题名

個案都市原住民學生之西方科學本質觀探討

并列篇名

Exploring Urban Aboriginal Students' Western Views about the Nature of Science

DOI

10.6384/CIQ.201504_18(2).0006

作者

許綺婷(Chi-Ting Hsu)

关键词

科學本質觀 ; 都市原住民學生 ; 族群認同 ; the nature of science ; urban aboriginal student ; ethnic identity

期刊名称

課程與教學

卷期/出版年月

18卷2期(2015 / 04 / 01)

页次

125 - 167

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

多元文化觀點提供不同族群應該可以形成各自的觀點而非只有單一主流的價值。本研究以個案背景、族群認同度去探討其西方科學本質觀。首先晤談三位高三都市原住民學生之族群認同程度,並以涵化理論的二維模式分析其在科學方面的族群認同類型,接著讓學生從對科學架構的想法圖、對科學家的意象以及認同的科學中是否涵蓋原住民科學去闡述各自的科學本質觀。結果發現:(1)受到家庭背景與強勢主流教育體系的支配,族群認同度較低、屬於同化者的個案學生,傾向具有較單一的西方科學本質觀,並蘊含了西方的思維與世界觀。(2)族群認同度較高,屬於涵化者的個案學生,傾向具有較多元的科學本質觀,認為科學應同時涵蓋西方科學和原住民科學。(3)對本身文化呈現高認同,但在科學方面卻是認同主流科學之同化者的個案學生,雖傾向不認為科學有涵蓋原住民科學,但其科學本質觀中仍蘊含了原住民的思維與世界觀。基於研究結果文末建議教師在教導都市原住民時,應加入結合原住民世界觀與原住民科學的教材,讓學生了解原住民科學的發展與知識,以加強學生對自己族群科學文化的認同感,從而培養多元文化的科學本質觀。

