Web 2.0科技融入大學協作式課程之研究：使用探究社群模型比較Wiki融入與線上討論教學

Collaborative Learning with a Web 2.0 Technology-Integrated University Course: Differences in the Presence of a CoI Model between Wiki-Integrated and Asynchronous Discussions

10.6384/CIQ.201404_17(2).0008

劉建人(Chien-Jen Liu)；楊淑晴(Shu-Ching Yang)

混成式學習 ； 線上討論 ； 探究社群 ； 數位教材 ； 科技融入教學 ； blended-learning ； online discussion ； community of inquiry ； digital content ； technology-integrated learning

課程與教學

17卷2期（2014 / 04 / 01）

167 - 195

繁體中文

本研究擬驗證「探究社群模型（CoI）」問卷，並用以比較二種Web 2.0科技融入大學「數位教材設計」協作式課程教學策略的效果是否有顯著差異（「融入Wiki混成式學習」vs.「線上討論學習」），並使用Smart PLS結構方程工具進行模式探索。研究結果發現「融入Wiki混成式學習」組學生在知覺教學（TP）、認知（CP）與社交（SP）三面向均顯著高於「線上討論學習」組；再者TP直接影響SP與CP，並分別具有76%與57%的預測力；另外，SP亦直接影響CP，具有34%的預測力。TP可以解釋SP達到59%的變異量，TP與SP共同可以解釋CP達72%的變異量，均具有高度的解釋力。本結果亦印證過去學者的研究TP是影響CP與SP的關鍵角色，尤其TP對SP具備非常高的預測力，進而間接影響CP。此外，比較兩種教學策略對CoI模型的結構無顯著差異。

This study is to verify the Community of Inquiry (CoI) questionnaire. By using this, it also compares the learning effects from two Web 2.0 technologies integrated into a collaborative teaching in a university course designed with digital contents. The SmartPLS tool from Structural Equation Model (SEM) was employed to explore the CoI model. The findings show that the perceived teaching, cognitive and social presences in ＂Wiki-integrated blended learning＂ are with significant differences higher than that in ＂online discussion learning.＂ Teaching presence (TP) directly affects the social presence (SP) and cognitive presence (CP) with 76% and 57% respectively of predictive power. The SP also directly affects CP with 34% of predictive power. TP can explain 59% of the variance in SP, whereas TP and SP, taken together, explain 72% of the variance in CP, providing a high degree of explanatory power. The results also confirm that TP is a key role affecting CP and SP in the past studies. However, the two teaching strategies within the CoI structure didn’t show any significant differences.

1. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier Books
2. Akyol, Z.,Garrison, D. R.(2011).Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning.British Journal of Educational Technology,42(2),233-250.
3. Arbaugh, J. B.(2007).An empirical verification of the community of inquiry framework.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,11(1),73-85.
4. Arbaugh, J. B.,Cleveland-Innes, M.,Diaz, S.,Ice, P.,Garrison, D. R.,Richardson, J. C.,Shea, P.,Swan, K.(2008).Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample.The Internet and Higher Education,11(3-4),133-136.
5. Arbaugh, J. B.,Hwang, A.(2006).Does "teaching presence" exist in online MBA courses?.The Internet and Higher Education,9(1),9-21.
6. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94.
7. Bromme, R.(Ed.),Hesse, F. W.(Ed.),Spada, H.(Ed.)(2005).Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication: And how they may be overcome.Boston, MA:Kluwer.
8. Bruner, J.(1990).Acts of meaning.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
9. Chin, W. W.(1998).Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling.MIS Quarterly,22(1),vii-xvi.
10. Cole, M.(2009).Using Wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches.Computers & Education,52(1),141-146.
11. Crook, C.(1997).Children as computer users: The case of collaborative learning.Computers & Education,30(3-4),237-247.
12. Darabi, A.,Arrastia, M. C.,Nelson, D. W.,Cornille, T.,Liang, X.(2011).Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,27,216-227.
13. Daspit, J. J.,D'Souza, D.E.(2012).Using the community of inquiry framework to introduce Wiki environment in blended-learning pedagogies: Evidence from a business capstone course.Academy of Management Learning & Education,11(4),666-683.
14. De Wever, B.,Van Keer, H.,Schellens, T.,Valcke, M.(2010).Roles as structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction.Computers in Human Behavior,26,516-523.
15. Falk, R. F.,Miller, N. B.(1992).A primer for soft modeling.Akron, OH:University of Akron Press.
16. Fornell, C.,Bookstein, F. L.(1982).Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory.Journal of Marketing Research,19(4),440-452.
17. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
18. Garrison, D. R.,Anderson, T.,Archer, W.(2000).Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education.The Internet and Higher Education,2(2-3),87-105.
19. Garrison, D. R.,Cleveland-Innes, M.(2005).Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough.American Journal of Distance Education,19(3),133-148.
20. Garrison, D. R.,Cleveland-Innes, M.,Fung, T. S.(2004).Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network,8(2),61-74.
21. Garrison, D. R.,Cleveland-Innes, M.,Fung, T. S.(2010).Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework.The Internet and Higher Education,13(1-2),31-36.
22. Hair, J. F.,Hult, G. T. M.,Ringle, C. M.,Sarstedt, M.(2013).A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
23. Hammond, M.(2005).A review of recent papers on online discussion in teaching and learning in higher education.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,9(3),9-23.
24. Henri, F.(1992).Computer conferencing and content analysis.Collaborative learning through computer conferencing,Berlin:
25. Hiltz, S.(Ed.),Goldman, R.(Ed.)(2005).Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Howard, J.(2002).Technology-enhanced project-based learning in teacher education: Addressing the goals of transfer.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,10(3),343-364.
27. Ice, P.,Arbaugh, B.,Diaz, S.,Garrison, D. R.,Richardsono, J.,Shea, P.,Swan, K.(2007).Community of inquiry framework: Validation and instrument development.13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning,Orlando, FL:
28. Ice, P.,Swan, K.,Kupczynski, L.,Richardson, J.(2008).The impact of asynchronous audio feedback on teaching and social presence: A survey of current research.Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications,Chesapeake, VA:
29. Johnson, E. B.(2002).Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it's here to stay.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
30. Jonassen, D.,Howland, J.,Marra, R.,Crismond, D.(2008).Meaningful learning with technology.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson.
31. Joo, Y. J.,Lim, K.Y.,Kim, E. K.(2011).Online university students' satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model.Computers & Education,57(3),1654-1664.
32. Ke, F.(2010).Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students.Computers & Education,55(2),808-820.
33. Khan, B.(Ed.)(1997).Web-based instruction.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications.
34. Kirschner, P. A.,Erkens, G.(2013).Towards a framework for CSCL research.Educational Psychologist,48(1),1-8.
35. Kline, R. B.(2011).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
36. Lambropoulos, N.,Faulkner, X.,Culwin, F.(2012).Supporting social awareness collaborative e-learning.British Journal of Educational Technology,43(2),295-306.
37. Liu, C. J.,Yang, S. C.(2012).Applying the practical inquiry model to investigate the quality of students' online discourse in an information ethics course based on Bloom's teaching goal and Bird's 3C model.Computers & Education,59(2),466-480.
38. Minocha, S.,Schroeder, A.,Schneider, C.(2011).Role of the educator in social software initiatives in further and higher education: A conceptualization and research agenda.British Journal of Educational Technology,42(6),889-903.
39. Naidu, S.(Ed.)(2003).Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices.London:Kogan.
40. Naismith, L.,Lee, B.-H.,Pilkington, R. M.(2011).Collaborative learning with a wiki: Differences in perceived usefulness two contexts of use.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,27(3),228-242.
41. Neumann, D. L.,Hood, M.(2009).The effects of using a wiki on student engagement and learning of report writing skills in an university statistics course.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,25(3),382-398.
42. Payne, C. R.(Ed.)(2009).Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks.Hershey, PA:IGI Global.
43. Richardson, J. C.,Ice, P.(2010).Investigating students' level of critical thinking across instructional strategies in online discussions.Internet and Higher Education,13(1-2),52-59.
44. Richardson, J. C.,Swan, K.(2003).Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,7(1),68-88.
45. Rick, J.,Guzdial, M.(2006).Situating CoWeb: A scholarship of application.Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,1(1),89-115.
46. Rubin, B.,Fernands, R.,Avgerinou, M. D.(2013).The effects of technology on the community of inquiry and satisfaction with online courses.Internet and Higher Education,17,48-57.
47. Sawyer, R. K.(Ed.)(2006).Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
48. Schrire, S.(2004).Interaction and cognition in asynchronous computer conferencing.Instructional Science,32(6),475-502.
49. Sfard, A.(1998).On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one.Educational Researcher,27(2),4-13.
50. Shea, P.,Bidjerano, T.(2013).Understanding distinctions in learning in hybrid, and online environments: An empirical investigation of the community of inquiry framework.Interactive Learning Environments,21(4),355-370.
51. Shea, P.,Bidjerano, T.(2009).Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster "epistemic engagement" and "cognitive presence" in online education.Computers & Education,52(3),543-553.
52. Shea, P.,Li, C. S.,Pickett, A.(2006).A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses.The Internet and Higher Education,9(3),175-190.
53. Sigala, M.(2007).Integrating Web 2.0 in e-learning environments: A socio-technical approach.International Journal of Knowledge and Learning,3(6),628-648.
54. Stahl, G.(2006).Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
55. Swan, K.,Ice, P.(2010).The Community of Inquiry framework ten years later: Introduction to the special issue.Internet and Higher Education,13(1-2),1-4.
56. Torras, M. E.,Mayordomo, R.(2011).Teaching presence and regulation in an electronic portfolio.Computers in Human Behavior,27(6),2284-2291.
57. Tsai, W.-T.,Li, W.,Elston, J.,Chen, Y.(2011).Collaborative learning using Wiki web sites for computer science undergraduate education: A case study.IEEE Transactions on Education,54(1),114-124.
58. Vygotsky, L. S.(1962).Thought and language.New York:Wiley.
59. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
60. West, J. A.,West, M. L.(2009).Using Wikis for online collaboration.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
61. 孫春在、林珊如(2007)。網路合作學習。臺北:心理。

1. 董力華(2021)。COVID-19疫情影響下的通識課：網路合作學習經驗與實施成效探究。人文社會科學研究，15(4)，81-110。
2. (2022)。探究社群模式運用在虛擬社群之教學策略。教育研究月刊，335，39-53。