華人角色關係的情緒表達規則回顧與前瞻

A Review of Emotional Display Rules: Roles in Chinese Context

10.6254/IPRCS.201906_(51).0004

林佳樺(Chia-Hua Lin)；姜定宇(Ding-Yu Jiang)

上下關係 ； 情緒表達規則 ； 情緒展現行為 ； 華人文化 ； Chinese culture ； emotion expression ； emotional display rule ； vertical relationship

本土心理學研究

51期（2019 / 06 / 01）

169 - 228

繁體中文

華人傳統文化注重角色規範，依循關係特徵進行人際互動，並且在泛家族主義的影響之下，家庭中所學習的人際互動模式會擴展應用至家族外的群體，形塑成具有華人文化特色的情緒表達規則。情緒展現規則的樣貌與對人際互動的影響在西方已有豐富的研究成果，不過在華人社會中的情緒表達規則與情緒展現行為仍尚未有系統性地進行探討。因此，本文回顧本土心理學研究中，華人家庭與組織涉及情緒互動的文獻，從夫妻婚姻、父母教養與子女孝道，呈現家庭中上下角色的情緒表達與互動關係，接著延伸至組織中主管的華人領導行為，以及部屬對主管展現的忠誠與忍，透過比較家族內外的上下關係之互動模式，試圖瞭解華人角色關係中的情緒表達規則。並進一步從關係脈絡、文化與組織脈絡，以及個人價值觀切入，探討華人情緒表達規則與展現行為的特色。最後，本文為未來研究提供具文化意涵之方向與建議。

Emotional expression plays an important role in interpersonal interaction and communication. Emotion conveys information that helps the receiver to understand the expresser's intentions and influences the receiver's behavior. Studies have shown that emotion can be expressed nonverbally through tone of voice, physical gestures, and facial expressions. How people express their emotion is affected by culture; emotional display rules provide the norms for individuals to express emotions that meet cultural expectations. Regulating emotional behavior based on emotional display rules reduces vagueness and uncertainty in social interactions. Past studies have discussed the behavior and effects of interpersonal emotional display rules in Western culture, but the corresponding rules in Chinese culture are still poorly understood. Chinese culture has unique vertical role relationships characterized by unequal interaction norms, and there are different behavioral expectations for people of different statuses within a vertical relationship. We reviewed journal articles from Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies in order to develop a framework of the emotional display rules used in Chinese role relationships. We focused on studies of three kinds of role relationships that have a clear vertical structure in Chinese culture: the relationships between husband and wife, parents and children, and leader and subordinate. We reviewed 44 articles (12 about marriage, 13 about the family, and 18 about organizations) and conducted a content analysis. The analysis showed that the relationship between husbands and wives follows Chinese cultural traditions. There is a hierarchical difference between genders, with men having greater power than women. Wives are expected to be warm, caring, and obedient to their husbands. Expressing positive emotion and suppressing negative emotion are the wives' main display rules when interacting with their husbands. In contrast, husbands represent authority in the family, and do not need to regulate their emotions. Husbands should be willing to suppress their negative emotions to avoid conflict and maintain harmony in the family, but tend to use implicit ways to express their love and thankfulness toward their wives. In the vertical relationship between Chinese parents and children, Chinese society encourages parents to be strict with their children's education, and parents are thus expected to mask their positive emotion and express negative emotion to prevent their children from becoming