教育實習實施同儕觀察對實習教師教師效能感之影響

The Effect of Peer Observation in Educational Practicum on Student Teachers' Teacher Efficacy

10.6384/CIQ.200501.0111

陳世佳(Shr-Jya Chen)；楊正誠(Cheng-Cheng Yang)

同儕觀察 ； 教育實習 ； 教師效能感 ； 實習教師 ； educational practicum ； peer observation ； student teacher ； teacher efficacy

課程與教學

8卷1期（2005 / 01 / 01）

111 - 124

繁體中文

師資培育法修訂後，未來實習教師的教育實習將改為半年制，也因此教育實習的視導與評鑑，成為落實專業師資培育的關鍵。近年來國外相關研究提出，同儕觀察為一頗具效能的視導模式，能提供教師教學活動的觀察，協助教師改進教學技巧。循此理念，本研究以實習教師為對象，設計一套為期六個月的「同儕觀察活動」，期能充實教育實習訓練，抒解教學視導人力不足之困境。為了評鑑同儕觀察運用於教育實習之可行性，本研究以教師效能感作為指標，採「不等組前測－後測設計」，以觀察同儕觀察對實習教師的影響。實驗組15位實習教師除了接受傳統視導之外，並參與同儕觀察活動；控制組26位實習教師則僅接受傳統視導。活動前後以教師效能感問卷針對實驗組與控制組同時施測，以獨立樣本單因子共變數分析進行前後測得分之分析。研究結果發現同儕觀察的實施能夠提升實驗組實習教師的個人教學效能感。因此，研究者建議師資培育機構或教育實習機構可將同儕觀察運用於教育實習歷程中，對實習教師之成長將具有正面的助益。

The revision of the Teacher Education Law declared that the educational practicum will be shortened into six months. Therefore, supervision and evaluation during the practicum became more challenging and crucial to teacher education training. According to recent studies, peer observation was proposed to be an effective method to improve teachers’ teaching skills. This study developed a six-month ”peer observation activity” for student teachers in educational practicum, hoping to carry instructional supervision into effect and to ease the overwhelming workload demanded for instructional supervision. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of this ”peer observation activity” on student teachers, using a pretest-posttest nonequivalent groups design. Treatment group student teachers (n=15) participated in the peer observation activity in addition to the traditional supervision, while the control group student teachers (n=26) received only the traditional supervision. Teacher efficacy was measured before and after this activity. ANCOVA was used to examine the differences between these two groups. Results indicated that peer observation raised treatment group’s personal teaching efficacy. It was concluded that peer observation was an effective activity to help student teachers' growth and was worthy of adoption in educational practicum.

1. 師資培育法
2. 高級中等以下學校及幼稚園教師資格檢定及教育實習辦法
3. Alfonso, R. J.(1977).Will peer supervision work?.Educational Leadership,34(8),594-601.
4. Bandura, A.(1977).Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review,84,191-215.
5. Chambers, S. M.,Henson, R. K.,Sienty, S. F.(2001).Paper presented at the 24th annual meeting of he Southwest Educational Research Association.New Orleans, LA:
6. Cosh, J.(1999).Peer observation: A reflective model.ELT Journal,53(1),22-27.
7. Cosh, J.(1998).Peer observation in higher education: A reflective approach.Innovations in Education and Training International,35(2),171-176.
8. Dembo, M. H.,Gibson, S.(1985).Teacher's sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement.The Elementary School Journal,86,173-184.
9. Fortman, C. K.,Pontius, R.(2000).Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association.Chicago, IL:
10. Gibson, S.,Dembo, M. H.(1984).Teacher efficacy A construct validation.Journal of Educational Psychology,76(4),569-582.
11. Goddard, R. D.,Hoy, W. K.,Hoy, A. W.(2000).Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement.American Educational Research Journal,37(2),479-507.
12. Hopfengardner, J. D.,Walker, R.(1984).Collegial support: An alternative to principal-led supervision of instruction.NASSP Bulletin,68,35-40.
13. Koehler, V. R.(1988).Barriers to effective supervision of student teaching: A field study.Journal of Teacher Education,39(2),28-34.
14. Martin, G. A.,Double, J. M.(1998).Developing higher education teaching skills through peer observation and collaborative reflection.Innovations in Education and Training International,35(2),161-170.
15. Mento, A. J.,Giampetro-Meyer, A.(2000).Peer observation of teaching as a true developmental opportunity.College Teaching,48(1),28-31.
16. Munson, B. R.(1998).Peers observing peers: The better way to observe teachers.Contemporary Education,69(2),108-111.
17. Robbins, P.(1991).How to plan and implement a peer coaching program.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
18. Sullivan, S.,Glanz, J.(2000).Alternative approaches to supervision: Cases from the field.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,15(3),212-235.
19. Wiles, J.,Bondi, J.(1986).Supervision: A guide to practice.Columbus, OH:Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
20. Zorga, S.,Dekleva, B.,Kobolt, A.(2001).The process of internal evaluation as a tool for improving peer supervision.International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling,23,151-162.
21. 吳璧如(2002)。教師效能感之理論分析。教育研究資訊，10(2)，45-64。
22. 呂木琳(2002)。教學視導-理論與實務。台北:五南。
23. 李珀(2001)。教學視導。台北:五南。
24. 邱錦昌(1995)。教育視導之理論與實際。台北:五南。
25. 張德銳(2001)。共譜教師專業成長的新樂章:談同儕教練。中等教育，52(2)，134-143。
26. 陳聖謨(1991)。學校教學視導實施現況的檢討與建議。教育研究雙月刊，59，68-75。
27. 黃國光(2001)。SPSS與統計原理剖析。台北:松崗。
28. 楊振昇(1999)。我國教學視導制度之困境與因應。課程與教學季刊，2(2)，15-30。
29. 顏國樑(2002)。教育法規。高雄:麗文文化。

1. (2007)。教育實習輔導制度運用發展性教學輔導系統之策略。教育研究與發展期刊，3(1)，143-169。