核心素養融入師資職前教育之融通課程：以美學素養為例

Infusion between Aesthetic Literacy and Professional Education Courses in the Preservice Teachers Program

10.6384/CIQ.201401_17(1).0003

李雅婷(Ya-Ting Lee)

美學素養 ； 高等教育 ； 教育專業課程 ； 師資職前教育 ； aesthetic literacy ； higher education ； professional education courses ； preservice teachers program

課程與教學

17卷1期（2014 / 01 / 01）

61 - 93

繁體中文

高等教育機構中專業課程與通識課程的分野對峙情形，已掀起對高等教育培育全人素養職責的省思聲浪。除了理念探討外，國外亦有推動實例。臺灣教育行政主管單位近年來亦規劃了相關補助計畫推動。本研究以一所受臺灣教育部辦公室顧問室補助推動通識課程革新經費之高等教育機構之歷程為例，分析探究其中子計畫主題「核心素養融入專業課程」之課程設計與成效，並以其中一門實驗課程「美學素養融入國民小學教學實習」作為分析案例。本研究主要採文件分析，提出三點結論如下：（一）美學素養融入國民小學教學實習專業課程基於「做中理解」理念與「做教育學」，融入教學藝術三要素，發展成為一個單科統整課程。（二）核心素養融入專業課程需有課程四要素之配套措施外，尚須社群情感支持。（三）美學素養融入師資職前專業課程有助於師資生重新審視教育專業知能的意義，然理想實踐行動尚需時間。根據結論提出兩項建議：對發展核心素養融入課程之概念模式的建議，以及對教育部的建議。

Over several decades there have been research papers arguing that university education is in a state of crisis. In particular, the trends of excessive disciplinary specialization have resulted in that general education and the major lack coherence, which poorly prepares a student for becoming a whole person. Having the faculty at the College of Education engaged in this one-and-a-half-year project granted by the Ministry of Education of Taiwan was based on the assumption that general education and the major going separately was misguided. All preservice teachers in Taiwan are required to take the professional courses in advance. ＂Practicum of Elementary School Teaching＂ (PEST), one of required credits, is an integrated and advanced subject in order to better coordinate teaching experiences in the preservice teachers program. The main purpose of this study is to explore and examine the effects of infusion between aesthetic literacy as well as PEST. The conclusions were as follows: 1. Based on the ideas of ＂understanding by doing＂ and ＂do pedagogy,＂ the infusion between aesthetic literacy as well as PEST was organized in an integrated curriculum with three elements of artistry in teaching. 2. In addition to four items of supporting measures, it is necessary to organize the affective supportive groups during the implementation of the infusion between aesthetic literacy as well as PEST. 3. According to the data collected, this curricula was found beneficial for professional growth in teaching design as well as teachers’ willingness to improve their teaching profession, which reminds our preservice teachers to reconsider the complexity of what counts as teaching. Several of the preservice teachers, however, did not provide an atmosphere that welcomed exploration and adventure, thus, it becomes that teaching them to design is more likely playing dominos. Moreover, several preservice teachers failed to ＂read＂ some of the qualities emerged and respond with qualities appropriate to the direction that they expected their students to take. Finally, some suggestions were provided for developing the concept models of infusion between core literacy and professional education courses as well as for the decision making in the Ministry of Education of Taiwan.

1. 李雅婷(2011)。師資職前教育師培生進行問題引導學習之課程設計與實施研究。屏東教育大學學報，37，57-96。
   連結：
2. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Minton, Balch & Company.
3. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier Books.
4. Augustine, S. M.,Zoss, M.(2006).Aesthetic flow experience in the teaching of preservice language arts teachers.English Education,39(1),72-95.
5. Barce, J.,Habrowski, E. P.,Kanne, J.,Skrobul, G.(2000).,未出版
6. Berghoff, B.(2007).Taking an aesthetic stance toward teaching and assessment.Focus on Exceptional Children,39(7),1-12.
7. Berleant, A.(2005).Aesthetics and environment: Theme and variations.Aldershot, UK:Ashgate.
8. Carlson, A.(2009).Nature and landscape: An introduction to environmental aesthetics.New York, NY:Columbia University Press.
9. Denzi, N. K.(Ed.),Lincoln, Y. S.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of qualitative research.London, UK:Sage.
10. Eisner, E. W.(1994).The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs.New York, NY:Macmillan College.
11. Fogarty, R.(1991).Ten ways to integrative curriculum.Education Leadership,49(2),61-66.
12. Garrison, J.(1997).Dewey and eros: Wisdom and desire in the art of teaching.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
13. Greene, M.(1988).The dialectic of freedom.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
14. Greene, M.(2001).Variations on a blue guitar-The Lincoln Center Institute lectures on aesthetic education.New York, NY:Teachers College, Columbia University.
15. Greene, M.(1995).Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
16. Grumet, M. R.(1993).The play of meanings in the art of teaching.Theory into Practice,32(4),204-209.
17. Handerhan, E. C.(1993).Literacy, aesthetic education, and problem solving.Theory into Practice,32(4),244-251.
18. Kerr, C.(1963).The uses of the university.New York, NY:Harper & Row.
19. Lewis, H. R.(2006).Excellence without a soul: How a great university forgot education.New York, NY:Public Affairs.
20. Marsh, C. J.(2008).Key concepts for understanding curriculum.London, UK:Routledge.
21. May, W. T.(1993).Teaching as a work of art in the medium of curriculum.Theory into Practice,32(4),210-218.
22. Neuman, W. L.(2007).Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education.
23. Nichols, J.(1996).,未出版
24. Pink, D. H.(2006).A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future.New York, NY:Riverhead Books.
25. Schubert, W. H.(1992).Practitioners influence curriculum theory: Autobiographical reflections.Theory into Practice,31(3),236-244.
26. Schwab, J. J.(1978).The practical 3: Translation into curriculum.Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays,Chicago, IL:
27. Simpson, D. J.,Jackson, M. J. B.,Aycock, J. C.(2005).John Dewey and the art of teaching: Toward reflective and imaginative practice.London, UK:Sage.
28. Wiggins, G.,McTighe, J.(2005).Understanding by design.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
29. 李雅婷(2011)。通識教育與師資培育課程統整方案探究。通識教育學刊，8，31-52。
30. 國立屏東教育大學師資培育中心編、國立屏東教育大學教育學系編(2012)。邁向實務的師資培育革新。屏東:國立屏東教育大學。
31. 陳伯璋編(2011)。課程美學。臺北:五南。
32. 陳政宏(2010)。大學課程之重新分類：擺脫通識與專業課程二分法的問題。教育研究與發展，6(3)，257-288。
33. 黃俊傑(2007)。二十一世紀的大學專業教育與通識教育：互動與融合。通識學刊，1(2)，1-28。
34. 黃政傑編(2010)。教學藝術。臺北:五南。

1. 陳昭宇(2018)。素養導向的體育課程與教學：證據本位實務的思考。課程與教學，21(2)，111-140。
2. 黃彥文(2023)。植基在地化共鳴－偏鄉地區美感教育校本課程的可能與限制之研究。課程與教學，26(4)，189-228。