後／書寫中心主義的藝術解構及其對課程與教學的哲學反思

The Artistic Deconstruction of Post-/Graphocentrism and its Philosophical Reflection of Curriculum and Instruction

10.6384/CIQ.201807_21(3).0007

洪如玉(Ruyu Hung)

徐冰 ； 解構 ； 德里達 ； 書寫中心主義 ； 語音中心主義 ； 後書寫中心主義 ； Xu Bing ； deconstruction ； Derrida ； graphocentrism ； phonocentrism ； postgraphocentrism

課程與教學

21卷3期（2018 / 07 / 01）

169 - 185

繁體中文

漢字是世界語言書寫文字中，為相當獨特的表意文字，其它文字大多使用拼音文字來書寫。在東亞文化傳統中，漢字書寫不僅是一種語言文字的溝通符號，也是藝術表現的媒介，中國傳統書法、日本書道反映出漢字的審美特性。漢字做為獨特的語文媒介，也蘊藏著文化理解和教育反思上獨特的意義。本文對照西方哲學家Derrida觀點並以中國藝術家徐冰的藝術作品，提出跨文化界限的辯證理解與交互解構，重新省視習以為常的漢字書寫與教育文化思維方式。本文將漢文化思惟特色稱為書寫中心主義（graphocentrism），其內涵包括漢文化傳統之特色與限制。然而，漢字文化本身也蘊含著跳脫漢字思維的潛能，本文稱為後書寫中心主義（post-graphocentrism）。本研究之教育的啟示體現於兩面向：一、釐清漢字思維的書寫中心主義特色；二、探究後書寫中心主義的意義及其在教育上的啟示，也包括對於課程與教學的反思。

Among all the languages worldwide, Chinese is extremely distinctive and unique because its writing system, based on logograms, while most other languages are using alphabets and syllabaries, based on phonograms. In East Asian cultures, Chinese characters are a means not only for communication, but also for artistic demonstration. The traditional Chinese calligraphy shufa or the Japanese shodo displays the aesthetic characteristics of Chinese written form. Chinese writing exhibits various artistic qualities by its contents of composition and styles of fonts of the handwriting. As a unique writing system, the Chinese language form implies rich meanings for cultural and educational purposes. This paper aims to present an interculturally dialectical understanding and deconstruction which helps analyse and examine the taken-for-granted modes of thoughts and traditions carried by the Chinese written form. Though the western philosopher Derrida and Chinese artist Xu Bing provide inspirations just in opposite ways, the author proposes the ＂graphocentrism＂ concept marking the particularity and limitations of thoughts. It also manifests other possibilities to creative thinking, which is post-graphocentrism. In conclusion, there are two goals in this paper: the clarification of graphocentrism, and the exploration of post-graphocentrism with its implications for education, curriculum, and instruction.

1. 幽蘭(2005)。中國書法藝術品評的美學思想－論張懷瓘的《書斷》。哲學與文化，32(12)，47-70。
   連結：
2. 洪如玉(2016)。Derrida 解構思想之探析及其教育蘊義。教育實踐與研究，29(1)，173-198。
   連結：
3. 黃智陽(2007)。書藝觀念與觀念書藝的離合。書畫藝術學刊，3，169-194。
   連結：
4. Culler, J.(Ed.)(2003).Deconstruction: Critical concepts in literary and cultural studies.London, UK:Routledge.
5. Derrida, J.(1982).Margins of philosophy.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
6. Derrida, J.(1976).Of grammatology.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
7. Derrida, J.(1981).Positions.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
8. Derrida, J.(1976).Speech and phenomena, and other essays on Husserl's theory of signs.Evanston, IL:Northwestern University Press.
9. Derrida, J.(1976).Writing and difference.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
10. Derrida, J.,Caputo, J. D.(1997).Deconstruction in a nutshell: A conversation with Jacques Derrida.New York, NY:Fordham University Press.
11. Huggins, N. (2014). Joseph Kosuth and the idea of art. Retrieved from https://nicholashuggins.wordpress.com/2014/12/08/joseph-kosuth-and-the-idea-of-art/
12. Hung, R.(2013).The weight of words: Exploring the Chinese graphocentrism.43rd Annual Conference of Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia (PESA),Melbourne, Australia:
13. Jenner, W. J. F.(1992).The tyranny of history: The root of China's crisis.London, UK:The Penguin Press.
14. Kosuth, J. (1965). One and three chairs. Retrieved from https://www.moma.org/learn/moma_learning/joseph-kosuth-one-and-three-chairs-1965
15. Kraus, R. C.(1991).Brushes with power: Modern politics and the Chinese art of calligraphy.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
16. Lewis, M. E.(1999).Writing and authority in early China.Albany:SUNY Press.
17. Sáenz-Ludlow, A.(2007).Signs and the process of interpretation: Sign as an object and as a process.Studies in Philosophy and Education,26(3),205-223.
18. Tsao, Hsingyuan(Ed.),Ames, Roger T.(Ed.)(2011).Xu Bing and contemporary Chinese art.Albany:State University of New York Press.
19. Yen, Y.(2005).Calligraphy and power in contemporary Chinese society.London, UK:Routledge.
20. 王靜芬、毛秋瑾譯(2011)。中國石碑：一種象徵形式在佛教傳入之前與之後的運用。北京市:商務印書館。
21. 李建緯(2013)。彰化儒學，為高九仞─彰化孔廟文物調查與研究。庶民文化研究，7，39-95。
22. 徐冰(2014)。視野：徐冰特別專輯。今天，105，1-219。
23. 耿慧玲(2008)。石刻與經典研究。止善，5，3-20。
24. 高明士(2005)。中國中古的教育與學禮。臺北市:國立臺灣大學出版中心。
25. 高明士(1982)。隋唐廟學制度的成立與道統的關係。臺大歷史學報，9，93-122。
26. 張韜(2010)。書法創作的文化哲學思想內核：仁智與道德。中華書道，70，35-40。
27. 郭繼明(2010)。書法和諧論—書法藝術本質特徵探微。書畫藝術學刊，8，1-12。
28. 華正人編(1999)。歷代書法論文選。臺北市:華正書局。
29. 蔡清田(2015)。課程設計與發展的關鍵DNA：核心素養。臺北市:五南。