互動式電子白板融入創新合作學習模式對國小數學科學習成效與動機之影響

The Effects on 6th Grade Students' Mathematical Achievement and Learning Motivation Using Innovative Cooperative Learning Model with the Aid of Interactive Whiteboard

10.6384/CIQ.201101.0116

黃思華(Tzu-Hua Huang)；劉遠楨(Yuan-Chen Liu)；顏菀廷(Wan-Ting Yan)

互動式電子白板 ； 創新合作學習模式 ； 學生小組成就區分法 ； 小組遊戲競賽法 ； Interactive Whiteboard ； Cooperative Learning ； Student Teams Achievement Divisions ； Team Game Tournament

課程與教學

14卷1期（2011 / 01 / 01）

115 - 139

繁體中文

互動式電子白板挾帶著強大的互動性功能進入了教學現場，改變了教師教和學生的學。本研究結合了合作學習中的學生小組成就區分法及小組遊戲競賽法，設計出一套適用於互動式電子白板教學環境的創新合作學習模式，以探討此創新教學模式對於國小數學科統計量與圓形百分圖及立體圖形兩個單元學生學習成效及學習動機的影響。教學過程中，電子白板不僅能呈現複合式的教材，更是引起師生互動討論的媒介。透過此創新合作學習模式，學生與電子白板、教師與電子白板、教師與學生均產生互動，進而對學生的學習產生影響。本研究實驗組以創新合作學習模式融合互動式電子白板進行教學，控制組以創新合作學習模式融合單槍投影機進行教學，研究結果發現實驗組的學習成效和學習動機均有顯著的進步。

This study is to design an innovative cooperative learning model with the aid of interactive whiteboard (IWB) in conjunction with Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) and Team Game Tournament (TGT) and to investigate the effect on 6th Grade students' Mathematical achievement and their learning motivation, specifically on the 6th grade Mathematics statistics with pie chart and solid diagram lessons. With IWB applied, teachers can present complex Mathematics contents to the students and interact more with their students. Through innovative cooperative learning model, students, teacher and the IWB interact more often, and the model improved students' learning effectiveness. Students were divided into two groups, the experimental group students learned through the innovative cooperative learning model with IWB while the control group students learned through the innovative cooperative learning model with an overhead projector. The result reveals a significant difference, statistically, in learning effectiveness and motivation in learning Mathematics. The study proves that using the innovative cooperative learning model with the aid of IWBs creates more interactions between teacher and students during the classes and produces students' learning achievements.