rebellious, and to build their authority in the family. Children must follow the norm of filial piety by taking good care of their parents and suppressing their own needs to fulfill their parents' expectations. The corresponding emotional display rule requires children to express positive emotion and suppress negative emotion when interacting with their parents. Cultural norms may also affect interpersonal interactions in the workplace. Chinese culture emphasizes hierarchy and authority. Authoritarian leadership is a traditional Chinese value, with leaders expected to be father-like, disciplinarian, and powerful. Leaders may reprimand their subordinates and behave seriously to earn subordinates' reverence. Chinese subordinates are sensitive to authority and may actively show obedience and loyalty to their leaders. They tend to suppress their negative emotions to fulfill leaders' requests and express positive emotion to support leaders. Based on this review of Chinese vertical role relationships and emotional expression, we present six propositions. First, we propose that people with a lower status (such as children, wives, and subordinates) follow the emotional display rules of suppressing negative emotions and expressing positive emotions, whereas people with a higher status (such as parents, husbands, and leaders) follow the emotional display rules of expressing negative emotions and suppressing positive emotions (Proposition 1). We also suggest that the specific role norms of Chinese culture may enhance individuals' perception of emotional display rules in vertical role relationships (Proposition 2). In the organizational context, subordinates, who occupy a lower status role, tend to pay attention to others' emotional cues to regulate their emotions appropriately, and thus may be more conscious of emotional display rules. In contrast, supervisors may pay less attention to others' emotional cues because they are the higher status role model and do not need to be careful about following norms (Propositions 3 and 4). Furthermore, we propose that personal values may moderate the relationship between emotional display rules and individuals' emotional expressions. When people value interpersonal harmony, they may suppress negative emotion to avoid conflict, but may also be concerned that expressing positive emotions will be seen as immature behavior. Therefore, the display rule of suppressing negative emotions has a stronger positive association with suppressing behavior, whereas the display rule of expressing positive emotions may have a weaker association with expressing emotional behavior when individuals value harmony (Proposition 5). We further hypothesize that the values associated with the modernization of Chinese societies influence the effect of Chinese emotional display rules. Individuals displaying more modern characteristics may pay less attention to the cues of others and to authority. The emotional display rules of vertical role relationships may have a stronger positive effect on emotional display behavior in individuals displaying fewer modern characteristics (Proposition 6). In this article, we reviewed empirical studies of Chinese vertical role relationships in marriage, the family, and organizations, and analyzed the emotional interaction behaviors in these studies to identify the features of emotional display rules in Chinese culture. Future research could explore Chinese emotional display rules in different situations and the personal consequences of emotional interactions to gain a better understanding of emotional expression in Chinese societies.

