臺灣課程評鑑研究的回顧與前瞻

Review and Prospects on the Development of Curriculum Evaluation Research in Taiwan

10.6384/CIQ.201210.0025

黃嘉雄(Chia-Hsiung Huang)

課程評鑑 ； 評鑑模式 ； 評鑑取向 ； 課程評鑑研究 ； curriculum evaluation ； evaluation model ； evaluation approach ； research on curriculum evaluation

課程與教學

15卷4期（2012 / 10 / 01）

25 - 51

繁體中文

本文先發展一能用以對國內課程評鑑研究作品進行量化內容分析的分類架構；接著，以此分類架構針對國內已發表的課程評鑑研究文獻，包括期刊論文、博碩士論文和政府補助案之研究報告，實施內容分析。根據分析結果，本文提出臺灣課程評鑑研究發展的重要現象：1.1990年代已有少量的研究作品，2000年以後則由於九年一貫課程政策之推行而數量大增；2.評鑑議題中比較熱門者，乃評鑑綜論、價值判斷與規準形成、評鑑者角色與素養和評鑑實施程序與技術之主題；3.許多研究評鑑聚焦於CIPP和目標本位評鑑模式，最近則彰權益能評鑑和回應式評鑑漸受重視；4.屬於後期中等教育階段的課程評鑑研究案較稀少。依據這些發現，本文亦提出一些未來臺灣課程評鑑研究發展的前瞻性觀點。

In this article, a conceptual framework of classification is firstly developed for quantitative content analysis of the writings of curriculum evaluation in Taiwan. Then, I analyze and review by the classification framework the Taiwan published writings focused on curriculum evaluation, including journal articles, doctor and master degree thesis, and research reports financed by government.According to the results of the content analysis, the man features of curriculum evaluation research in Taiwan are presented as the follows:1. Most of the researches have been done since 2000, due to the Taiwan grade 1-9 curriculum reform policies. A few of them had been done in 1990's.2. The issues related to evaluation definition and its' importance, developing criterion for judgment and their values foundations, and the processes and methods for implementing evaluation are the popular research topics.3. Lots of the researches are focused on the CIPP and objective-based evaluation models. However, the empowerment evaluation and the responsive evaluation have recently received more attention.4. The researches of post-secondary education curriculum evaluation are quiet few.Based on the findings, some prospective ideas for the development of curriculum evaluation research in Taiwan are provided.

1. 游家政(2009)。學校本位課程評鑑的回顧與展望。課程與教學季刊，12(1)，25-48。
   連結：
2. 教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北：作者。
3. 教育部（2000）。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。臺北：作者。
4. Eisner, E. W.(2002).The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill Prentice Hall.
5. Gredler, M. E.(1996).Program evaluation.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
6. Guba, E. G.,Lincoln, Y. S.(1989).Forth generation evaluation.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
7. Lewy, A.(Ed.)(1977).Handbook of curriculum evaluation.Paris:UNESCO, international Institute for Educational Planning.
8. Nevo, D.(1995).School-based evaluation: A dialogue for school improvement.New York:Pergaman.
9. Scriven, M.(2000).Evaluation ideologies.Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation,Norwell, MA:
10. Stufflebeam, D. L.(2000).Foundational model for 21st century program evaluation.Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation,Norwell, MA:
11. Worthen, B. R.(Ed.),Sanders, J. R.(Ed.),Fitzpatrick, J. L.(Ed.)(1997).Program evaluation: Alternatives approaches and practical guidelines.New York:Longman.
12. 馬信行(1998)。教育科學研究法。臺北:五南。
13. 陳美如(2002)。臺灣課程評鑑的回顧與展望。教育學刊，18，87-112。
14. 陳美如、郭昭佑(2003)。學校本位課程評鑑─理念與實踐反省。臺北:五南。
15. 黃光雄編、簡茂發編(2000)。教育研究法。臺北:師大書苑。
16. 黃政傑(1987)。課程評鑑。臺北:師大書苑。
17. 黃嘉雄(2010)。課程評鑑。臺北:心理。

1. 陳美如(Mei-Ju Chen);郭昭佑(Chao-Yu Guo);曾莉婷(Li-Ting Tseng)(2023)。國際課程評鑑研究課題與趨勢分析：2000－2020年。教育研究與發展期刊。19(1)。107-140。