從國際學生評估計劃（PISA）的結果反思香港語文課程、教學與學生的閱讀素養

Reflection on the Results of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA): Chinese Language Curriculum, Teaching, and Hong Kong Students' Reading Literacy

10.6384/CIQ.201110.0050

劉潔玲(Kit-Ling Lau)

國際學生評估計劃 ； 閱讀素養 ； 香港語文課程改革 ； 中文閱讀教學 ； PISA ； reading literacy ； Hong Kong Chinese language curriculum reform ； Chinese reading instruction

課程與教學

14卷4期（2011 / 10 / 01）

49 - 72

繁體中文

本文主要報告香港學生在PISA2009閱讀評估的結果，分析近年香港學生在閱讀素養方面有何明顯的進步和不足之處，並從課程改革的角度探討影響學生閱讀素養的因素。PISA2009的結果顯示，香港學生在閱讀的整體表現比最初兩屆PISA計劃有明顯的進步，其中以綜合和理解歷程的進步最為顯著，香港學生在PISA2009的閱讀時間和動機也有明顯的提升。不過，香港學生在閱讀非連續文本的表現遜於連續文本，學生的策略運用和後設認知能力也未如理想。由於課程改革的推行，近年香港語文科的閱讀教學出現了很多新的變革，香港學生在最近兩屆PISA的閱讀素養有明顯的改進，反映出新課程所建議的閱讀教學和測驗模式較舊課程更為切合PISA的理念以及現今社會對閱讀能力的最新要求。如要進一步提升香港學生的閱讀素養，本文建議教師需加強在非連續文本和閱讀策略的教學，以及更多激勵和支持學生在語文課堂的參與。

This paper shows the results of Hong Kong students in PISA2009 reading assessment. It analyzes the improvements and weaknesses of their reading literacy, and discusses how the curriculum reform in Hong Kong has affected students' development of reading literacy. The findings of PISA2009 indicate that Hong Kong students improved their overall reading performance when compared with the first two PISA cycles. Among the three reading processes, Hong Kong students scored significantly higher in integration and interpretation in PISA2009 than in PISA+. Their reading time and reading enjoyment also increased in PISA2009. However, Hong Kong students' performance in reading non-continuous texts was relatively weaker than in reading continuous texts. Moreover, students' strategy use and metacognition were also unsatisfactory. In recent years, the reading instruction in Chinese language classes has undergone rapid changes due to the curriculum reform. Hong Kong students' better performance in PISA2009 supports that the reading instructional and testing approach adopted in the new Chinese language curriculum is more consistent with the concept of PISA assessment and the literacy requirement of the modern society than the old curriculum. To further develop Hong Kong student's reading literacy, the paper argues that more effort should be put in the teaching of non-continuous texts and reading strategies, and in encouraging and supporting students' participation in Chinese language classes.

