《二十六期年刊》在課程史上的意義

The Significance of the 26th Yearbook of NSSE in History of Curriculum

10.6384/CIQ.200510.0077

單文經(Wen-Jing Shan)；鍾鴻銘(Horng-Ming Jong)

二十六期年刊 ； 課程史 ； 課程編製 ； 26th Yearbook ； curriculum history ； curriculum making

課程與教學

8卷4期（2005 / 10 / 01）

77 - 89

繁體中文

「全美教育研究社」在1927年出版的《二十六期年刊》為美國課程史中最重要的文獻之一。本文旨在概述此一年刊的內容，並且探討其在課程史中所具有的意義。全文共分為六節，首節為前言，說明本文寫作的緣起；第二節，敘述其出版的歷史背景；第三節，介紹第一冊《課程編製：過去與現在》的內容；第四節，介紹第二冊《課程編製之基礎》的內容；第五節，分別自（一）促成課程領域的專門化、（二）引導課程人員的專業化、（三）嘗試建立課程理念的共識、（四）初步擬定課程編製的步驟等四方面，說明該年刊在課程史中的重要性。最後，則殿以結論。

The purpose of the article is to investigate the historical significance of the 26th Yearbook, one of the most important documents in curriculum history in the USA in particular and the world in general. The yearbook ”The foundations and technique of curriculum-construction” published by the National Society for the Study of Education in 1927 consists of two volumes: ”Curriculum-making: Past and present” and ”The foundations of curriculum-making.” The article is divided into four sections except the introduction and conclusion. The background of the yearbook's publication as well as the scan view of each volume is explicated in first four sections; in the fifth section, the historical significance of the yearbook is analyzed as facilitating the specialization of curriculum field, stimulating of the professionalization of the curriculum personnel, the establishment of the curriculum consensus, and setting up the guidelines of curriculum making.

1. Kliebard, H. M.(1986).The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958.Boston, London, and Henley:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2. Kliebard, H. M.(1992).Forging the American curriculum: Essays in curriculum history and theory.New York:Routledee.
3. Kridel, C.(2000).Books of the century catalog.Columbia, SC:University of South Carolina.
4. Lavisky, S.(1973).An uncritical review of "The curriculum literature," 1955-1970.
5. Rugg et al.(1969).The foundations and technique of curriculum-construction, part II. The foundations of curriculum-making. The Twenty-Sixth yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education.NY:Arno Press & The New York Times.
6. Rugg et al.(1969).The foundations and technique of curriculum-construction, part I. Curriculum-making Past and present. The Twenty-Sixth yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education.NY:Arno Press & The New York Times.
7. Rugg, G. O.,Counts, G.(1969).The foundations and technique of curriculum-construction, part I. Curriculum-making: Past and present. The Twenty-Sixth yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education.NY:Arno Press & The New York Times.
8. Rugg, H. O.(1969).The foundations and technique of curriculum-construction, part II. The foundations of curriculum-making. The Twenty-Sixth yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education.NY:Arno Press & The New York Times.
9. Rugg, H. O.(1969).The foundations and technique of curriculum-construction, part II. The foundations of curriculum-making. The Twenty-Sixth yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education.NY:Arno Press & The New York Times.
10. Rugg, H. O.(1947).Foundations for American education.NY:World Book.
11. Rugg, H. O.(1969).The foundations and technique of curriculum-construction, part I. Curriculum-making: Past and present. The Twenty-Sixth yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education.NY:Arno Press & The New York Times.
12. Rugg, H. O.(1969).The foundations and technique of curriculum-construction, part I. Curriculum-making: Past and present. The Twenty-Sixth yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education.NY:Arno Press & The New York Times.
13. Rugg, H. O.(1969).The foundations and technique of curriculum-construction, part I. Curriculum-making: Past and present. The Twenty-Sixth yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education.NY:Arno Press & The New York Times.
14. Rugg, H. O.(1969).The foundations and technique of curriculum-construction, part I. Curriculum-making: Past and present. The Twenty-Sixth yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education.NY:Arno Press & The New York Times.
15. Tanner, D.,Tanner, L.(1990).History of the school curriculum.New York:Macmillan.
16. Tanner, D.,Tanner, L.(1995).Curriculum development: Theory into practice.Englewood, NJ:Merrill.
17. Tyler, R. W.(1987).The five most significant curriculum events in the twentieth century.Educational Leadership,44(4),36-38.
18. Tyler, R. W.(1971).The curriculum: Retrospect and prospect.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
19. Whipple, G. M.(1969).The foundations and technique of curriculum-construction, part I. Curriculum-making: Past and present. The Twenty-Sixth yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education.NY:Arno Press & The New York Times.
20. Whipple, G. M. (Ed.)(1969).The foundations and technique of curriculum-construction, part I. Curriculum-making: Past and present. The Twenty-Sixth yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education.NY:Arno Press & The New York Times.
21. Whipple, G. M. (Ed.)(1969).The foundations and technique of curriculum-construction, part II. The foundations of curriculum-making. The Twenty-Sixth yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education.NY:Arno Press & The New York Times.
22. Willis, G.,Schubert, W. H.,Bullough, R. V.,Kridel, C.,Holton, J. T.(1994).The American curriculum: A documentary history.Westport, CT:Praeger.
23. 方德隆譯、A. C. Ornstein、F. P. Hunkins著(2004)。課程基礎理論( Foundations of curriculum, I)。台北:高等教育。
24. 賈士蘅譯、Keith Jenkins著(1996)。歷史再思考(Re-thinking history)。台北:麥田。
25. 盧建榮(1996)。歷史再思考(Re-thinking history)。台北:麥田。

1. 鍾鴻銘(2006)。H. Rugg教科書爭議事件。教育研究集刊，52(3)，103-139。
2. (2009)。《中等教育的基本原理》在美國課程史上意義之初探。教育研究與發展期刊，5(2)，1-26。