教學活化，活化教學：文化歷史活動理論觀

Activation of Teaching and Activating Teaching: A Perspective of Cultural Historical Activity Theory

10.6384/CIQ.201901_22(1).0002

林佩璇(Pei-Hsuan Lin)

文化歷史活動理論 ； 教學活化 ； 活化教學 ； 展化學習 ； cultural historical activity theory ； activation of teaching ； activating teaching ； expansive learning

課程與教學

22卷1期（2019 / 01 / 01）

17 - 37

繁體中文

教育改革中各類教學方法與策略不斷推陳出新，活化成了教學改革熱門議題。本文從文化歷史活動理論的視野，探討人類活動的特性，藉以闡述教學活化及活化教學的概念。首先就文化歷史活動理論的發展，說明教學活動是社會實踐的生產過程，包含多元系統，教學活動永遠處於歷史之中。其次說明教學活化，活化並非巧合或偶發的生物性，而是人類演化過程展現的生成作用，教學本身即具有文化歷史的活化本質及特性。接著討論活化教學，活化作為動詞，是催化教學改變的動力。文中探討國外及臺灣教學研究發現，藉以說明活化有賴主體敏察教學系統的擾動因子、視矛盾為活化契機、珍視交會的多元聲音、持續內化－外化的教學轉化與展化學習歷程，主體在人類活動中，不可免地也參與了教學再創歷史。

Responding to educational reforms brought up by professionals in the last decade, all manner of teaching methods or strategies have been implemented in school teaching. Activating teaching has been one the popular issues in the reforms. This article aims at exploring both concepts of ＂activation of teaching＂ and ＂activating teaching＂ by investigating them with the perspectives of cultural historical activity theory (CHAT). First, it describes the historical development of CHAT. Then it elaborates that teaching activities with multiple systems are in fact related to some socially and historically practical processes. Secondly, it states that the activation of teaching is not of any coincidental nature of biology, but a generation of cultural history shown by the human evolution process. The teaching per se has the essence of activation with cultural history. Next, the activating means to catalyze the motivation of teaching change and several elements for activating teaching should be included, such as awareness of the disturbances in teaching systems, the viewing of contradictions as activating opportunities, cherishing the multiple voices in teaching systems, the continuous internal-external transformation and expansive learning. Any teacher who connects to human activities indispensably has been likely participating in the reconstruction of cultural history of teaching.

1. 林佩璇(2017)。矛盾趨動擴展學習：差異化教學的實踐轉化。課程與教學季刊，12(4)，117-150。
   連結：
2. 陳佩英,曾正宜(2011)。探析專業學習社群的展化學習經驗與課程創新行動—活動理論取徑。教育研究集刊，57(2)，39-84。
   連結：
3. Disturbance. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disturbance
4. Cole, M.(1999).Cultural psychology: Some general principles and concrete example.Perspectives on activity theory,New York, NY:
5. Davydov, V. V.(1999).The content and unsolved problems of activity theory.Perspectives on activity theory,New York, NY:
6. Eisner, E. W.(1994).The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs.New York, NY:Macmillan.
7. Engeström, Y.(1999).Activity theory and individual and social transformation.Perspectives on activity theory,New York, NY:
8. Engeström, Y.(1999).Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice.Perspectives on activity theory,New York, NY:
9. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit. Retrieved from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engeström/expanding/toc.htm
10. Engeström, Y.(2008).From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
11. Engeström, Y.,Miettinen, R.(1999).Introduction.Perspectives on activity theory,New York, NY:
12. Feryok, A.(2009).Activity theory, imitation, and their role in teacher development.Language Teaching Research,13(3),279-299.
13. Koschmann, T.(1999).Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin's contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration.Proceedings of the computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL). Paper presented at 1999 CSCL Conference, Stanford University, California,Mahwah, NJ:
14. Lektorsky, V. A.(1999).Activity theory in a new ear.Perspectives on activity theory,New York, NY:
15. Leont’ev, A. N.(1978).Activity, consciousness, and personality.Englewood Cliffs. NJ:Prentice- Hall.
16. Murphy, E.,Manzanares, M. R.(2008).Contradictions between the virtual and physical high school classroom: A third-generation activity theory perspective.British Journal of Educational Technology,39(6),1061-1072.
17. Osuna, M. M.(2003).Albany,Department of Theory and Practice, University at Albany, State University of New York.
18. Roth, W. M.,Lee, Y. J.(2007).‘Vygotsky's neglected legacy’: Cultural-historical activity theory.Review of Educational Research,77(2),186-232.
19. Smidt, S.(2009).Introducing Vygotsky.New York, NY:Routledge.
20. Stinnett, J.(2012).Emerging voices: Resituating expertise: An activity theory perspective on representation in critical ethnography.College English,75(2),129-149.
21. Tolmna, C. W.(1999).Society versus context in individual development: Does theory make a difference?.Perspectives on activity theory,New York, NY:
22. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
23. Vygotsky, L. S.(1962).Though and language.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
24. 王金國(2015)。活化教學，不可忽略學習原理與教學倫理。臺灣教育評論月刊，4(12)，107-109。
25. 吳清山(2014)。善用活化教學提升學生學習效能。師友，559，31-35。
26. 林佩璇(2013)。回應文化差異的特色課程發展。教育人力與發展雙月刊，30(6)，17-28。
27. 林佩璇(2014)。課程轉化的持續動力：文化歷史活動理論觀。第十六屆兩岸三地課程理論研討會：課程改革持續的動力
28. 林盈均(2016)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學課程與教學傳播科技研究所。
29. 胡佳慧(2017)。彰化市，國立彰化師範大學國文學系。
30. 陳映如(2014)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學地理學系。
31. 廖宇瑄(2014)。臺中市，逢甲大學公共政策研究所。

1. 游士正(2019)。生命教育通俗因果觀教材有助大一新生設定生涯願景乎？。大學教學實務與研究學刊，3(1)，101-128。
2. (2022)。十二年國民基本教育完全免試入學政策之實踐探析。教育政策論壇，25(2)，43-76。