大學英語口語訓練課室自我評量的研究

A Study of Self Assessment in the University English Oral Training Classroom

10.6384/CIQ.200710.0085

陳玉美(Yuh-Mei Chen)

自我評量 ； 英語教學 ； 課室評量 ； self-assessment ； English teaching ； classroom assessment

課程與教學

10卷4期（2007 / 10 / 01）

85 - 100

繁體中文

本研究旨在檢視大學生學習自我評量英語口語表現、內化評量標準的成效，並探討學生對評量活動的看法。研究在台灣某國立大學外文系大一口語訓練課堂中進行，參與者為28位修課的學生，評量時程包含2週訓練及10週兩輪評量，研究工具包括評量表及學習問卷，評量標準及等級自師生合力訂定，包含四個項目和五個等級，學習問卷收集學生對評量學習任務的看法及評量對學習影響的意見。結果發現學生傾向低估自己的表現，評量經驗有助學生內化評量標準，第二輪評量時，學生與老師的評分沒有顯著的差異，書面評語反映主要的評分標準，內容也自負面轉為正向、反思、及改進建議。學生多數肯定評量學習，表示評量任務麻煩卻有益，讓他們變得獨立、思考得多、學習得多，他們認為自評有益學習、回饋有助改進。研究結果顯示自我評量只要實行步驟得宜，具有信度效度，能提升學生學習成效。

This paper reports a study which investigated the practice of self-assessment in the university English oral training classroom with the focus on students' learning process to internalize the assessment criteria and their perceptions of the assessment task. A class of 28 students taking a freshman oral training course participated in the study. Data were collected from an evaluation form, on which marks and written statements were demanded for assessment, and a questionnaire, which elicited students' opinions about participating in assessment and its impact on learning. The assessment criteria and scoring standards were developed jointly by students and the teacher. The study found that students tended to under-mark themselves, but gradually internalized the criteria and standards as they gained experience in assessment. In the second cycle of assessment, their marks became more comparable to the teacher's marks, and their written comments reflected more of the agreed criteria, moving towards giving self positive, reflective and constructive feedback. Students by and large supported the practice of self-assessment, claiming that the assessment task was hard but good, making them independent, think more and learn more. Self-assessment was overall considered beneficial for learning and other assessors' feedback critical and valuable for improvement. The study demonstrates that self-assessment, if implemented with appropriate procedures, is a valid and reliable tool to enhance university students' English learning.

