源自死亡焦慮的宗教委身機制：分析與模型建構

The Mechanisms for Religious Commitment Activated by Death Anxiety: An Analysis and Model Construction

10.6254/2017.48.231

張蘭石(Nam-Sat Chang)

自我的曼陀羅模型 ； 死亡提醒 ； 批判實在論 ； 宗教性 ； 持續連結 ； continuing bond ； critical realism ； Mandala model of self ； mortality salience ； religiosity

本土心理學研究

48期（2017 / 12 / 01）

231 - 277

繁體中文

為了分析華人文化內在結構中的宗教機制，本文以黃光國的「自我的曼陀羅模型」作為理論核心，建構了「宗教自我曼陀羅模型」作為宗教性機制的分析架構，藉以有系統地分析「源自死亡焦慮的宗教委身機制」。本文依據學術界對華人宗教性、宗教向度與普化宗教的理論與實徵研究，以及心理學界在「死亡提醒效應」與「持續連結理論」兩方面的研究，提出假設：一、在機構式宗教之內發宗教取向者間，宗教委身機制啟動於死亡焦慮。二、在華人傳統殯葬中，「死亡提醒」可能增強人們的死亡焦慮而暫時性啟動宗教委身機制，導致宗教性遽增之現象。在顯示「源自死亡焦慮的宗教委身機制」後，作者擴大應用在分析華人殯儀祭祀，於是對華人「天、鬼神雙重信仰」得到一個基於批判實在論的分析。

In this paper I propose a paradigm shift for studying religious mechanisms within Chinese culture. Using the Mandala Model of Self postulated by Kwang-Kuo Hwang as the core, I developed the Mandala Model of Religion and Self as an analytical framework for religious mechanisms. This framework provides a systematic analysis of the mechanisms for religious commitment activated by death anxiety. Based on theoretical and empirical studies of personal religiosity and diffused religions, I draw from the psychological concepts of the mortality salience effect and continuing bonds to propose two hypotheses: (1) Religious commitment mechanisms are activated by death anxiety (especially among people with intrinsic religious orientation in institutional religions). (2) Mortality salience may increase death anxiety for individuals who attend a traditional Chinese funeral and temporarily activate religious commitment mechanisms. After modeling the religious commitment mechanisms activated by death anxiety, I apply them more generally to a traditional Chinese funeral and related rituals. The result is a critical realist analysis of Chinese dual belief in Heaven and spirits.

