談科技大學英文補救教學課程設計

English Remedial Course Design for Students at Universities of Technology

10.29718/TJHSS.201003.0004

吳歆嬫(Hsin-Rong Wu)

英語為外語 ； 科技大學 ； 補救教學 ； EFL ； remedial course ； university of technology

淡江人文社會學刊

41期（2010 / 03 / 01）

69 - 100

繁體中文

近年來，科技大學學生英文程度偏低的情形引起各界關注，教育部提供各校經費辦理提昇學生外語能力，補救教學即是重點之一。然而，英文補救教學課程常常是短期、重點式的補救方法，因此，有頭痛醫頭、腳痛醫腳的缺點。據研究者的教學經驗，大部分科技大學學生英文程度不佳，連應英或應外系的學生也是，原因都是基礎不穩。進行補救教學時，非應英（外）系的學生都希望從頭教起，把基礎穩紮穩打的建立起來；然而，應英系的學生們卻一直被認為英文程度好，所以，不必參加補救教學，也因此沒有機會從頭學起。本研究以94位科技大學應英系和非應英系學生為研究對象，從詞彙量測驗和初級英檢模考的成績來判斷，應英系學生只比非應英系學生程度稍好，但基礎不穩，小錯不斷，因此，都需要從頭學習英語。本研究所提出的補救教學課程依學生的程度而有不同而設計。從頭學起的補救教學課程設計特色是以精熟學習的理論為主，以打下穩固英文基礎為目標，總教學時數為40小時，後測顯示兩組學生的成績進步情形。口訪內容和學生的反饋單，了解學生對此補救教學課程的看法，和學習前中後的感想。文末提出教學上的建議供有心於補救教學的老師們參考。

Recently, technological university students' deficiency in English has received much attention. The Ministry of Education supports universities of technology to provide students with a remedial program. Viewed from the past experience, a remedial program is always short-term and focused. The short-term behavior: ”Treat the head when the head aches; treat the foot when the foot hurts,” not only has wasted educational resources but has never achieved educational goals. Both English majors and non-English majors at universities of technology have insufficient competence in English. They need to lay a solid foundation in English by receiving an effective remedial program which will help them start over. In this study, 94 participants from Applied English department and non-English departments were required to take Vocabulary level test and the Elementary GEPT mock test. According to their test results, English majors were slightly better than non-English majors, but their proficiency was not steady. Therefore, a start over remedial program was designed for them based on theory of mastery learning in order to achieve the goal of building up a solid foundation for them in English. The total duration was forty hours and the posttest showed their progress. Data from oral interviews and student feedback showed participants' attitude toward this remedial program. Finally, the researcher provides suggestions for teachers who have an interest in remedial instruction.

1. 凌安屏（2007 年6 月14日）。〈要求太高？英檢未過屏科大六成畢業生領不到證書〉。ET today News。2008 年4 月3 日，取自：http: // www.ettoday.com/2007/06/14/124-2111657.htm
2. 楊桂華、陳揚盛（2007 年6 月14 日）。〈屏東科大6 成英檢沒過 無法畢業不及國中程度學者：太差了〉，《蘋果日報》，第A14 版。
3. Waring, R. (2001, February 16). How should teachers in corporate vocabulary teaching into their classes? Retrieved September 2, 2009, from http://www1.harenet.ne.jp/~waring/papers/eltnews.html
4. 曹逢甫（2005）。《在台灣進行英語字母拼讀法教學：理論與實踐》。94年12月2日演講主題，取自：http://zephyr.nsysu.edu.tw/Interlanguage/record/handout/1202_2/prof_tsao.pdf。http://zephyr.nsysu.edu.tw/Interlanguage/record/handout/1202_2/prof_tsao.pdf
5. 洪臣宏（2008 年7 月24 日）。〈英檢列畢業門檻‧輔英科大不合理？〉，《自由時報》。2008年7 月24 日，取自：http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2008/new/jul/24/today-complain2.htm
6. Bloom, B. S.(1968).Learning for mastery.UCLA Evaluation Comment,1(2),1-8.
7. Burley, H.(1994).Persistence: A meta-analysis of college developmental studies programs.Annual Forum of the Association of Institutional Research,New Orleans, LA:
8. Education Commission of the States (ECS)(2000).State funding for community colleges: A 50-state survey.Denver, CO:Center for Community College Policy.
9. Huang, C. C.(1999).Current issues in reading comprehension.Journal of Pingtung Vocational Senior High School,16,75-88.
10. Huang, C. C.(2000).A threshold for vocabulary knowledge on reading comprehension.Proceedings of the 17th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in ROC,Taipei:
11. Jenkins, D.,Boswell, K.(2002).State policies on community college remedial education: Findings from a national survey.Denver, CO:Center for Community College Policy.
12. Nation, I. S. P.(1990).Teaching and learning vocabulary.Boston:Heinle & Heinle.
13. National Center for Educational Statistics(2003).Remedial education at higher education institutions in fall 2000.Washington, DC:U. S. Department of Education.
14. Schmitt, N.(2000).Vocabulary in Language Teaching.Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press.
15. Shults, C.(2000).Remedial education: Practices and policies in community colleges.Washington, DC:American Association of Community Colleges.
16. West, M.(1953).A general service list of English words.London:Longman.
17. 余民寧(2002)。精熟學習、測驗診斷、與補救教學。IRT測驗與教學，1，11-14。
18. 余光雄、黃文禪(2006)。科技大學一年級新生英語詞彙知多少？。2006英語教學與評量國際研討會光碟版論文集，嘉義:
19. 吳歆嬫、黃宣穎、廖熒虹、王鈺琪、張珍婉、黃靜怡(2007)。基礎英語過關─1。台南:福克斯文教股份有限公司。
20. 杜正治編、李咏吟編(1993)。學習輔導。台北:心理出版社。
21. 林寶山(1990)。教學論。台北:五南出版社。
22. 邱淵、王鋼、夏孝川、洪邦裕、龔偉民、李亞玲(1989)。教學評量。台北:五南出版社。
23. 張思中(2006)。張思中與十六字外語教學法。北京:北京師範大學。
24. 張新仁(1999)。學習策略訓練之初探。教育文粹，18，86-94。
25. 張新仁(2001)。實施補救教學之課程與教學設計。教育學刊，17，85-106。
26. 張新仁、王家通編(1995)。教育導論。台北:五南出版社。
27. 張新仁、邱上真、李素慧(2000)。國中英語科學習困難學生之補救教學成效研究。教育學刊，16，163-191。
28. 黃光雄(1988)。教學原理。台北:師大書苑。
29. 鄧敦平(2000)。補救教學的迷思─談回歸起點的教學。師說，138，36-43。

1. Chou, Chi-ting(2013).Exploring English Remedial Instruction for Freshmen at a Technical College from the Perspective of Teaching Efficacy.英語教學期刊,37(4),149-194.
2. Chou, Chi-ting(2014).The implementation, influencing factors, difficulties, and coping strategies of English remedial instruction: A case study.彰化師大教育學報,25,113-136.
3. Yu, Chi-fang(2011).A Study in the Effect of the Online Remedial Program at Soochow University.東吳外語學報,33,1-23.
4. (2011).探討東吳大學大一英文線上補救教學效益.臺北教育大學語文集刊,20,1-23.