1. 王叢桂,羅國英(2007)。華人管理者與情緒智能講師對情緒智能之認知差異。本土心理學研究，27，231-297。
   連結：
2. 利翠珊(2006)。華人婚姻韌性的形成與變化：概念釐清與理論建構。本土心理學研究，25，101-137。
   連結：
3. 利翠珊(2012)。夫妻關係間的忍與婚姻滿意度之關連。中華心理衛生學刊，25(3)，447-475。
   連結：
4. 利翠珊,蕭英玲(2016)。夫妻內隱情感經驗：感恩、忍與婚姻滿意度。本土心理學研究，45，93-128。
   連結：
5. 利翠珊,蕭英玲(2008)。華人婚姻品質的維繫：衝突與忍讓的中介效果。本土心理學研究，29，77-116。
   連結：
6. 吳宗祐(2008)。主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾：信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。本土心理學研究，30，3-63。
   連結：
7. 吳宗祐,周麗芳,鄭伯壎(2008)。主管的權威取向及其對部屬順從與畏懼的知覺對威權領導的預測效果。本土心理學研究，30，65-115。
   連結：
8. 吳宗祐,徐瑋伶,鄭伯壎(2002)。怒不可遏或忍氣吞聲：華人企業主管威權領導與部屬憤怒反應。本土心理學研究，18，3-49。
   連結：
9. 吳宗祐,鄭伯壎(2003)。組織情緒研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究，19，137-173。
   連結：
10. 李美枝(1998)。中國人親子關係的內涵與功能：以大學生為例。本土心理學研究，9，3-52。
    連結：
11. 李美枝(2001)。手足與朋友關係的內涵與功能：從猩種與人種的表現看演化的藍圖與文化的加工。本土心理學研究，16，135-182。
    連結：
12. 李敏龍,楊國樞(1998)。中國人的忍：概念分析與實徵研究。本土心理學研究，10，3-68。
    連結：
13. 卓馨怡,利翠珊(2008)。成年子女的孝道責任與焦慮：親子關係滿意度的影響。本土心理學研究，30，155-197。
    連結：
14. 周婉茹,周麗芳,鄭伯壎,任金剛(2010)。專權與尚嚴之辨：再探威權領導的內涵與恩威並濟的效果。本土心理學研究，34，223-284。
    連結：
15. 林以正,黃金蘭,李怡真(2011)。進退之間的拿捏：忍的情境變異性與心理適應。本土心理學研究，35，57-100。
    連結：
16. 林姿葶,姜定宇,蕭景鴻,鄭伯壎(2014)。家長式領導效能：後設分析研究。本土心理學研究，42，181-249。
    連結：
17. 林姿葶,鄭伯壎(2012)。華人領導者的噓寒問暖與提攜教育：仁慈領導之雙構面模式。本土心理學研究，37，253-302。
    連結：
18. 林姿葶,鄭伯壎,周麗芳(2014)。家長式領導：回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究，42，3-82。
    連結：
19. 林昭溶,林惠雅(1999)。國中學生親子沖突的因應歷程。本土心理學研究，12，47-101。
    連結：
20. 林家五,王悅縈,胡宛仙(2012)。真誠領導與仁慈領導對組織公民行為及主管忠誠之差異效果。本土心理學研究，38，205-256。
    連結：
21. 林惠雅,林麗玲(2008)。青少年知覺之家人關係型態與幸福感。本土心理學研究，30，199-241。
    連結：
22. 姜定宇(2009)。華人企業主管知覺部屬效忠。中華心理學刊，51，101-119。
    連結：
23. 姜定宇,張菀真(2010)。華人差序式領導與部屬效能。本土心理學研究，33，109-177。
    連結：
24. 姜定宇,鄭伯壎(2003)。組織忠誠、組織承諾、及組織公民行爲研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究，19，175-209。
    連結：
25. 姜定宇,鄭伯壎(2014)。華人差序式領導的本質與影響歷程。本土心理學研究，42，285-357。
    連結：
26. 姜定宇,鄭伯壎,鄭紀塋,周麗芳(2007)。華人效忠主管的概念分析與量表建構。中華心理學刊，49(4)，407-432。
    連結：
27. 徐瑋伶,鄭伯壎,黃敏萍(2002)。華人企業領導人的員工歸類與管理行為。本土心理學研究，18，51-94。
    連結：
28. 高旭繁,陸洛(2006)。夫妻傳統性／現代性的契合與婚姻適應之關聯。本土心理學研究，25，47-100。
    連結：
29. 張兆球,郭黎玉晶(1998)。香港兒童對父母管教訊息的情緒反應和行為傾向。本土心理學研究，9，281-305。
    連結：
30. 張思嘉(2001)。婚姻早期的適應過程：新婚夫妻之質性研究。本土心理學研究，16，91-133。
    連結：
31. 張思嘉(2006)。家庭與婚姻：台灣心理學研究的現況與趨勢。本土心理學研究，26，3-34。
    連結：
32. 莊耀嘉(1999)。家庭中人際互動結構與運作模式。本土心理學研究，12，3-46。
    連結：
33. 郭均誠,林姿葶,周婉茹,鄭伯壎(2015)。領導者之差序對待幅度與部屬效能：平均德行領導的調節效果。本土心理學研究，43，125-172。
    連結：
34. 陳依芬,黃金蘭,林以正(2011)。忍的情緒調控策略與心理適應之關聯。本土心理學研究，35，3-56。
    連結：
35. 陸洛(2003)。人我關係之界定──「折衷自我」的現身。本土心理學研究，20，139-207。
    連結：
36. 陸洛,高旭繁,陳芬憶(2006)。傳統性、現代性、及孝道觀念對幸福感的影響：一項親子對偶設計。本土心理學研究，25，243-278。
    連結：
37. 黃士哲,葉光輝(2013)。父母教養方式對青少年雙元孝道信念的影響效果：中介歷程的探討。本土心理學研究，39，119-164。
    連結：
38. 黃宗堅,葉光輝,謝雨生(2004)。夫妻關係中權力與情感的運作模式：以衝突因應策略為例。本土心理學研究，21，3-48。
    連結：
39. 黃筱蘋,黃囇莉(2012)。破冰之旅──虛性和諧友誼中的情緒分享及其影響。中華心理學刊，54(2)，219-242。
    連結：
40. 黃囇莉,鄭琬蓉,黃光國(2008)。邁向發聲之路：上下關係中「忍」的歷程與自我之轉化。本土心理學研究，29，3-76。
