九年一貫課程培養學生動手做能力課程規劃之探討─以手擲滑翔機為例

A Curriculum to Facilitate Pupils' Hands-on Abilities: Building Hand Launch Glider

10.6384/CIQ.200601.0081

李賢哲(Shyan-Jer Lee)；樊琳(Lynn Farh)；李文慶(Wen-Chin Lee)

九年一貫課程 ； 基本能力 ； 動手做 ； 飛行教材 ； basic capability ； curriculum design ； flying course ； hands-on

課程與教學

9卷1期（2006 / 01 / 01）

81 - 98

繁體中文

九年一貫課程綱要於自然與生活科技學習領域，其課程目標著重「激發學生創造潛能」；分段能力指標首項，在於教導學生「過程技能」，期能培養學生之基本動手做能力。本文結合科學教育與具實際經驗之模型愛好人士，研發適合國中小學生階段之飛行教材－製造手擲滑翔機。藉著飛行教師實際展示各式飛行模型，培訓學生實際動手做的能力，期能激發學生之興趣、好奇心，主動的動手做，展現多元之歷練與膽識，做為激發科學創造潛能的基石。本課程實施於國小四年級和國中一年級之兩位個案與國中創意飛行營，實驗教學結果顯示，學生對於飛行的瞭解，能植基於課程中傳導之內容，設計並發展屬於自己特色的機型。於飛行知識與科學技能教學前後開放問卷結果中，學生學習興趣有明顯提高、工具使用之技能增長、和對滑翔機之飛行特性相關描述呈多元化增長。展現動手作之飛行課程，於實際執行過程中，對學生在學習能力與興趣的培養有正向之助益。

One of the main goals of the contemporary nine-year continuous curriculum is to improve the students' learning abilities and scientific literacy. In order to achieve the goal, we need to facilitate students' process skills through hands-on activities. This hands-on curriculum design we utilize hand launch glider (HLG) as an example. Before the pupils design and construct their own HLG, aeronautical teachers dynamically fly radio controlled (R/C) models allowing pupils to gain experience in aerodynamics. To strengthen pupils' capabilities in comparison and observation, various static models are also demonstrated. The tasks for pupils to perform in the teaching and learning processes are the followings: 1. draw the design, 2. measure and construct the design, 3. adjust the model, 4. trial and error, and 5. readjust. Trial and error is one of the key philosophies in testing their own design. Observation records, model inspections and open questionnaires are among the collection of our data. The results from two case studies (4th and 7th grade) and one flying camp, show that pupils' in the aerodynamic design, tool and material applications, and scientific processes are improved significantly. The facilitation of the interest in aeronautic sports also allows pupils to learn more contexts in their extra-curriculum. This self-learning experience is one of the main factors affecting the outcomes in pupils' life-long learning experience.

1. 李賢哲、李彥斌(2002)。以科學過程技能融入動手做工藝教材培養國小學童科學創造力。科學教育學刊，10(4)，341-372。
   連結：
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993).Benchmarks for scientific literacy.New York:Oxford University Press.
3. Carin. A. A.,Sund, R. B.(1989).Teaching science through discovery.London:Mernll Publishing Company..
4. Cobet, W. W.,K. Tobin (ed.)(1993).The practice of constructivism in science education.Hillsdale. NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Daniels, H.,Bizar, M.(1998).Methods that matter Six structures fin best practice classroom.York, Maine:Stenhouse.
6. Eddy, D.(2002).Learning by doing.Western Fruit Grown,122(1),12L.
7. Eddy. D.(2002).Learning by doing.Western Fruit Grover,122(1),12L.
8. Eick, C. J.(2002).Science curriculum in practice: Student teachers` use of hands-on activities in high stakes testing schools.NASSP Bulletin,86,72-85.
9. Frindrichsen, P. M.(2001).Moving from Hands-on to inquiry-based: a biology course for prospective elementary teachers.The American Biology Teacher,63(8),562-568.
10. Madaus, G. F.(1988).The distortion of teaching and testing: High-stakes testing and instruction.Peabody Journal of Education,65(3),29-46.
11. National Research Council(1996).National Science Education Standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
12. Posner. G.,Strike, K.,Hewson, P.,Gertzog, W.(1982).Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change.Science Education,66,211-227.
13. Richard, T.,Houlihan, M. B.(1999).Hands-on learning.The American School Board Journal,186,22-25.
14. Shoup. S. R.(1999).Learning from experience.Resource,6(4),9-10.
15. Smith, M. L.,Fey, P.(2000).Validity and accountability in high-stakes testing.Journal of Teacher Education,51,334-345.
16. Taylor, J. A.(2001).Using a practical context to encourage conceptual change: an instructional sequence in bicycle science.School Science and Mathematics,10(3),117-124.
17. Veronesi, P.,Van Voorst, C.,P. A. Rubba,J. A. Rye,P. F. Keig,W. J. Di Biase (Eds.)(2000).Proceedings of the 2000 Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science.University park:Pennsylvania State university.
18. Vesper, K, H.(1979).New-venture ideas: Do not overlook experience factor.Harvard Business Review,57(4),164.
19. 于瑞珍(1998)。初聲試啼－簡介國立科學工藝博物館展示廳動手做活動。博物館學季刊，12(4)，29-32。
20. 小林昭夫、王政友譯(2003)。圖解飛機的構造與原理。台北縣:世茂出版社。
21. 中華創意發展協會(2002)。「Power Tech 12全國少年科技創作競賽」決賽新聞稿。台北:國立臺灣師範大學。
22. 毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。臺北:心理出版社。
23. 江新合、唐偉成(1999)。開發科學創造力的V-MAP教學策略實徵研究。科學教育學刊，7(4)，367-391。
24. 呂翠夏(1993)。從活動中學習－方案教學的實施方法。國教之友，45(20)，27-32。
25. 李賢哲(2001)。以動手做（DIY）工藝的興趣培養中小學童具科學創造力之人格特質。科學教育月刊，243，2-7。
26. 李賢哲、樊琳、李彥賦(2001)。從科學活動過程技能中培養國小學童科學創造力。九十年度師範院概論文集，台中:
27. 洪榮昭、林雅玲、林展立(2002)。國中小創意教師教學策略與成效之研究。創造力課程開發國際學術研討會大會手冊，臺北市:
28. 教育部(2001)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北市:教育部。
29. 章順慧(2002)。國小科技教育課程運用模組化教學與設備之初探。國教新知，48(3)，39-44。
30. 薛梨真(1999)。從實作型研習探討國小統整課程的實施。臺南師院學報，32，175-208。

1. 羅希哲、蔡慧音、詹為淵、石儒居(2010)。網路專題式學習應用於高中女學生STEM知識學習之研究。人文社會科學研究，4(4)，115-141。
2. 游光昭、洪國峰、林坤誼(2010)。從反思與實踐看國中生在科技實作活動中的學習歷程表現。課程與教學，13(3)，219-250。