英文摘要

The aim of this study was to explore the western views about the nature of science based on the family background and the ethnic identity. Employing the two-dimensional model of acculturation theory, the study interviewed three 12th- grade urban aboriginal students about their ethnic identity differences. A semi-structured interview was also employed to find out their perception about the nature of science. The results were listed as follows: (1) the student dominated by the family background and the mainstream schooling had weaker ethnic identity, and his views about the nature of science revealed a single western view, (2) the student who had stronger ethnic identity owned multiple views about the nature of science. Both the western science and the indigenous science were included in his view of science, and (3) although the student who had strong ethnic identity in indigenous culture but not in indigenous science did not include indigenous science in his view of science, he still held some indigenous worldviews about the nature of science. Accordingly, school teachers were recommended to promote urban aboriginal students' understanding about the nature of science and enhance their ethnic identity by teaching indigenous science.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 江淑卿、潘于君(2010)。文化取向之科學探究融入圖畫書教學對原住民兒童作用力與反作用力、摩擦力概念學習之影響。高雄師大學報,29,1-25。
    連結:
  2. 林美馨、楊芳瑩(2011)。由認識觀發展的角度探討國小學童對科學探究過程之看法。科學教育學刊,19(6),531-548。
    連結:
  3. 邱明富、高慧蓮(2006)。科學史融入教學對國小學童科學本質觀影響之探究。科學教育學刊,14(2),163-187。
    連結:
  4. 傅麗玉(2004)。誰的科學教育?中小學科學教育的多元文化觀點。課程與教學,7(1),91-108。
    連結:
  5. 英國為「科學」一詞下了新定義(2009,4 月8 日)。新華網。取自http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/tech/2009-04/08/content_11147999.htm
  6. Abd-El-Khalick, F.,Lederman, N. G.(2000).The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(10),1057-1095.
  7. Aikenhead, G. S.(1993).Foreword: Multicultural issues and perspectives on science education.Science Education,77(6),659-660.
  8. Aikenhead, G. S.(1997).Towards a first nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum.Science Education,81(2),217-238.
  9. Akerson, V. L.,Hanuscin, D. L.(2007).Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program.Journal of Research on Science Teaching,44(5),653-680.
  10. Allen, N. J.,Crawley, F. E.(1998).Voices from the bridge: Worldview conflicts of Kickapoo students of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,35(2),111-132.
  11. American Association for the Advancement of Science=AAAS(1993).Benchmarks for Science Literacy.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  12. American Association for the Advancement of Science=AAAS(1989).Science for all Americans.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  13. Anderson, J. A.(1988).Cognitive styles and multicultural populations.Journal of Teacher Education,39(1),2-9.
  14. Atwater, M. M.(2000).Equity for black Americans in precollege science.Science Education,84,154-179.
  15. Atwater, M. M.(2010).Multicultural science education and curriculum materials.Science Activities,47(4),103-108.
  16. Atwater, M. M.,Riley, J. P.(1993).Multicultural science education: Perspectives, definitions, and research agenda.Science Education,77(6),661-668.
  17. Banks, J. A.(2002).An introduction to multicultural education.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
  18. Barnhardt, R.,Kawagley, A.(2005).Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska native ways of knowing.Anthropology and Education Quarterly,36(1),8-23.
  19. Berry, J. W.(1997).Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation.Applied Psychology: An International Review,46(1),5-34.
  20. Bianchini, J.,Cavazos, L.,Helms, J.(2000).From professional lives to inclusive practice: Science teachers and scientists' views of gender and ethnicity in science education.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(6),511-547.
  21. California State Department of Education(1990).Science framework for California public schools.Sacramento:California Department of Education.
  22. Carey, S.,Evans, R.,Honda, M.,Jay, E.,Unger, C.(1989).An experiment is when you try it and see if it works: A study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge.International Journal of Science Education,11(5),514-529.
  23. Cobern, W. W.(1989).A comparative analysis of NOSS profiles on Nigerian and American preservice, secondary science teachers.Journal of Research in Science Education,26(6),533-541.
  24. Cobern, W. W.(1996).Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education.Science Education,80(5),579-610.
  25. Collette, A. T.,Chiappetta, E. L.(1989).Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools.Columbus, OH:Merrill Publishing Company.
  26. Council of Ministers of Education(1996).Common framework of science learning outcomes K-12 (Draft).Victoria, BC:Ministry of Education, Skills and Training.
  27. Curriculum Corporation(1994).A statement of science for Australian schools: A joint project of the states, territories and the Commonwealth of Australia initiated by the Australian Education Council.Victoria:Carlton.
  28. Deng, F.,Chen, D.-T.,Tsai, C.-C.,Chai, C. S.(2011).Students' views of the nature of science: A critical review of research.Science Education,95(6),961-999.
  29. Department of Education(1995).Science in the national curriculum.London:HMSO.
  30. Dzama, E. N. N.,Osborne, J. F.(1999).Poor performance in science among African students: An alternative explanation to the African worldview thesis.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,36(3),387-405.
  31. Ewing, K. M.,Richardson, T. Q.,James-Myers, L.,Russell, R. K.(1996).The relationship between racial identity attitudes, worldview, and African American graduate students' experience of the imposter phenomenon.Journal of Black Psychology,22,53-66.
  32. Fleer, M.(1999).Children's alternative views: Alternative to what?.International Journal of Science Education,21(2),19-135.
  33. Foley, D.(1990).Learning capitalist culture: Deep in the heart of Tejas.Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
  34. Griffiths, A. K.,Barman, C. R.(1995).High school students' views about the nature of science: Results from three countries.School Science and Mathematics,95(5),248-255.
  35. Haidar, A. H.(1999).Emirates pre-service and in-service teachers' views about the nature of science.International Journal of Science Education,21(8),807-822.
  36. Hodson, D.(1993).In search of a rationale for multicultural science education.Science Education,77(6),685-711.
  37. Hodson, D.(1999).Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action.Science Education,83(6),775-796.
  38. Huang, C.-M.,Tsai, C.-C.,Chang, C.-Y.(2005).An investigation of Taiwanese early adolescents' views about the nature of science.Adolescence,40(159),645-654.
  39. Hutnik, N.(1991).Ethnic minority identity: A social psychological perspective.Oxford, UK:Clarendon Press.
