杜威在19、20世紀之交美國中學歷史與社會設科演變過程中所扮演的角色

Dewey's Role in the Transformation Processes of the Subject of History and Social Studies of the Secondary Schools in the United States at the Turn of the 19th and 20th Century

10.6384/CIQ.201904_22(2).0007

單文經(Wen-jing Shan)

杜威 ； 美國中學課程 ； 歷史科 ； 社會科 ； 設科演變 ； 1916年報告 ； 課程史 ； John Dewey ； secondary level curriculum in the USA ； history ； social studies ； subject transformation ； 1916 Report ； curriculum history

課程與教學

22卷2期（2019 / 04 / 01）

173 - 203

繁體中文

19、20世紀之交，美國中學歷史與社會設科的演變過程，始終是美國課程學界關注的重要研究問題之一。作者因撰寫與本文主題相近的論文而得知杜威（J. Dewey）在此過程中所扮演的角色仍頗有爭議，乃起意研究之。作者除據有關的課程文件，簡述此一設科演變的過程外，並將杜威置於此一由時勢、思潮所構成的脈絡中，檢視其與有關人物的貢獻，俾便理解其在當中究竟扮演怎樣的角色。本文的重點置於杜威等人與《1916年報告》的關聯，並據以指陳該報告多次出現杜威所言「關注當下的成長需求」一語所具有之籠統的特性，讓對於該報告的完成有直接且重要貢獻的T. J. Jones、A. W. Dunn及J. H. Robinson三位人士之觀點得以聯結，並且形成共識，而使未參與研擬該報告的杜威，以觀點聯結者的角色，成為一位有重大貢獻的間接影響者。

The transformation processes of the subjects of history and social studies of the secondary level at the turn of the 19th and 20th century has been the significant curriculum research topics in the United States. J. Dewey's role played in the process has caused much debate. The author decided to investigate the topic. The researcher described those processes by reviewing the related curriculum documents in order to understand Dewey's role and his contributions in the context of contemporary situations and thoughts. The paper emphasized the relations among Dewey and others and the 1916 Report. Based on the findings, the author pointed out that the vagueness in Dewey's statement ＂attending to the needs of present growth＂ was quoted several times in the Report. It implied that T. J. Jones, A. W. Dunn and J. H. Robinson who had direct and important contributions in finishing up the Report may align Dewey's viewpoint to form their consensus. This made Dewey, who were not a Report committee member, a special and important contributor.

