H. Rugg創造性自我表現之課程美學觀點探究

The Inquiry on the Thought of Aesthetics of Curriculum of H. Rugg-Creative Self-Express

10.6384/CIQ.200704.0145

李雅婷(Ya-Ting Lee)

創造性自我表現 ； 課程美學 ； H. Rugg ； creative self-express ； aesthetics of curriculum ； H.Rugg

課程與教學

10卷2期（2007 / 04 / 01）

145 - 159

繁體中文

課程史學者稱H. Rugg一生是二十世紀美國課程改革教育意識型態的縮影：科學化課程建製，兒童中心教育以及社會重建論。如此的歷史評價，足見其思想在二十世紀課程領域中佔有舉足輕重的地位。而Rugg認為個人美感經驗所產生的統合性力量，乃是邁向社會統整不可或缺的工具，此種欲結合「個人」與「社會」的論述，也成為其獨特之處，而為後世課程學者所關注。本文即由四個焦點進行探究：一、了解Rugg生平；二、從四大美學理論探究Rugg美學旨趣；三、認識影響Rugg思想的當代前衛藝術家；四、探析Rugg創造性自我表現思想，以深切地了解Rugg之美學論述。

”Rugg's career virtually represents in miniature the panorama of educational ideologies that characterized twentieth-century curriculum reform in America: scientific curriculum making, child-centered education, and social reconstructionism.”, appraised by the curriculum historian, H. M Kliebard. It proved the significant place of Rugg in curriculum history. His special opinions that creative art experience, because of its integrity-producing power, was an indispensable vehicle for social integration, indicated a implication that we needed a theory which will embrace the coordinate concepts ”the social” and ”the individual”. The purpose of this article explored the thoughts of H. Rugg, including 1)introducing his life history ; 2)inquiring the four theories of aesthetics for analyzing Rugg's aesthetic interests; 3)acquainting the contemporary avant-garde artists whom Rugg associated; 4)understanding the thoughts of Rugg's creative self-expression.

1. 李雅婷(2005)。社會轉化與美感創造－探析社會重建論的課程關懷。課程與教學季刊，8(2)，41-51。
   連結：
2. Carbone, P. F.,Wilson, V. S.,M. E. James(Ed.)(1995).Social reconstruction through education: the philosophy, history, and curricula of a radical ideal.New Jersey:Ablex.
3. Efland, A. D.,R. W. Neperud(Ed.)(1995).Context, content, and community in art education-Beyond postmodernism.New York:Teachers College, Columbia University.
4. Eisner, E. W.,Vallance, E.(1974).Conflicting conceptions of curriculum.Berkeley:McCutchan.
5. Kliebard, H. M.(1995).The struggle for the American curriculum.New York:Routledge.
6. Kliebard, H. M.,Wegner, G.,H. M. Kliebard(Ed.)(2002).Changing course: American curriculum reform in the 20th century.New York:Teachers College, Columbia University.
7. Littleford, M. S.,W. F. Pinar(Ed.)(1999).Contemporary curriculum discourses.New York:Peter Lang.
8. Marsh, C. J.,Willis, G.(2003).Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues.New Jersey:Upper Saddle River.
9. Null, J. W.,L. M. Burlbaw(Eds.),S. L. Field(Eds.)(2005).Explorations in curriculum history.Greenwich:Information Age Publishing Inc..
10. Rugg, H.(1936).American life and the school curriculum.New York:Ginn and Company.
11. Rugg, H.(1952).The teacher of teachers: Frontiers of theory and practice in teacher education.New York:Harper & Brothers.
12. Rugg. H.(1947).Foundations for American education.New York:World Book.
13. Rugg. H.,Shumaker, A.(1928).The child-centered school.New York:Arno & The New York Times.
14. 方德隆譯、A. C. Ornstein、F. P. Hunkins著(2004)。課程基礎理論。臺北:高等教育。
15. 莊明貞主編(2003)。課程改革－反省與前瞻。臺北:高等教育。
16. 陳麗華、彭增龍、張益仁(2004)。課程發展與設計：社會行動取向。臺北:五南。
17. 單文經(2004)。Rugg及Bruner社會領域課程改革經驗的啓示。第十一屆課程與教學論壇學術研討會「邊陲與發聲－課程與教學的文化政治與社會正義」，屏東:

1. (2012)。課程美學研究在台灣：議題與問題。教育學報，40(1-2)，31-44。
2. (2012)。台灣課程美學研究之現況與未來趨勢。教育學報，40(1-2)，45-66。