詩性陰性書寫對課程實踐的啟示

The Enlightenment of Poetic Feminine Writing on Curriculum Practice

10.6384/CIQ.200610.0051

張佳琳(Chang-Chia Lin)

陰性書寫 ； 女性主義 ； 詩性智慧 ； feminine writing ； feminism ； poetic wisdom

課程與教學

9卷4期（2006 / 10 / 01）

51 - 65

繁體中文

隨著性別多元時代之來臨，強調包容與纖敏的陰性書寫風格應運而起，相較於在社會文化裡取得絕對高於陰性位階的陽性特質，陰性書寫抗拒傳統裡二元對立以及必分高下優劣的詞彙與觀念，主張讓意念與文字自由自在地流淌，呈顯開放、多重、變化且富於節奏的樣態，除衝擊現代社會獨尊嚴謹工整條理分明之體制，這種陰性書寫賦予人性想像創造之可能性也提示課程應從追求邏輯真理的泥沼中躍出，重新認識人性輕軟細柔的部分，在課程實踐上引入陰性書寫的詩性、非線性且不受框架限制的包容性，以陰陽並濟、多元共存、美感張力的改革來凸顯差異性、詩意奧秘、陰性纖敏、想像創造，為課程的向度賦予更多發展空間。

While the age of diversity and fluidity in sexual identity came along, the feminine writing has become more and more important. The feminine writing is a means that emphasizes on the catholic and penetration. In a consequence, it is important to hold the features of feminine writing in order to insist a subject position rather then on an essential subjectivity. Especially, the feminine writing opens the vision for curriculum to allow students hold a multi-styled and multi-toned nature. Definitely, curriculum practice that reclaim both masculine and feminine, diversity and aesthetics, will help student to release their own voice to challenge and transgress the privileging on the false universalism and give out the space for students to write and read their own texts.

1. Adkison, J. A.(1981).Women in school administration: A review of the research.Review of Educational Research,51(3),311-343.
2. Bergin, T. C.,Fisch, M.H.(trans.)(1948).The New Science of Giambattista Vico.Cornell University.
3. Beyer, L.E.,Liston, D.p.(1996).Curriculum in conflict: Social visions, educational agendas, and progressive school reform.New York:Teachers College Press.
4. Cixous, H.,New French Feminisms(eds.),Blain Marks(eds.),Isabelle de Courtivron.(eds.)(1986).The laugh of the Medusa.N.Y.:Schocken Books.
5. Eisner, E.W.(1998).The enlightened eye: qualitative inquiry and the enancement of education.practice, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
6. Gilligan, C.,Eisenstein, H.(Eds.),Jardine, A.(Eds.)(1985).In a different voice: Women' s conceptions of self and of morality.New Brunswick:Rogers University Press.
7. Greene, M.,W. Pinar(ed.)(1975).Curriculum theorizing: the reconceptualists.Berkeley:McCutchan.
8. Huebner, D.,W. Pinar(ed.)(1975).Curriculum theorizing: the reconceptualists.Berkeley:McCutchan.
9. Kesson, K.R.(Eds),Henderson, J.G(Eds)(1999).Understanding democraticcurriculum leadership.London:Teachers College.
10. MacDonald, J. B.,W. Pinar(Ed.)(1975).Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists.Berkeley, CA:McCutchan.
11. MacKinnon, C.(1992).Toward a feminist theory of the state.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
12. Martin, J.R.(1992).The school home.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
13. Noddings, N.(1992).The challenge to care in schools.New York:Teacher College Press.
14. Stone, L.,W. Kohil(Ed.)(1995).Critical conversations in philosophy of education.New York:Rontledge.
15. Vallance,E.,E. Short(Ed.)(1991).Forms of curriculum inquiry.Albany,NY:State University of New York Press.
16. Vico, G.,T. G. Bergin,M. H. Fisch(Trans.)(1948).The new science of Giambattista Vico.New York:Comell University Press.
17. 刁擴華譯(1996)。女性主義思潮。台北:時報文化。
18. 朱光潛(1983)。維柯的新科學及其對中西美學的影響（上、中、下）。聯合月刊，21-23
19. 何慧芳(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。南華大學文學研究所碩士論文。
20. 李元貞(2000)。女性詩學。台北:女書文化。
21. 李英豪、亞弦主編、簡政珍主編(1994)。創世紀四十年評論選1954-1994。台北:創世紀。
22. 張京媛主編(1992)。當代女性主義文學批評。北京大學出版社。
23. 張京媛譯/主編、A, Rich著(1992)。當代女性主義文學批評。北京:北京大學出版社。
24. 張佳琳(2001)。女性主義教育學。中等教育，52(6)，114-126。
25. 莊明貞、魏雲儀(1999)。女性主義教育學。兩性平等教育季刊，10，115-116。
26. 彭懷恩譯、Swingewood A.著(1990)。社會學思想史。台北:風雲論壇。
27. 黃政傑(1995)。多元社會課程取向。台北:師大書苑。
28. 黃逸民(1999)。博士論文(博士論文)。台大外文研究所博士論文。
29. 葉朗(1993)。現代美學體系。台北:書林。
30. 劉亮雅譯(1987)。吳爾芙－當代世界小說家讀本。台北:光復。
31. 錢銘恰、蘇彥、李宏(1995)。女性心理與性別差異。北京:北京大學出版社。
32. 謝小苓譯、Sophia Phoca著(1999)。後女性主義。台北:立緒文化。