    連結：
41. 葉光輝(1998)。孝道概念的心理學探討：雙層次孝道認知特徵的發展歷程。本土心理學研究，9，53-117。
    連結：
42. 葉光輝(2009)。華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究，32，101-148。
    連結：
43. 葉光輝(2004)。現代華人家人的互動關係及其心理歷程。本土心理學研究，22，81-119。
    連結：
44. 葉光輝(2009)。華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究，32，101-148。
    連結：
45. 葉光輝,吳志文,王敏衡(2016)。知覺滿足需求的教養與青少年的適應表現：雙元自主能力的跨時間中介效果檢驗。本土心理學研究，45，57-92。
    連結：
46. 葉光輝,黃宗堅,邱雅沂(2006)。現代華人的家庭文化特徵：以台灣北部地區若干家庭的探討為例。本土心理學研究，25，141-195。
    連結：
47. 樊景立,鄭伯壎(2000)。華人組織的家長式領導：一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究，13，126-180。
    連結：
48. 鄭伯壎(2004)。華人文化與組織領導：由現象描述到理論驗證。本土心理學研究，22，195-251。
    連結：
49. 鄭伯壎,周麗芳,黃敏萍,樊景立,彭泗清(2003)。家長式領導的三元模式：中國大陸企業組織的證據。本土心理學研究，20，209-250。
    連結：
50. 鄭伯壎,周麗芳,樊景立(2000)。家長式領導：三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究，14，3-64。
    連結：
51. 鄭伯壎,姜定宇(2000)。華人組織中的主管忠誠：主位與客位概念對員工效能的效果。本土心理學研究，14，65-113。
    連結：
52. 蕭英玲,利翠珊(2009)。夫妻間的恩情與親密：簡效量表的發展。本土心理學研究，32，3-40。
    連結：
53. 簡晉龍,黃囇莉(2015)。華人權威取向之內涵與形成歷程。本土心理學研究，43，55-123。
    連結：
54. Ashforth, B. E.,Humphrey, R. H.(1993).Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity.Academy of Management Review,18(1),88-115.
55. Baldwin, M. W.,Baccus, J. R.(2003).Relational knowledge and an expectancy-value approach to self-esteem.Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 9),London:
56. Baumeister, R. F.,Bratslavsky, E.,Muraven, M.,Tice, D. M.(1998).Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74(5),1252-1265.
57. Bhave, D. P.,Glomb, T. M.(2016).The role of occupational emotional labor requirements on the surface acting–job satisfaction relationship.Journal of Management,42(3),722-741.
58. Brotheridge, C. M.,Grandey, A. A.(2002).Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of "people work".Journal of Vocational Behavior,60(1),17-39.
59. Butler, E. A.,Lee, T. L.,Gross, J. J.(2007).Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific?.Emotion,7(1),30-48.
60. Davidson, T.,Van Dyne, L.,Lin, B.(2017).Too attached to speak up? It depends: How supervisor-subordinate guanxi and perceived job control influence upward constructive voice.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,143,39-53.
61. De Leersnyder, J.,Mesquita, B.,Kim, H.,Eom, K.,Choi, H.(2014).Emotional fit with culture: A predictor of individual differences in relational well-being.Emotion,14(2),241-245.
62. Diefendorff, J. M.,Greguras, G. J.(2008).Contextualizing emotional display rules: Examining the roles of targets and discrete emotions in shaping display rule perceptions.Journal of Management,35(4),880-898.
63. Ekman, P.(1993).Facial expression and emotion.American Psychologist,48(4),384-392.
64. Ekman, P.,Friesen, W. V.,O'sullivan, M.,Chan, A.,Diacoyanni-Tarlatzis, I.,Heider, K.(1987).Universals and cultural differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,53(4),712-717.
65. Elfenbein, H. A.,Ambady, N.(2002).On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin,128(2),203-235.
66. Fiske, A. P.(1991).Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations.New York:Free Press.
67. Gardner, W. L.,Avolio, B. J.,Luthans, F.,May, D. R.,Walumbwa, F. O.(2005).Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development.The Leadership Quarterly,16(3),343-372.
