國民小學教師績效責任領導量表之發展與運用

The Development and Application of the Accountability Leadership Scale for Elementary School Teachers

10.6384/CIQ.201804_21(2).0007

張文權(Wen-Cheng Chang)；范熾文(Chi-Wen Fan)

績效責任領導 ； 教師領導 ； 量表發展 ； 教師專業 ； accountability leadership ； scale development ； teacher leadership ； teacher professional

課程與教學

21卷2期（2018 / 04 / 01）

169 - 198

繁體中文

本研究目的在發展適切的國小教師績效責任領導量表，並依此評估現況。首先，參考相關文獻確立概念結構，繼而發展測量題項，再透過預試樣本進行項目分析與探索性因素分析，確立因素層面。接續，取樣612位國小教師為正式樣本；為確認測量模式之適切性，利用模型競爭策略，選定二階單因素模型做為量表之驗證模型；並藉由個別項目信度、組成信度、平均變異數抽取量、幅合效度、區別效度、效標關聯與複核效化等方法，檢驗模型之信效度。最後，依據量表衡量現況。研究結果顯示，本研究發展量表包括重信守諾的領導作為、公平開放的正向文化、學生學習為績效責任、合作的專業學習社群等四個潛在因素，共計19題，均具良好之信效度。此外，量表整體及各層面的表現為中上程度，以學生學習為績效責任認同度最高，而不同性別、職務別之教師，在知覺程度上有所差異。

This study aims to develop an accountability leadership scale for elementary school teachers so as to evaluate its accountability on the leadership. First, the conceptual structure of the scale was defined through the related literature reviews to develop the measurement items. Then, an item analysis and exploratory factor analysis were carried out with the pre-test subjects to establish the factors. Then, the formal data were collected from 612 elementary school teachers, and the 2nd-order single factor modeling was chosen through the competitive strategy to confirm the appropriateness of the measurement model. Next, the reliability and validity of the model were examined in terms of its reliability of individual items, as well as the composite reliability, extracted average variance, convergent validity, discriminant validity, criterion-related validity, and cross-validation. Finally, the actual results based on the scale developed were measured. The results show that in the accountability leadership scale for teachers appear in the 4 latent factors, including ＂promise-keeping leadership behaviors,＂ ＂an open and fair positive culture,＂ ＂student learning as the accountability,＂ and ＂a cooperative professional learning community,＂ in which 19 items consisted with good reliability and validity. In addition, the overall and individual performance of the scale developed were at an above-average level; ＂student learning as accountability＂ obtained the highest recognition among the 4 factors, and the teachers' characteristics were considered significantly different from genders and job positions.

