题名

巢狀探究教學對國二學生覺知教師溝通行為改變之探討

并列篇名

Investigating the 8(superscript th) Graders' Changes of Perception of Teachers' Communication Behavior of Nested Inquiry-Based Instruction

DOI

10.6384/CIQ.200907.0129

作者

蔡執仲(Chih-Chung Tsai)；段曉林(Hsiao-Lin Tuan)；靳知勤(Chi-Chin Chin)

关键词

探究教學 ； 探究學習 ； 溝通行為 ； 巢狀探究教學 ； inquiry teaching ； inquiry learning ； communication behavior ； nested ； inquiry-based instruction

期刊名称

課程與教學

卷期/出版年月

12卷3期（2009 / 07 / 01）

页次

129 - 152

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of inquiry-based instruction on 8(superscript th) graders' perceptions of their teachers' communication behavior in the physical science classes. A total of 295 8th graders participated in the study. The experimental group included five classes (n=155) who were taught with three units of nested-based inquiry instruction for three months. In the control group, teachers used the textbook to teach five classes of students (n=140). The ”Teacher Communication Behavior Questionnaire” was implemented in both groups before the study and again three months later to collect students' perceptions about the climate of classroom environments. Results showed, the nested-based inquiry instruction could significantly increase students' perceptions of teachers' communication behaviors (p＜.001). However, the nested-based inquiry instruction showed significantly higher gain scores (p＜.001) than textbook-based instruction, especially in the scales of ”Challenging Questioning (CQ),”, ”Encouragement and Praise (EP), ”Non-verbal Supportive (NVS),” and ”Controlling and Management (CM).” However, the scales of ”Understanding and Friendly (UF)” showed no difference. Four scales dominated students' perceptions of the classroom climate about inquiry-based instruction; these were EP, CM, HQ, and NVS (explained the variances over 5%). Among four scales, the HQ scale related to the Personal Development Dimension; EP and NVS scales related the Relationship Dimension and CM scale related the System Management and Change Dimension. Finally, it was found that personal development, relationships, and system management and change of the psychosocial factors have been improved by nested inquiry-based instruction.
英文摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of inquiry-based instruction on 8(superscript th) graders' perceptions of their teachers' communication behavior in the physical science classes. A total of 295 8th graders participated in the study. The experimental group included five classes (n=155) who were taught with three units of nested-based inquiry instruction for three months. In the control group, teachers used the textbook to teach five classes of students (n=140). The ”Teacher Communication Behavior Questionnaire” was implemented in both groups before the study and again three months later to collect students' perceptions about the climate of classroom environments. Results showed, the nested-based inquiry instruction could significantly increase students' perceptions of teachers' communication behaviors (p＜.001). However, the nested-based inquiry instruction showed significantly higher gain scores (p＜.001) than textbook-based instruction, especially in the scales of ”Challenging Questioning (CQ),”, ”Encouragement and Praise (EP), ”Non-verbal Supportive (NVS),” and ”Controlling and Management (CM).” However, the scales of ”Understanding and Friendly (UF)” showed no difference. Four scales dominated students' perceptions of the classroom climate about inquiry-based instruction; these were EP, CM, HQ, and NVS (explained the variances over 5%). Among four scales, the HQ scale related to the Personal Development Dimension; EP and NVS scales related the Relationship Dimension and CM scale related the System Management and Change Dimension. Finally, it was found that personal development, relationships, and system management and change of the psychosocial factors have been improved by nested inquiry-based instruction.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 李昊憲、張俊彥(2004)。地球科學教室學習環境問卷之研發與初探。科學教育學刊，12，421-443。
    連結：
  2. 游淑媚、林淑芳(2005)。國小學生的生物腐化想法與科學教室環境知覺關係之研究。科學教育學刊，13(3)，241-262。
    連結：
  3. 黃台珠、Aldridge, J.M.、Fraser, B.J.(1998)。台灣與西澳科學教室環境的跨國研究：結合質性與量的研究方法。科學教育學刊，6(4)，343-362。
    連結：
  4. 蔡執仲、段曉林、靳知勤(2007)。巢狀探究教學模式對國二學生理化學習動機影響之探討。科學教育學刊，15(2)，119-144。
    連結：
  5. Achtenhagen, F.(2001).Criteria for the development of complex teaching-leaning environments.Instructional Science,29,361-380.
  6. American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993).Benchmarks fat science literacy.New York:Oxford University Press.
  7. Anderson, A.,Hamilton, R. J.,Hattie, J.(2004).Classroom climate and motivated behavior in secondary schools.Learning Environments Research,7,211-225.
  8. Chinn, C. A.,Malhotra, A.(2002).Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks.Science Education,86,175-218.
  9. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
  10. Crawford, B. A.,Krajcik, J. S.,Marx, R.W.(1999).Elements of a community of learners in a middle school science classroom.Science Education,83,701-723.