68. Grandey, A. A.,Diefendorff, J. M.,Rupp, D. E.(2013).Bringing emotional labor into focus: A review and integration of three research lenses.Emotional labor in the 21st century: Diverse perspectives on emotion regulation at work,New York:
69. Gross, J. J.(1998).Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74(1),224-237.
70. Gross, J. J.,John, O. P.(2003).Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85(2),348-362.
71. Hochschild, A. R.(1979).Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure.American Journal of Sociology,85(3),551-575.
72. Hofstede, G.(1983).The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories.Journal of International Business Studies,14(2),75-89.
73. Hülsheger, U. R.,Schewe, A. F.(2011).On the costs and benefits of emotional labor: A meta-analysis of three decades of research.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,16(3),361-389.
74. James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9(34), 188-205.
75. Jiang、 D. Y.,Cheng, B. S.(2008).Affect‐ and role‐based loyalty to supervisors in Chinese organizations.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,11(3),214-221.
76. Kang, S. M.,Shaver, P. R.,Sue, S.,Min, K. H.,Jing, H.(2003).Culture-specific patterns in the prediction of life satisfaction: Roles of emotion, relationship quality, and self-esteem.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,29(12),1596-1608.
77. Kim, H. S.,Sherman, D. K.(2007)."Express yourself": Culture and the effect of self-expression on choice.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,92(1),1-11.
78. Kitayama, S.,Markus, H. R.,Kurokawa, M.(2000).Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States.Cognition & Emotion,14(1),93-124.
79. Lazarus, R. S.(1991).Cognition and motivation in emotion.American Psychologist,46(4),352-367.
80. Leung, K.,Brew, F. P.,Zhang, Z. X.,Zhang, Y.(2011).Harmony and conflict: A cross-cultural investigation in China and Australia.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,42(5),795-816.
81. Li, T. S.,Chen, F. M.(2002).Affection in marriage: A study of marital En-qing and intimacy in Taiwan.Journal of Psychology in Chinese Society,3(1),37-59.
82. Lim, L. L.(2009).The influences of harmony motives and implicit beliefs on conflict styles of the collectivist.International Journal of Psychology,44(6),401-409.
83. Lindzey, G.(Ed.),Aronson, E.(Ed.)(1985).Handbook of social psychology.New York:Random House.
84. Manusov, v.(Ed.),Patterson, M. L.(Ed.)(2006).The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
85. Markus, H. R.,Kitayama, S.(1991).Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review,98(2),224-253.
86. Matsumoto, D.(1990).Cultural similarities and differences in display rules.Motivation and Emotion,14(3),195-214.
87. Matsumoto, D.,Hwang, H. S.,Yamada, H.(2012).Cultural differences in the relative contributions of face and context to judgments of emotions.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,43(2),198-218.
88. Matsumoto, D.,Yoo, S. H.,Hirayama, S.,Petrova, G.(2005).Development and validation of a measure of display rule knowledge: The display rule assessment inventory.Emotion,5(1),23-40.
89. Mauss, I. B.,Butler, E. A.,Roberts, N. A.,Chu, A.(2010).Emotion control values and responding to an anger provocation in Asian-American and European-American individuals.Cognition and Emotion,24(6),1026-1043.
90. Menon, T.,Blount, S.(2003).The messenger bias: A relational model of knowledge valuation.Research in Organizational Behavior,25,137-186.
91. Milliken, F. J.,Morrison, E. W.,Hewlin, P. F.(2003).An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why.Journal of Management Studies,40(6),1453-1476.
92. Planalp, S.(1999).Communicating emotion: Social, moral, and cultural processes.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
93. Redmond, V.,Jameson, J. K.,Binder, A. R.(2016).How superior–subordinate relationship quality and conflict management styles influence an employee's use of upward dissent tactics.Negotiation and Conflict Management Research,9(2),158-176.
94. Russell, J. A.(1994).Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of the cross-cultural studies.Psychological Bulletin,115(1),102-141.
95. Sanchez-Burks, J.,Bartel, C. A.,Blount, S.(2009).Performance in intercultural interactions at work: Cross-cultural differences in response to behavioral mirroring.Journal of Applied Psychology,94(1),216-223.
