運用強化錨式教學改善數學低成就學生文字題解題能力之研究

The Effects on Using Enhanced Anchored Instruction to Improve Word-problem Solving Abilities of Low-Achieving Students in Mathematics

10.6384/CIQ.201404_17(2).0007

潘文福(Wen-Fu Pan)；蔡敏潔(Min-Chieh Tsai)

低成就 ； 原住民 ； 問題解決 ； 強化錨式教學 ； 數學文字題 ； aboriginal ； enhanced anchored instruction ； low-achieving ； math word problems ； problem-solving

課程與教學

17卷2期（2014 / 04 / 01）

141 - 165

繁體中文

本研究目的在協助彩虹（化名）國小數學低成就學生，提高他們對3年級數學文字題的解題能力，並比較傳統錨式與強化錨式策略的成效差異。本研究從96-100年度花蓮縣學測題庫抽取3年級數學文字題各20題，編成前測、後測與延宕後測複本試卷，並從前測篩選出30名低成就學生，隨機分派至實驗組與控制組，各20節的補救教學於2013年1月寒假實施，教材針對前測答對率低於60%的6題文字題而設計。本研究利用t考驗和共變數分析，以瞭解實驗的組內與組間效果。結果顯示：（1）傳統錨式與強化錨式策略都有助於改善數學低成就學生的文字題解題能力；（2）包括實物操作、角色扮演和類推練習等的強化錨式策略，比傳統錨式策略有更好的學生解題能力改善效果。

The first purpose of this study is to help improve the abilities of low-achievers in mathematics of a Hualien aboriginal primary school with their third-grade math word problems. It also aims to compare the effects on problem-solving strategies between traditional anchored instruction (AI) and enhanced anchored instruction (EAI). The pretest, posttest, and delayed alternate posttest used in this study contain 20 third-grade math word problems from Academic Competence Test Bank of Hualien County (2007-2011). The participants in this study are 30 low-achievers from the pretest. They are randomly assigned to the experiment and control groups for a 20-session remedial course during the winter vacation in January 2013. The materials designed are based on the items from the pretest where students failed to answer correctly, e.g., with poor performance under 60%. The anchored animations were used, for both groups, as supplement materials to help learners’ comprehension during the instruction. This study employed t-test and one-way ANCOVA to investigate both within-groups and between-groups effects. The results show that: 1) The AI and EAI are effective for improving low-achievers' comprehension of word problems as well as their problem-solving abilities; 2) Applying EAI strategies (e.g., hands-on practices, role play, and analogy exercises) are more effective approaches to improve learners' word-problem solving abilities.

