性別化的課程與教學─一所高中學生的課堂經驗

Gendered Curriculum and Teaching-Class Experiences of Senior High School Students

10.6384/CIQ.200610.0019

楊巧玲(Chiao-Ling Yang)

性別教育 ； 課程與教學 ； 高中學生 ； 課堂經驗 ； gender education ； curriculum and teaching ； senior high students ； class experiences

課程與教學

9卷4期（2006 / 10 / 01）

19 - 34

繁體中文

本文是國科會研究專案成果的一部份，該研究旨在將青少年次文化中的性別現象加以問題化，深入瞭解青少年在校園生活中的性別經驗。事實上自一九七0年代開始，便有學者指陳性別是校園生活中的主要組織原則之一，舉凡學校制服、學習科目、行政實務、教室活動、空間使用，在在都直接間接地具現性別，有人稱為性別政權（gender regime），有人稱為性別符碼（gender code）（Acker, 1988），而課程與教學則是其中的一部份，往往既形塑又反映學生在學校中的性別經驗（Connell, 2000; Kessler et al, 1985）。在課程研究的領域裡，Goodlad（1979）早已指出不同層次之間的差距，但是衡諸既有文獻，可以發現經驗課程這個層次較少受到研究者的注意，而學生觀點在研究中的缺席象徵其相對弱勢（Wood, 2003），本研究試圖彌補這個部份的不足，以台灣南部地區一所男女合校的高級中學為場域，在三個類組中各選一個班級，每班各分十組逐週進行焦點團體訪談，每組訪談大綱雷同，以利資料分析與經常比較，關於性別在類組選擇以及同儕互動方面所起的作用已經分別撰文發表，本文將著眼於學生針對與性別議題有關的課程與教學所做的自我陳述與小組討論，包括哪些課程提及性別相關的議題、教師如何進行、學生有何反應，並對現行高中課程的改革與性別平等教育的推動提出建議。

This article is part of a research project sponsored by the National Science Council. The entire purpose of the project is to problemtize the gender aspect of youth subculture and understand profoundly their gender experiences in school. Indeed, since the 1970s scholars have indicated gender as a major organizing principle in school life, such as school uniforms, subject areas, administrative practice, classroom activities, space utilization. Each of them all embodies gender in explicit and implicit ways. Some call it the gender regime while others the gender code (Acker, 1988), which entails curriculum and teaching which both shape and reflect students' gender experiences in school ( Connell, 2000; Kessler et al, 1985). In the field of curriculum studies, Goodlad (1979) pointed out long ago the gap between and among different levels of curriculum, but the level of experiential curriculum has still not received adequate research attention in existing literature. And the lack of students' perspectives in research symbolizes their disadvantaged position (Wood, 2003). This study attempts to address this insufficiency. Based on a co-educational senior high school located in the southern region of Taiwan, one class is selected from every different group, named the first, second, and third subject category and thus there are three classes in total. Each class is divided into ten groups and a focus group interview is conducted every week A similar interview guide is used in order to analyze collected data and make constant comparisons. Two other articles have been presented with respect to how gender influences high school students' subject choice and peer interaction. This article focuses on students' self report and group discussion about the topic of the curriculum and teaching with gender implications, including which courses or classes mention about gender-related issues, how they are taught, how students respond. It intends to draw out some suggestions for reforming the current high school curricula and promoting gender equity education in senior high.