  40. Johnson, J. T.,Murton, B.(2007).Re/placing native science: Indigenous voice in contemporary constructions of nature.Geographical Research,45(2),121-129.
  41. Kang, S.,Scharmann, L. C.,Noh, T.(2005).Examining students' views on the nature of science: Results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th graders.Science Education,89(2),314-334.
  42. Karabenick, S. A.,Moosa, S.(2005).Culture and personal epistemology: U.S. and Middle Eastern students' beliefs about scientific knowledge and knowing.Social Psychology of Education,8(4),375-393.
  43. Kawagley, A. O.,Norris-Tull, D.,Norris-Tull, R. A.(1998).The indigenous worldview of Yupiaq culture: Its scientific nature and relevance to the practice and teaching of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,35(2),133-144.
  44. Kelly, G. A.(1955).Psychology of personal constructs.New York, NY:Norton.
  45. Klopfer, L.,Cooley, W.(1961).The history of science cases for high schools in the development of student understanding of science and scientists.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,1(1),33-47.
  46. Laubach, T. A.,Crofford, G. D.,Marek, E.A.(2012).Exploring Native American students' perceptions of scientists.International Journal of Science Education,34(11),1769-1794.
  47. Lederman, N. G.(1992).Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(4),331-359.
  48. Lederman, N. G.,Niess, M. L.(1997).The nature of science: Natually?.School Science and Mathematics,97(1),1-2.
  49. Lee, O.(1997).Science literacy for all: What is it, and how can we achieve it?.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,34(2),219-222.
  50. Liu, S. Y.,Lederman, N.(2007).Exploring prospective teachers' worldviews and conceptions of nature of science.International Journal of Science Education,29(10),1281-1307.
  51. Loving, C. C.(1995).Comment on "Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education".Science Education,79(3),341-348.
  52. Lujan, V. B.(2008).Texas,University of Texas.
  53. McComas, W. F.(2004).Keys to teaching the nature of science.Science Teacher,71(9),24-27.
  54. McComas, W. F.(Ed.)(1998).The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  55. Meichtry, Y. J.(1992).Influencing students understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(4),389-407.
  56. Miller, M. C. D.,Montplaisir, L. M.,Offerdahl, E. G.,Cheng, F.-C.,Ketterling, G. L.(2010).Comparison of views of the nature of science between natural science and nonscience majors.CBE-Life Sciences Education,9(1),45-54.
  57. Miller, P.E.(1963).A comparison of the abilities of secondary teachers and students of biology to understand science.Iowa Academy of Science,70,510-513.
  58. Ministry of Education(1993).Science in the New Zealand curriculum.Wellington:Learning Media.
  59. National Research Council(1996).National science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  60. Ogawa, M.(1995).Science education in a multi-science perspective.Science Education,79(5),583-593.
  61. Phinney, J. S.(1992).The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups.Journal of Adolescent Research,7(2),156-176.
  62. Phinney, J. S.(1990).Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research.Psychological Bulletin,108(3),499-514.
  63. Porter, J. R.,Washington, R. E.(1993).Minority identity and self-esteem.Annual Review of Sociology,19(1),139-161.
  64. Snively, G.,Corsiglia, J.(2001).Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education.Science Education,85(1),6-34.
  65. Solomon, J.,Duveen, J.,Scot, L.,Mccarthy, S.(1992).Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(4),409-421.
  66. Stanley, W. B.,Brickhouse, N. W.(1994).Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education.Science Education,78(4),387-398.
  67. Sutherland, D.,Dennick, R.(2002).Exploring culture, language and the perception of the nature of science.International Journal of Science Education,24(1),1-25.
  68. Varelas, M.,Kane, J. M.,Wylie, C. D.(2011).Young African American children's representations of self, science, and school: Making sense of difference.Science Education,95(5),824-851.
  69. Varelas, M.,Kane, J. M.,Wylie, C. D.(2012).Young black children and science: Chronotopes of narratives around their science journals.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,49(5),568-596.
  70. Waldrip, B. G.,Taylor, P. T.(1999).Permeability of students' worldviews to their school views in a non-Western developing country.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,36(3),289-303.
  71. Walls, L.(2012).Third grade African American students' views of the nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,49(1),1-37.
  72. Zimmermann, E.,Gilbert, J. K.(1998).Contradictory views of the nature of science held by a Brazilian secondary school physics teacher: Educational value of interviews.Educational Research and Evaluation,4(3),213-234.
  73. 李亦園(1982)。臺灣土著民族的社會與文化。臺北:聯經。
  74. 李江德(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北,國立臺灣師範大學生物研究所。
  75. 李悅美(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北,臺北市立師範學院科學教育研究所。
  76. 卓石能(2004)。都市原住民學童族群認同與其自我概念生活適應之關係研究―以高雄市原住民國小學生為例。原住民教育季刊,35,77-108。
  77. 林立康(2007)。原住民地區國小學童之環境世界觀研究。環境教育學刊,6,33-70。
  78. 林陳涌(1995)。國科會專題研究成果報告國科會專題研究成果報告,臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。
  79. 林陳涌(1996)。「了解科學本質量表」之發展與效化。科學教育學刊,4(1),1-58。
  80. 林陳涌、楊榮祥(1998)。利用凱利方格晤談法探討教師對科學本質的觀點—個案研究。科學教育學刊,6(2),113-128。
  81. 凌平(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東,國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所。
  82. 夏曼•藍波安(2009)。蘭嶼達悟族的海洋知識。台灣原住民研究論叢,5,125-154。
  83. 張琇喬(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中,靜宜大學青少年兒童福利研究所。
  84. 張錦裕(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北,國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所。
  85. 許文忠(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北,臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。
  86. 郭東雄(2010)。台灣paiwan(排灣)族石板屋建築知識與住居文化。臺灣原住民研究論叢,8,117-146。
  87. 郭重吉、蔣佳玲(1995)。評析學生對科學家的形象之相關研究。科學教育月刊,179,2-14。
  88. 陳枝烈(1997)。台灣原住民教育。臺北:師大書苑。
  89. 陳枝烈(2009)。排灣族文化中的科學智慧初探。台灣原住民研究論叢,6,115-156。
  90. 傅麗玉(1999)。從世界觀探討台灣原住民中小學科學教育。科學教育學刊,7(1),71-90。
  91. 楊旭銘(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東,國立屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所。
  92. 裴家騏(2010)。魯凱族的狩獵知識與文化-傳統生態知識的價值。台灣原住民研究論叢,8,67-84。
  93. 劉炳輝(2006)。博士論文(博士論文)。屏東,國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所。
  94. 潘立夫(1996)。排灣文明初探。屏東:屏東縣立文化中心。
  95. 潘立夫(1995)。排灣族採訪冊。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。
  96. 鍾孟蓉(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北,國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所。
  97. 譚光鼎(1994)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。
  98. 譚昌國(2007)。排灣族。臺北:三民。
被引用次数
  1. 謝州恩、劉湘瑤(2016)。建構國小自然科學課程之科學本質要項。科學教育學刊,24(4),355-377。
  2. 鄭景元(2021)。教師對文化殊異資賦優異學生之覺知探究。資優教育論壇,19(2),74-96。