1. Bottge, B. A. (2009). Anchored instruction. Retrieved from http://www.education.com/reference/article/anchored-instruction/
2. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
3. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston, MA: Heath.
4. Bottge, B. A.(1999).Effects of contextualized math instruction on problem solving of average and below-average achieving students.Journal of Special Education,33,81-92.
5. Bottge, B. A.,Heinrichs, M.,Mehta, Z.,Hung, Y.(2002).Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes.Journal of Special Education,35,186-200.
6. Bottge, B. A.,Rueda, E.,Grant, T. S.,Stephens, A. C.,LaRoque, P. T.(2010).Anchoring problem-solving and computation instruction in context-rich learning environments.Exceptional Children,76(4),417-437.
7. Bottge, B. A.,Rueda, E.,Kwon, J.,Grant, T.,LaRoque, P. T.(2009).Assessing and tracking students' problem solving performances in anchored learning environments.Educational Technology Research & Development,57(4),529-552.
8. Bottge, B. A.,Rueda, E.,LaRoque, P. T.,Serlin, R. C.,Kwon, J.(2007).Integrating reform-oriented math instruction in special education settings.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,22,96-109.
9. Bottge, B.,Rueda, E.,Skivington, M.(2006).Situating math instruction in rich problem-solving contexts: Effects on adolescents with challenging behaviors.Behavioral Disorders,31,394-407.
10. Bouck, E. C.,Flanagan, S.(2009).Assistive technology and mathematics: What is there and where can we go in special education.Journal of Special Education Technology,24(2),17-30.
11. Brown, J. S.,Collins, A.,Duguid, P.(1989).Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher,17(1),32-41.
12. Cho, S.,Bottge, B. A.,Cohen, A. S.,Kim, S.(2011).Detecting cognitive change in the math skills of low-achieving adolescents.The Journal of Special Education,45(2),67.
13. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt=CTGV(1997).The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
14. Duncan, G.,Bamberry, G.(2010).Anchored instruction: It's potential for teaching introductory management.International Journal of Learning,17(3),163-177.
15. Fan, X.,Chen, M.,Matsumoto, A.(1997).Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Finding from the national educational longitudinal study of 1988.The Journal of Experimental Education,65(3),229-242.
16. Fuchs, L. S.,Fuchs, D.(2002).Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without co morbid reading difficulties.Journal of Learning Disabilities,35,563-573.
17. Gagnon, J. C.,Bottge, B. A.(2006).Mathematics instruction in secondary interim, short- and long-term alternative school placements.Preventing School Failure,51(1),39-47.
18. Hickey, D. T.,Moore, A. L.,Pellegrino, J. W.(2001).The motivational and academic consequences of elementary mathematics environments: Do constructivist innovations and reforms make a difference?.American Educational Research Journal,38,611-651.
19. Kelly, A. E.(Ed.),Lesh, R. A.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
20. Kelly, A. E.(Ed.),Lesh, R. A.(Ed.),Baek, J. Y.(Ed.)(2008).Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching.New York, NY:Routledge.
21. Kilpatrick, J.(1967).Problem solving in mathematics.Review of Educational Research,39,523-524.
22. Kneller, M. F.(2009).Northern Illinois University.
23. Kudryashov, N. A.(2009).Seven common errors in finding exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations.Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation,14(9/10),3507-3529.
24. Lamberg, T. D.,Middleton, J. A.(2009).Design research perspectives on transitioning from individual micro-genetic interviews to a whole-class teaching experiment.Educational Researcher,38(4),233-245.
25. Lashway, L.(2004).The mandate: To help low-performing schools.Teacher Librarian,31(5),25-27.
26. Lave, J.,Smith, S.,Butler, M.(1988).Problem solving as an everyday practice.The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving,Reston, VA:
27. Lave, J.,Wenger, E.(1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
28. Lee, J.,Grigg, W.,Dion, G.(2007).,Washington, DC:National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
29. Lin, T.,Hsu, Y.,Cheng, Y.(2011).Emerging innovative teacher education from situated cognition in a web-based environment.Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,10(2),100-112.
30. Loveless, T.(2004).The Brown Center report on American education: How well are American students learning?.Washington, DC:The Brookings Institution.
31. Maccini, P.,Gagnon, J. C.(2006).Mathematics instructional practices and assessment accommodations by secondary special and general educators.Exceptional Children,72,217-234.
32. Mayer, R. E.(1987).Educational psychology:A cognitive approach.New York, NY:Harper Collins.
33. Mayer, R. E.,Moreno, R.(2003).Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning.Educational Psychology,38(1),43-52.
34. Montgomery, D.(2003).Gifted & talented children with special educational needs: Double exceptionality.London:David Fulton Publishers.
35. National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics=NCSM(1977).Position paper on basic mathematical skills.Arithmetic Teacher,25,19-22.
36. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics=NCTM(1980).An agenda for action, recommendation for school mathematics of the 1980's.Palo Alto, CA:Dale Seymour Publications.
37. Pan, H. M.(1993).Colorado,University of Northern Colorado.
38. Prado, M. M.,Gravoso, R. S.(2011).Improving high school students' statistical reasoning skills: A case of applying anchored instruction.Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,20(1),61-72.
39. Putt, I. J.(1978).Indiana,Indiana University.
40. Raghubar, K.,Cirino, P.,Barnes, M.,Ewing-Cobbs, L.,Fletcher, J.,Fuchs, L.(2009).Errors in multi-digit arithmetic and behavioral inattention in children with math difficulties.JLearn Disability,42(4),356-371.
41. Rittle-Johnson, B.,Koedinger, K. R.(2005).Designing knowledge scaffolds to support mathematical problem solving.Cognition and Instruction,23,313-349.
42. Sanny, R.,Teale, W. H.(2008).Using multimedia anchored instruction cases in literacy methods courses: Lessons learned from pre-service teachers.Journal of Literacy & Technology,9(1),2-35.
43. Schoenfeld, A. H.(1985).Mathematical problem solving.Orlando, FL:Academic Press.
44. Schweder, W.,Wissick, C. A.(2008).Using video-based anchored instruction to teach functional behavior analysis.Journal of Special Education Technology,23(2),50-55.
45. Silverman, R.(2007).A comparison of three methods of vocabulary instruction during read-alouds in kindergarten.Elementary School Journal,108(2),97-113.
46. Swanson, H. L.,Jerman, O.,Zheng, X.(2009).Math disabilities and reading disabilities: Can they be separated?.Journal of Psycho-educational Assessment,27(3),175-196.
47. Tabbers, H. K.,Martens, R. L.,van Merrienboer, J. J. G.(2004).Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueing.The British Journal of Educational Psychology,74,71-81.
48. Woodward, J.(2004).Mathematics education in the United States: Past to present.Journal of Learning Disabilities,37,16-31.
49. 王羚如(2002)。同儕解題溝通對數學障礙學生文字解題影響之分析研究。臺南師院學生學刊，23，61-89。
50. 李靜瑤(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學水利及海洋工程學系。
51. 孟瑛如(1992)。學習障礙與補救教學—教師及家長實用手冊。臺北:五南。
52. 林明哲(1990)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化，國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。
53. 林俊元(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺南，國立臺南大學應用數學研究所碩士班。
54. 張淑美(2005)。看到了分數，也看到了孩子。北縣教育，51，85-89。
55. 張新仁(2002)。當代教學統整新趨勢：建構多元而適配的整體學習環境。教育學刊，18，43-64。
56. 教育部(1997)。,臺北:作者。
57. 曹宗萍(1988)。高屏地區國小兒童四則問題的解題過程及其相關因素之研究。屏東師院學報，4，51-116。
58. 梁家輔、邱嘉俞、林素微(2008)。原住民數學低落？原住民與非原住民在不同取向下的數學表現差異探討。2008年原住民學生數理教育學術研討會論文集，臺東:
59. 劉秋木(1996)。國小數學科教學研究。臺北:五南。
60. 戴錦秀、柳賢(2006)。原住民數學素養之初探。2006年原住民學生數理科教／學理論與實務學術研討會論文集，臺東:
61. 鍾靜(1999)。落實國小數學新課程之意圖與學校本位的進修活動。課程與教學，2(1)，15-35。
62. 鍾靜(2005)。論數學課程近十年之變革。教育研究，133，124-134。
63. 譚光鼎(1998)。,臺北:行政院原住民委員會。
64. 寗自強(1993)。國小數學科新課程的精神及改革動向─由建構主義的觀點來看。科學教育學刊，1(1)，101-108。

1. 陳佳欣(2023)。臺灣國小數學低成就學生之數學成就影響因素研究。教育學誌，49，107-128。
2. 蘇宥鋐、黃國豪、郭庭歡、曹雅涵(2017)。年齡對二胡業餘學習者偏好之影響。人文社會學報，13(1)，1-28。