题名 |
明清間偽書《致身錄》攷論 |
并列篇名 |
On the Arguments of ZhiShenLu between the Ming and Qing Dynasties |
DOI |
10.29718/TJHSS.201009.0002 |
作者 |
吳航(Hang Wu) |
关键词 |
致身錄 ; 攷證 ; 明清時期 ; 偽書 ; ZhiShenLu ; textual criticism ; the Ming and Qing dynasties ; apochrypha |
期刊名称 |
淡江人文社會學刊 |
卷期/出版年月 |
43期(2010 / 09 / 01) |
页次 |
27 - 48 |
内容语文 |
繁體中文 |
中文摘要 |
舊題史仲彬《致身錄》是明萬曆間出現的一部記載建文君臣「遜荒」的偽書,系諸生史兆鬥所撰而託名於其先祖史仲彬。它的問世,既有深刻的歷史文化背景,又帶來了較大的影響。對此偽書充斥世間,失實亂真,一些有責任心、本著核實求真原則的學者,如沈德符、錢謙益、李清、査繼佐、潘檉章、朱彝尊、潘耒等等,進行了一系列的攷校辨偽工作。同時,仍有其他學者如徐釚、邵遠平、梅文鼎、朱鶴齡等持有不同意見。他們的攷證,是與清初崇實黜浮、辨偽存真的實學思潮分不開的,又是清初經世實學研究的重要表現之一。 |
英文摘要 |
ZhiShenLu is one of the aprochryphal historical books about the great escape of the Emperor Jianwen and his ministers, published in the Wanli period of the Ming Dynasty, which was written by Shi Zhaodou, a talent in the provincial exam, but signed as Shi Zhongbin. Its background had deep historical and cultural roots, and had a deep impact on the society then. It was advocated all over the society but was inconsistent with the historical facts, so some responsible historians, for example, Shen Defu, Qian Qianyi, Li Qing, Zha Jizuo, Pan Chengzhang, Zhu Yizun, Pan Lei and so forth, undertook a series of examinations of the book and proved it to be fake at long last. However, some scholars such as Xu Qiu, Shao Yuanping, Mei Wending and Zhu Heling and so on had different attitudes towards it. Their arguments, in the early Qing dynasty, were associated with the substantial and distinguishing trends of thought, and one of the important expressional forms of substantial academics. |
主题分类 |
人文學 >
人文學綜合 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合 |
参考文献 |
|