1. 丁仁傑(2014)。當代台灣新興宗教的信仰體系及其「可信性」：五個新興宗教團體的考察。新世紀宗教研究，12(3)，1-36。
   連結：
2. 李秉倫、黃光國、夏允中(2015)。建構本土哀傷療癒理論：儒家關係主義和諧哀傷療癒理論。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，28，7-33。
   連結：
3. 夏允中、越建東(2012)。以佛教的死亡本質及生命無常觀點來探討死亡恐懼。本土心理學研究，38，167-187。
   連結：
4. 張蘭石(2016)。四句的應用：心靈現象之多面向研究法。本土心理學研究，46，25-71。
   連結：
5. 許敏桃、余德慧、李維倫(2005)。哀悼傷逝的文化模式：由連結到療癒。本土心理學研究，24，49-84。
   連結：
6. 顏志龍(2012)。渴望心理學的科學革命：從「恐懼管理理論」的研究歷程反思心理學研究之現狀。本土心理學研究，38，103-129。
   連結：
7. Malinowski, B. (1948). Magic, science and religion and other essays. Boston, MA: Beacon.
8. Tillich, P. (1936). The interpretation of history. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
9. Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom, Vol. 1. London, UK: John Murray.
10. Freud, S. (1917). Mourning and melancholia, Vol. 4. New York: Basic Books.
11. Durkheim, E. (1915). The elementary forms of the religious life. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.
12. Otto, R. (1923). The idea of the holy (J. W. Harvey Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13. Abdel-Khalek, A. M.(2004).The Arabic Scale of Death Anxiety (ASDA): Its development, validation, and results in three Arab countries.Death Studies,28(5),435-457.
14. Allport, G. W.,Ross, J. M.(1967).Personal religious orientation and prejudice.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,5(4),432-443.
15. Archer M. S.(1995).Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
16. Archer, M. S.(1988).Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
17. Batson, C. D.,Schoenrade, P.,Ventis, L.(1993).Religion and the individual.New York:Oxford University Press.
18. Becker, E.(1973).The denial of death.New York:Free Press.
19. Berger, P.(1997).Epistemological modesty: An interview with Peter Berger.Christian Century,114(30),972-978.
20. Bhaskar, R. A.(1975).A Realist theory of science.Leeds, UK:Leeds Books.
21. Bishop, J.(1989).Natural agency: An essay on the causal theory of action.Cambridge, New York:Cambridge University Press.
22. Boerner, K.,Heckhausen, J.(2003).To have and have not: Adaptive bereavement by transforming mental ties to the deceased.Death Studies,27(3),199-226.
23. Bowker, J.(1993).The meanings of death.Cambridge, New York:Cambridge University Press.
24. Bowlby, J.(1988).A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development.London:Basic Books.
25. Burke, B. L.,Martens, A.,Faucher, E. H.(2010).Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research.Personality Social Psychology Review,14(2),155-195.
26. Chan, C. L. W.,Chow, A. Y. M.,Ho, S. M. Y.,Tsui, Y. K. Y.,Tin, A. F.,Koo, B. W. K.,Koo, E. W. K.(2005).The experience of Chinese bereaved persons: A preliminary study of meaning making and continuing bonds.Death Studies,29(10),923-947.
27. Charles, W. F.(Ed.),Gerhard, E. S.(Ed.)(1989).Religious issues and interreligious dialogues.New York:Greenwood.
28. Cohen, A.,Pierce, J.,Chambers, J.,Meade, R.,Gorvine, B.,Koenig, H.(2005).Intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity, belief in the afterlife, death anxiety, and life satisfaction in young Catholics and Protestants.Journal of Research in Personality,39(3),307-324.
29. Cohn-sherbok, D.(Ed.),Lewis, C.(Ed.)(1995).Beyond death: Theological and philosophical reflections on life after death.Basingstoke, UK:Macmillan.
30. Corr, C. A.,Nabe, C. M.,Corr, D. M.(1994).A task-based approach for understanding and evaluating funeral practices.Thanatos,19(2),10-15.
31. Eliade, M.(2004).Shamanism: Archaic techniques of ecstacy.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
32. Eliade, M.,Willard, R.(Trans.)(1961).The sacred and the profane: The nature of religion.New York:Trask, Harper Torchbooks.
33. Falkenhain, M.,Handal, P. J.(2003).Religion, death attitudes, and belief in afterlife in the elderly: Untangling the relationships.Journal of Religion and Health,42(1),67-76.
34. Field, N. P.,Filanosky, C.(2009).Continuing bonds, risk factors for complicated grief, and adjustment to bereavement.Death Studies,34(1),1-29.
35. Field, N. P.,Friedrichs, M.(2004).Continuing bonds in coping with the death of a husband.Death Studies,28(7),597-620.
36. Finke, R.,Stark, R.(1992).The churching of America, 1776-2005: Winners and losers in our religious economny.New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press.
37. Finke, R.,Stark, R.(1988).Religious economies and sacred canopies: Religious mobilization in American cities, 1906.American Sociological Review,53(1),41-49.
38. Finke, R.,Stark, R.(1998).Religious choice and competition.American Sociological Review,63(5),761-766.
39. Goss, R. E.,Klass, D.(2005).Dead but not lost: Grief narratives in religious traditions.New York:Altamira Press.
40. Greenberg, J.,Simon, L.,Pyszczynski, T.,Solomon, S.,Chatel, D.(1992).Terror management and tolerance: Does mortality salience always intensify negative reactions to others who threaten one's worldview?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,63(2),212-220.
41. Hoge, D. R.(1972).A Validated Intrinsic Religious Motivation Scale.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,11(4),369-376.
42. Hsu, M. T.,Kahn, D. L.,Yee, D. H.,Lee, W. L.(2004).Recovery through reconnection: A cultural design for family bereavement in Taiwan.Death Studies,28(8),761-786.
43. Huang, F. Y.(2008).University of Manchester.
44. Hwang、 K. K.(2011).The Mandala Model of Self.Psychological Studies,56(4),329-334.
45. James, W.(2013).The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature.North Chelmsford, MA:Courier Corporation.
46. Jonas, E.,Fischer, P.(2006).Terror management and religion: Evidence that intrinsic religiousness mitigates worldview defense following mortality salience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,91(3),553-567.
