知覺優先論：教學歷程中的「覺得」和「懂得」

Primacy of Perception: "Feeling" and "Knowing" in Teaching

10.6384/CIQ.201307_16(3).0008

林逢祺(Ferng-Chyi Lin)

尼爾 ； 知覺優先論 ； 覺得 ； 懂得 ； A. S. Neill ； Primacy of perception ； feeling ； knowing

課程與教學

16卷3期（2013 / 07 / 01）

201 - 218

繁體中文

本文的目的在運用作者個人生命史中的事件和梅洛龐蒂（ M. Merleau-Ponty）的知覺現象學，來詮釋尼爾（A. S. Neill）「使思維聽從感覺」的主張，並闡釋其在教學上的意義。藉著生活例證，本文說明「反思依賴著一個未經反思的經驗」、「對於世界的有效思維，須以充足的知覺為前提」。由這個知覺優先論的立場，我們可以了解尼爾何以主張學生必須具備「使思維聽從感覺的能力」。尼爾主張思維聽從感覺的內在理由，乃在發現「有感」理解才是能產生行動召喚力的真誠之知。這種真誠之知需要有感教學來培育。有感教學強調從「覺得」走向「懂得」，而非由「懂得」來規定「覺得」。這是以學習者為主體、注重身體知覺和行動實踐的教育哥白尼式革命。

The purpose of this article is to utilize events of the author's past personal experiences and M. Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of perception to interpret A. S. Neill's claim that students should have the power ”to subordinate their thinking to their feeling.” The implication of this kind of claim will also be discussed for teaching in the research.Using personal experience, this article illustrates that ”reflection bears upon an unreflective experience” and that ”sufficient perception is the precondition of valid thinking concerning the world around.” This is the position used to argue for the primacy of perception, and the point of Neill's claim that students should have the power to subordinate their thinking to their feeling could also be clarified from this perspective.The intrinsic reason of Neill's advocating for subordinating thinking to feeling is that he found a profound and authentic knowing would call for an action afterwards. However, the knowing needs to be nourished by a real teaching. Instead of regulating ”feeling” by ”knowing,” the teaching should emphasize ”feeling so” before ”knowing so.” This kind of teaching would also lead for a Copernican revolution in education which will take care of learners' subjectivity, perceptions, and practices accordingly.

1. 劉盈慧（2012，9 月19 日）。臺博館潛返地心特展4D 電影小朋友最愛。聯合報，教育AA4 版。
2. 歐陽教（1973，3 月29 日）。蛙教書。聯合報，第15 版。
3. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: The Penguin Group.
4. Blackburn, S.(1999).Think: A compelling introduction to philosophy.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
5. Eisner, E. W.(2005).Reimagining schools: The selected works of Elliot W. Eisner..London:Routledge.
6. Fong, T-L.(2009)。The awareness of pedagogical aesthetics: Transformation of pedagogical profession identity by Taiwanese alternative school teacher。Symbolic universes of pedagogical professionalism in different cultures，Taipei:
7. Greene, M.(1973).Teacher as stranger: Educational philosophy for the modern age.Belmont:Wadsworth Publishing Company.
8. Magill, F. N.(1990).Masterpieces of world philosophy.New York, NY:HarperCollins Publishers.
9. Merleau-Ponty, M.(1964).The primacy of perception and other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history and politics.Illinois:Northwestern University Press.
10. Merleau-Ponty, M.,Smith, C.(Trans.)(1962).Phenomenology of perception.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul..
11. Morris, M.(2008).Teaching through the ill body: A spiritual and aesthetic approach to pedagogy and illness.London:Sense Publisher.
12. Neill, A. S.(1968).Summerhill.London:Penguin Books.
13. Nietzsche, F. W.,Hollingdale, R. J.(Trans.)(1961).Thus spoke Zarathustra.London:Allen & Unwin.
14. Urmsom, J. O.(Ed.),Rée, J.(Ed.)(1989).The concise encyclopedia of western philosophy & philosophers.London:Routledge.
15. Zembylas, M.(2007).Five pedagogies, a thousand possibilities: Struggling for hope and transformation in education.Rotterdam:Sense Publishers.
16. 王克難譯、Neill, A. S.(2003)。夏山學校。臺北:遠流。
17. 陳雅慧(2010)。誰把臺灣少年考笨了？。親子天下，19，122-125。
18. 黃武雄(2003)。學校在窗外。臺北:左岸文化。
19. 黃郁倫、鍾啟泉譯、佐藤学(2012)。學習的革命：從教室出發的改變。臺北:天下。
20. 歐用生(2010)。課程研究新視野。臺北:師大書苑。
21. 蘇永明(2006)。主體的爭議與教育。臺北:心理。

1. 黃雅新,陳琬云,林秀玲,吳相儀(2020)。「大學生感恩課程」之教學歷程研究。教育研究集刊，66(1)，35-76。
2. 黃彥文(2023)。植基在地化共鳴－偏鄉地區美感教育校本課程的可能與限制之研究。課程與教學，26(4)，189-228。
3. 梁福鎮(2015)。Michael Winkler普通教育學之探究。教育研究集刊，61(4)，1-32。