1. Ames, C.(1992).Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology,84,261-271.
2. Block, C. C.(ed.),Parris, S. R.(ed.)(2008).Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices.New York:Guilford Press.
3. Dole, J. A.,Brown, K. J.,Trathen, W.(1996).The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students.Reading Research Quarterly,31,62-88.
4. Ellsworth, N. J.,Hedley, C. N.,Baratta, A. N.(1994).Literacy: A redefiniation.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Garner, R.(1987).Metacognition and reading comprehension.Norwood, NJ:Ablex Publishing Co.
6. Goodman, K.(1986).What's whole in whole language?.Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann Educational Books.
7. Guthrie, J. T.,Wigfield, A.,VonSecker, C.(2000).Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading.Journal of Educational Psychology,92,331-341.
8. Kamil, M.L.(ed.),Mosenthal,P.B.(ed.),Pearson, P.D.(ed.),Barr, R.(ed.)(2000).Handbook of reading Research.New York:Longman.
9. Lau, K. L.(2009).Reading motivation, perceptions of reading instruction and reading amount: A comparison of junior and senior secondary students in Hong Kong.Journal of Research in Reading,32,366-382.
10. Lau, K. L.,Chan, D. W.(2003).Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good readers and poor readers in Hong Kong.Journal of Research in Reading,26,177-190.
11. Lau, K. L.,Lee, J. C. K.(2008).Examining Hong Kong students' achievement goals and their relations with students' perceived classroom environment and strategy use.Educational Psychology,28,357-372.
12. Mikulecky, L.,Drew, R.(1996).Basic literacy skills in the workplace.Handbook of reading research
13. OECD(2009).PISA 2009 Assessment Framework - Key Competencies in Reading,Mathematics and Science.Paris:OECD Publications.
14. Palincsar, A. S.,Brown, A. L.(1984).Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction,1,117-175.
15. Paris, S. G.,Paris, A. H.(2001).Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning.Educational Psychologist,36,89-101.
16. Perfetti, C. A.(1985).Reading ability.New York:Oxford University Press.
17. Perry, N. E.(1998).Young children' s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it..Journal of Educational Psychology,90,715-729.
18. Pintrich, P. R.,Roeser, R. W.,DeGroot, E. A.(1994).Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents' motivation and self-regulated learning.Journal of Early Adolescence,14,139-161.
19. Pressley, M.(ed.),Harris, K. R.(ed.),R. K.(ed.),Guthrie, J. T.(ed.)(1992).Promoting academic competence and literacy in school.San Diego:Academic Press.
20. Pressley, M.,Schuder, T.,Bergman, J. L.,El-Dinary, P. B.(1992).A researcher-educator collaborative interview study of transactional comprehension strategies instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology,84,231-246.
21. Rogers, C.(1998).Motivational indicators in the United Kingdom and The People's Republic of China.Educational Psychology,18(3),275-292.
22. Ruddell, R. B.(ed.),Ruddell, M. R.(ed.),Singer, H.(ed.)(1994).Theoretical models and Processes of Reading.Newark, Delaware:International Reading Association.
23. Shell, D. F.,Colvin, C.,Bruning, R. H.(1995).Self-efficacy, attribution, and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement:Grade-level and achievement-level differences.Journal of Educational Psychology,87(3),386-398.
24. Stevenson, H.W.(1993).Why Asian students still outdistance Americans.Educational Leadership,50(5),63-66.
25. Tompkins, G. E.(2003).Literacy for the 21st century.Upper Saddle River,NJ:Merrill/Prentice Hall.
26. Wang, J. H.,Guthrie, J. T.(2004).Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation,extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students.Reading Research Quarterly,39,162-186.
27. Weaver, C.(1994).Reading process and practice: From socio-psycholinguistics to whole language.Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
28. Wigfield, A.(1997).Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation.Educational Psychologist,32,59-68.
29. Wolters, C. A.(2004).Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology,96,236-250.
30. Wolters, C. A.,Pintrich, P. R.(1998).Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms.Instructional Science,26,27-47.
31. 何文勝(1999)。從能力訓練角度論中國語文課程教材教法。香港:文化教育出版社。
32. 林清山、程炳林(1995)。國中生自我調整學習因素與學習表現之關係暨自我調整的閱讀理解教學策略效果之研究。教育心理學報，28，15-58。
33. 韋志成(2000)。現代閱讀教學論。南寧:廣西教育出版社。
34. 香港大埔中學校長會(2003)。課改路：一個地區合作推行中文科課程改革的探索。香港:香港大埔中學校長會中國語文教學品質圈。
35. 香港考詴及評核局(2005)。香港中學會考中國語文科水平參照等級描述及示例。香港:政府印務局。
36. 香港課程發展議會(2007)。中學中國語文建議學習重點。香港:政府印務局。
37. 香港課程發展議會(2001)。中學中國語文課程指引（初中及高中）。香港:政府印務局。
38. 香港課程發展議會(1990)。中國語文科（中一至中五）。香港:政府印務局。
39. 香港課程發展議會(2001)。學會學習：課程發展路向。香港:政府印務局。
40. 香港課程發展議會與香港考詴及評核局(2007)。中國語文科課程及評估指引（中四至中六）。香港:政府印務局。
41. 祝新華(2004)。體現多個認知層次的閱讀測試的題型系統。中國語文測詴，5，1-11。
42. 祝新華(2003)。以閱讀認知理論為基礎探討理解能力的層次。中國語文測試，4，15-21。
43. 陳李綢(1995)。學習訓練方案對國中生閱讀理解學習之影響。教育心理學報，28，77-98。
44. 黃顯華(2005)。中學中國語文科新修訂課程實施情況（2002/2003 學年至2003/2004 學年）評估研究中學中國語文科新修訂課程實施情況（2002/2003 學年至2003/2004 學年）評估研究,香港:香港中文大學教學研究所。
45. 黃顯華(2000)。尋找課程與教學的知識基礎 －香港中小學中文科課程與教學研究。香港:中文大學出版社。
46. 劉潔玲(2001)。香港中學中文科輔導教學模式的調查研究。教育曙光，44，64-72。
47. 劉潔玲(2007)。新課程實施下高中中文科教師的閱讀教學觀與教學模式。教育學報，35(2)，29-58。
48. 劉潔玲、陳維鄂(2003)。檢討在香港中學中文科實施閱讀策略教學的成效。教育學報，31(1)，59-94。
49. 黎歐陽汝穎(1995)。從中學中文科教師對閱讀教學工作的認識的調查結果看九十年代中文科閱讀教學的新挑戰。中國語文教育論文集，香港:

1. 孫劍秋、林孟君(2013)。從臺灣中學生PISA閱讀素養的表現談精進學生閱讀素養的教學策略。中等教育，64(3)，35-51。
2. 張燕珠(2022)。在PISA閱讀素養框架下比較不同教學年資教師自評文言篇章教學策略：以香港中學為例。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，53，31-54。
3. (2015).The Reading Attainment of Hong Kong Primary Four Students: A Study of Literacy Achievements and Its Implications.教育學報,43(1),35-58.