國民小學教師課程自主權的實踐與限制

Curriculum Autonomy, Implementation and Constraints in a Primary School

10.6384/CIQ.200704.0065

孫敏芝(Ming-Chih Sun)

課程自主權 ； 教師專業自主 ； curriculum autonomy ； teacher autonomy

課程與教學

10卷2期（2007 / 04 / 01）

65 - 79

繁體中文

近年來隨著台灣社會的變遷，教育政策邁向多元與開放的改革趨勢，在中小學課程改革政策上，政府積極推動學校本位課程發展，聲言將權力下放，保留適當比例的空白課程，賦予學校與教師更大的自主權。本文從相關文獻與質化研究實務經驗分析以下幾點，第一、專業自主權、教師自主權與課程自主權的定義與內涵；第二、研究實務經驗發現國小教師的確知覺到比以往更大的課程決策自主空間，而且認同以集體自主的方式進行課程實踐；第三、教師亦感受到來自教育改革制度、學校環境與權力結構的權威對教師課程自主權的箝制；最後，教師在實踐課程自主權的過程中，學校組織不同層級內會出現矛盾與衝突，導致教師會發展一些因應策略加以調適。

With the change of the society, there has arisen a demand for educational reform in Taiwan. The government attempts at curricular renewal through embarking upon school-based curriculum development, granting schools 20% of lessons in which they could have more autonomy.With the reflections on literature review and practical experiences of research, this study explores some important issues as follows:1. The definitions of professional autonomy, teacher autonomy and curriculum autonomy were analyzed.2. The analysis of teachers' perspectives of the degree of autonomy revealed that the majority of respondents perceived greater freedom of curricular decisions. Further, they preferred the collective autonomy in implementing curriculum change.3. Teachers perceived greater autonomy while admitting the structural constraints from the system, the school constraints and the power relations with the high ranking supervisors.4. Teachers continued to develop coping strategies in the face of contradictions and conflicts which operate at different school levels.

1. 周淑卿(2001)。課程決定的賦權迷思－集中化與離中化的探討。教育研究集刊，47，91-106。
   連結：
2. 黎萬紅、盧乃桂(2002)。權力下放與教師的專業自主－港台兩地教育改革的經驗與思考。教育研究集刊，48(4)，53-74。
   連結：
3. 簡良平、甄曉蘭(2001)。學校自主發展課程之相關因素分析。教育研究集刊，496，53-80。
   連結：
4. Beattie, M.,Thiessen, D.(1997).School-based restructuring and curriculum change: teachers' and students' contrasting perspectives.The Curriculum Journal,8(3),411-440.
5. Bezzina, M.(1991).Teachers' perceptions of their participation in school based curriculum development: a case study.Curriculum Perspectives,11(2),39-47.
6. Brady, L.(1995).School based curriculum development and the national curriculum: can they coexist.Curriculum and Teaching,10(1),47-54.
7. Bull, B.(1988).The Nature of Teacher Autonomy.paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA. ED 303853
8. Carr, W.,Kemmis, S.(1986).Becoming Critical: Education Knowledge and Action Research.Lewes:Falmer Press.
9. Craig, A.(1980).Australia,Macquarie University.
10. Devorah, E.(2001).Who controls the teachers.Educational Management & Administration,29(1),97-111.
11. Dickinson, L.(1995).Autonomy and motivation: a literature review.System,23(2),165-175.
12. Elliot, J.(1994).The teacher's role in curriculum development: An unresolved issue in English attempts at curriculum reform.Curriculum Studies,2(1),43-68.
13. Gordon, D.,N. Sabar(Eds.),J. Rudduck(Eds.),W. Reid(Eds.)(1987).Partnership & Autonomy in School-Based Curriculum Development.University of Sheffield: Division of Education.
14. Hawthorne, R. D.(1990).Analyzing school-based collaborative curriculum decision making.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,5(3),279-286.
15. Howells, H.(2003).Teacher professionalism and curriculum power: a cautionary tale.English in Australia,136,27-39.
16. Hoyle, E.,John, P.(1995).Professional Knowledge and Professional Practice.London:Cassell.
17. Law, E.,Galton, M.(2004).Impact of a school-based curriculum project on teachers and students: a Hong-Kong case study.Curriculum Perspectives,24(3),43-58.
18. Little, D.(1991).Autonomy: Definitions, Issues and Problems.Dublin:Authentik.
19. Lortie, D.,A. Etzioni(Eds.)(1969).The Semi-professions and their Organization.NY:Free Press.
20. Oliva, P. F.(1988).Developing the Curriculum.London:Scott, Foresman and Company.
21. Pearson, L.,Hall, B.(1993).Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale.Journal of Educational Research,83(3),172-178.
22. Porter, A.(1979).Teacher autonomy and the control of content taught-research series no.24Teacher autonomy and the control of content taught-research series no.24,Institute for Research on Teaching, College of Education, Michigan State University.
23. Prideaux, D.(1993).School-based curriculum development: partial, paradoxical and piecemeal.Journal of curriculum studies,25(2),169-178.
24. Shoham, E.(1995).Teacher autonomy in school-based curricula in Israel: its significance for teacher education.Westminster Studies in Education,18,35-45.
25. Short, P. M.,Greer, J. T.(1989).Increasing teacher autonomy through shared governance: effects on policy making and student outcomes.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,San Francisco, CA:
26. Turner, D.(2004).Privatisation, decentralisation and education in the United Kingdom: The role of the state.International Review of Education,50,347-357.
27. Walker, D.(1990).Fundamentals of Curriculum.San Diego:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
28. Zmuda, A.,Kuklis, R.,Kline, E.(2004).Transforming Schools: Creating a culture of continuous improvement.Alexandria:ASCD.
29. 行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。
30. 林佩璇(2004)。學校課程實踐與行動研究。台北:高等教育。
31. 陳奎憲(2001)。教育社會學導論。台北:師大書苑。

1. 李珮瑜(2014)。Paulo Freire「批判意識」對教師圖像之啟示。人文社會科學研究，8(3)，58-78。
2. 蘇船利、黃毅志(2012)。教師之抗爭意識以及專業自主意識與其參加組織意願的關連：以台東為範圍。教育實踐與研究，25(2)，195-224。
3. 孫敏芝(2010)。國小教師團隊合作文化的雙面向探討—以發展學校願景為例。課程與教學，13(1)，117-139。