1. 丁一顧(2014)。教師專業學習社群之調查研究：「關注學生學習成效」為焦點。課程與教學季刊，17(1)，209-232。
   連結：
2. 林和春、楊佩禎(2016)。國民小學校長課程領導與教師領導關係之研究─以桃園市為例。中等教育，67(4)，57-84。
   連結：
3. 范熾文、莊千慧(2009)。國小教師績效責任信念、知識管理與班級經營效能關係之研究。學校行政，59，113-136。
   連結：
4. 張文權、范熾文、陳成宏(2017)。國民中學校長績效責任領導困境與策略之研究─質性分析取徑。教育科學研究，62(3)，57-93。
   連結：
5. 張文權、陳慧華、范熾文(2016)。當代績效責任領導：概念、理論及對校長領導之啟示。學校行政，101，34-54。
   連結：
6. 張世璿、丁一顧(2016)。國民小學教師領導核心能力指標建構之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報，33(1)，1-38。
   連結：
7. 張德銳(2010)。喚醒沈睡的巨人─論教師領導在我國中小學的發展。臺北市立教育大學學報，41(2)，81-110。
   連結：
8. 劉芳玲、王文伶(2015)。國中小資源班任課教師數學專業知能及其受重視程度之研究。教育研究與發展，11(1)，1-32。
   連結：
9. 蔡進雄(2011)。教師領導的理論、實踐與省思。中等教育，62(2)，8-19。
   連結：
10. 賴協志、吳清山(2015)。國民中學學習領域召集人正向領導、教師教學省思與創新教學成效關係之研究。課程與教學季刊，18(4)，1-27。
    連結：
11. 謝傳崇、謝宜君(2016)。國民小學教師正向領導對學生幸福感影響之研究：以學生學術樂觀為中介變項。師資培育與教師專業發展，9(3)，29-56。
    連結：
12. 簡杏娟、賴志峰(2014)。國民小學教師領導促進專業學習社群建構之個案研究。學校行政，90，172-193。
    連結：
13. Accountability. (n.d.). Oxford living dictionaries. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/accountability
14. Responsibility. (n.d.). Oxford living dictionaries. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/responsibility
15. Aliakbari, M.,Sadeghi, A.(2014).Iranian teachers' perceptions of teacher leadership practices in schools.Educational Management Administration and Leadership,42(4),576-592.
16. Amzat, I. H.(Ed.),Valdez, N. P.(Ed.)(2017).Teacher empowerment toward professional development and practices.Singapore:Springer.
17. Anderson, K. D.(2004).The nature of teacher leadership in schools as reciprocal lnfluences between teacher leaders and principals.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,15(1),97-113.
18. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94.
19. Barnett, B. G.(Ed.),Shoho, A. R.(Ed.),Bowers, A. J.(Ed.)(2013).School and district leadership in an era of accountability.North Carolina, NC:Information Age.
20. Benson, K.(2011).Arizona State University.
21. Bodenmiller, J. J.(2015).University of Phoenix.
22. Connors, R.,Smith, T.(2014).The wisdom of Oz: Using personal accountability to succeed in everything you do.New York, NY:Penguin Group.
23. Cooper, T. L.(2012).The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
24. Crowther, F.,Ferguson, M.,Hann, L.(2009).Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
25. Danielson, C.(2006).Teacher leadership that strengthens professional practice.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
26. Darling-Hammond, L.,Bullmaster, M. L.,Cobb, V. L.(1995).Rethinking teacher leadership through professional development schools.The Elementary School Journal,96(1),87-106.
27. Darling-Hammond, L.,Wilhoit, G.,Pittenger, L.(2014).Accountability for college and career readiness: Developing a new paradigm.Education Policy Analysis Archives,22(86),1-38.
28. DeWitt, P.,Slade, S.(2014).School climate change: How do I build a positive environment for learning?.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
29. Dive, B.(2008).The accountable leader: Developing effective leadership through managerial accountability.Philadelphia, Philly:Kogan Page.
30. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
31. Frederick, H. R.,Wood, J. A. A.,West, G. R. B.,Winston, B. E.(2016).The effect of the accountability variables of responsibility, openness, and answerability on authentic leadership.Journal of Research on Christian Education,25(3),302-316.
32. Fullan, M.,Rincón-Gallardo, S.,Hargreaves, A.(2015).Professional capital as accountability.Education Policy Analysis Archives,23(15),1-22.
33. Gonzalez, R. A.,Firestone, W. A.(2013).Educational tug-of-war: Internal and external accountability of principals in varied contexts.Journal of Educational Administration,51(3),383-406.
34. Gordin, L.(2012).Teachers as team leaders in a professional learning community: Empowering and equipping teachers leaders to lead.Saarbrücken, Germany:LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
35. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2010).Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Prentice Hall.
36. Hairon, S.,Goh, J. W. P.,Chua, C. S. K.(2015).Teacher leadership enactment in professional learning community contexts: Towards a better understanding of the phenomenon.School Leadership and Management,35(2),163-182.
37. Hamzah, N.,Noor, M. A. M.,Yusof, H.(2016).Teacher leadership concept: A review of literature.International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,2(12),185-189.
38. Hannaford, B.(2011).Teacher perceptions of a professional learning community: A new way to think about teaching, the professional learning community.Saarbrücken, Germany:LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
39. Hickey, W. D.,Harris, S.(2005).Improved professional development through teacher leadership.The Rural Educator,26(2),12-16.
40. Hord, S. M.(2009).Professional learning communities: Educators work together toward a shared purpose.Journal of Staff Development,30(1),40-43.
41. Hoy, W.(2012).School characteristics that make a difference for the achievement of all students: A 40‐year odyssey.Journal of Educational Administration,50(1),76-97.
42. Jackson, T.,Burrus, J.,Bassett, K.,Roberts, R. D.(2010).Teacher leadership: An assessment framework for an emerging area of professional practice.Princeton, NJ:Educational Testing Service.
43. Jamal, A.-H.,Tilchin, O.,Essawi, M.(2015).A teacher accountability model for overcoming self-exclusion of pupils.International Education Studies,8(9),58-64.