47. Jung, C. G.(1957).The undiscovered self (present and future).New York:American Library.
48. King, M. B.,Hunt, R. A.(1969).Measuring the religious variable: Amended findings.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,8(2),321-323.
49. King, M. B.,Hunt, R. A.(1975).Measuring the religious variable: National replication.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,14(1),13-22.
50. Klass, D.(2006).Continuing conversation about continuing bonds.Death Studies,30(9),843-858.
51. Klass, D.(2001).Continuing bonds in the resolution of grief in Japan and North America.American Behavioral Scientist,44(5),742-763.
52. Klass, D.(Ed.),Silverman, P. R.(Ed.),Nickman, S. L.(Ed.)(1996).Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief.London, UK:Taylor & Francis.
53. Klass, D.,Goss, R.(2003).The politics of grief and continuing bonds with the dead: The cases of Maoist China and Wahhabi Islam.Death Studies,27(9),787-811.
54. Klass, D.,Goss, R.(1999).Spiritual bonds to the dead in cross-cultural and historical perspective: Comparative religion and modern grief.Death Studies,23(6),547-567.
55. Klass, D.,Silverman, P.,Nickman, S.(1996).Continuing bonds: New understanding of grief.Washington, DC:Taylor & Francis.
56. Lakatos, I.(1968).Criticism and the methodology of scientific research programmes.Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,69,149-186.
57. Larry, A. B.(Ed.)(1979).Death and dying: Theory/research/practice.Dubuque, IA:William C. Brown.
58. Liu、 S. H.(1971).The religious import of Confucian philosophy: Its traditional outlook and contemporary significance.Philosophy East and West,21(2),157-175.
59. Mills, A.(Ed.),Durepos, G.(Ed.),Wiebe, E.(Ed.)(2010).Encyclopedia of case study research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
60. Pyne, D. A.(2010).A model of religion and death.The Journal of Socio-Economics,39(1),46-54.
61. Root, B. L.,Exline, J. J.(2014).The role of continuing bonds in coping with grief: Overview and future directions.Death Studies,38(1),1-8.
62. Routledgea, C.,Juhla, J.(2010).When death thoughts lead to death fears: Mortality salience increases death anxiety for individuals who lack meaning in life.Cognition and Emotion,24(5),848-854.
63. Rue, L. D.(2006).Religion is not about God: How spiritual traditions nurture our biological nature and what to expect when they fail.New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press.
64. Shiah, Y. J.(2016).From self to nonself: The nonself theory.Frontiers in Psychology,7,124.
65. Shiah, Y. J.,Chang, F.,Tam, W. C. C.,Chuang, S. F.,Yeh, L. C.(2013).I don't believe but I pray: Spirituality, instrumentality, or paranormal belief?.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,43(8),1704-1716.
66. Smith, W. C.(1993).What Is scripture? A comparative approach.Minneapolis, MN:Fortress Press.
67. Smith, W. C.(1962).The meaning and end of religion.New York:Harper & Row.
68. Stark, R.,Bainbridge, W. S.(1987).A theory of religion.New York:Peter Lang.
69. Stark, R.,Finke, R.(2000).Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
70. Stroebe, M. S.(Ed.),Stroebe, W.(Ed.),Hansson, R. O.(Ed.)(1993).Handbook of bereavement.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
71. Szonyi, M.(2009).Secularization theories and the study of Chinese religions.Social Compass,56(3),312-327.
72. Thorson, J. A.(1991).Afterlife constructs, death anxiety, and life reviewing: The importance of religion as a mediating variable.Journal of Psychology and Theology,19(3),278-284.
73. Tillich, P.(1957).Dynamics of faith.New York:Harper & Row.
74. Tillich, P.(1963).Christianity and the encounter of the world religions.New York:Columbia University Press.
75. Tillich, P.(1952).The courage to be.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
76. Turner, B. S.(Ed.),Salemink, O.(Ed.)(2014).Routledge handbook of religions in Asia.New York:Routledge.
77. Turner, V. W.(1969).The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure.New York:Walter de Gruyter.
78. Warner, R. S.(1993).Work in progress toward a new paradigm for the sociological study of religion in the United States.American Journal of Sociology,98(5),1044-1093.
79. Wortmann, J. H.,Park, C. L.(2008).Religion and spirituality in adjustment following bereavement: An integrative review.Death Studies,32(8),703-736.
80. Yang、 C. K.(1961).Religion in Chinese society.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
81. Yang、 F. G.(2006).The red, black, and gray markets of religion in China.Sociological Quarterly,47(1),93-122.
82. Young, L. A.(Ed.)(1997).Rational choice theory and religion: Summary and assessment.New York:Routledge.
83. 余光弘(1985)。A. Van Gennep 生命禮儀理論的重新評價。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，60，229-257。
84. 吳汝鈞(1996)。莊子的終極關懷。哲學雜誌，17，172-197。
85. 宋文里、李亦園(1988)。個人宗教性：台灣地區宗教信仰的另一種觀察。清華學報，18(1)，113-139。
86. 李亦園(1987)。和諧與均衡：民間信仰中的宇宙詮釋與心靈慰藉模型。現代人心靈的真空及其補償研討會論文集，中壢:
87. 李亦園(1992)。文化的圖像（下）─宗教與族群的文化觀察。台北:允晨文化出版公司。
88. 李梅、李潔、時勘(2015)。持續連結量表中文版的修訂與初步應用。中國臨床心理學雜誌，23(2)，251-255。
89. 林本炫、伊慶春、林彥妏(2011)。台灣青少年宗教信仰的發展與變遷初探：「台灣青少年成長歷程研究」追蹤調查資料的分析。2011 兩岸三地華人青少年研究暨台灣青少年成長歷程研究第四次學術研討會，台北:
90. 姜守誠(2010)。十王信仰：唐宋地獄說之成型。湖南科技學院學報，32(9)，81-87。
91. 張家麟(2013)。典範的建構與挑戰─從科學哲學論華人宗教研究。宗教哲學，65-66，193-216。
92. 張蘭石(2016)。以中觀揚棄在人類沙文主義與生態法西斯主義兩極端中的自性見─討論國家公園內既存宗教設施之合法化問題。法印學報，6，73-101。
93. 陳建洪(2000)。終極關切與儒家宗教性：與劉述先商榷。二十一世紀，58，87-93。
94. 章英華編(2000)。臺灣地區社會變遷基本調查計劃第三期第五次調查計劃執行報告。台北:中央研究院社會學研究所。
95. 傅偉勳(1987)。從終極關懷到終極承諾─大乘佛教的真諦新探。當代，11，16-26。
96. 黃光國(1999)。多元典範的研究取向：論社會心理學的本土化。社會理論學報，2(1)，1-51。
97. 黃光國(2011)。心理學的科學革命方案。台北:心理出版社。
98. 楊國樞編、瞿海源編(1988)。變遷中的台灣社會─第一次社會變遷基本調查資料的分析。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
99. 鄔佩麗(2008)。危機處理與創傷治療。台北:學富文化公司。
100. 劉述先(2000)。對於終極關切與儒家宗教性問題的回應。二十一世紀，59，115-117。
101. 蔡彥仁(2014)。,未出版
102. 蔡彥仁(2012)。臺灣地區宗教經驗之比較研究─簡介一個跨學科研究的案例。人文與社會科學簡訊，13(3)，175-183。

