文化差異與文化認同：以兩所阿美族學校學生的語言認同建構為例

Cultural Differences and Cultural Identification: The Construction of Linguistic Identities among the Amis Students in Two Primary Schools

10.6384/CIQ.200811.0051

黃文定(Wen-Ding Huang)

文化差異 ； 文化認同 ； 原住民學生 ； 語言教育 ； 學校教育 ； cultural difference ； cultural identity ； indigenous student ； language education ； schooling

課程與教學

11卷4期（2008 / 11 / 01）

51 - 73

繁體中文

本文的主要目的在理解阿美族學生文化認同建構的過程，以及其間出現的問題。為了達成上述目的，本研究選擇文化領域中極為重要的面向之一一語言，作為分析的主題，採用人種誌的研究途徑，以四種方法在兩所阿美族小學同時進行為期五個月的資料蒐集“參與式觀察、半結構性訪談、問卷和文件分析。在研究觀點上，本文採用Cornell和Hartmann(2007)的建構主義來理解與闡釋阿美族學生語言認同建構的過程。根據本文的分析可以發現，兩所學校的阿美族學生認為國語與母語的功能有其差異，國語在日常溝通、學習活動與展現個人語言才能以建立自信上，具有極為重要的功能，然而，母語最顯著的功能卻是娛樂與玩笑，這使得他們在建立對自己族語的正向認同上有其困難，而這將不利於他們建立「雙文化認同」。

The main purpose of this paper is to understand the construction process of the Amis students in their cultural identities as well as possible problems occurred in the process. By using an ethnography approach, this research takes the tribe language as the focus as language is an important cultural dimension. The data are collected from four parts: participant observation, semi-structured interviews, questionnaire surveys, and documentary analysis over a period of five months from two primary schools where majority students are Amis. The analysis of linguistic identification conducted in this research is based on Cornell and Hartmann's (2007) constructionist approach. It is found that Amis students perceived the function of Mandarin differently from that of their mother tongue. For them, Mandarin plays an important role in daily communication, learning activities, and building self-confidence. Whereas, their mother tongue serves to play games for fun. It is then argued that educational practices in these two schools cannot facilitate students in constructing positive identities with their mother tongue. This possible failure might hinder students' formation of ”dual cultural identities” proposed in the policy of national education.

1. Aikman, S.(1999).Sustaining indigenous languages in southeastern Peru.International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,2(3),198-213.
2. Cornell, S. E.,Hartmann, D.(2007).Ethnicity and race: Making identities in a changing world.London:Sage.
3. Fenton, S.(2003).Ethnicity.Cambridge:Polity.
4. Gay, G.(2000).Culturally responsive teaching Theory, research, and practice.N.Y.:Teachers College Press.
5. Geertz, C. (Ed)(1963).Old societies and new states The quest for modernity in Asia and Africa.N.Y.:The Free Press.
6. Hempel, L.(2004).What's it worth to you? The questionable value of instrumentalist approaches to ethnic identification.International Journal of Comparative Sociology,45(4),253-275.
7. Hsiau, A.(1997).Language ideology in Taiwan The KMT's language policy, the Tai-yu language movement, and ethnic politics.Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development,18(4),302-315.
8. Jenkins, R.(1997).Rethinking Ethnicity Argument and Explorations.London:Sage.
9. Joseph, J. E.(2004).Language and identity National, ethnic, religious.N.Y.:Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Lawson, S.,Sachdev, I.(2004).Identity, language use, and attitudes Some Sylheti-Bangladeshi data from London, UK.Journal of Language and Social Psychology,23(1),49-69.
11. Mac an Ghaill, M.(1988).Young, gifted and black Student-teacher relations in the schooling of black youth.Stony Stratford:Open University Press.
12. Mercer, K.,S. Rutherford (Ed)(1990).Identity Community, culture, difference.London:Lawrence & Wishart.
13. Ogbu, J. U.(1995).Cultural problems in minority education Their interpretations and consequences-Part one: Theoretical background.The Urban Review,27(3),189-205.
14. Ogbu, J. U.(1995).Cultural problems in minority education Their interpretations and consequences-Part one Case studies.The Urban Review,27(4),271-297.
15. Ogbu, J. U.,Simons, H. D.(1998).Voluntary and involuntary minorities A cultural-ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education.Anthropology & Education Quarterly,29(2),155-188.
16. Phinney, J. S.,Romero, I.,Nava, M.,Huang, D.(2001).The role of language, parents, and peers in ethnic identity among adolescents in immigrant families.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,30(2),135-153.
17. Rassool, N.(2004).Sustaining linguistic diversity within the global cultural economy: issues of language rights and linguistic possibilities.Comparative Education,40(2),199-214.
18. Scott, J. G. M.(1990).A resynthesis of the primordial and circumstantial approaches to ethnic group solidarity towards an explanatory modal.Ethnic and Racial Studies,13(2),147-171.
19. Shils, E.(1975).Center and periphery Essays in macrosociology.London:The University of Chicago Press.
20. Stewart, W. A.,J. A. Fishman (Ed)(1968).Readings in the sociology of language.The Hague:Mouton.
21. Stubbs, M.(1983).Language, schools and classrooms.London:Routledge.
22. Taylor, C.,B. T. Goldberg. (Ed.)(1994).Multiculturalism: A critical reader.Oxford:Blackwell.
23. Tilly, V.(1997).The terms of the debate: Untangling language about ethnicity and ethnic movements.Ethnic and Racial Studies,20(3),497-522.
24. Verkuyten, M.(2005).The social psychology of ethnic identity.Hove:Psychology Press.
25. 教育改革諮議報告書（第四期）
26. 施正鋒主編(1997)。族群政治與政策。臺北市:前衛。
27. 孫家秀(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺東市，國立臺東師範學院教育研究所。
28. 張如慧(2002)。民族與性別之潛在課程－以原住民女學生為例。臺北市:師大書苑。
29. 張錦裕(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所。
30. 教育部(1997)。中華民國原住民教育報告書。
31. 許文忠(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立師範學險國民教育研究所。
32. 陳佩文(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所。
33. 劉秋雲(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立政治大學。
34. 謝繼昌(2003)。文化、接觸與族群。現代化研究，33，87-96。
35. 譚光鼎(2002)。臺灣原住民教育：從廢墟到重建。臺北市:師大書苑。

1. 林介士(2018)。兩岸當局對於中國大陸惠台三十一條措施之分析。發展與前瞻學報，22，19-47。
2. 林世哲(2019)。國中小戰鼓社團學生參與動機與文化認同度之相關性研究－以2018第六屆全國鼓陣錦標賽為例。體育學系系刊，18，1-14。
3. 張曉婷,辛靜婷(2020)。融入越南文化之反偏見課程行動研究：教學歷程與幼兒族群關係發展。課程與教學，23(3)，109-140。
4. 張亞齡、王俊斌(2010)。什麼才算是多元文化教育？以Maxine Greene 的教育觀點檢視。教育科學期刊，9(1)，29-49。