44. Kilinc, A. Ç.(2014).Examining the relationship between teacher leadership and school climate.Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice,14(5),1729-1742.
45. Kline, R. B.(2016).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
46. Kraines, G.(2001).Accountability leadership: How to strengthen productivity through sound managerial leadership.Franklin Lakes, NJ:Career Press.
47. Moore, L.(2016).Feet to the fire: How to exemplify and create the accountability that creates great companies.New York, NY:Business Expert.
48. Noar, S. M.(2003).The role of structural equation modeling in scale development.Structural Equation Modeling,10(4),622-647.
49. Preedy, M.(Ed.),Bennett, N.(Ed.),Wise, C.(Ed.)(2012).Educational leadership: Context, strategy and collaboration.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
50. Reeves, D. B.(2004).Accountability for learning: How teachers and school leaders can take charge.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
51. Richardson, T.(2015).The responsible leader: Developing a culture of responsibility in an uncertain world.Philadelphia, PA:Kogan Page.
52. Rosenblatt, Z.,Shimoni, O.(2001).Teacher accountability: An experimental field study.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,15(4),309-328.
53. Sahlberg, P.(2010).Rethinking accountability in a knowledge society.Journal of Educational Change,11(1),45-61.
54. Sebastian, J.,Allensworth, E.,Huang, H.(2016).The role of teacher leadership in how principals influence classroom instruction and student learning.American Journal of Education,123(1),69-108.
55. Sergiovanni, T. J.,Green, R. L.(2014).The principalship: A reflective practice perspective.Boston, MA:Pearson.
56. Silverstein, S.(2015).No more excuses: The five accountabilities for personal and organizational growth.Shippensburg, PA:Sound Wisdom.
57. Sink, C. A.(2009).School counselors as accountability leaders: Another call for action.Professional School Counseling,13(2),68-74.
58. Sirotnik, K. A.(Ed.)(2004).Holding accountability accountable: What ought to matter in public education.New York, NY:Teacher College.
59. Smith, T. M.,Rowley, K. J.(2005).Enhancing commitment or tightening control: The function of teacher professional development in an era of accountability.Educational Policy,19(1),126-154.
60. Tate, T.,Kabia, J.,Nair, S.(2016).Balancing respect while ensuring accountability in the funder-grantee relationship: Lessons from central Africa, Liberia and India.Journal of Human Rights Practice,8(2),1-15.
61. Ulrich, D.,Smallwood, N.(2013).Leadership sustainability: Seven disciplines to achieve the changes great leaders know they must make.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
62. Wang, T.(2016).School leadership and professional learning community: Case study of two senior high schools in Northeast China.Asia Pacific Journal of Education,36(2),202-216.
63. Wenner, J. A.,Campbell, T.(2017).The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership.Review of Educational Research,87(1),134-171.
64. Whalan, F.(2012).Collective responsibility: Redefining waht falls between the cracks fro school reform.Rotterdam, Netherlands:Sense.
65. Wise, C.(Ed.),Bradshaw, P.(Ed.),Cartwright, M.(Ed.)(2013).Leading professional practice in education.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
66. Wood, J. A.,Winston, B. E.(2007).Development of three scales to measure leader accountability.Leadership and Organization Development Journal,28(2),167-185.
67. Worrall, D.(2014).The personal accountability code: The step-by-step guide to a winning strategy that transforms your goals into reality with the new science of accountability.Carlton, AU:The Accountability Codes.
68. Worrall, D.(2013).Accountability leadership: How great leaders build a high performance culture of accountability and responsibility.Carlton, AU:The Accountability Codes.
69. 丁一顧、黃智偉、王佳蕙(2016)。教學導師教師領導之研究：校長支持作為與影響。教育政策論壇，19(2)，65-92。
70. 吳明隆(2007)。結構方程模式：AMOS 的操作與應用。臺北市:五南。
71. 吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS 與統計應用分析。臺北市:五南。
72. 吳清山(2016)。教育的正向力量。臺北市:高等教育。
73. 吳清山(2000)。學校績效責任的理念與策略。學校行政，6，3-13。
74. 吳清山(2012)。教師專業學習社群與學生學習。教育人力與專業發展，29(1)，1-4。
75. 吳清山(2014)。落實品德教育、責無旁貸。國家教育研究院電子報，23
76. 林志成(2015)。聚焦學生學習的教師領導之挑戰、角色與策略。教育研究月刊，256，39-53。
77. 邱皓政(2011)。測驗原理與量表發展技術。臺北市:雙葉。
78. 范熾文(2016)。科技部專題研究成果報告科技部專題研究成果報告,科技部。
79. 范熾文、張文權(2016)。當代學校經營與管理新興議題。臺北市:高等教育。
80. 范熾文、陳靖娥(2014)。國小校長故事領導與教師專業承諾關係之研究。市北教育學刊，45，69-98。
81. 郝德天(2014)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮縣，國立東華大學教育行政與管理學系。
82. 張文隆(2011)。當責。臺北市:商周。
83. 張文權、范熾文(2015)。促進教師專業發展的新趨向─績效責任領導。師資培育法20年的回顧與前瞻，臺北市:
84. 張民杰(2016)。教師專業發展評鑑105 年版規準解析。臺灣教育評論，5(6)，115-118。
85. 張芳全(2008)。統計就是要這樣跑。臺北市:心理。
86. 張夏銘、李新鄉、陳聖謨、丁文生(2012)。教師領導與教師專業發展關係之研究─以台南市國民中學為例。南臺人文社會學報，8，29-55。
87. 教育部統計處（2017）。教育統計查詢網。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/
88. 許素梅(2010)。博士論文(博士論文)。花蓮縣，國立東華大學國民教育研究所。
89. 黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式：理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
90. 顏國樑、任育騰(2013)。透過組織公平與組織信任提升學校效能。教育研究月刊，232，48-64。

1. 陳麗如(2021)。從教師領導研究回顧探討其若干應用與限制。學校行政，133，152-178。
2. (2018)。凝聚學校共責的新力量：教師績效責任領導之實踐分析。教育政策論壇，21(3)，143-180。
3. (2019)。教師專業績效責任的理念與實踐。教育研究月刊，302，4-24。
4. (2021)。國小教師績效責任領導影響學生學業樂觀之關係－以教師專業學習社群為中介變項。教育學報，49(1)，73-95。
5. (2024)。國民小學校長績效責任領導、團隊組織與創新經營效能關係之研究。臺東大學教育學報，35(1)，1-30。