1. Chen, Y.-M.(2006).Peer and self-assessment for English oral performance: A study of reliability and learning benefits.English Teaching and Learning,30(4),1-22.
   連結：
2. 單文經(2002)。現代與後現代課程論爭之平議。師大學報：教育類，47(2)，123-142。
   連結：
3. Adams, C.,King, K.(1995).Towards a framework for student self assessment.Innovation hi Education and Training International,32,336-343.
4. Airasian, P. W.(1997).Classroom assessment.New York:McGraw-Hill.
5. AlFallay, I.(2004).The role of some selected psychological and personality traits of the rater in the accuracy of self-and peer-assessment.System,32,407-425.
6. Aronowitz, S.,Giroux, H. A.(1991).Postmodern education: Politics, culture and social criticism.Westport Ct:Greenwood Publishing Group.
7. Bachman, L. F.,G. Hkbatani,H. Pierson (Eds)(2000).Learner directed assessment in ESL.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
8. Bachman, L.,Palmer, A.(1989).The construct validation of self ratings of communicative language ability.Language Testing,6,14-29.
9. Benson, P.,Voller, P. (Eds.)(1997).Autonomy and independence in language learning.London:Longman.
10. Bhabha, H. K.(1994).The location of culture.London:Routledge.
11. Blue, G.(1994).Self-assessment of foreign language skills: Does it work.CLB Working Paper,3,18-35.
12. Bond, D.(1999).Avoiding the traps: Seeking good practice in the use of self-assessment and reflection in professional courses.Social Work Education,18(2),121-133.
13. Boud, D.(1995).Enhancing learning through self assessment.London:Kogan Page.
14. Boud, D.(2000).Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society.Studies in Continuing Education,22(2),151-167.
15. Boud, D.,Falchikov, N.(1989).Quantitative studies of self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings.Higher Education,18,529-549.
16. Boyd, H,Cowan, J.(1985).A case for self-assessment based on recent studies of student learning.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,10(3),225-235.
17. Chang, S.-h.(1999).Promoting autonomy and self direction m language learning.Journal of Taipei University of Technology,32(1),413-442.
18. Chen, Y.-M.(1999).A portfolio approach to EPL university writing instruction.Proceedings of the 16th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China,Taipei:
19. Chen, Y.-M.(2000).Learning writing as writers: A portfolio writing curriculum for E university first-year students.Proceedings of the 17th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China,Taipei:
20. Chuang L. –j.(1997).Reflection on English achievement test-A case study in the junior college.Journal of National Chiayi Institute of Technology,55,139-156.
21. Dickinson, L(1987).Self-instruction in language learning.Cambridge University Press.
22. Dochy, F.,Segers, M.,Sluijmans, D.(1999).The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review.Studies in Higher Education,24(3),331-350.
23. Esch, E. (Ed.)(1994).Self-access and the adult language learner.London:CILT.
24. Falchikov, N.(1986).Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment.Innovations in Education & Training International,11(2),146-166.
25. Fang, Y. –c.(2005).Observing ESL writing instruction in the U.S: Suggestions for EFL teachers in Taiwan.Studies in English Language and Literature,16,35-45.
26. Fetterman, D.,Kaftarian, S.,Wandersman, A.(1996).Empowerment evaluation.Sage.
27. Freire, P.(1985).The politics of education.South Hadley, MA:Bergin & Gravey.
28. Giroux, H. A.(1992).Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education.New York:Routledge.
29. Gremmo, M. –J.,Riley, P.(1995).Autonomy, self-direction, and self access m language teaching an learning: The history of an idea.System,23(2),151-164.
30. Hanrahan, S. J.,Isaacs, G.(2001).Assessing self-and peer-assessment: The students' views.Higher Education Research & Development,20(1),53-70.
31. Heron, J.,D. Boud (Ed.)(1988).Developing student autonomy in learning.London:Kogan Page.
32. Holec, H.(1981).Autonomy in foreign language learning.Oxford:Pergamon.
33. Jonassen, D. H.(1991).Evaluating constructivistic learning.Educational Technology,31(9),28-33.
34. Knowles, M.(1975).Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers.London:Prentice Hall.
35. LeBlanc, R.,Painchaud, G.(1985).Self-assessment as a second language placement instrument.TESOL Quarterly,19(4),673-687.
36. Long, D.(1990).Learner-managed learning: The key to lifelong learning and development.London:Kogan Page.
37. McDonald, B.,Boud, D.(2003).The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations.Assessment in Education,10(2),209-220.
38. Orsmond, P,Merry, S.,Reiling, K.(1997).A study in self-assessment: tutor and students' perceptions of performance criteria.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,22(4),357-369.
39. Orsmond, P,Merry, S.,Reiling, K.(2000).The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,25(1),23-38.
40. Orsmond, P,Merry, S.,Reiling, K.(2002).The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,27(4),309-323.
41. Oscarson, M.(1989).Self-assessment of language proficiency: Rationale and applications.Language Testing,6,1-13.
42. Oscarson, M.(1997).The encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment.Dordrecht:Academic.
43. Path, M.(2002).The influence of peer feedback on self and peer-assessment of oral skills.Language Testing,19(2),109-131.
44. Sheerin, S.(1989).Self-access.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
45. Shohamy, E.(2001).The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests.Harlow, England Pearson Education Limited.
46. Sluijsmans, D.,Dochy, F.,Moerkerke, G.(1999).Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer-, and co-assessment Learning Environment Research.Learning Environments Research,1,293-319.
47. Stefani, A. J.(1994).Peer, self, and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities.Studies in Higher Education,19(1),69-75.
48. Stiggins, R. J.(2001).Student-involved classroom assessment.New Jersey:Merrill Prentice Hall.
49. Strong-Krause, D.,G. Ekbatani,H. Pierson (Eds.)(2000).Learner-directed assessment in ESL.New Jersey:Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
50. Tait, J.,Knight, P. (Eds.)(1996).The management of independent learning.London:Kogan Page.
51. Tan, K. H. K.(2004).Does student self-assessment empower or discipline students.Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education,29(6),651-662.
52. Taras, M.(2001).The use of tutor feedback and student self-assessment in summative assessment tasks towards transparency for students and tutors.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,26(6),605-614.
53. von Glasersfeld, E.(1995).Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning.London:Falmer.
54. Williams, E.(1992).Student attitudes towards approaches to learning and assessment.Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education,17,45-58.
55. Yang, T. H.(2002).Self-assessment as a placement tool for oral training courses.Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China,Taiwan:
56. Zimmerman, B. J.,Schunk, D. H. (Eds.)(2001).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. 俞曉貞(2001)。英文閱讀教學評量研究－以國防大學中正理工學院九十一年班爲例。復興崗學報，6，65-97。
58. 張世忠(2000)。建構教學：理論與應用。臺北:五南。
59. 英語教育電子月刊
60. 陳玉美(1997)。英文教學中學生修改文稿相關議題之探討。英語教學，21(3)，15-23。
61. 英語教育電子月刊
62. 中央社2003/11/06新聞。2006/06/23參英語教育電子月刊
63. 蕭雅萍(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台南師範學院國民教育研究所。

1. Ho, Kuo-Yin(2009).English Language Testing: Random Number Generator Mechanism.嶺東學報,26,247-270.
2. 賀國英、何禮麗(2010)。經典通識「莎士比亞戲劇中的情愛世界初探」—教學成果的研究。嶺東通識教育研究學刊，3(3)，1-13。