1. 鍾樹椽、程璟滋(2005)。資訊科技應用於數學科教學之探討。教育資料與圖書館學，43(2)，249-266。
   連結：
2. Virtual Learning （2003）. Interactive whiteboards case studies: new tools, new pedagogies, new learning? Available at: http://www.virtuallearning.org.uk/whiteboards/ Case_Studies.pdf. （Accessed 16 May 2007）
3. 教育部(2006)。「建構縣市e化學習環境示範推動計劃」，http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/b0089/e-environment.pdf，2009年10月10日。
4. Levy, P. （2002） Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study. An Accessed 21 July 2008, from the World Wide Web: http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm.
5. Becta （2006）. Planning to purchase an interactive whiteboard. An Accessed 21 July 2008, from the World Wide Web http://www.becta.org.uk/leaders/leaders.cfm?section=31&id=3173.
6. Boyle, J. （2002）. Virtual magic. Times Educational Supplement, 26 April 2002.
7. Beauchamp, G.(2004).Teacher Use of the Interactive Whiteboard in Primary Schools: towards an effective transition framework.Technology, Pedagogy and Education,13(3),327-348.
8. Beeland, W. D.(2002).Student engagement, visual learning and technology: can interactive white-boards help?.Action Research Exchange,1(1)
9. Coupal, L. V.(2004).Constructivist learning theory and human capital theory: shifting political and educational frameworks for teachers' ICT professional development.British Journal of Educational Technology,35(5),587-596.
10. Glover, D.,Miller, D.(2001).Missioners, tentative and luddites: leadership challenges for school and classroom posed by the introduction of IAWs into schools in the UK.BEMAS Conference Newport Page ll
11. Glover, D.,Miller, D.(2002).Running with technology: the impact of the large-scale introduction of IAWs in one secondary school.Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education,10(3),257-276.
12. Goldman, S. R.(2003).Learning in complex domains: when and why do multiple representations help?.Learning and Instruction,13,239-244.
13. Goodison, T.(2002).Learning with ICT at primary level.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,18,282-292.
14. Grouws, D.(ed.)(1992).Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning.New York:Macmillan.
15. Hazzan, O.(2003).Prospective high school mathematics teachers' attitudes toward integrating computers in their future teaching.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,35(2),213-225.
16. Heaton, R. M.,Mickelson, W. T.(2002).The Learning and Teaching of Statistical Investigation in Teaching and Teacher Education.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,5(1),35-59.
17. Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.(1999).Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
18. Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.(1999).Make cooperative learning.Theory Into Practice,38(2),67-74.
19. Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.,Holubec, E. J.(1990).Circles of learning.Edina, MN:Interaction Book Company.
20. Kamuran, T.,Fikri, A.(2008).The effects of cooperative learning on Turkish elementary students' mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics using TAI and STAD methods.Educ Stud Math,67,77-91.
21. Ke, F.,Grabowski, B.(2007).Gameplaying for math learning: co-operative or not?.British Journal of Educational Technology,38(2),249-259.
22. Kennewell, S.,Morgan, A.(2003).Proceedings from IFIP Working Groups 3.5 Conference: Young Children and Learning Technologies,Sydney:
23. Konold, C.(1993).Inconsistencies in students' reasoning about Probability.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,24(5),392-414.
24. López, O. S.(2005).The Digital Learning Classroom: Improving English Language Learners' academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology.Computers & Education,54(4),901-915.
25. Molina, D. D.(1990).Austin,The University of Texas.
26. Morgan, A. E.,Kennewell, S. E.(2006).Initial teacher education students' views on play as a medium for learning-a divergence of personal philosophy and practice.Technology, Pedagogy and Education,15(3),307-320.
27. Shenton, A.,Pagett, L.(2007).From 'bored' to screen: the use of the interactive whiteboard for literacy in six primary classrooms in England.Literacy,41(3),129-136.
28. Slavin, R.(1995).Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
29. Smith, H.,Higgins, S.,Wall, K.,Miller, J.(2005).Interactive Whiteboards: Boon or Bandwagon? A Critical Review of the Literature.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,21,91-101.
30. Van Hiele, P. M.(1986).Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education.Orlando, FL:Academic Press.
31. 余月甄、劉子鍵(2005)。「教學決策參照架構」對教師應用無線科技進行數學教學之成效的影響。2005年教育資訊傳播與科技國際學術研討會論文集，基隆:
32. 吳靜吉、程炳林(1993)。激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。測驗年刊，39(1)，59-78。
33. 張盈盈(2002)。多媒體在國小數學教學上之應用。國教天地，150，47-50。
34. 張新仁編(2003)。學習與教學新趨勢。臺北:心理出版社。
35. 許楨哲(2003)。實際建置線上網路競賽系統：以數學競賽網站為例。視聽教育雙月刊，44(4)，42-45。
36. 陳映雯(2007)。數學學習障礙學生時間化聚解題與教學策略。屏師特殊教育，14，1-9。
37. 陳惠邦(2006)。互動白板導人教室教學的現況與思考。2006年臺北市國際華人資訊教育創新論壇論文集，臺北:
38. 鄭瑞春(1991)。視聽教學媒體在小學數學科教學上的應用。國教月刊，37(9, 10)，31-35。

1. 蔡東鐘(2015)。電子教科書與傳統教科書對學習影響分析。教科書研究，8(2)，39-72。
2. 蔡文榮、陳雅屏(2016)。互動式電子白板的使用差異對國小生英語學習動機與學習成就之影響。彰化師大教育學報，30，31-58。
3. 賴素珍,陳殷哲(2022)。建構師資培育生教學成熟度模式之研究。當代教育研究季刊，30(2)，1-47。
4. 蕭佳純(2021)。創造力教學對學生學習行為、學習動機影響之研究：兼論教師信任、參與專業學習社群對創造力教學之影響。教育科學期刊，20(2)，69-94。
5. 張聖翎,林秀玲,吳相儀(2021)。突破合作學習困境：得獎教師教學策略分析之研究。教育心理學報，52(4)，807-827。
6. (2016)。國小教育機構學習態度、網路學習社群對數學科學習成效模式之建構與驗證。教育學報，44(2)，81-99。