1. 陳復(2020)。自性的曼陀羅模型：解決黃光國難題的工夫論。中華輔導與諮商學報，58，47-84。
2. 陳泰璿、張蘭石、張峻嘉、夏允中(2018)。黃光國難題正面臨的迷陣與突破再四問：自性的有無？何謂自性？自性如何修養達成？如何進行社會科學研究？。本土心理學研究，49，95-117。
3. 黃光國,夏允中(2019)。開啟以儒釋道文化的修養諮商心理學理論語實徵研究：邁向自性覺醒的心理療癒。中華輔導與諮商學報，54，1-20。
4. 黃奕偉(2022)。臺灣「宗教心理學」研究之現況分析（1974－2019）：以期刊及學位論文為對象的考察。臺灣宗教研究，21(1)，155-203。
5. 李佩珊,吳佳純(2022)。「臺灣中小學輔導人員施為行動短式量表」之發展與分析。測驗學刊，69(1)，55-82。
6. 李仁豪(2020)。〈雙重尋道論〉：「主客對立」與「天人合一」之對立與合一。本土心理學研究，54，177-237。
7. 張蘭石(2018)。儒家修養曼陀羅模型：華人殯儀傳統中「天」「鬼神」雙重信仰之機制的分析架構。本土心理學研究，50，3-58。
8. 張蘭石(2019)。宗教的四窗、四鏡、羅盤與黑洞：宗教自我曼陀羅模型的諮商應用。中華輔導與諮商學報，54，21-58。