  11. Dart, B.,Burnett, P.,Boulton-Lewis, G.,Campbell, J.,Smith, D.,McCrindle, A.(1999).Classroom learning environments and students' approaches to learning.Learning Environments Research,2,137-156.
  12. Dorman, J. P.(2003).Cross-national validation of the What Is Happening In This Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis.Learning Environments Research,6,231-245.
  13. Ford, M. J.,Wargo B. M.(2007).Routines, roles, and responsibilities for aligning scientific and classroom practices.Science Education,91,133-157.
  14. Herron, M. D.(1971).The nature of science enquiry.School Review,79,171-212.
  15. Kass, A.,Burke, R.,Blevis, E.,Williamson, M.(1993).Constructing learning environments for complex social skills.The Journal of the Learning Sciences,3(4),387-427.
  16. Lampert, M.(1990).When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching.American Educational Research Journal,27,29-63.
  17. Lemke, J. L.(1990).Talking Science: Language, learning, and values.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
  18. Lidar, M.,Lundqvist, E.,östman, L.(2005).Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers' epistemological move and students' practical epistemology.Science Education,90,148-163.
  19. Magnusson, S. J.,Palincsar, A. S.(1995).The learning environment as a site of science education reform.Theory into Practice,34(1),43-50.
  20. Martin-Hansen, L.(2002).Defining inquiry.The Science Teacher,69(2),34-37.
  21. Marx, R.,Blumenfeld, P.,Krajcik, J.,Blunk, M.,Crawford, B.,Kelly, B.,Meyer, K.(1994).Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers.Elementary School Journal,94(5),517-538.
  22. Moos, R. H.(1979).Evaluating educational environments: Procedures, measures, findings and policy implications.San Francisco:Jossey Bass.
  23. Moos, R. H.(1974).The social climate scales: An overview.Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologist Press.
  24. National Research Council(1996).National science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  25. National Research Council(2000).Inquiry and national science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  26. Polman, J. L.,Pea, R. D.(2001).Transformative communication as a cultural tool for guiding inquiry science.Science Education,85,223-238.
  27. Rogoff, B.(1994).Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners.Mind, Culture, and Activity,1,209-229.
  28. Roth, W. -M.(1995).Authentic school science.Dordrecht, Netherlands:Kluwer.
  29. Sandoval, W. A.(2005).Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry.Science Education,89,634-656.
  30. Sandoval, W. A.,Reiser, B. J.(2004).Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry.Science Education,88,342-375.
  31. Savinainen, A.,Scott, P.,Viiri, J.(2005).Using a bridging representation and social interactions to foster conceptual change: Designing and evaluating an instructional sequence for Newton's Third Law.Science Education,89,175-195.
  32. She, H. C.,Fisher, P. L.(2002).Teacher communication behavior and its association with students' cognitive and attitudinal outcomes in Taiwan and Australia.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39(1),63-78.
  33. She, H. C.,Fisher, P. L.(2000).The development of a questionnaire to describe science teacher communication behavior in Taiwan and Australia.Science Education,84,706-726.
  34. Solomon, J.,R. Millar (Ed.)(1989).Doing science.London:Palmer Press.
  35. Staer, H.,Goodrum, D.,Hacking, M.(1998).High school laboratory work in Western Australia: Openness to inquiry.Research in Science Education,28(2),219-228.
  36. Tyack, D.,Tobin, W.(1994).The "grammar" of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change?.American Educational Research Journal,31(3),453-479.
  37. Tyson, L. M.,Venville, G. J.,Harrison, A. G.,Treagust, D. F.(1997).A multidimensional framework for interpreting conceptual change events in the classroom.Science Education,81,387-404.
  38. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind in Society.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  39. Walberg, H. J.(1991).Improving school science in advanced and developing countries.Review of Educational Research,61,25-29.
  40. Walberg, H. J.,F. Farley (Eds.),N. J. Gordon (Eds.)(1981).Psychology and education: the state of the union.Berkeley, CA:McCutchan.
  41. Watson, J. R.,Swain, F. R. L.,Mckobbie, C.(2004).Students' discussions in practical scientific inquiries.International Journal of Science Education,26,25-45.
  42. White, B. Y.,Frederiksen, J. R.(1998).Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students.Cognition and Instruction,16(1),3-118.
  43. Wubbels, T. (Eds.),Levy, J. (Eds.)(1993).Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education.London:Flamer Press.
  44. Yerrick, R.,Pedersen, J.,Arnason, J.(1998)."We're just spectator": An interaction of science epistemologies and teaching.Science Education,82,619-648.
  45. 邱皓政(2007)。量化統計與分析。臺北市:五南。
  46. 教育部(2000)。國民中小學課程綱要－白然與生活科技學習領域。臺北市:行政院教育部。
被引用次数
  1. 段曉林、余忠潔、王翠妃(2013)。探究教學對國中資優學生科學推理類型轉變之影響。特殊教育研究學刊，38(1)，76-106。
  2. 盧秀琴、陳月雲、洪榮昭(2011)。設計體驗式探究鷹架教學應用於非制式科學教育─不同探究能力學童的學習比較。科學教育學刊，19(4)，359-381。
print cancel