96. Schneider, K. G.,Hempel, R. J.,Lynch, T. R.(2013).That "poker face" just might lose you the game! The impact of expressive suppression and mimicry on sensitivity to facial expressions of emotion.Emotion,13(5),852-866.
97. Schwartz, S. H.,Verkasalo, M.,Antonovsky, A.,Sagiv, L.(1997).Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style.British Journal of Social Psychology,36(1),3-18.
98. Shi, X.,Wilson, S. R.(2010).Upward influence in contemporary Chinese organizations: Explicating the effects of influence goal type and multiple goal importance on message reasoning and politeness.Management Communication Quarterly,24(4),579-606.
99. Soto, J. A.,Levenson, R. W.,Ebling, R.(2005).Cultures of moderation and expression: Emotional experience, behavior, and physiology in Chinese Americans and Mexican Americans.Emotion,5(2),154-165.
100. Tee, E. Y.(2015).The emotional link: Leadership and the role of implicit and explicit emotional contagion processes across multiple organizational levels.The Leadership Quarterly,26(4),654-670.
101. Tepper, B. J.(1995).Upward maintenance tactics in supervisory mentoring and nonmentoring relationships.Academy of Management Journal,38(4),1191-1205.
102. Triandis, H. C.,Bontempo, R.,Villareal, M. J.,Asai, M.,Lucca, N.(1988).Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54(2),323-338.
103. Trougakos, J. P.,Beal, D. J.,Cheng, B. H.,Hideg, I.,Zweig, D.(2015).Too drained to help: A resource depletion perspective on daily interpersonal citizenship behaviors.Journal of Applied Psychology,100(1),227-236.
104. Tsai, J. L.,Miao, F. F.,Seppala, E.,Fung, H. H.,Yeung, D. Y.(2007).Influence and adjustment goals: Sources of cultural differences in ideal affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,92(6),1102-1117.
105. Van Kleef, G. A.(2014).Understanding the positive and negative effects of emotional expressions in organizations: EASI does it.Human Relations,67(9),1145-1164.
106. Van Kleef, G. A.(2009).How emotions regulate social life: The Emotions as Social Information (EASI) model.Current Directions in Psychological Science,18(3),184-188.
107. Van Kleef, G. A.,De Dreu, C. K.,Manstead, A. S.(2010).An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The Emotions as Social Information model.Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 42),San Diego, CA:
108. Van Kleef, G. A.,Homan, A. C.,Cheshin, A.(2012).Emotional influence at work: Take it EASI.Organizational Psychology Review,2,311-339.
109. Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D.,Barrett, L. F.,Barsalou, L. W.(2013).Neural evidence that human emotions share core affective properties.Psychological Science,24(6),947-956.
110. Yam, K. C.,Fehr, R.,Keng-Highberger, F. T.,Klotz, A. C.,Reynolds, S. J.(2016).Out of control: A self-control perspective on the link between surface acting and abusive supervision.Journal of Applied Psychology,101(2),292-301.
111. Yang, K. S.(2006).Indigenous personality research: The Chinese case.Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context,New York:
112. Zhang, Z. X.,Wei, X.(2017).Superficial harmony and conflict avoidance resulting from negative anticipation in the workplace.Management and Organization Review,13(4),795-820.
