課程史研究的歷史回顧及重要議題分析

The Curriculum History Research in Retrospect and the Analysis of Important Issues

10.6384/CIQ.200604.0105

楊智穎(Jyh-Yiing Yang)

課程史 ； 文化歷史 ； 課程改變 ； curriculum history ； cultural history ； curriculum change

課程與教學

9卷2期（2006 / 04 / 01）

105 - 115

繁體中文

自一九七○年代之後，課程史逐漸被視為一個重要的學術研究領域，然而，其做為課程研究理論依據的一部分，和哲學、心理學與社會學相較，在概念和方法論方面仍缺乏深入與系統性的探討。為能更清晰地認識課程史研究的本質，以作為評鑑各類課程史研究之良窳的依據，本研究進行課程史研究的歷史回顧，同時歸納出重要的議題進行深入探討。本研究主要分為五部分，包括西方課程史研究的興起與發展、課程史研究的範疇、美國課程史研究取向的歷史轉折與課程史研究的重要問題探討，5.啟示與展望。

The history of curricula increasingly came to be viewed as an important area for scholarship and research in 1970. However, curriculum history as a part of curriculum theory still lacked an exposition of concepts and methodology deeply and systematically, compared with philosophy, psychology and sociology. In order to understand the nature of curriculum history research, the article analyzed historical development of curriculum history research through literature review. In addition, this paper also discussed the important issues of curriculum history research based previous literature.This article was divided into the following five parts. First, the rise and development of curriculum history research are analyzed. Second, the scope was explored. Third, the historical shift in America was examined. Fourth, the important issues were discussed. Finally, this article presented some implications and prospects.

1. 單文經(2005)。Rugg及Bruner社會領域課程改革經驗的啓示。教育研究集刊，51(4)，1-30。
   連結：
2. Bellack, A.(1969).History of curriculum thought and practice.Review of Educational Research,39,283-292.
3. Bellack, A.,B. M. Franklin (Ed.)(2000).Curriculum & curriculum: Herbert M. Kliebard and the promise of schooling.New York:Teachers College Press.
4. Doyle, W.,Ponder, G. A.,O. L. Davis. (Ed.)(1976).Perspectives on curriculum development: 1776-1976 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Washington, DC:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5. Foucault, M.,D.F. Bonchard, (Ed.)(1977).Language counter-memory practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault.Oxford:Blackwell Press.
6. Franklin, B. M.(1977).Curriculum history: It`s natures and boundaries.Curriculum inquiry,7(1),33-47.
7. Franklin, B. M.,A. Lewy, (Ed.)(1991).The international encyclopedia of curriculum.Oxford:Pergamon Press.
8. Goodson, I.(1988).The making of curriculum.London:The Falmer Press.
9. Goodson, I.(1989).Curriculum reform and curriculum theory: A case of historical amnesia.Cambridge Journal of Education,19(2),131-141.
10. Goodson, I.(1994).Studying curriculum: Cases and methods.New York and London:Columbia University.
11. Goodson, I.,B. M. Franklin (Ed.)(1986).Building the American community: The school curriculum and the search for social control.Philadelphoa:The Falmer Press.
12. Goodson, I.,I. F. Goodson (Ed.)(1985).Social histories of the secondary curriculum: Subjects for study.London:The Falmer Press.
13. Goodson, I.,Marsh, C. J.(1996).Studying school subjects.London & Washington:The Palmer Press.
14. Kliebard, H.(1992).Forging the American curriculum.New York and London:Routledge.
15. Kliebard, H. M.(1986).Struggle for the American curriculum.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
16. Kliebard, H. M.,Franklin, B. M.,J. H. Best (Ed.)(1983).Historical inquiry in education : A research agenda.Washington DC:American Educational Research Association.
17. Kliebard, H. M.,P. Jackson (Ed.)(1992).Handbook of curriculum research.New York:Macmillan.
18. Kridel, C.,Newman, V.,W.F. Pinar (Ed.)(2003).International handbook of curriculum research.NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
19. Marsh, C. J.(1992).Key concepts for understanding curriculum.London:The Falmer Press.
20. Marsh, C.,Willis,G.(1999).Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Merrill.
21. Munro, P.,W.F.Pinar (Ed).(1998).Curriculum: Toward new identities.New York:Garland.
22. Omstein, A.C.,Hunkins, F.P.(1996).Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and issues.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
23. Pinar, W. F.,Reynolds,W. M.,Slattery, P.,Taubmn, P. M.(1995).Understanding Curriculum.New York:Peter Lang.
24. Popkewitz, T. S.(1987).The formation of the school subjects.New York:The Falmer Press.
25. Popkewitz, T. S.,C. A. Torres,T. R. Mitchell (Eds.)(1998).Sociology of education: Emerging perspectives.State University of New York Press.
26. Popkewitz, T. S.,Pereyra, M. A.,Franklin, B. M.(Ed.)(2001).Cultural history and education.New York and London:Routledge Falmer.
27. Reid, W.(1986).Curriculum theory and curriculum change : What can we learn from history?.Journal of Curriculum Studies,18(2),159-166.
28. Scott. J. W.(1996).Feminism and history.New York:Oxford University Press.
29. 卯靜儒(2001)。台灣近十年來課程改革之政治社會學分析。台灣教育社會學研究，79-102。
30. 卯靜儒、張建成(2004)。行政院國家委員會專題研究計畫行政院國家委員會專題研究計畫,未出版
31. 白亦方、國立台灣師範大學主辦(2004)。課程史研究，此其時矣。「第十屆課程與教學論壇，課程與教學革新的反省與前瞻國際學術研討會」，台北:
32. 楊智穎、中華民國課程與教學學會主編(2004)。課程與教學研究之發展與前瞻。台北:高等教育。
33. 楊智穎、單文經主編(2004)。課程與教學新論。台北:心理。
34. 楊智穎、歐用生、陳伯璋主編(2003)。課程與教學的饗宴。高雄:復文。
35. 楊龍立主編(2003)。九年一貫課程與文化。台北:五南。
36. 楊龍立、單文經主編(2004)。課程與教學新論。台北:心理。

1. 彭煥勝、陳美如(2016)。探尋一段臺灣課程發展史─板橋模式的回顧與前瞻。教科書研究，9(1)，1-36。
2. 宋明娟(2007)。D. Tanner、L. Tanner與H. Kliebard的課程史研究觀點解析。教育研究集刊，53(4)，1-32。
3. (2011)。為臺灣課程領域的發展史研究另闢蹊徑。教育研究與發展期刊，7(2)，1-26。