1. 洪久賢(2001)。教師性別教育專業成長之分析研究。師大學報教育類，46(2)，213-231。
   連結：
2. Abu El-Haj, T.R.(2003).Challenging the inevitability of difference: young women and discourses about gender equity in the classroom.Curriculum Inquiry,33(4),401-425.
3. Acker, S.(1988).Teacher, gender and resistance.British Journal of Sociology of Education,9(3),307-322.
4. Allen, L.(2004).Beyond the birds and the bees: constituting a discourse of erotics in sexuality education.Gender and Education,16(2),151-167.
5. Brown, D.,Evans, J.(2004).Reproducing gender? Intergenerational links and the male PE teacher as a cultural conduit in teaching physical education.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,23,48-70.
6. Connell, R. W.(2000).The Men and the Boys.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
7. Diorio, J. A.,Munro, J. A.(2000).Doing harm in the name of protection: menstruation as a topic for sex education.Gender and Education,12(3),347-365.
8. Easthopc, A.(1990).What a Man' s Gotta Do.Boston, MA:Unwin Hyman.
9. Goodlad, J.(eds.)(1979).Curriculum Inquiry: The study of curriculum practice.New York:Macmillan.
10. Harrison, L.(2000).Gender relations and the production of difference in school-based sexuality and HIV/AIDS education in Australia.Gender & Education,12(1),5-19.
11. Harrison, L.,Hillier, L.(1999).What should be the 'subject' of sex education?.Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,20(2),279-288.
12. Kehily, M. J.,Nayak, A.(1997).'Lads and laughter' : humour and the production of heterosexual hierarchies.Gender & Education,9(1),69-87.
13. Kenway, J.,Modra, H.,C. Luke(eds.),J. Gore(eds.)(1992).Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy.New York:Routledge.
14. Kessler, S.,Ashenden, D.J.,Connell, R.W.,Dowsett, G.W.(1985).Gender relations in secondary schooling.Sociology of Education,58,34-48.
15. Mac An Chaill, M.(1996).Deconstructing heterosexualities within school arenas.Curriculum Studies,4(2),191-209.
16. Mac An Ghaill, M.(1991).Schooling, sexuality and male power: towards an emancipatory curriculum.Gender& Education,3(3),291-309.
17. Nayak, A. S.,Kehily, M. J.(1996).Playing it straight: masculinities, homophobias and schooling.Journal of Gender Studies,5(2),211-230.
18. Nilan, P.(2000).You' an hopeless I swear to god' : shifting masculinities in classroom.Gender & Education,12(1),53-68.
19. Robinson, K.(2000).'Great Tits, Miss!' The silencing of male students' sexual harassment of female teachers in secondary schools: a focus on gendered authority.Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,21(1),75-90.
20. Shelton, C.(2003).Male primary teachers and perceptions of masculinity.Educational Review,55(2),195-209.
21. Wood, E.(2003).The power of pupil perspectives in evidence-based practice: the case of gender and underachievement.Research Papers in Education,18(4),365-383.
22. 方德隆(2000)。國民小學中年級教科書是否符合兩性平等教育原則檢視報告書。台北:教育部。
23. 何春蕤(1997)。中小學教師的兩大隱憂與性別教育改革。性／別教育通訊，1，4-13。
24. 何春蕤(1998)。教改理念下的性別教育。性／別教育通訊，2，4-13。
25. 吳嘉麗(1998)。從性別角度看國中數理化教科書。兩性平等教育季刊（現已改爲性別平等教育季刊），2，58-65。
26. 洪久賢、殷童娟(2000)。性別平等教育融入高中家政教學之有效教學策略研究：以男生班教學爲例。測驗與輔導，163，3416-3420。
27. 游美惠(2001)。性別意識、教師增能與性別教育的推展。中等教育，52(3)，42-57。
28. 黃婉君(1998)。國小新版國語科教科書性別意識形態之內容分析研究。兩性平等教育季刊，5，26-37。
29. 楊巧玲(2005)。性別化的興趣與能力：高中學生類組選擇之探究。臺灣教育社會學研究，5(2)，113-153。
30. 楊巧玲(2004)。「男」男「女」女：高中學生性別關係之探究。發表於第一屆亞太地區性別平等教育學術與實務研討會
31. 楊巧玲、謝臥龍主編(2002)。性別平等教育－探究與實踐。台北:五南。
32. 楊巧玲、謝臥龍主編(2004)。知識型構中性別與權力的思想與辯證。台北:唐山。
33. 劉慧君譯、Erik Centerwall and Skolverket原著(1998)。可以真實感受的愛：瑞典性教育教師手冊。台北:女書文化。
34. 潘志煌(1998)。師生教學互動中的性別差異－國小班級多重個案研究。新竹師院國民教育研究所論文集
35. 公聽會辦理計畫
36. 謝臥龍(2001)。高中職性別平等教育與性侵害防治教育課程核心概念之德懷研究。中等教育，52(3)，20-41。
37. 謝臥龍(1999)。從性別平等的教育觀點來探討高雄地區國小課堂中師生互動的關係。教育研究資訊，7(1)，57-80。

1. 潘愷、陳佩瑩、方文熙(2017)。科技大學學生性別平等教育量表編制與初探。教育科學期刊，15(2)，93-119。
2. 吳慧卿(2017)。性別教育課程選課行為與學習成效影響因素探討：以中部某醫學大學為例。教育科學期刊，16(1)，19-55。
3. 謝佳容、潘愷、李慧貞(2017)。性別主流化課程訓練對護理系學生性別刻板印象與角色態度影響效果之研究。中華心理衛生學刊，30(4)，359-384。