教師課程意識與教學實踐模式之建構－以英語科為例

A Structural Equation Model of Curricular Consciousness and Pedagogical Praxis of Junior high School Teachers: Taking English Field as an Example

10.6384/CIQ.200901.0099

龔心怡(Hsin-Yi Kung)；林素卿(Su-Ching Lin)

課程意識 ； 教學實踐 ； 結構方程模式 ； curricular consciousness ； pedagogical praxis ； structural equation modeling

課程與教學

12卷1期（2009 / 01 / 01）

99 - 124

繁體中文

本研究旨在透過模式建構檢驗課程意識與教學實踐兩者之關係。以495位英語教師為問卷調查對象，研究結果如下：（一）專業知識覺知可由內容知識覺知、教學信念覺知、溝通式教學覺知、學生覺知、教學知識覺知等五項測量指標呈現，其中以教學信念覺知的因素負荷量最高。（二）教學實踐可由教學策略、教學評量與回饋、教學內容三項測量指標呈現，其中以教學評量與回饋的因素負荷量最高。（三）課程意識包含環境覺知與自我覺知兩項測量指標，及專業知識覺知一個潛在變項；其中以專業知識覺知的因素負荷量最高。（四）課程意識與教學實踐兩者呈現正相關。根據研究發現，本研究提出三項建議，以強化課程意識，提升教學實踐成效。並對未來研究提出兩項建議。

The main purpose of the study was to use a structural model to explore the relationships between curricular consciousness and pedagogical praxis of junior high school English teachers. Using questionnaires to speak to 495 teachers in central Taiwan, data was analyzed by structural equation modeling. The results of this study include: first, first-order latent factor ”professional knowledge awareness” can be effectively composed of content knowledge awareness, teaching belief awareness, communicated teaching awareness, student awareness, and teaching knowledge awareness. The teacher belief awareness has the highest factor loading. Secondly, first-order latent factor ”pedagogical praxis” can be effectively composed of teaching content, teaching strategy, and teaching assessment and feedback. The teaching assessment and feedback has the highest factor loading. Thirdly, second-order latent factor ”curricular consciousness” can be effectively composed of two observed variables: environment awareness and self awareness, and one first-order latent factor: professional knowledge awareness. The professional knowledge awareness has the highest factor loading. Fourth, the correlation between curricular consciousness and pedagogical praxis is significantly positive. The suggestions for facilitating curricular consciousness and pedagogical praxis, and the further research are also included.

1. 李奉儒(2003)。P. Freire的批判教學論對於教師實踐教育改革的啟示。教育研究集刊，49(3)，1-30。
   連結：
2. 甄曉蘭(2003)。教師課程意識與教學實踐。教育研究集刊，49(1)，63-94。
   連結：
3. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1998).On the evaluation of structural equation model.Academic of Marketing Science,16,76-94.
4. Borg, S.(2003).Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do.Language Teaching,36,81-109.
5. Calderhead, J.(1984).Teachers' classroom decision-making.London:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
6. Clandinin, D. J.,Connelly, F. M.(1986).Rhythms in teaching: The narrative study of teachers' personal practical knowledge of classrooms.Teaching and Teacher Education,2(4),377-387.
7. Cochran, K. F.,DeRuiter, J. A.,King, R. A.(1993).Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation.Journal of Teacher Education,44(4),263-272.
8. Freire, P.,Myra Bergman Ramos(Trans.)(1972).Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York:Herder and Herder.
9. Giroux, H. A.(1988).Teacher as intellectuals: Toward a pedagogy of learning.Granby, Mass:Bergin & Garvey.
10. Greene, M.,W. Pinar(Ed.)(1974).Heightened consciousness, culture revolution, and curriculum theory.Berkeley, CA:McCutchan.
11. Grundy, S.(1987).Curriculum: Product or praxis.PA:The Falmer Press.
12. Issues in Freirean pedagogy
13. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sorbom, D.(1993).LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Hillside, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Kline, R. B.(1995).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
15. Koutsoulis, M. K.,Campbell, J. R.(2001).Family processes affect students' motivation, and science and math achievement in Cypriot high schools.Structural Equation Modeling,8(1),108-127.
16. Raykov, T.,Marcoulides, G. A.(2000).A first course on structural equation modeling.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Remillard, J. T.(2000).Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth-grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text.The Elementary School Journal,100(4),331-350.
18. Rubio, D. M.,Berg-Weger, M.,Tebb, S. S.(2001).Using structural equation modeling to test for multidimensionality.Structural Equation Modeling,8(4),613-626.
19. Schön, D. A.(1983).The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.London:Temple Smith.
20. Schön, D. A.(1987).Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
21. Schumacker, R. E.,Lomax, R. G.(2004).A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Tillema, H. H.(2000).Belief change towards self-directed learning in student teachers: Immersion in practice or reflection in action.Teaching and Teacher Education,16,575-591.
23. 方永泉譯、P. Freire原著(2002)。受壓迫者教育學。台北:巨流。
24. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。台北:高等教育。
25. 邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式：的理論、技術與應用。台北:雙葉。
26. 張光甫(2003)。教育哲學－中西哲學的觀點。台北:雙葉。
27. 張樹倫、翁國盈、陳伯璋(2003)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告（報告編號：NSC91-2413-H-003-045-FB）行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告（報告編號：NSC91-2413-H-003-045-FB）,未出版
28. 黃光雄、蔡清田(1999)。課程設計－理論與實際。台北:五南。
29. 黃芳銘(2004)。結構方程模式理論與應用。台北:五南。
30. 黃純敏、程玉秀、林秀珍(2004)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告（報告編號：NSC91-2413-H-003-044-FB）行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告（報告編號：NSC91-2413-H-003-044-FB）,未出版
31. 甄曉蘭(2001)。中小學課程改革與教學革新。台北:元照出版社。
32. 甄曉蘭、陳伯璋、揚智巧(2003)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告（報告編號：NSC91-2413-H-003-043-FB）行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告（報告編號：NSC91-2413-H-003-043-FB）,未出版
33. 歐用生(2003)。課程典範再建構。高雄市:麗文文化。
34. 潘義祥(2003)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立體育學院體育研究所。
35. 潘麗珠、王秀玲、李玉馨、康瀚文、連育仁、許力仁(2004)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告（報告編號：NSC92-2413-H-003-043-FB）行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告（報告編號：NSC92-2413-H-003-043-FB）,未出版
36. 簡成熙譯、G. R. Knight原著(2005)。教育哲學導論。台北:五南。

1. 范斯淳(Szu-Chun Fan);陳君瑜(Chun-Yu Chen)(2021)。第二專長教師投入生活科技教育之動機、課程意識建構與教學實踐初探。教育科學研究期刊。66(3)。31-59。