文化自我的觀點。本土心理學研究，59，123-189。