1. 單文經(2017)。19、20 世紀之交美國中學歷史單獨設科與社會合科演變的歷史分析。教科書研究，10(2)，33-66。
   連結：
2. 鍾鴻銘(2016)。T. J. Jones T. J. Jones 與《1916 社會科委員會報告書》對社會科緣起之歷史意義探究。教育研究集刊，62(3)，35-71。
   連結：
3. American Historical Association. (1899). The study of history in schools: A report to the American Historical Association by the Committee of Seven. New York, NY: Macmillan. Retrieved from https://www.historians.org/about-aha-and-membership/aha-history-and-archives/historical-archives/the-study-of-history-in-schools
4. Barnard, J. L., Carrier, F. W., Dunn, A.W., & Kingsley, C. D. (1915). The teaching of community civics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED541852
5. Baysinger, P. R.,Levine, B..Baysinger, P. R., & Levine, B. (1979). Textual commentary for MW8. MW8:481-491..
6. Baysinger, P. R.,Levine, B..Baysinger, P. R., & Levine, B. (1980). Textual commentary for MW9. MW9:377-382..
7. Blewett, J.(Ed.)(1960).John Dewey: His thought and influence.New York, NY:Fordham University Press.
8. Cuban, L.(2018).The flight of a butterfly or the path of a bullet? Using technology to transform teaching and learning.Cambridge, MA:Harvard Education Press.
9. Dewey, J..Dewey, J. (1909b). Moral principles in education. MW4:265-291.
10. Dewey, J..Dewey, J. (1897b). My pedagogic creed. EW5:84-95..
11. Dewey, J..Dewey, J. (1909a). History for the educator. MW4:192-197..
12. Dewey, J..Dewey, J. (1897a). Ethical principles underlying education. EW5:54-83..
13. Dewey, J..Dewey, J. (1899). School and society. MW1:104-109..
14. Dewey, J..Dewey, J. (1912). Infancy, theory of, in education (Contributions to A cyclopedia of education). MW7:245-248 (MW7:209-365)..
15. Dewey, J..Dewey, J. (1886). Soul and body. EW1:93-115,.
16. Dewey, J..Dewey, J. (1915). Schools of tomorrow. MW8:205-404..
17. Dunn, A. W. (1907). The community and the citizen. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/communityandcit00dunngoog
18. Dunn, A. W. (Compiler). (1916). The social studies in secondary education. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED542444
19. Egan, K.(1980).John Dewey and the social studies curriculum.Theory and Research in Social Education,8(2),37-83.
20. Evans, R. W.(2004).The social studies wars: What should we teach the children?.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
21. Fallace, T. D.(2009).John Dewey's influence on the origins of the social studies: An analysis of the historiography and new interpretation.Review of Educational Research,79(2),601-624.
22. Fallace, T. D.(2008).Did social studies really replace history in American secondary schools?.Teachers College Record,110(10),2245-2270.
23. Fraser, J. W.(2007).Preparing America's teachers: A history.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
24. Gagnon, P.(Ed.)(1989).Historical literacy: The case for history in American education.New York, NY:Macmillan.
25. Hendricks, L. V. (1946). James Harvey Robinson, the teacher of history, Morningside Heights, NY: King's Crown.
26. Hiner, N. R.(1972).Professions in process: Changing relations between historians and educators, 1896-1911.History of Education Quarterly,12(1),34-56.
27. Hiner, N. R.(1973).Professions in process: Changing relations among social scientists, historians, and educators, 1880-1920.History Teacher,6(2),201-218.
28. Jackson, P.(1968).Life in classrooms.New York, NY:Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
29. Jenness, D.(1990).Making sense of social studies.New York, NY:Macmillan.
30. Johnson, H. (1940). Teaching of history in elementary and secondary schools with applications to allied studies (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
31. Jones, T. J. (1906). Social studies in the Hampton curriculum. Hampton, VA: Hampton Institute Press.Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/socialstudiesin00jonegoog
32. Jorgensen, C. G.(2012).John Dewey and the dawn of social studies: Unraveling conflicting interpretations of the 1916 report.Charlotte, NC:Information Age.
33. Kliebard, H.(1986).The struggle of the American curriculum, 1893-1958.Boston, MA:Routeledge & Kegan Paul.
34. Kliebard, H.(2004).The struggle of the American curriculum, 1893-1958.Boston, MA:Routeledge & Kegan Paul.
35. Kliebard, H.(2002).Changing course: American curriculum and the 20th century.New York, NY:Teachers College Express.
36. Labaree, D.(1987).Politics, markets, and the compromised curriculum.Harvard Educational Review,57(3),483-493.
37. Lybarger, M. B.(1983).Origins of the modern social studies: 1900-1916.History of Education Quarterly,23(4),456-468.
38. Maxwell, W. H. (1905). Education for efficiency. National Education Association Journal of Proceedings and Addresses (pp. 59-67). Washington, DC: National Education Association. Retrieved from https://archive.orgdetailsaddressesproce1905natiuoft
39. National Education Association. (1893). Report of the Committee of Ten on secondary school studies, with the reports of the conferences arranged by the Committee. Washinton, DC: U.S. Goverment Printing Office. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/reportofcomtens00natirich
40. Novick, P.(1988).That noble dream: The "objectivity question" and the American historical profession.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
41. Orrill, R.,Shapiro, L.(2005).From bold beginnings to an uncertain future: The discipline of history and history education.The American Historical Review,110,727-751.
42. Ravitch, D.(2007).History's struggle to survive in the schools.OAH Magazine of History,21(2),28-32.
43. Ravitch, D.(Ed.)(1985).The school we deserve: Reflections on the educational crisis.New York, NY:Basic.
44. Robinson, J. H. (1932). John Dewey and his world. Harvard Teachers Record, 2, 6-16.
45. Robinson, J. H. (1912). New history. New York, NY: Macmillan. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/newhistoryessays00robi
46. Robinson, J. H. (1930). John Dewey and liberal thought. In J. Dewey & H. W. Holmes (Eds.), John Dewey, the man and his philosophy; Address delivered in New York in celebration of his seventieth birthday (pp. 153-172). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Ross, D.(1990).The origins of American social science.Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press.
48. Rugg, E. U. (1923). How the current courses in history, geography, and civics came to be what they are. In G. M. Whipple (Ed.), The twenty-second yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 48-75). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/twentysecondyear009639mbp
49. Saxe, D. W.(1992).An introduction to the seminal social welfares and efficiency prototype: The founders of 1916 social studies.Theory and Research in Social Education,20(2),156-178.
50. Saxe, D. W.(1991).Social studies in schools: A history of the early years.Albany, NY:State University of New York Press.
51. Saxe, D. W.(1992).Framing a theory for social studies foundations.Review of Educational Research,62(3),259-277.
52. Shaver, J. P.(Ed.)(1991).The handbook of social studies teaching and learning.New York, NY:Macmillan.
53. Thorton, S.(1984).Social studies misunderstood: A reply to Kieran Egan.Theory and Research in Social Education,12(1),43-73.
54. U.S. Bureau of Education. (1913). Preliminary statements by chairmen of Committees of the National Education Association on the Reorganization of Secondary Education. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED543240
55. White, M. (1949). Social thought in America: The revolt against formalism. New York, NY: Viking.
56. 炳松（譯）,Johnson, H.(2012).歷史教學法.上海:上海古籍.
57. 殷超(2014)。論美國中學歷史教育的發展歷程。教育教學論壇，30，60-61。
58. 國家教育研究院（2017）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校社會領域（草案）。臺北市：國家教育研究院。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/67/196020910.pdf
59. 張卓鴻(2015)。長春市，東北師範大學教育科學院。