113. 何友暉,陳淑娟,趙志裕(1991)。關係取向：為中國社會心理方法論求答案。中國人的心理與行為（一九八九），台北:
114. 利翠珊(1995)。夫妻互動歷程之探討：以臺北地區年輕夫妻為例的一項初探性研究。本土心理學研究，4，260-321。
115. 林文瑛,王震武(1995)。中國父母的教養觀：嚴教觀或打罵觀？。本土心理學研究，3，2-92。
116. 林安梧(1997)。「道德與思想之意圖」的背景理解：以「血緣性縱貫軸」為核心的展開。本土心理學研究，7，126-164。
117. 姜定宇(2005)。台灣大學心理學研究所。
118. 張嘉真,李美枝(2000)。親子間情感行為的溯源與文化塑形。中華心理衛生學刊，13(2)，1-35。
119. 莊耀嘉,楊國樞(1997)。角色規範的認知結構。本土心理學研究，7，282-338。
120. 馮涵棣,陳倩慧(2002)。情緒、文化與道德社教化：以羞恥感為例的探討。情感、情緒與文化，台北:
121. 黃光國(2002)。從社會心理的角度看儒家文化傳統的內在結構。傳統中華文化與現代價值的激盪與調融（一），台北:
122. 黃堅厚(1982)。現代生活中孝的實踐。傳統文化與現代生活研討會論文集，台北:
123. 黃囇莉(1996)。中國人的和諧觀／衝突觀：和諧化辯證觀之研究取徑。本土心理學研究，5，47-71。
124. 楊中芳(1992)。中國人真是具有集體主義傾向嗎？試論中國人的價值體系。中國人的價值觀國際研討會論文集，台北:
125. 楊國樞(1993)。中國人的社會取向：社會互動的觀點。中國人的心理與行為：理論與方法篇，台北:
126. 楊國樞(1992)。父子軸家庭與夫妻軸家庭：運作特徵、變遷方向及適應問題。家庭與心理衛生國際研討會，台北:
127. 楊國樞(1985)。現代社會的新孝道。中華文化復興月刊，19，51-67。
128. 楊國樞(1997)。心理學研究的本土契合性及其相關問題。本土心理學研究，8，75-120。
129. 楊國樞（編）,黃光國（編）,楊中芳（編）(2005).華人本土心理學（上冊）.台北:遠流出版公司.
130. 楊國樞（編）,黃光國（編）,楊中芳（編）(2005).華人本土心理學（下冊）.台北:遠流出版公司.
131. 楊國樞,余安邦,葉明華(1991)。中國人的個人傳統性與現代性：概念與測量。中國人的心理與行為（一九八九），台北:
132. 楊國樞,葉光輝,黃囇莉(1989)。孝道的社會態度與行為：理論與測量。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，65，171-227。
133. 葉光輝(1997)。親子互動的困境與衝突及其因應方式：孝道觀點的探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，82，65-114。
134. 葉光輝(1997)。台灣民眾之孝道觀念的變遷情形。九○年代的台灣社會：社會變遷基本調查研究系列二（下冊），台北:
135. 葉光輝(2002)。父母的後設情緒理念類型及測量。情感、情緒與文化，台北:
136. 葉光輝,楊國樞(2008).中國人的孝道：心理學的分析.台北:國立台灣大學出版中心.
137. 葉明華,楊國樞(1997)。中國人的家族主義：概念分析與實徵衡鑑。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，83，169-225。
138. 鄭伯壎(1992)。權威家長的領導行為。中國人的心理與行為：理論與方法篇，台北:
139. 鄭伯壎(1995)。家長權威與領導行為之關係：一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，79，119-173。
140. 鄭伯壎(1995)。差序格局與華人組織行為。本土心理學研究，3，142-219。
141. 鄭伯壎（編）,樊景立（編）,徐淑英（編）,陳曉萍（編）(2014).組織與管理研究的實證方法（二版）.台北:華泰文化出版公司.

1. 費吳琛,周婉茹,李啓文,李庭閣(2023)。部屬啊！您有做自己的機會嗎？尚嚴、專權雙元領導與部屬任務績效之關聯性：以情緒調節策略揭開潘朵拉的盒子。組織與管理，16(2)，69-130。
2. 黃湘紜,王玉珍(2021)。華人父母教養期許形塑經驗與子女知覺期待之生涯因應。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，36，31-45。
3. 魏大紘,賴念華,張祐誠,張哲恩(2023)。文化心理劇對成員在孝道困境中親子互動的改變效益。中華輔導與諮商學報，66，123-158。
4. 葉思妤,陳品潔,刑志彬,王毓君,王芊文(2022)。情緒勒索人際互動特質量表之建構。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，37，27-44。
5. (2024)。伴侶情緒表達矛盾對關係滿意度之影響：行動者與伴侶相依模式之探討。教育心理學報，55(4)，795-818。
6. (2024)。華人組織中的人際關係：回顧與展望。中華心理學刊，66(1)，153-193。
7. (2024)。主管知覺受到部屬的不公平對待：主管原諒與報復。中華心理學刊，66(1)，51-82。