再製理論與課程

Reproduction Theory and Education

10.6384/CIQ.200104.0131

高博銓(Bo-Chuan Kao)

再製理論 ； 文化再製 ； 社會再製 ； reproduction theory ； cultural reproduction ； social reproduction

課程與教學

4卷2期（2001 / 04 / 01）

131 - 146+158

繁體中文

以再製概念來批判學校教育是教育社會學中，相當重要的研究主題。然而，由於各家所採取的觀點各有不同，因此使再製理論的發展，呈現多元繽紛的現象。然而，綜觀這些理論，主要是從經濟、文化、以及政治的角度，來探討學校教育的再製現象，進而批判現代的教育活動，尤其有關課程方面的批判，更是研究的焦點。事實上，由於課程是教育活動的核心所在，攸關教育事業的成敗。因此分析學校中的再製現象，以瞭解各種的再製過程，杜漸防微，避免學校淪為優勢階層再製的工具，誠屬必要。

It is an important topic of study for scholars to criticize education with reproduction theory in the field of educational sociology. However, with the different perspectives from various schools, the development of reproduction theory reveals multiple orientations. Judging from these theories, they analyze phenomena of reproduction in school and criticize modern educational activities from the standpoints of economy, culture and politics. Especially, the criticism of curriculum has drawn much attention. Since the curriculum is the essence of education and is closely related to the success of education, it is significant to analyze phenomena of reproduction in schools so as to have a better understanding of different processes of reproduction. On the other hand, with the knowledge of reproduction theory, it is necessary for us to prevent schools from becoming tools of reproduction dominated by those who have advantageous positions.

1. Apple, M. W.(1990).Ideology and Curriculum.London:Routledge.
2. Apple, M. W.(1988).The Curriculum: Problems, Politics, and Possibilities.NY:SUNY Press.
3. Apple, M. W.(1982).Cultural and Economic Reproduction in Education: Essays on Class, Ideology and the State.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
4. Bourdieu, P.(1977).Outline of a Theory of Practice.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
5. Bourdieu, P.(1991).Language and Symbolic Power.Cambridge:Polity.
6. Bourdieu, P.,Passeron, J. C.(1977).Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture.London:Sage.
7. Bourdieu, P.,Wacquant, L. J. D.(1992).An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
8. Bowles, S.,Gintis, H.(1976).Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
9. Dewey, J.(1916).Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education.NY:Macmillan.
10. Giroux, H. A.(1981).Ideology, Culture and the Process of Schooling.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
11. Giroux, H. A.(1981).Curriculum and Instruction.Berkeley, CA:McCutchan.
12. Gramsci, A.(1971).Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci.London:Lawrence and Wishart.
13. Marx, K.(1969).Capital.Moscow:Progress Publishers.
14. Robbins, D.(1991).The Work of Pierre Bourdieu.Open University Press.
15. Ross, A.(2000).Curriculum: Construction and Critique.London:Falmer Press.
16. Smart, B.(1985).Michel, Foucault.London:Routledge.
17. 陳伯璋(1988)。意識型態與教育。台北:師大書苑。
18. 歐用生(2000)。新世紀的教育展望。高雄:麗文。
19. 譚光鼎(1998)。社會與文化再製理論之評析。教育研究集刊，40，23-48。

1. 李政翰(2007)。學校跳脫文化再製現象之可能性——從教師專業倫理實踐之角度檢視。學校行政，48，168-186。
2. (2003)。從再製理論看學校教育的角色。屏東師院學報，21，217-242。